More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Megan Tady

Megan Tady

Posted: February 16, 2011 03:57 PM

Tomorrow, the House of Representatives is poised to pass a federal budget that zeroes out any support for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, slashing funding for NPR, PBS, and dozens of local stations across the country. A handful of bills are also working their way through Congress that would do the same. The tale is so riveting, the impact so monumental, that we could call this NPR's "Driveway Moment".

Anyone who cares about or relies upon public broadcasting should be glued to this story like a Terry Gross interview with Elvis Presley found alive. If you can't imagine your daily commute without Morning Edition, or the nights you can flip TV channels from some vapid reality show to truly thought-provoking reporting on PBS, then you should be making some noise. If you remember learning to count from Sesame Street, you should be ready to howl like the Count if the show gets killed.

Already, a million people have signed petitions against defunding public media, and the calls for support are increasing every hour, including from other members of Congress. Today, Reps. Ed Markey (D-Ma.), Earl Blumenauer (d-Ore.) and Nita Lowey (D-NY) announced an amendment that would restore the funding that was cut out of the budget initially.

I'm not trying to scare you with a "Glenn Beck doomsday chalkboard" by predicting complete and utter disaster. But I will tell you that the threats to our public broadcasting system are serious and real. And while our radio dials won't suddenly go to static, if funding is slashed for public media, we'll see (and hear) a sad and startling, and likely very rapid, decline in quality reporting and local programming.

Here's what you should know:

  • The proposed bills and the House budget would zero out the $430 million federal appropriation for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting -- a cost that averages a mere $1.39 per person in the United States. By comparison, we spent approximately $19.40 per capita to subsidize ethanol production in 2010.
  • More than 70 percent of that funding goes to local stations around the country, providing the lifeblood for broadcasters in rural or economically hard-hit areas where there are fewer sources of news and programming.
  • Public media have become a vital resource for Americans at a time when commercial journalism is in decline: U.S. print newsrooms have shrunk by 25 percent in the past three years alone. Local television stations have lost more than 1,500 jobs since 2008, leaving public broadcasters as primary news outlets. In some parts of the country, public media are the only source of local news and public affairs programs.
Now it's true that NPR has taken some hits in recent months, what with Juan Williams-Gate. This controversy, coupled with the need to cut the federal deficit, has given some lawmakers the political cover they need to urgently push for pulling the plug on public media. Keep in mind that public broadcasting has been under fire since its infancy, and has to crawl back to Congress every year to plead for ever-shrinking amounts of funding, making it vulnerable to partisan political meddling.

Even with its dwindling federal budget, public media has managed to gain the trust and respect of the majority of Americans, especially at a time when corporate media is fascinated with Snooki's hairdo resembling a showdog, and the Comcast-NBC merger ushers in a new era of mega-media consolidation. We should be pushing for more funding for public media, not fighting against less.

Around the world, governments are clamping down and threatening the core information infrastructures in their nations, shutting down Internet service, and attacking and deporting journalists. The threats facing our public broadcasters are far less visible and far less violent, but the impact may be the same.

It's time for members of Congress to stop playing politics with public media, and let some of the best journalists and media makers in the nation do their job. We need them now more than ever.

 

