iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Melinda Gates

GET UPDATES FROM Melinda Gates
 

Scaling Impact to Save Lives

Posted: 11/02/11 12:26 PM ET

As the world's population hit 7 billion yesterday, there's been a lot of talk about the incredible advances the global community has made improving the health of the world's poorest people and saving lives, especially when it comes to children. In 1960, about 20 million children died before they turned five years old. By 2010, that number was reduced to less than 8 million. This is undeniable progress.

But the fact that almost 8 million children still die each year highlights the tremendous amount of work that still lies ahead. How will we continue to bring this number down?

First, we need to continue scaling up new and existing vaccines. These miracle technologies were critical, cost effective tools in bringing down deaths so far and they will continue to do so.

Second, we have to target the deaths that vaccines will not address. We know that over 40 percent of these nearly 8 million children die during the first 28 days of life and that percentage is growing over time. Bringing down these deaths will mean finding ways to get best practice family health innovations into the hands of the people who need them the most.

Fortunately, we have made significant advances in developing the interventions that will save newborn lives. Most of these are not technological, but instead require changing behaviors, such as getting mothers to adopt kangaroo care and clean cord care.

The challenging step is to get more people to embrace these health innovations and adopt them as standard practice.

Or, in other words, how do we scale impact?

We need to understand how new ideas become accepted and how certain behaviors become widely adopted within a culture.

We can say to a new mother: "Make sure the umbilical cord is clean and dry to prevent infection." But there is so much we don't understand about spreading this specific message. What prevents a mother in Uttar Pradesh from letting the cord dry? What is the best way to help her understand why she should? Can you use the same message with a mother in Malawi?

To help us answer some of these questions, I am thrilled to welcome some of the world's top family health and behavioral change experts to Seattle today for our first convening on driving social behavior change and effective knowledge-sharing: "Achieving Lasting Impact at Scale: Social and Behavioral Change and the Spread of Family Health Innovations in Low-Income Countries." This diverse set of practitioners, policy makers, researchers, foundation grantees, partners and staff will spend two days analyzing how ideas spread.

Our group will explore how ideas and solutions are passed from village to village, neighbor to neighbor, mother to child. We will anchor our discussions around the most effective ways of spreading ideas.

Over the next few days, we'll share what we're learning about behavior change and the effective spread of solutions. Please join the conversation by commenting on the posts, or join me on Twitter (@melindagates) using the hashtag #scaleimpact.

 

Follow Melinda Gates on Twitter: www.twitter.com/melindagates

 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:13 PM on 11/17/2011
I agree with the poster that said saving these lives begins with the parents. If the mother does not have proper care while she is pregnant, how can the baby have proper care after he or she is born? Also, taking care of the mother while she is pregnant will help to ensure that the baby is born healthy.
02:54 PM on 11/06/2011
Human system should take care about sick kids, but first of all it should be proper education of basic medical things to parents. If they are living in poor country without help it can be difficult, but help should be organize to all as education. For example ' during the war people have not so good conditions, but because they are responsible for each other - they can survive. Same is here: if parents will be educated and responsible for others - the problem will be easier to fix.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yintwin
08:11 PM on 11/06/2011
I agree here. I also think that the form of education should go further, and teach how we need to look after each other, work things out and problem solve together, and put the welfare of people above self profit. Imbed these concepts into education, and the result will be a natural flow of help where needed, just like in an extended global family.
01:07 PM on 11/06/2011
There is a delicate balance that nature is obligated to maintain. Wether it be around life and death, or sickness and health. It is when we humans are out of step with this balance that causes us suffering. Humanity has to learn how this system works and work with it, not against it. The way to influence society for the betterment of mankind, all members of that society must have one goal, one desire. The desire to understand and live in balance with the system. We cannot change nature. We have to change our nature.
04:50 PM on 11/06/2011
I agree, that all the solutions, and actions the article mentions can only be truly successful when we operate and think as a single human family in balance with our environment, understanding how we have to live in a closed, interdependent system that surrounds us.
If we can achieve such a mutual attitude towards each other that I view even the person on the other side of the globe as my own family, then we will quickly and efficiently solve all of the mounting problems threatening our future today.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
11:38 AM on 11/06/2011
The introduction of "Death Control" without the simultaneous introduction of "Birth Control" is a crime Against Humanity".

