The Ticket That Imploded

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted May 15, 2008 | 05:24 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

The naked truth about the soft machine of the American body politic is that we are incessantly manipulated by invisible forces orchestrated by a conspiracy of strategists with vastly superior intelligences.

In recent months, weeks and days the American people have been programmed by the MSM to anticipate a Democratic presidential ticket that simply defies logic. Theoretically, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton will lock themselves together in a strange and troubling political embrace under the time-honored captions, "Opposites attract," and "Politics makes strange bedfellows."

The earliest intimations occurred some time ago in the immediate aftermath of the presidential debate before Super Tuesday moderated by Wolf Blitzer of CNN who boldly mooted the possibility of a dream ticket: a black man and a white woman united together in a quest for the White House. One month later, these titillating intimations escalated to a higher level in the aftermath of the Texas and Ohio primaries.

First, when the question of a dream ticket was broached by CBS's Harry Smith on the Early Show, Hillary Clinton said, "That may be where this is headed." Emboldened by the former First Lady's eager acquiescence to the rather dubious proposal made by a network go-between, the next day ABC's Diane Sawyer repeatedly raised the possibility of the dream ticket in a comic pantomime with James Carville, a long-serving Clinton factotum.

From that point, there was little secret that egged on by the Clinton political family, the MSM wanted what was for all practical purposes an arranged political marriage. The media industry saw this once only conjunction as a surefire formula for astronomical ratings via the big buildup in a premeditated vulgarization of the presidential campaign.

Without missing a beat, the MSM's campaign to infantilize the American public continued its unrelenting onslaught. To satisfy the gargantuan hunger and thirst of the insatiable MSM Leviathan, come hell or high water, the presidency must be leveled to the lowest common denominator - audience share, ratings, sales and advertising revenues. Of course, the beneficiaries of this tawdry carnival would have been the owners and stockholders of the major media, while the two candidates would suffer hideous discomfort in their portrayal of the political odd couple.

The incompatibility of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with race or gender. Their incompatibility is purely and simply political. One represents the politics of change, while the other represents the status quo ante. One has launched an inclusive movement that is bringing new blocs into his column, while the other is projecting her politics of divisiveness by segregating her supporters across a racial fault-line.

Last week, when Clinton described her political appeal as derived from, "working class, white Americans," she invoked the language of the Dixiecrat movement of 1948 when Strom Thurmond led a massive exodus of segregationists away from the presidential campaign of Harry Truman that nearly cost HST the election.

Negotiations for the arranged political marriage hit a feverish pitch on Fox News. The moves were not subtle. On several Fox News programs, experts extolled the appeal of an Obama-Clinton dream ticket. In an interview on Sirius radio, Terry McAuliffe excitedly enthused about the dream ticket.

Swiftly after that episode the dream ticket farcicality escalated to the dowry negotiations and that is where it hit a brick wall. On Fox News Sunday, Howard Wolfson revealed a massive 20 million dollar Clinton campaign debt, but later on the same program Obama's chief advisor, David Axelrod, coldly rejected the possibility of transferring such a massive amount of political dowry from one campaign to another.

In a long and witheringly embarrassing series of overt maneuvers, the Clinton campaign floated their trial balloon for the ticket of their broken dreams. When the public negotiations eventually reached the dowry stage, representatives of Obama balked leaving a jilted bride committed to a shotgun wedding alone at the proverbial altar in her faded wedding dress with the wilting flowers and the stale wedding cake as props adorning a rapidly decaying backdrop fit for Miss Havisham.

In his classic Nova trilogy, William Burroughs warned America about the political abuse of the viral nature of language. In his chillingly accurate prophecy, Burroughs described our culture as defined by mind control via psychic, electronic, viral, subliminal and pharmaceutical agents under the control of a fiendish gang of miscreants, the Nova Mob. Burroughs explained,

The basic nova mechanism is very simple: Always create as many insoluble conflicts as possible and always aggravate existing conflicts -- This is done by dumping life forms with incompatible conditions of existence on the same planet.

Every American knows that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are incompatible partners for a political marriage. While Burroughs defined language as a virus, we can now define the offspring of language, politics, as a virus -- a psychic virus that compels us to fantasize about the impossible while careering headlong aboard an express train towards a terrible explosion in an insoluble conflict leading to what would certainly have become a political nova.

