iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Meryl Ain, Ed.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Meryl Ain, Ed.D.
 

Are Schools Getting Too Carried Away With Technology?

Posted: 11/04/11 03:18 PM ET

When my grandmother died in 1978 at almost 90, I thought the technological changes she had experienced in her lifetime would never be duplicated. I couldn't have been more wrong.

Technology is now changing at a dizzying pace, and parents and educators have to decide what's best for our children. It's a difficult conundrum with dueling points of view.

On one hand, most schools have embraced technology, spending huge amounts of money on upgrading electronic equipment that soon becomes obsolete. First it was the installation of computer labs, then the purchase of laptops, followed by iPads. I admit, I drooled when SMART Boards were installed in a district in which I was working as a central office administrator. I secretly wished I could be a high school social studies teacher again, and with the touch of a finger take my students to sites that would propel great class discussions.

But technology should be taken just so far. What is the wisdom of turning cell phones into teaching tools in the classroom? Newsday reports that an Amityville social studies teacher recently asked his 11th graders to use their personal cell phones to text a response to a poll about a presidential speech they had just watched in the classroom.

According to the article, this is part of a growing local and national trend.

Many other school districts, however, still bar students from bringing their cell phones and smart phones to school -- and for good reason. They have been viewed as a distraction, even a dangerous one. Do we really want students checking their email and texting during class? Do we want them using it to make dates during class, surf their favorite sites on the Web, cheat, or even engage in drug dealing? As much as schools will try to restrict its use in school, some students won't be able to control themselves.

Even if you argue that most kids won't engage in such nefarious behavior, whatever happened to raising your hand and having a discussion? Do our children have to be tethered to machines 24/7?

Apparently, some people in the computer industry don't think so. A recent article in the New York Times pointed out that some of Silicon Valley's technology leaders send their children to schools without computers! They think it's easy enough to pick up computer skills, and that what's really important is great teaching that actively engages kids in learning. Engagement is really the issue. Does technology foster engagement or inhibit it?

In addition, public schools have to consider the cost. Computers in education are here to stay, but they need to be used judiciously -- always with the goal of fostering student engagement and enabling critical and creative thinking.

If cell phones are now becoming the teaching tool du jour, then what do public schools do with the millions of dollars in computer equipment they bought? With built-in obsolescence, it's critically important that schools don't spend mindlessly on the latest cool gadget, only to abandon it for a better one a few years later.

Who is watching the technology store in our public school districts? Every year, superintendents and chief technology officers present a computer budget to the board of education and the public. As we go forward in this difficult economy, there needs to be accountability, research, evidence and a rationale for future spending on electronic devices. Most of all, schools require a clear vision for how they plan on engaging students in learning -- both with and without computers.

This post originally appeared here.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kdallas999
Entrepreneur, patriot and liberal
09:37 AM on 11/08/2011
Imagine the discussion of whether schools should move from slates to paper. Why move to paper? It's wasteful, you have to keep buying it, you have to have pencils and pens too. Slates are so much easier.

And then a hundred years later - books. Why textbooks? Teachers know what they're teaching, why can't a student just remember it?

Times change. Schools need to change with them. Yep, we live in a fast moving tech world that blows through new devices like water. And schools should be right in the mix.
09:12 PM on 11/07/2011
I agree with much of this article, too much $ has been spent on technology that isn't being properly used in the classroom. I think we need to unplug part of the day but also really plug in with teachers who REALLY know how to use this new technology.
09:11 PM on 11/07/2011
Well, Dr. Ain, I am so glad you do not use any devices while you are in meetings or trainings since they are a distraction due to your emailing, texting, date making, and drug dealing.

Sadly, you have been out of the classroom way too long, much like many other people with a doctorate attached to their names. Do some true, hands on research about engagement and collaboration. You might find that the kids can teach you a thing or two.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
11:43 AM on 11/07/2011
I think this technology arms race in schools is similar to the pushing of technology in medical practices: it has more to do with administrators and doctors being able to brag about being on the bleeding edge than it is about the outcomes of students or patients.