The reason: It directly results in more suffering and death.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
10:16 AM on 11/06/2011
To avoid children dying, maybe it's time to think about helping people NOT having children when they can't take care of them. Regardless of the race, the religion and the place. MAlthus is coming back. And he was right. 300 years later maybe, but he was right.
06:40 PM on 11/06/2011
Yep. I was just about to write a post about the sky-high birthrates in these very poor countries and how feeding them and curing their diseases only makes the problem much bigger in the future. Several of you have beat me to it. As one practical solution, how about offering aid on an individual basis, on the condition that people be sterilised first.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
farmerlady
Blonde, Democratic socialist, and unwilling expat
05:27 AM on 11/06/2011
With seven billion people in the world and the environment impossibly degraded, the Gates fortune would more profitably be spent on promoting education for women (which reduces the birthrate) and family planning.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:21 PM on 11/02/2011
Bravo with respect to the malaria vaccine. It will save many lives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:19 PM on 11/02/2011
Not a good idea to ask a group of Americans how ideas spread in a foreign culture. They don't know.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ADVOCATE4ZPG
10:32 AM on 11/06/2011
Who cares how they're spread as long as the outcome is a reduced, birth rate! If it requires flooding the Islamic "world" with phoney mullahs preaching "one-child," then so be it!!!
09:46 PM on 11/02/2011
Vaccines, vaccines, vaccines. I really wish you and Bill would practice due diligence on the lack of good safety studies for them. I don't know how you can keep thinking they are so great when there are so many kids with autism, selective mutism, ADHD, ODD, learning disabilities, debilitating allergies, seizures etc.
09:48 AM on 11/06/2011
There is no scientific evidence linking vaccines to any of these problems.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ADVOCATE4ZPG
10:24 AM on 11/06/2011
"Jened" is part of a web of power-seeking "gossips" seeking to attach CAUSALITY ITY of to unrelated events by PROXIMITY of recounting them. Her ILK is unable to cite any evidence but the most easily discounted "testimonials." He/she is a greater danger to the health of any/all children than any of the apocryphal hazards she INVOKES....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeepThought24
NATURE, REASON, FACTS and SCIENCE...not
09:24 PM on 11/02/2011
Melinda, so who’s going to feed all these kids you save? And then of course they’ll need clothes, housing, medical care, education and nurturing to a productive and fruitful adulthood.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:20 PM on 11/02/2011
Oh, heck. It must be so much easier on everyone to let them die!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ADVOCATE4ZPG
10:24 AM on 11/06/2011
.....so much easier to PREVENT their conception!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
farmerlady
Blonde, Democratic socialist, and unwilling expat
05:28 AM on 11/06/2011
You are correct, I have often wondered how many of these babies saved with desperate measures in the camps are later returned to their wasteland environment only to perish later on.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kori77
09:07 PM on 11/02/2011
Thank you for the work you do Melinda! Please do, become educated more about permaculture and holistic land management and stop funding Monsanto; they do far more bad, than any good they do.
zanzy
your micro bio is empty, just like our democracy.
08:16 PM on 11/02/2011
How about taxing the rich (everywhere) and using this money to fund public health centers and clean water around the world? You know, a real global fund for health. And, how about stop blaming poor mothers for neonatal and their own (maternal) deaths. The real blame should be targeted at the superwealthy that are tearing down public health clinics and regional hosiptals in the world and pouring a small fraction of this money into ineffective message-only (no health care) campaigns.
03:52 AM on 11/04/2011
Because taxing the rich (everywhere) is not possible and does anyone think that a government would do a better job with the money than the Gates foundation is doing with their wealth. These problems need solutions that nobody is willing to consider or impliment. Sure tax until there are no rich as the song goes but who will feed them after we get rid of all the rich. The efforts will have allowed greater and healther populations only to suffer greater when there is no wealth left to consume. Message-only campaigns ... otherwise known as education are necessary to develop populations that are sustainable both economically and environmentally otherwise there is no possibility for positive changes in these situations.
zanzy
your micro bio is empty, just like our democracy.
04:26 AM on 11/04/2011
It is possible to tax the wealthy of many countries and place this money into a global fund for health. In fact, this is what the UN humanitarian programs funds are, but the wealthy of the world are using money to fight against the UN and civil and human rights organizations. You do know that UNICEF, ministries of health, along with Not for profit civil and human rights groups built up public health hospitals and clinic around the world, including in extremely resource poor nations. And that these publlc health centers are under consist attack from the NEOconservatives and the superwealthy. You know, they prefer feudialism.

BTW, Message-only campaigns are not a health service or health education. It's a little commerical placed on a radio program. THis is what the gates foundation is funding; instead of funding comprehensive public health hospitals and clinics. Pregnant women need a comprehesive reproductive and child health care clinic, not a PSA on a radio program.
zanzy
your micro bio is empty, just like our democracy.
04:29 AM on 11/04/2011
To your question, "does anyone think that that a government (both bi and multilaterals) can do a better job than the Gates Foundation? I scream YES. UNICEF eradicated Small pox from the earth, and public health experts (lead by Jona salk) developed the vaccine against polio. US, Europe and other industrial countries had high vaccination rates because the vaccines were subsidized. And UNICEF and various ministries of health were doing an excellent job through high vaccinations coverage through public health clinic, including in very resource poor nations. But then the IF and World Bank stopped countries from investing into public health and education, thus polio came back, not only wild polio transmission, but polio outbreaks (person to person).
06:21 PM on 11/02/2011
A Texan (Dallas) we can all be proud of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
livingbettertherapy
Counselor, Therapist, Strategic Intervention
05:29 PM on 11/02/2011
Bravo, Ms. Gates. You are doing something about the problem, not just complaining about it. In Somalia, the heart rending lullabye that many mothers sing to coax their children to sleep contains the phrase "if you go to sleep your hunger will disappear." It is time for all good people in this country to respond to world hunger and infant mortality. We help children all over this world realize their dreams by making hunger disappear.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ADVOCATE4ZPG
10:29 AM on 11/06/2011
Your aim is pointless in the midst of Somalian chaos......with one of the highest FERTILITY RATES in the world. Only something like an ENFORCED, one-child, demographic policy will save that place in the long run.....!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwertz
04:23 PM on 11/02/2011
Mr. and Mrs. Gates deserve the highest respect and praise for their open hearts and open wallets. But I wonder if putting some of their clout behind wresting control of this country from the fangs of corporate greed and restoring middle America might not serve the interests of their global efforts well in the long run.