For all concerned, it is just as well that the Obama-Clinton ticket imploded. Whether Hillary Clinton will morph into a political version of the vindictive Miss Havisham remains to be seen.

In a spate of blatant misogyny, the Bible informs us of the "fury" of a scorned woman. Let us hope that Miss Hillary Havisham does not chose to reward our programmed political fantasia with her vengeful presence even though it would thrill the MSM and their shadowy controllers -- the Nova Mob.

 
 

Comments
83
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)


you are so right if the msm has it way we are in big poop its like something out of a movie mind control and murdoch is at the controls it's like the cartoon pinky and the brain when pinky ask the brain
what are we going to do tomorrow and the brain says same thing we do ever day try to take over the world this might be funny but we better look at it hard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 PM on 05/20/2008

Two of two

Poorly motivated are the alternative news sources and bloggers who sell themselves and their stories as the "true" (hence objective) antidote to MSM lies. They also have this culture of non-constructive discontent down pat. Better to take the shards of truth, facts, and organize them either in relationship to those in the vicinity (stream of consciousness), themselves, or a goal they at least feel to be potentially productive. The universalist fallacy is still strongly with this culture.

We seem to be heading in the direction where the 'new' journalism of Tom Wolfe and Hunter S. Thompson has perhaps the best hope of credibility. Stream of consciousness and inserting your own story into the story. In general, I liked Carmichael's castigation of the main stream media (but Wolf Blitzer . . . bold??!!), and his perspective about how they approach events like the campaign as a ringmaster approaches a circus. It may be that real news is becoming a commodity, like Bloomberg or the Economist, and you have to pay for it.

With regard to BHO and HRM, the time for voting being past, and having been a delegate at a previous convention, I"m perfectly happy to wait until the Party decides, while continuing to organize support for the issues, using the National election to the degree that it furthers those interests. When an organizer gets distracted by the election itself, s/he"s taken his eye off the ball.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 05/18/2008

One of two

One always appreciates a reference to Burroughs. As an expat journalist, I've watched CNN grow more and more -- biased is perhaps too strong a word, but less objective is certainly too weak a phrase -- deliberate in the way they spin stories, and of course they are not alone. Some of the comments here point to a conspiracy to promote one and dis the other. Others point out that the media does not have this much power. The algorithm proposed here, "Always create as many insoluble conflicts as possible and always aggravate existing conflicts " seems to nicely cover the evidence, and also goes far in explaining the "culture of Fear" that I have noticed on visits to the U.S.

To expand this theory a bit, I do not think that the players doing the influencing " various factions and power centers within the government, for example -- quite share this goal of exacerbating conflicts, but they do recognize the efficacy of the methodology. The media realize that maximizing non-constructive discontent translates into viewership/readers, and hence ad revenue. So news sources and the media work hand in glove. But theoretically, they should be open to covering any story from any angle that is sold to them -- as long as it is sold so that it fosters discontent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 05/18/2008

I wanted Senator Edwards as President, but since he was forced out of the race, I guess I'll have to vote for McCain. Or not vote at all. Does any of that make sense? OK, drop in "Senator Clinton" in place of Edwards. Does THAT make sense?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 AM on 05/17/2008

You are kidding, right? What psychotropic drugs does one need to ingest in order to be able go from Edwards to McCain?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 05/18/2008

I hope Obama vets and picks a running mate well before the convention, to head off a scenario where he is forced to take Clinton by a vote of the delegates. If the Veep candidate is out there campaigning with him for a few weeks, it will be much harder to get rid of him/her in favor of Her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 05/16/2008

I don't think Obama's that stupid. If Hillary was on the ticket, I think she would do everything she could to make sure he loses the election. Or, if they won, who could trust her in the white house knowing she wants to run against him in 4 years?

Do we think the Republicans would simply forget, in a joint campaign, that Hillary has repeatedly said people should not vote for Obama because he's black, because he is not as old as she and McCain are, because he's not white, because he's a doo-doo head and so's his wife, and all the other stupid things she and her supporters have said?