Follow Megan Tady on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MegTady

Tomorrow, the House of Representatives is poised to pass a federal budget that zeroes out any support for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, slashing funding for NPR, PBS, and dozens of local st...
Tomorrow, the House of Representatives is poised to pass a federal budget that zeroes out any support for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, slashing funding for NPR, PBS, and dozens of local st...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
derekc06
Good night, you Princes of Maine.
03:18 PM on 03/01/2011
There needs to be permanent funding for the CPB so as to fully insulate it from partisan meddling.
01:24 PM on 02/17/2011
NPR would be better off without the 1.5% of their budget they get from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. They could then do more to serve the "Reality based Community" and not have to listen to those Right Wingers who are anti-reality.
01:08 PM on 02/17/2011
Conservatives use the word “liberal†as some sort of pejorative. Truth is NPR interviews both Liberal and Conservative figures. They gave and continue to give coverage to the Tea party. Do the critics actually listen to NPR? It is supposed to be the people’s radio, unvarnished by corporate interests. We need that.
There is value in the cultural programming which I have found over the years to be particularly offensive and irritating to my conservative friends. NPR is still an oasis on the radio dial where one can get away from the commercialized noise chamber of morning zoo antics and rightwing hate fomenters. Considering the other well financed options on the radio, NPR needs all the help they can get. Americans are becoming culturally ignorant. It is not all about the Super bowl and pop culture. I don’t mind the government paying a little to give us some exposure foreign news via the BBC and to cultural and arts programming.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ckdogs
11:43 AM on 02/17/2011
I listen to both stations all the time. I never find their coverage "left" or "right", but factual and informative. This is a piddling amount to support an independent voice in national news. The Republicans are relentless in wanting to shut down any voices that call them to account. Public outcry can save these outstanding stations. Write to your congressperson!
06:55 AM on 02/17/2011
NPR is always saying they dont get very much money from the taxpayer, but it sure is hard to get a straight forward accounting. If they, in fact, do get such a small amount, don't take any and then you can be as liberal or conservative as you want. I don't see why taxpayers need to support government endorsed media or why they fight so hard for the money if it's such an insignificant amount.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShawnRay
10:00 PM on 02/16/2011
Get rid of NPR and PBS. They are liberal and I do not want my tax dollars to fund it. I have spent over a year writing government officials to kill NPR. It is good to hear that our representatives have listened.
11:19 AM on 02/17/2011
Oooooooh “LIBERAL†, there's that word again, it's the “Boogiemanâ€, It's Scary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShawnRay
05:14 PM on 02/17/2011
It is destroying our nation because people believe that they get benefits that they do not pay for. I have to make 45,000 in donations just so I do not have to pay taxes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediamarv
1-2-3 Is this thing working?
05:59 PM on 02/16/2011
Sesame Street is not on NPR.... you are confusing the issue with PBS, two separate entities.
Neither of which should be defunded their pittance of taxpayer money (their entire annual funding from congress amounts to the cost of 6 hours of war in Afghanistan based upon a figure I read that the cost of the war was a Billion dollars a day. That figure might include Iraq, not sure but the amount is accurate).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hardyman1966
The antonym of liberal is INTOLERANT.
05:36 PM on 02/16/2011
None of this surprises me given our current climate, largely comprised of people who don't give a damn about education or public television since they don't involve profits that can be gleened.

NPR and PBS need all the help they can get.  Who under the age of 45-48 DIDN'T grow up with Sesame Street?  (And then move on to The Electric Company in the 70's?)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
05:20 PM on 02/16/2011
NPR has gone very right wing to appease their Republican tormentors, but they continue being tormented anyway. So if NPR were to die for lack of government funding, we wouldn't be losing much. After all, people can turn to Fox to hear cheerleading for our overseas invasions or to hear torture being called "interrogation techniques" or to hear the latest Republican press releases brought to life as though they were news.
05:16 PM on 02/16/2011
Another step toward total corporate control. It seens the Republicans aren't for anything that doesnt give big corporations and billionaires another leg up.
06:56 AM on 02/17/2011
You prefer government control?
04:30 PM on 02/17/2011
Apples and oranges. The government doesn't control NPR, while corporations DO control all the other media outlets.
04:50 PM on 02/16/2011
This vote, alone, will determine whether my elected officials remain in office, when they come up for reelection.
06:56 AM on 02/17/2011
That's ridiculous.
03:56 PM on 02/16/2011
I love public broadcasters. But the local stations need to get the funding somewhere else so they can stop dealing with this every 4 years.

Or NPR could lower programing costs by 20% to offset this issue.
03:52 PM on 02/16/2011
This is honestly, ridiculous. This reminds me of how China restricts its internet use. I see how this money could go towards something else. However, I believe that telivision programs such as PBS are especially good for kids and adults. They have a variety of programs that are family friendly. I myself grew up on PBS and have recently started listening to NPR. NPR is a great station that informs people of issues going on in the US on a deeper level. This is partially taking away our rights, these specific stations are helpful and informational. Why would the House want to cut funding for helpful programs?