There aren't many times when I go to a movie and I leave speechless. But that did happen to me recently when I saw the film Kick Ass. For those of you that don't know, the film is about an average to slightly nerdy comic book loving kid who decides that he can be his own type of superhero. He dresses up in a wet suit and heads out into the street to save some people. The film is based on the comic book by Mark Millar, is written by Jane Goldman and Matthew Vaughn (the pair the brought us the underappreciated Stardust) and directed by Vaughn.
Now, you ask, why did Melissa Silverstein of Women & Hollywood a) even want to see this film; and b) what about it could have made her speechless?
The answer is Hit Girl. (Alert: there will be spoilers below)
First, let's be clear. This is a movie for adults. If your kid wants to see it, say no.
Hit Girl is a character that I have never seen on screen before. She is an 11 year old girl assassin. This girl, played amazingly by Chloe Grace Moretz, is a walking destruction machine. She shoots, she stabs, she bayonets. She does things on screen that literally left my mouth agape. FYI - no studio would touch this movie. They loved it, but said you gotta take out Hit Girl. No one would finance a film with an 11-year-old girl killer. Those movies are just not made in Hollywood.
The thing about Hit Girl is not just that she is a brutal and ruthless killer. She enjoys it. Way. Too. Much.
And the language. I really thought there were language limits, but Hit Girl pushes those boundaries, and quite frankly, after this movie I don't think there are any language barriers left. They've been trampled by an 11-year-old girl. Never before have a heard the c-word (yes, that word) uttered by a girl describing men. While I was horrified at the moment, I have to admit that I smiled at the same time because she was doing something onscreen I never thought I would see. A girl kicking ass. Literally.
So I am conflicted. The thing about Hit Girl, as Jane Goldman said to me in an interview, and I agree with, is that because she is 11 the violence is not sexualized. So much of violence we see in films is perpetrated on women because they are women. Hit Girl kills because that's what her daddy (Nicolas Cage) taught her to do (let's not get into the bad parenting here.) You know you're into different territory when the first scene you see of your heroine is her father teaching her take a bullet in a vest.
The question I've been asking myself since I saw the film: does Hit Girl movie us forward or backwards? I don't really have a final answer. The pros are that she is actually the hero of the film. She saves everyone and kills all the bad guys. The last time I saw that was...well...never. The actress who plays Hit Girl, Chloe Grace Moretz, wanted to play an Angelina Jolie type action role. This is the type of part she told her agents to find according to a story in the NY Times: "You know, like an action hero, woman empowerment, awesome, take-charge leading role." It warms my heart that a young actress is interested in playing these kinds of parts; that she wants to, for lack of a better word, kick ass, is cool. Also, the fact that all these guys are destroyed by a girl never becomes an issue. There's no sexist bullshit about guys being killed by a girl. She comes and reeks havoc and all these guys want to do is survive.
The cons are the language and the fact that she uses her "girlness" to disarm people (because, really, who would think a little girl could kick your ass?)
We would never be having this whole conversation about Hit Girl if the character would have been Hit Boy. No one would care in the same if a 11-year-old boy said the c-word. I'd probably just dismiss it as another sexist movie and character and move on.
I'm still very conflicted about this. I don't know if this is progress or if this is setting up girls in a very bad way. But one thing I do know is that with all the buzz surrounding the film, I am hoping that the sequel will be called Hit Girl instead of Kick Ass 2.
Just a Sweet Young Actress? $&@%# Right! (NY Times)
Originally published at Women & Hollywood
Follow Melissa Silverstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/melsil
Peruse, if you will, this 7 page sample of KICK-ASS #5 which introduces Red Mist and note how UNLIKE the movie it is:
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=preview&id=1750&disp=table
Btw, I consider the movie story a rare (slight) improvement over the original comic, with the exception of Dave's relationship with Katie -- Dump that "hero", he's less than "zero"!
One thing does leave me rather curious thou. Chloe Moretz's parents allowed her to see the finished film Mostly it was because she was in it; makes sense. But also because they are assured that she will not act out like the character she portrayed. This being the possible case, is it possible that other parents could see this film with older kids. I wouldn't take a much younger child to see it, but my own daughter is the character in questions age; and she is a smart, wise young lady.
As my daughter was leaving yesterday to return to school, she joked that she was disappointed that I had never taught her to beat up and kill bad guys. I replied that her Grampa has lots of guns, and we have the whole summer ahead of us.
I predict a run on purple wigs and plaid skirts.
The story and dialogue are pitch-perfect. The camera work and cinematography are flawless. The action sequences are breathtaking and inventive. Finally, there's an over-arching intelligence and compassion that infuses the project that makes you feel that you've seen something unique and powerful.
He took a very successful comic and made a movie out of it. It's an adult movie with an "R" rating. It's not meant for kids. As an adult, if you're not capable of watching this film for the purpose the director intended, which is for pure entertainment, then head to a proctologist and get the stick removed. IT'S. A. MOVIE. Get over yourself. Roger Ebert said he, "didn't see the point to this film". Why does there have to be a point???????? Can't it just be a story with sounds and moving pictures? Does it really have to satisfy something deeper than that?
By the way, I agree with all who've said Chloe Moretz stole the film. Big things on the horizon for that actress.
what I'll gonna say to my daughter when she said
something like :" I wanna be like her "
I'm just kidding I don't give a damn,
What they gonna do next?
Chiuauas playing
coyotes with heavy guns?
is just another way to make more action movies
now exploiting sweet little girls with heavy guns
I like Nicolas Cage rage
he's perfect as Big Daddy.
I mean Maggie Gillenhall's character got blown to bits playing that part in Batman and nobody even remembers she was in the movie. Yet, Heath Ledger and Bale are the ones who get the accolades because nobody puts their performance in a box because of their gender. Heath Ledger can "magically" make a pen disappear into a man's face and we gave the man an Academy Award because it spoke to the character he played and played well.
People are going to remember this little girl instilling so much fear in 5 grown men with machine guns they were cowering behind a corner even when they knew she was out of ammo. They even resorted to using a bazooka on this kid. There's no way any of that fear would have worked if the audience didn't see just how extreme a caricature of vigilante violence this 11 year old girl represented in the bad GUYS minds.
The film-makers deserve to be applauded and I hope this opens the door for female caped crusaders that actually play the part not just slightly more muscular lois lane types...
Sabrina the teenage witch.
it's 2010.
I'd love some help with the trace I feel like I am leaving somethings out.
Carrie Ann Moss in "Matrix" trilogy.
Jolie as "Lara Croft" series.
Jolie in "Wanted."
Jolie in "Mr. and Mrs. Smith."
(Yeah, Jolie has made her "Big Bucks" on kicking a$$. BWAH!)