Harvey Weinstein was reported by CNN to have called Pelosi and told her that if Hillary is not chosen, he and "his" people will not give any money to any Democrats. It could be that the neocon Democrats will force Hillary in as VP to try to spy on Obama, so they know before anyone else what he intends to do.

Do I trust the Clintons? Not a big.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 05/16/2008

There are minutes to go on this Nova Express, and we're the cut-ups.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 05/16/2008

There's no question the media is pushing the so-called dream ticket, which is anything but. In fact, the media is why Obama and Clinton emerged as the leading candidates for their party. If the media had done their job from the start, they would've pounced all over Hillary's claim of experience and brought up Jeremiah Wright a lot sooner than they did. But they decided to sit on it so that the two "historic" candidates would come out on top and the "same old white guys" would be forced to drop out. I like Obama and will vote for him, but even I can admit the media helped make it this far. They went easy on him in the beginning and then when he pulled ahead of Hillary, the dug up Reverend Wright to make sure Hillary could make a comeback. The media wanted to see a convention floor fight. But since that's not gonna happen, their next best option is having Hillary on the ticket. Imagine if Obama picks some white guy as his running mate. No big ratings there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 05/16/2008

What a dumb comment. The media does not have the power to cause people to vote for a candiate. If that were true, Obama would have won TX, OH, PA ... And as far as Reverend Wright, I suspect that it was Clintons who held back the story ... they knew about him long before the media. And the media folks who did raise Wright aka Fox, didn't try to hard to press the issue because everyone was too busy anointing Hillary. So what if some secondary candidate has some crazy reverend ... that's not news. It was only news when Obama was the front runner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 05/16/2008

Dumb comment, you say.

The media takes in billions of bucks to sell worthless junk to "consumers" (previously "citizens"), yet they have no power to frame politics in a way that favors one candidate over another....Odd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 05/16/2008

dan abrams has made it his personal goal to ensure the so called "dream ticket," and he's not alone, there's at least one on every major network spouting the same nonsense, ignoring the million and one reasons why this would be anything but a unity ticket, and one which would spell certain disaster. i'll give people the argument that obama probably has to at least consider extending a faux vp offer, but anybody that actually believes it would be a strong ticket is deluding themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 05/16/2008

"... we are incessantly manipulated by invisible forces orchestrated by a conspiracy of strategists with vastly superior intelligences." How painfully true!

Except you must leave Wolf out, for he does not belong to any group that can be tagged as "intelligent."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 05/16/2008

How can you have a political marriage between someone who wants to bomb and someone who wants to talk?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 05/16/2008

It may come to an Obama - Clinton ticket, but the MSM is not the sole orchestrater of this incompatible marriage, make no mistake. The public at large is plagued by a much bigger 'virus' than language: it is plagued by unresolved pain surrounding race and gender-based violence and injustice. Please don't cloud the issue, Mr. Carmichael. Please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 05/16/2008

This post is awesome! I think it also explains the Kerry-Edwards debacle of 2004 too. Thank G-d the "Nova Mob" failed this time!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 05/16/2008

Where some see a vast conspiracy, I see "dumb and dumber". "Where" is on tv, in newspapers and sometimes on the internet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 05/16/2008

Not a day goes by without Blitzer pushing Hillary's neocon dream to bomb Iran. He has always manipulated his show to force this agenda and he loves Hillary Clinton so the fact that he is pushing for her on the ticket is perfectly natural for a true believer like him. Gore made the terrible choice of another neocon as his running mate and Hillary Clinton has the same views as Lieberman so forget it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 05/16/2008

Independents, are much perplexed at the choices facing them. Senator Clinton has a scandal scorched history while Senator McCain's is of utmost honor but manages a weak campaign. An Obama - Clinton ticket makes no sense. (No, I have not forgotten Senator Obama's attributes, or lack of.)
How to describe Senator Barack Obama correctly considering his "johnny come lately" appearance? What does anyone know of the guy except he is in the Kennedy mold -- John, not the other one.. Senator Obama is a walking charisma package of with charm, wit and "hope." There's the rub. Beneath the veneer is a survivor of Chicago's politics, a man able to bully his way through the dirtiest venue in the USA. Sounds like a kinda tough guy needed for the job of Prez, right? Nope, I wrote "bully," and like them all, ultimately weak , only skilled in below the belt tactics. The latest example; unless Senator Barack H. Obama has a nickname of "some," as in "some people say "........(President Bush's opening to his appeasement comments in Israel), Senator Obama delivered a characteristic dirty response . The President used a general word for contempt for appeasers, support of Israel and in no way aimed at Senator Obama. But the Senator pounced, charging he was smeared, and his political cronies (of a character similar to Ted -- you know the one) supported the below the belt deluge. Thus some of us really know this johnny come lately.
Let's get out and vote