My kids' high school is equipped with SMART boards and internet-accessible desktop computers for each teacher, which simply eliminates the need for manual overhead slides. I think these are great tools. Further, our school has a teacher-to-parent web tool that allows kids to get their homework assignments and parents to monitor grades. To me, that's the best use of technology--getting parents more engaged in their student's learning experience and helping their kids stay on track.
11:17 AM on 11/07/2011
i can understand updating computers and such...but ipads...i'm jelly. i remember overheads and vhs's with the occasional laser disc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
04:58 PM on 11/06/2011
This is an article that would be fun to save and show to students in 20 years time.
05:27 AM on 11/06/2011
It's called change, and educators and administrators NEED to constantly upgrade their skills and methods to accommodate (be ahead of) the rapidly rising curve of that change. This is where the innovation that will protect our future begins. Administrators as well need to upgrade and understand that technology and management of it need to be a larger segment of their skill set.
It's easier and more fun to look over the horizon than to try and hold back the sunrise.
Is Ed.D. the top limit?
11:18 AM on 11/06/2011
How much useless change is going on in computer software? We always need more file formats, right? How much does more processing power not help? Is a fifth grader going to learn more because his computer is quad-core instead of dual-core? The technology is important but it can also be manipulated by the computer industry so they can make more money. This iPad fad is really strange. Give me an HTC Flyer for $300.

Actually it would make sense if the entire educational system paid for a design, made it open source and told the manufacturers they would buy nothing else. What would that do to the economy of scale? Dozens of manufacturers would make the identical machine. How easy would they be to get parts for and repair? The Model-T Ford of computerized education but more like a Mustang in sophistication.
03:57 PM on 11/06/2011
My point exactly. Up grade those skills, discriminating being one of the most valuable. Though textbooks are soon to be software based and better. First tries are not always good but are certain to get better. Can't imagine trying to engage a kid that's used to hyper-linked hypertext with a print book.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
11:51 AM on 11/07/2011
Change for the sake of it is rarely terribly productive. Innovation, IMO, isn't in the tools per se. It's in looking at problems differently than anyone has ever done before. Some of the greatest books ever written were done in long-hand, long before the typewriter was ever invented. Some of the greatest mathematical thinking was proven on chalkboards, long before anyone ever had an inkling of computers.

Technology facilitates thinking, it doesn't cause it.
Tara Hunkoff
I could have been Sheila Noyeau
12:57 AM on 11/06/2011
Teaching kids hardware and/or software in academic classes makes about as much sense as teaching them about fuel injection systems in driver education.
10:24 AM on 11/05/2011
When corporations started using computers in the 50s and 60 accounting was among the first things they did. Why isn't double-entry accounting mandatory in the schools, it is 700 years old?

I built my first computer in 1978. They are all von Neumann machines. But the majority of computer science books don't even mention the term much less explain it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dg96tefnEU

People constantly say children are the future but GOOD science fiction contains ideas about the future. There are more than 1000 SF works that are free and legal on the net. Our school system did not say much about SF in the 60s. They may be saying more now but lots of stuff called SF has gotten as dumb as Harry Potter and Star Wars.

The Accounting Game: Basic Accounting Fresh From the Lemonade Stand
http://www.exceltip.com/book-1570713960.html
http://www.fool.com/personal-finance/general/2006/10/18/foolish-book-review-quotthe-accounting-gamequot.aspx

All Day September by Roger Kuykendall
http://www.feedbooks.com/book/2295/all-day-september

Eight Keys to Eden by Mark Clifton
http://www.xenodochy.org/ex/abstract/eightkeys.html
http://www.onread.com/book/Eight-Keys-to-Eden-6514/

The Tyranny of Words (1938) by Stuart Chase
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9H1StY1nU8

Teach Yourself Electricity and Electronics, by Stan Gibilisco
http://www.electronics-tutorials.com/book-reviews/teach-yourself-electricity-and-electronics.htm
01:31 PM on 11/05/2011
Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future. Way of the future.
11:34 AM on 11/07/2011
is it the way of the future? If so why do school it departments end up with so much stuff going to waist. Every year teachers fight for whatever's trendy and then forget about it in a few months
09:50 AM on 11/05/2011
For many students they don't have access to computers at home. School is the only place that they can get the computer skills that they're going to need.
01:33 PM on 11/05/2011
Some kids don't have books at home. School is the only place that they can get the reading and writing skills they need.

