More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Michael Brenner

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Brenner
 

Why Santorum

Posted: 02/21/2012 9:07 am

American electoral politics has become as close to a random phenomenon as public life ever gets. Obama and Palin in 2008 established that truth. The Republican contest, now in its second year, has confirmed it. Just about anything can happen. The causal sequence is about as hard to discern as is figuring out why the green no. 6 billiard ball arrived in the side left pocket of the table after the wedge has been scattered by a turbo-powered cue ball. That is the permissive factor. But why someone as improbable as Rick Santorum? An ineffectual, nondescript, right-wing senator, a defeated candidate for reelection in Pennsylvania, a lucrative spell as a D.C. lobbyist, a penchant for outrageous statements and outlandish policy ideas. For months, he was the afterthought in the Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs TV series whose performances were met with a chorus of "what's he doing up there?"

Here are a few thoughts -- even while keeping in mind that he simply may be the orange no. 3 ball dropping into the far right pocket. One is that he is the latest beneficiary of the hardcore Tea Partiers' ferocious dedication to having someone, anyone, who will give voice loudly and publicly to the warped emotions that torment them. Ever since Sarah Palin realized their impossible dream of having things said on the public stage (and getting the rapt attention of the media) which previously were heard only around the dinette table or on the steps of the trailer home, they have become addicted to a daily ration of raw meat. Whomever could feed them was given the full devotion of the addict to the dealer. So we had in succession: Trump, Bachmann, Perry, Cain and Gingrich. Each in turn got busted by the straight primary voters or O.D.'d on his self-infatuation. That left the forgotten guy in the back row who somehow had managed to stick around. So Rick Santorum became the new savior.

A contributing factor was Mitt Romney -- the last best hope of traditional Republicans. An awkward recent convert to know-nothingness who lacks either the personal charm or political street smarts to offset it. He still looked like the inevitable candidate to represent the GOP in the November contest against the old-style 'moderate Republican' who occupies the White House -- Barack Obama. For true conservatives (not the radical reactionaries who have come to terrorize them), this was the best of all worlds. A Romney victory would give them more complete and unchallenged control over the apparatus of government along with the power they crave. Failure to unseat the accommodating Obama merely meant that the establishment powers need only to continue the strategy which has given them so many boons since January 2009. Nothing to worry about. A win-win situation. But then the unthinkable happened: Romney has begun to tank again while the Tea Partiers will not relent. The specter of Rick Santorum rose up from depths. Even were Romney to stagger, through, his candidacy is so shot with holes that it could sink beneath the waves before election day.

This unexpected occurrence seems likely to save the Democrats from another extended sojourn in the wilderness. The Romney-Santorum dynamic shifts the odds in Obama's favor, despite his own fragile hold on the minds and hearts of voters. That brings a thin smile to the lips of the Blue Dogs and elicits great sighs of relief among self-satisfied liberals proud of their pragmatic virtue -- even though all the latter will get out of it is, maybe, another Supreme Court nominee who will vote only to nibble at the edges of Roe v. Wade. The Republican power brokers nonetheless will do their all to prevent that from happening. The situational logic points inexorably to finding another alternative: e.g. Governors Christie of New Jersey or Daniels of Indiana or whomever. The first two come with their own heavy baggage. But what's baggage when you can marshal half a billion or so to airbrush the past and to promote a new, improved product? Admittedly time is pressing. It is not like the old days when it was possible to draft a white knight at the convention because there were so many uncommitted delegates and those held as bargaining chips by favorite sons. So the hand-picked candidate must be selected quickly. That makes it likely that the lucky soul will be low-hanging fruit, i.e. a recognizable if not entirely known quantity like Christie.

The hard right-wingers, of course, will cry bloody murder as they grasp ever more tightly onto Santorum. Some of the Christian fundamentalists will even argue that low-hanging fruit could be lethal -- after all, look at what happened when it was plucked in the Garden of Eden. A titanic battle could ensue, pitting old money represented by the business elite against the Tea Party throng bankrolled by the new money of eccentric billionaires from the southwest. For those distressed by this prospect, keep in mind that a fresh round of debates with Rick Santorum squaring off against Mr. or Ms. 'X' may be in the offing. Just when the arrival on our screens of the summer reruns makes us desperate for entertainment.