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 AM on 05/16/2008

Whenever I read these posts that claim Obama"s history is a blank,.. {which is basically admitting a refusal to do a bit of research, or read a book} then penciling in their lapses with conjecture and fear loaded rhetoric, I can't help but be a bit frustrated¦

Backing up from Casey's post to see it from a distance,.. and tilting one"s head to make a semblance of the scribbled stick figures, it's comical how he draws Bush's blatant but customarily clumsy & illiterate, political attack against a fellow American on a foreign stage, as innocent in soft pastel colors, then takes his red crayon and angrily marks Obama, as some sort of hard core, old style, "dirty", "Chicago" politician with a hair trigger and chip on his shoulder, {something that quite frankly goes 180 degrees against the facts, when compared to the reality of the remarkably civil and enlightened campaign he has just run against the pit bull tactics of the Clintons.}
Then ends his cartoon with the words "Let's get out and vote"¦. It"s Totally hilarious in a sad way¦

But after the laughter dies subsides,¦
I can't decide if it"s more pathetic, or scary,...This grade school attempt to change reality with a crayon or maybe the fact that he actually may believe what he wrote¦

Is reality this much controlled by bias ?

Does the media have this much power¦ so much so, that actual life is being manipulated from the inside out ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 05/16/2008

Interesting article and certainly correct in its observation that that MSM is an overwhelming manipulative force in the contest.

Remember the Iowa caucases? Not really? That's the one where the number two winner -- John Edwards -- wasn't even mentioned in the MSM. Instead it was all about 1st place Obama and 3rd place Hillary. And the MSM continued to ignore Edwards except when it stopped to demonize him about getting a $400 haircut.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 05/16/2008

Correct, manipulative and they ain't stupid, either. Edward was a failed Senator, a failed VP nominee and all around empty suit. The MSM knew he was going nowhere so merely ignored him,uh, except for that effete haircut.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 05/16/2008

History has proven some success in these marriages of convenience. In my memory, Kennedy and Johnson and Reagan and Bush I. Johnson loathed the Kennedys and Bush coined the term "voodoo economics" to describe Reaganomics.

Hillary would be the presumptive nominee in 8 years and that might heal her wounds. Also, this hasn't been a slam dunk for the democrats. Barack still hasn't won the delegate count so a Hillary VP would grant her the recognition she deserves.

I'm a republican so another 8 years of the Trials [literally] of Bubba would be good grist for the blogs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 05/16/2008

A "shotgun wedding" of Obama and Clinton would be great news for John McCain. The Republicans are presently demoralized right now, as they should be. Only Hillary Clinton can energize the Republicans. Independents like me will never vote for a ticket with Hillary on it. So good bye to the Republicans and goodbye to the Independents. And goodbye to the young people who got so excited about Barack. To have Hillary on the ticket would be a bonanza for Fox News: every week will see new revelations about Bill Clinton's sex life since 2001.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 05/16/2008

It comforts me to know that the Obamaniacs won't take Hillary. That will leave her supporters free to vote for McCain. I think it's ironic that the liberal elitists who are always talking about talking to and negotiating with our enemies aren't able to put together a ticket that would guarantee them winning in November. At the same time Obama says he is going to reach across the aisle to get things done and he can't even get across the democrat tent to embrace hillary's supporters. You might as well get use to the idea of McCain in November and eight more years of Republicanism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 AM on 05/16/2008

She will hurt the ticket.
Independents and republicans won't vote for her.
Can't you see Fix News playing NEW Clinton scandles everyday. You know they are there.
Who vetted them?
Old politics vs New politics it won't work.
They (Bill would be there too) would undermine his power and he would be put in the position of defending them, a full time job.
They would have their center of power and push their policy! A Nightmare! They would undermine him at every turn.
Don't you see?
Get behind Barack and support him and together he will win. It's an exciting time and thing have already changed.
Stop looking at everything through the eyes of the Clintons.
Take off your HILLARY GOGGLES!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 05/16/2008

An Obama-Clinton ticket would drive independents and moderates toward McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 05/16/2008

The so called "Hillary supporters that will vote for McCain" are vastly exaggerated.