...and books are cheaper than computers, and don't become obsolete nearly as fast. Neither, for that matter, do teachers. We'd be better off giving our kids enough books and enough teachers than we would buying them computers that will be out of date in a year and unusable in five.
02:26 PM on 11/05/2011
I haven't used my science book yet this year. I don't have a Social Studies book. I do have a SMARTboard. Totally worth a tradeoff. Luckily I work in an urban district that has made technology a priority. We do have 75% of our kids getting free or reduced lunch and each student in the system has access to computers throughout the week. More and more kids are doing nothing but play video games at home, if we can get them interested in equating technology with education as well it's all to the good. It's our job as educators to give them the background and skills that they need to be productive members of society. That includes technology now a days.
08:49 AM on 11/05/2011
Only thing about smart phones is...not all kids have one.
11:11 PM on 11/04/2011
I see what she is trying to say here, and i agree 100% with her. My school, currently, made an enormous revamp in the entire teaching system, buying new computers, buying iPads, and even allowing them in classrooms. I've noticed from observation that this new implement of technologies only deter students from doing work. They have a piece of device in from of them, able to access the web and to play games, and they also have a class with mathematics on the board and a teacher yelling and trying to teach; what would the student most likely do? Of course, they want to abuse this "privilege" and play games. And especially for the iPads, they have this new feature that allows them to easily switch from one app to another with a swipe of the hand. This makes it 100x easier to get away with playing games...I mean, integrating some aspects of technology into learn has its perks, but it can also be deems detrimental into a certain extent. I just believe, overall, that this advance in technology in the classroom is a BIG failure. I guess we'll just wait for time to tell...
09:55 PM on 11/07/2011
Technology is only as effective as the teacher using it. Whether you are using a text or an iPad, the most important factor is how the teacher is facilitating a lesson. Teacher training is key for an investment like you describe- what has been done to address that? To blame technology for poor teacher instruction is missing the point.
10:27 PM on 11/08/2011
That's not true at all. You can put the worst kid in the best school, in terms of environment and academics, but that doesn't mean he will change. The only person that can change yourself, is yourself. Just because a teacher is good, doesn't mean a student will follow him or her. And yes, technology is a distraction from learning. This is why so many kids so bad in school, because of distractions! They have their phones, iPods, Xbox, and ALL these gadgets at their disposal! A lot of kids rather play games, than learn...and that's a fact.
09:38 PM on 11/04/2011
Wrong. Decent schools change textbooks fairly frequently. Why not computers, pads, etc? These are becoming "living books" that will evolve into finely-tuned teachers over the next few years. In our lifetimes, human teachers will become learning coaches and personalized, intelligent technology will be the commonly-accepted means to efficiently convey knowledge to students.
11:48 PM on 11/04/2011
I work for schools that have the money to do that. It doesnt work. The theory there is great, but in practice we spend tons of money on stuff teachers swear they need it, and will use it daily, but in 6 months the teachers son and daughter are using them at home, and they are never touched in the class again. I have stacks of iPod touches, laptop carts and anything else you can think of.
01:35 PM on 11/05/2011
I've been hearing that computers will evolve into finely-tuned teachers over the next few years for the past few decades.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
05:40 PM on 11/04/2011
i've been preaching this to colleagues for years. computers can be a useful tool, but they don't provide value when it comes to teaching and learning.
09:35 PM on 11/07/2011
Actually they do when connecting people and ideas but then none of the posters on here seem to understand that strangely....
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
06:53 PM on 11/08/2011
i think some people misinterpreted my meaning. by "value" i don't mean that having technology lacks merit relative to not having it. i mean that, relative to its impact, technology costs more than other means of improving student learning.
10:02 PM on 11/07/2011
After extensive training using technology in the classroom, I have to disagree with you. Using technology in the classroom is amazing as to the value it adds to the learning with my students. My teaching methods and structure is key to this effect. The kids can figure out any program or app without my help, what they do with that is the craft I bring to the classroom. My training includes critical thinking strategies, collaboration methods, and problem solving activities that is helping to create 21st century learners- technology is just one of the many tools I use to accomplish this.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
06:42 PM on 11/08/2011
we're talking across each other here because you're interpreting a different meaning of the word value than i meant. when i say technology doesn't provide value, i don't mean it doesn't contribute something positive. my intended point was that most educational hardware and software are not cost-effective relative to other potential uses of the money.