If not coal Mr. Brune, are you in favor of nuclear? Wind, solar, and cellulose can't meet our energy demands and I doubt if they ever will.
Cellulose has lots of potential, but we're wasting money getting there by creating this enormous corn based ethanol infrastructure that might have worse long term consequences than coal powered plants. Think of the demands for water, the amount of fertilizer needed, and the rechanneling of a food product so ethanol can provide 10 percent of our fuel needs.
If you believe global warming is caused by the activity of man and not something cyclical then coal has to be off the table. The only other viable global alternative is nuclear, but what to do with the waste and how to prevent weaponization?
I do find it hard to believe we can't put technology to work and somehow make coal cleaner to burn. All the mining in my area is below ground which makes home ownership tricky. You never know when your house might sink.
My immediate solution to our energy needs is to force us to dramatically more fuel efficient cars. We don't need another tax which hits lower income people. Mandate CAFE Standards of 35 miles per gallon, no exceptions. Mandate the use of trains instead of long haul trucking.
Mandate all new houses be built using geothermal piping to cut down on the amount of energy used raising or lowering the temperature of air.
Give people incentives to do the same to existing houses. And why aren't solar panels mandated in new construction? Or better insulation (concrete interlined with foam).
Our country needs energy room and in a huge way, but if not coal then what?




Loading comments…

Posted November 7, 2007 | 09:28 PM (EST)