iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Menachem Rosensaft

Menachem Rosensaft

Posted: April 29, 2009 06:44 AM

The Nazi War Criminal and Jesus: Patrick Buchanan's Obscene Comparison

What's Your Reaction:

Let us assume for a moment that an American public figure were to call Jesus Christ a Nazi war criminal. Can't you just hear the outcry, the denunciations from Church leaders and conservative Republicans? Let us assume further that the miscreant in question was a prominent television personality who regularly comments on the events of the day. How long do you think he'd last? The Catholic League would be picketing outside the studio. Rudy Giuliani would return from his political Siberia to organize a boycott. Heads would roll.

Well, this is pretty much what Patrick Buchanan did. The MSNBC political analyst and erstwhile reactionary candidate for the Republican presidential nomination has compared Nazi war criminal John Demjanjuk, who is about be deported to Germany to stand trial for his role in the murder of 29,000 Jews at the Sobibor death camp, to Jesus.

I'm not kidding. In his syndicated column of April 17, 2009, Buchanan not only called Demjanjuk "the sacrificial lamb whose blood washes away the stain of Germany's sins," but he wrote that the "spirit" behind the U.S. Justice Department's efforts to bring Demjanjuk to justice is "the same satanic brew of hate and revenge that drove another innocent Man up Calvary that first Good Friday 2,000 years ago."

Some innocent man. Among the findings of facts set forth by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in February of 2002 are that "The primary purpose of Trawniki Training Camp was to train men to assist the Nazi government of Germany in implementing its racially motivated policies, including and in particular 'Operation Reinhard;'" that "Operation Reinhard was the Nazi program to dispossess, exploit, and murder Jews in Poland;" that "Upon his arrival at Trawniki Training Camp, Defendant [Demjanjuk] entered service in the Guard Forces of the SS and Police Leader in Lublin District;" that "by January 18, 1943, while a member of the Guard Forces of the SS and Police Leader in Lublin District, Defendant was serving as an armed guard at the concentration camp located near Lublin, commonly known as the Majdanek Concentration Camp;" that "Defendant began serving at the Sobibor extermination camp no later than March 27, 1943;" that "In serving at Sobibor, Defendant contributed to the process by which thousands of Jews were murdered by asphyxiation with carbon monoxide;" and that "Defendant misrepresented and concealed his wartime residences and activities, which constituted misrepresentations and concealments of his wartime employment and residences for the purpose of gaining admission into the United States."

None of this matters to Buchanan whose long-time public support for a succession of Nazi war criminals is a constitutionally protected perversion. He even admires Adolf Hitler. In 1977, Buchanan wrote that, "Though Hitler was indeed racist and anti-Semitic to the core, a man who without compunction could commit murder and genocide, he was also an individual of great courage, a soldier's soldier... a political organizer of the first rank, a leader steeped in the history of Europe, who possessed oratorical powers that could awe even those who despised him."

Buchanan has never bothered to hide his offensive views on Israel and Jews. After the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, Buchanan said on national television that, "There are only two groups that are beating the drums right now for war in the Middle East, and that is the Israeli defense ministry and its amen corner in the United States." He has referred to Capitol Hill as "Israeli-occupied territory," and he considers the State of Israel to be "a strategic albatross draped around the neck of the United States."

In a September 1993 speech to the Christian Coalition, Buchanan said that, "Our culture is superior because our religion is Christianity and that is the truth that makes men free." After John Cardinal O'Connor had deplored Roman Catholic anti-Semitism, Buchanan declared, "If U.S. Jewry takes the clucking appeasement of the Catholic cardinalate as indicative of our submission, it is mistaken. When Cardinal O'Connor of New York seeks to soothe the always irate Elie Wiesel by reassuring him 'there are many Catholics who are anti-Semitic'... he speaks for himself. Be not afraid, Your Eminence; just step aside, there are bishops and priests ready to assume the role of defender of the faith."

