NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Melissa Broder

Melissa Broder

Posted: July 9, 2010 11:44 AM

The Poet Is a Scarecrow

What's Your Reaction:

The other night I felt poet's block so I turned on the TV and watched the very trippy 70s movie, The Wiz, starring Michael Jackson and Diana Ross. In addition to captivating me with its carnivorous subways and poppy girls, The Wiz reminded me of something that a teacher once said. I believe she was quoting the poet Muriel Rukeyser and I believe she said this:

"You need only be a scarecrow for poems to land on."

The notion of the poet as a resting place, a channel or vessel for poems, is a real comfort to me when I feel like my creative faucet is down to a dribble. It's also an idea that's apparent in Barbara Guest's poem Words.

In Words, Guest erases the poet entirely and imbues words themselves with the traits of a human creator. First the "word" is personified as an individual, "eager to find another [word]/ as capable as a thorn." The word craves companionship and possesses a nesting instinct: the desire to "create a rather larger/ mansion filled with spoons and condiments." The single word is looking through the Crate and Barrel catalogue; the single word is looking for potential suitors. In joining with another word, the single word creates a home for itself.

But this home, or poem, is no permanent structure. The home is rented and renovations are to be made. Guest's words are shape-shifters, forming texts that are never truly final. The magic of poetry then lies in its potentiality and malleability.

In her poetic statement, Forces of Imagination, Guest conveys poems as active forces exercising human imagination, rather than the other way around. The poem is an entity capable of feelings; it enjoys its flux state. One might consider certain theories of reincarnation, in which the soul of a fetus chooses its parents. Likewise, in Guest's world, a poem seeks out a certain type of artist; an artist who possesses the qualities of subjectivity or openness.

Now, I am a tightly-wound sort of lass -- prone to panic -- not what you might call relaxed or particularly "open." Given the active nature of Guest's humanized poems, what is my role in a poem's creation? How do I engage in the world, work so that I can eat, yet still find time and space to write? Without sounding too woo-woo, how can I be open to receive my poems?

I suppose the goal is to seek a dichotomy between stimulation and meditation, imagination and reason. But that's a tall order. In New York City where I live, I have to find stillness in some very strange places. I write on the subway. I meditate in my bathroom. Poems land on me in Union Square.

Guest affirms that the poet is a tight-rope walker, or "acrobat", in a "balancing act between reality and the imaginative force at work within a poem." This balance is difficult to come by. But the next time I'm stuck, feeling only as good as my last work, I'd like to think of that potential poem as an active participant in its own birth.

 

Follow Melissa Broder on Twitter: www.twitter.com/melissabroder

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:52 PM on 07/11/2010
Of all the lines in the book "To Kill a Mockingbird" these have always caused tears to come to my eyes.

Atticus has lost his case. Everyone is gone from the courtroom but those who are in the balcony where the blacks are allowed to sit. [A voice says] "Miss Jean Louise?" "I looked around. They wer standing. All around us and in the balcony on the opposite wall, the Negros were getting to their feet. Reverend Sykes's voice was as distant as Judge Taylor's:"Miss Jean Louise, stand up. Your father is passing."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smithn
Different strokes for different folks.
03:23 PM on 07/10/2010
Melissa,
Thank you so very much for sharing your gifted insights on the creative process. I'll be a scarecrow any day just to prevent another day as a 'Hollow Man'. Thanks!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bokiluis
08:49 AM on 07/10/2010
To follow up my last statement, it was indeed "The Wizard of Oz" that was only modestly successful when it was first released. Here is what wikipedia says:

"Initially, The Wizard of Oz made only a small profit due to its enormous budget, despite largely favorable critical reviews."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bokiluis
08:47 AM on 07/10/2010
It is quite amazing to me how "The Wiz" has taken on a life of its own. When it was first released, let's just say it wasn't so well received. But with time passing, it began showing up at Midnight screenings the way that "Rocky Horror Picture Show" did. So now it develops into a cult classic.
And then, young black kids embrace it as how it was originally intended as their own version of "The Wizard of Oz". Even before Michael's transitioning, Universal had released the DVD at least 3 different times including a 30th Anniversary version, a couple of years ago. You don't release a movie 3 times that has limited appeal. And now in this blog, the blogger analyzes the Scarecrow's poetry readings from the movie. It is all so surreal. Add into the fact that Diana Ross is the only living cast member from the movie and it takes on further symbolism. Didn't this happen to the original version of either "Gone With the Wind" or "The Wizard of Oz"? Where upon its original release, a work may have been misunderstood by its audience and then as the years progress, it finally finds acceptance. Pretty cool for a movie that many thought was a disaster when it first came out.