 
American electoral politics has become as close to a random phenomenon as public life ever gets. Obama and Palin in 2008 established that truth. The Republican contest, now in its second year, has c...
American electoral politics has become as close to a random phenomenon as public life ever gets. Obama and Palin in 2008 established that truth. The Republican contest, now in its second year, has c...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 64
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
skykam
Sarcasm is a dish best served bitter.
02:58 AM on 02/22/2012
== Why Santorum ==

He is the embodiment of "none of the above".....
02:27 AM on 02/22/2012
This article was an accurate, if cynical, assessment of the current state of politics in this country. It never ceases to amaze me how the rich can shamelessly manipulate the tax code to their advantage, sheltering their income through an endless variety of deductions and loopholes, parking millions upon millions in off-shore accounts, and still manage to convince many that we can’t afford to invest in infrastructure, rebuilding the nation’s crumbling roads, railroads, and bridges, though it would create untold thousands of jobs in this country that couldn’t be outsourced. Personally, I feel we really began the slide down this treacherous slope with the repeal of Glass-Steagall. And we’ve definitely got the best bread-and-circuses money can buy. We’re in the midst of a propaganda war, and the progressive forces are not fighting it particularly competently.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
08:40 PM on 02/21/2012
Santorum has been the tortoise, in the tortoise and the hare story, except there have been a few of the hares.

Since Iowa, Santorum has been climbing in the polls. The slow but consistent, not glamorous Santorum, has never been embraced by the media. He's just a normal guy.

And over time, the voters have warmed to Santorum's authentic values. We don't always agree with him, but he is not fake.

Gingrich is funny and interesting, but we are afraid of the crazy guy.

Romney is untrustworthy. That no longer even requires elaboration.

Did you know that Santorum doesn't even rent cars to move between engagements? He is driven in volunteer's cars (often "beaters").
10:01 PM on 02/21/2012
If you consider an ultra-conservative, war-mongering military service avoider who wants to shove his Catholic beliefs down the throats of all Americans a "normal guy", I guess he is for you. He talks tough on Iran...yet while I was getting mortared in Beirut he was one of the guys back home who considered us "losers" and "suckers". You see, we weren't "heroes" then to people like Gingrich and Santorum and Romney, we were the chumps that allowed them to stay home and make money.

Do some research and find out about Santorum's real values in the past...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
07:38 AM on 02/22/2012
We have not had a military presence in Beirut (Lebanon) since 1986.
11:49 PM on 02/21/2012
That's fine. I like him as a person, he seems to be a good guy, but not presidential material in my opinion. Good intentions do not always translate to sound policy. And although most evangelical conservative will try and find every way to distort it, the fact is that our founding father were very much against religion mixing up with government. Santorum, with his talk of Obama not going by the gospel, sounds more like an Iranian mullah than a US president. That's a major no for me, and should be a resounding no for any Jeffersonian republican out there.
07:38 PM on 02/21/2012
I dunno--maybe St. Ricky is onto to a viable rightwing economic policy at last. The various Inquisitions did manage to confiscate a lot of property and wealth for various clergy and members of the nobility.

It's not so bad--just remember that all your property is going to be taken anyway, so just sign the confession to being a witch, heretic, Democrat, whatever, BEFORE they torture you. either way, I hear the Rack is marvelous for stretching out a bad back.
photo
grittyreboot
Book-Cover Critic
05:46 PM on 02/21/2012
Last time around, the only substantial thing that Obama had going against him was a lack of experience.