Buchanan has also been a reliable ally of Holocaust deniers and other Nazi sympathizers. In his March 17, 1990, syndicated column, he wrote that it would have been impossible for Jews to perish in the gas chambers of the Treblinka death camp, and referred to a "so-called Holocaust survivor syndrome" which he described as involving "group fantasies of martyrdom and heroics."

Two years ago, Don Imus was unceremoniously dumped by MSNBC after making racially insensitive remarks about the Rutgers University women's basketball team. Buchanan's colleagues at MSNBC have consistently tolerated and overlooked his bigoted worldview. So have Christian fundamentalists and the Roman Catholic establishment since he strongly opposes abortion rights.

Imagine Rush Limbaugh's or Bill O'Reilly's apoplexy if a Jew or a liberal -- say Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow -- had referred disparagingly to Jesus. And what about Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Pat Robertson, and James Dobson, all of whom see themselves as defenders of what they consider to be Christian values? But then again, none of Buchanan's MSNBC colleagues have called him to task in the more than 10 days since his loathsome column appeared -- not Joe Scarborough, or Mika Brzezinski, or Chris Matthews, or Andrea Mitchell.

It will be interesting to see if any Church leaders will now be shamed into condemning Buchanan's obscene comparison of Demjanjuk to Jesus. And while I realize that the victims of Sobibor and Majdanek are not in a position to affect MSNBC's ratings, the cable news channel's executives should at the very least explain how they justify Buchanan's continued appearances on their programs.

Menachem Rosensaft is General Counsel of the World Jewish Congress and Adjunct Professor of Law at Cornell Law School

(This article was first published in slightly different form by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency)

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 106
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gib
My micro-bio is empty
04:59 PM on 04/29/2009
Buchanan deserves criticism on many counts. Have you ever criticized an Israeli government policies? If you took a moral stance where Israel is concerned your statements would carry much more weight.
06:06 PM on 04/29/2009
If Pat Buchanan would stop basing revealing and asserting his prejudices and justifications for the past and talk about the present; then he would have creditability.
06:37 PM on 04/29/2009
Maybe; however he cannot bring himself to do that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timinhi
06:29 PM on 04/30/2009
You're kidding, right? Are you saying that one may only "credibly" criticize someone or something if one has also criticized the opposing side? By what logic do you come to that conclusion? I can only criticize the Nazi Final Solution if I've also criticized the WWII internment of Japanese Americans? Or must I have criticized the Jews themselves--the ones who were exterminated, for some "wrong" they may have committed during their lives? I get it--we all have to be "fair & balanced," and give equal weight to both sides of every argument. We can't just present our individual opinion, because that makes us less than "credible," huh? Get a clue: Those of us who bothered to read the little bio/disclaimer in italics at the end of the OPINION piece ("Menachem Rosensaft is General Counsel of the World Jewish Congress and Adjunct Professor of Law at Cornell Law School (This article was first published in slightly different form by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency)") know or can figure out Professor Rosensaft's position on Israeli policies. This article is NOT about his opinion on Israel. It's about Buchanan, who is contemptible by any civilized standard for holding and publishing his obviously anti-Semitic and Nazi-apologist views. But by your logic, I guess because he's offered minor criticisms of the Nazis here & there, he's "credible."
04:51 PM on 04/29/2009
What ? didn't you know birds of a feather, still flock together.
04:43 PM on 04/29/2009
I am probably ten years younger than Pat Buchanan, but I grew up in WDC. I remember the signs that said "Gentiles Only", If one has the chance to visit the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum; one can see for oneself that this area also barred Jewish people. My godmother changed her name from Robinowitz to Robinson. I also remember the covenants that prohibited Jewish people from owning property in certain neighborhoods. This is a truth that needs to be remembered. And this is the era that formed his opinions that he holds today. Poor Pat.
04:54 PM on 04/29/2009
And by the by, I mean Washington, DC USA, not someplace in Germany.
04:59 PM on 04/29/2009
And also I remember an article in Gilbert Grosvenor's National Geographic Magazine where they finally admitted that they had actually photographed aerially the concentration camps which held the Jewish people captive. I did note some contrition.
04:04 PM on 04/29/2009
While I agree with most of your points, I don't think it's exactly inflammatory to describe Hitler as a great orator. He was able to convince people to follow him on a crusade of conquest, murder and genocide, obviously he could give a good speech.