For Most intelligent people, the price of a 'Spite Vote' in blood, gas, food, mortgages, would be too high as to put it way out of range of their 'under 50k' a year budget...

I want to see you out in front of the voting place, leading that charge¦.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 05/16/2008

Taking on the woman that the Republican party hates the most whose campaign has used tactics that have even turned off some Democrats (meaning your Obamamaniacs)is not a dream ticket. The vast majority of Americans (especially older ones) don't like change as it is - asking people to vote for a woman and a bi-racial man is just too much change. Obama will embrace Hillary supporters - it doesn't mean she has to be the VP to do it. I hope he takes Biden - an older white guy who is hea of the foreign relations committee and sure can throw a punch back at the Bush-ites.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 05/16/2008

It would also galvanize the Republicans that would love nothing more to vote against The Clintons.

Hillary supporters tend to forget that she has the highest negatives of all of the candidates and is (by far) considered the least trustworthy.

Obama has been nothing but respectful of Hillary and her supporters. It is she who has not done anything to unite the party. She is still claiming that her base of "hard-working whites" is broader than his base.

Hillary supporters who vote for McCain or stay home will just prove the biggest criticism of her to be true. This is about her and not the party. You have successfully caricatured yourself and your candidate.

Congratulations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 AM on 05/16/2008

Masterful reply!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 05/16/2008

Ann Coulter loves Sen. Clinton. Does that not mean anything to you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 05/16/2008

We dont need her anywhere around the white house. This woman and her family "is" dangerous. We need to turn the PAGE and start a new Chapter. IT'S THE MEDIA THAT KEEPS PUSHING FOR A JOINT TICKET. NOT NO, BUT HELL NO!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 AM on 05/16/2008

The biggest disadvantage to an Obama/Clinton ticket is Bill Clinton! President Clinton is as anxious to return to the White House as Senator Clinton is. As Obama said early in the campaign, he was confused himself about which one he was running against, and he would be faced with the same confusion and distraction if Senator Clinton is the VP. In fact, they would simply use the Vice Presidency to advance their own narcissistic agenda and to promote themselves. It would be a nightmare for a President Obama and for the Democratic Party in general. By herself, perhaps Hillary could be constrained, but she does not come by herself. She comes with a former President who never accepted the end of his term, who practically destroyed her candidacy with his unbridled fervor to help her win the nomination, and who destroyed his own legacy in the process; and he would be a destructive force to Senator Obama's presidency and administration as well.

John Edwards
Jim Webb
Governor Richardson

NOT HILLARY!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 AM on 05/16/2008

Excuse me for adding my little song to this.

We want to win the WH and a lot of other elections. We need as big a mandate as we can get.

Voter registration and GOTV are the absolute determination of a win. It overcomes the GOP campaigning and interference with the election process.

The GOP is in dire straits with a failed policy, message and record to run on. They are not registering or turning out voters as we are. The plan has to include how many people will stay home in November and how many may be irritated enough to get out and vote AGAINST our ticket.

The triggers for GOP voters to get out instead of stay home. Some overlap.

African American.

Hispanic,

Woman

Clinton.

It seems far more risky to choose the "Dream Ticket" than it ever was to run the exceptional candidates that lost because of GOP tactics, media complicity and tampering with the election process.

Personally, I lost any willingness to want Hillary in Obama's administration with the flagrant loss of sanity in pursuing the tough enough to be CIC by threatening to obliterate Iran and put the deterrent umbrella over the ME. I don't think Obama is anywhere near as naive or misinformed as people paint him on foreign relations and diplomacy. Hillary is much worse given that she knows much better that to say any of this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 AM on 05/16/2008