now, a healthcare reform, a few bin ladens, and a resurging auto industry later, he looks better than ever before to me.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
FoonTheElder
Always choosing between the lesser of two evils
04:42 PM on 02/21/2012
The Republicans want someone who can continue all of their failed policies of the past 30 years and make them magically do the complete opposite of what they've actually done. They want you to believe that trickle down will magically produce millions of jobs, they want you to believe that their deficit spending will magically make the deficit magically go away and they want you to believe that cutting taxes to billionaires and big corporations will magically create more in tax revenues. Except to the most gullible, who would believe any of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frizzy140
moderate in an extreme world
04:40 PM on 02/21/2012
obama is up 60% in the polls witha positive viewpoint, i dont think he's clinging
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:05 PM on 02/21/2012
You rather under-credit the performance of the 2008 campaign to elect the president by describing the most effective political machine assembled for some considerable time as `randomness'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scorpions5
Intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
03:08 PM on 02/21/2012
As an ex-teaparty member, I can tell you that when the teaparty was formed, it was on fiscal issues. It all came about because of Obamacare being passed. Groups sprang up all over which consisted of all demographics. We had democrates, republicans, independents, white, black, asian, poor, rich, gays, women, all different religions. All agreed on fiscal matters. There was NOTHING said about soical issues. Then along came Bachman, who was a big supporter, but it wasn't about fiscal issues anymore, it was about soical issues. She promoted it, she galvinized it. Pretty soon, people dropped out. Bachman hijacked the tea party movement and turned it into a republican religious right party. The teaparty group I belonged to lost many members, including me. I don't even know if they exist anymore where I live. The teaparty, when if first began did not and would not endorse any candidate, but now it has changed. It is just another branch of the republican party,thanks to Bachman.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:59 PM on 02/21/2012
What didn't you like about Obamacare?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scorpions5
Intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
08:30 AM on 02/22/2012
I didn't like it because it wasn't vetted enough. We didn't know what exactly it entailed. It was going to cost billions and yet no one knew how it was going to affect insurance, businesses, people, and so on. I am for national healthcare. I feel everyone should have it, but the way it was put together garnished many questions. Even Pelosi said "we don't know what is in the bill until we read it," and it had already been passed. I felt it was rushed through to soon.
photo
golions
Real Americans drink coffee, not tea.
07:44 PM on 02/21/2012
Very interesting insight; thanks for sharing that history.
photo
Noah Cross
Flying to London for some bangers and mash
03:04 PM on 02/21/2012
Please, Lord, let the GOP nominee be Santorum. I promise I'll eat all my veggies.
Jay Haney
My nuclear family imploded when I was 18. I've bee
02:01 PM on 02/21/2012
An accurate analysis overall, Mr. Brenner. Indeed, it reminds me very much of Max Allan Collins' take on the mess when the Tea Party first came into being. Looks like you both got it right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laurieanichols
je pense donc, je suis
01:54 PM on 02/21/2012
What is the republican party really looking for? Obviously Mitt Romney isn't it. The other candidates weren't it also, Santorum is the latest to be in the spotlight but why him? Does the republican party really want a President who is bound and determined to police their bedrooms, to make sure that good living wages are really a thing of the past, that science is no longer a priority in our education or even our national discussion, that the wealthy contribute as little as possible to our nations future while the middle class in proportion to their meager wages are forced to contribute more and more? That the elderly no longer have any financial security such as the meager benefits of social security and Medicare; for many that is all that they have. Raising a family in the U.S has become cost prohibitive and Santorum wants to abolish contraception, Santorum doesn't show much empathy or even logic with his religious doctrine, I really do not understand republicans.
09:02 PM on 02/21/2012
A minute ago I did read some quotes by Ambrose Bierce and came across a little gem. You just need to remove two words (I marked them with []) and everything is explained ;)

"In a civilization, and under a republican [form of] government, intelligence is so highly honored that it is rewarded by exemption from the cares of office."
01:16 PM on 02/21/2012
He was just lucky enough to be the one still hanging around while the others got picked off. Newt was unacceptable because of his past behaviors which most certainly would have been banged upon in a general election. Santorum maybe played it right by being more low key while Bachmann, Cain, and Perry were running their loud mouths 24/7 only to make fools of themselves in the end.
Jay Haney
My nuclear family imploded when I was 18. I've bee
02:03 PM on 02/21/2012
Hold that thought...Rick could well lose enough control of his mouth to lose his shot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanda Glass
I was for it before I was against it
07:54 PM on 02/21/2012
Oh no, I want to have ringside seats for St. Rick's implosion and it's coming. He's far from low key now and we aren't anywhere close to summer yet!
jhNY
Mercy.
01:10 PM on 02/21/2012
Enjoyable read, but for this: "which previously were heard only around the dinette table or on the steps of the trailer home"-- this is unnecessary projected disdain on the working class people who are supposed to live in and around such things. TP folk are by and large from a more rarefied income range, the middle class.
photo
Noah Cross
Flying to London for some bangers and mash
03:07 PM on 02/21/2012
Agreed. But at the same time the rhetoric and behavior we've come to expect from the GOPT makes it easy to think of them as not too terribly bright, hence the ease with which we sometimes dismiss them.
jhNY
Mercy.
06:14 PM on 02/21/2012
Agreed. But making 'working class' = 'not too bright' says more about the formulator than the formulation.
03:09 PM on 02/21/2012
Yes, I thought the same thing about that comment, and the one calling Obama a moderate Republican. Obama is a moderate Democrat, and perhaps moderation is what's needed in this time of political extremes.
03:21 PM on 02/21/2012
As a progressive Democratic I consider Obama to be Republican Lite.
04:46 PM on 02/21/2012
In any other reality, he would be a moderate Republican.
photo
philhellene
Far Left and Proud of It!
01:02 PM on 02/21/2012
"the hardcore Tea Partiers' ferocious dedication to having someone, anyone, who will give voice loudly and publicly to the warped emotions that torment them."

What the modern GOP has become. It has become "I am in it for myself" run amok vs. "We are all in the same boat together".