On the other hand, calling him a "soldier's soldier" is absurd to the extreme. Strategically speaking he was a total disaster and had no problem wasting lives with his "never surrender, never retreat" mentality. He was just lucky to have some good military strategists who understood Fuller and Douhet, otherwise he'd never have made it into France.
05:18 PM on 04/29/2009
True, Hitler was a great orator. When I was eleven years old, my family traveled to Europe, and one of our stops was the stadium (can't recollect where now; maybe Pat would know) where he delivered most of his speeches. You could feel his presence, but even at that age, I was able to distinguish that from his deeds. I went on from there to Ann Frank's Diary and Mien Kampf (sp) and Mondo Cane in my teens.
05:38 PM on 04/29/2009
PS-The year was 1956, and the evidence of the destruction of Europe was right there in front of my eyes, and by then Hitler had clearly been identified as the chief architect of that destruction. Maybe I was fortunate to see this, but I paid attention.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
03:16 PM on 04/29/2009
I'm sorry, but I am highly suspicious of this prosecution against Demjanjuk. You can't even seem to decide who is is, exactly. First, you thought he was Ivan the Terrible of Treblinka. You were absolutely CONVINCED of this. But when the Israeli Supreme Court expressed doubts, then it became "Oh, well then he was a guard at Sobibor, then." What is that, Plan B? Accuse him of being a Nazi, any old Nazi will do?

I fully support the prosecution of Nazi war criminals, but this case seems to have some gigantic holes in it, and you seem to be substituting zeal for prosecution in place of hard evidence.
02:57 PM on 04/29/2009
I hope MSNBC takes note of this man's rhetoric and stop him from being on their news shows.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
02:55 PM on 04/29/2009
Like so many other 'conservatives' in America, Buchanan has missed out on the Enlightenment which was central to the principles of the founders.
Ronald Wright (What is America?) calls this family squabble in America today 'Enlightenment America versus backwoods America'. The use of 'backwoods' is figurative, meaning the philosophical descendants of the early settlers with their religious fundamentalism and righteousness.
On the other hand, Buchanan may be just a garden-variety hate-filled bigot. Either way, I can;t fathom that he's on the payroll of MSNBC.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
normathumb
02:28 PM on 04/29/2009
Don't you understand? We were fighting against Bolshevism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Retrofuturistic
see things as they really are
02:24 PM on 04/29/2009
Why can we prosecute this Nazi war criminal but we are NOT prosecuting George W. Bush?
02:15 PM on 04/29/2009
This guy was first accused of being Ivan the Terrible and many went on record that they were positive that he was Ivan and got this guy deported and sent to trial in Israel. It was proven that he was not Ivan and the same people that said that they were sure he was Ivan now say they are sure he is the guy they are going after now. How can one man be accused by the same group as being two different individuals. What about double jepardy ?
01:35 PM on 04/29/2009
The Nazi war criminal is going to be crucified, but he isn't Jesus. I think what Pat Buchanan is getting at with some of his views is the stranglehold Jews have on American foreign policy. It seems that there were many Jews that arranged to have American soldiers and Iraqis crucified on the battlefield, but they weren't and in fact rarely are willing to carry their own cross in the desert. Jews constantly talk about the Holocaust, but there were a few in high positions that basically caused one in Iraq. It is often claimed in the media that Jews oppose the Iraq War more than anyone else. I'll bet after things started to go wrong in Germany around 1942 or 1943, Germans opposed Hitler more than anyone else in the world. One last note: Opposing Hitler was a little more dangerous than opposing the Bush Administration.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:58 PM on 04/29/2009
This antisemitic rant is so far from "intellectually honest" as to be laughable. Who are the "Jews that [sic] arranged to have American soldiers crucified on the battlefield"? I didn't realize that Bush, Cheny, Rumsfeld, Rice, et al. were Jewish! I didn't realize that Congress, which overwhelming authorized the use of force resolutions is made up largely of Jewish Americans! Some people whom I know who opposed the war were Jewish, some were Christian, and some were atheists; and some people whom I know who supported the war were Jewish, some were Christian and some were atheists. As for Germany, there were indeed many good Germans who opposed Hitler, including Bonhoffer and the many priests, nuns and ministers who went to their own deaths in the camps, but they did so before "things started to go wrong in Germany around 1942 or 1943". But this rant sounds so much like Pat Buchanan's anti-Israeli drivel that I wouldn't be surprised if it were -- he's about as "intellectually honest" as this commentator. Buchanan, after all, is the guy who thinks Churchill caused WWII by not making alliance with Hitler.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:33 PM on 04/29/2009
Let Pat Buchanan rattle off. He is the voicebox of the dwindling Republican Party full on of right wing extremism.

They'll reveal themselves more and more. And define their Gods. And dance naked while howling in darkness.
01:19 PM on 04/29/2009
"After the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, Buchanan said on national television that, "There are only two groups that are beating the drums right now for war in the Middle East, and that is the Israeli defense ministry and its amen corner in the United States." He has referred to Capitol Hill as "Israeli-occupied territory," and he considers the State of Israel to be "a strategic albatross draped around the neck of the United States."

All too true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
01:46 PM on 04/29/2009
Yes, it is. Like the stopped clock that is right twice a day.
02:11 PM on 04/29/2009
And like a stopped clock, you and Buchanan are useless for your stated purpose: the clock for telling time, you and Buchanan for promoting American ideals.
02:13 PM on 04/29/2009
Exactly. All anti-semites are against Israel but not everyone who objects to Israel's criminal treatment of the Palestinians is an anti-semite.
01:00 PM on 04/29/2009
He was assigned his duty post the same as military personnel at Abu G, Guantanamo are assigned.

Perhaps you feel he had a lot of freedom to request a transfer?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:22 PM on 04/29/2009
He'll have a lot of freedom of speech in the courtroom. He can sing like a bird. But he doesn't want to be a traitor to the dead men he honors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patricksmom
Extreme cat and dog lover
02:29 PM on 04/29/2009
For answers refer to Nuremburg trials and think of the fact that Hitler could not have accomplished such evil without a lot of support. For your consideration, there were good people who died while trying to save Hitler's victims.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Retrofuturistic
see things as they really are
02:39 PM on 04/29/2009
Also for your consideration: The place where Hitler got his "support" was from the Church.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Anderson
Doctor
12:55 PM on 04/29/2009
Although Pat's statements sometimes shock you maybe you are just not reading literally what he is writing. Take a look at Wikipedia at the life history of the top Nazi officials that survived the war, created the very laws and rules, that had little Schmo's like this fellow have to follow, and you will find a good portion of Generals, etc became the founders and developers of many of the new Germany's military, secret service, top university professors, city Mayors, auto industry, and so on. Ironically these ex hard core fellows somehow were integral in helping to create what is now a modern and democratic Germany. Still, should they have been prosecuted instead and secondly, should they deserve any less than the lowest guy on the wrung that possibly implemented or not the atrocities that the bigshots helped put in place?
01:03 PM on 04/29/2009
Yep.
But don't get in the way of a happy mob.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:09 PM on 04/29/2009
So who are those that would/should be prosecuted that created these very laws in Nazi Germany. Or other States?

Is this the same as our investigation into torture? Would Pat Buchanan agree that soldiers of lower rank have been set up to take the fall for those in higher command?

Is this the premise of his argument about war crimes?

That's the literal take that I got.