iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael D'Antonio

GET UPDATES FROM Michael D'Antonio
 

I Gave At Church: Mitt Romney and the Tithing Gimmick

Posted: 09/13/2012 8:35 am

No modern presidential candidate has made a show of his church donations in the way Mitt Romney has made a show of his Mormon tithing. And before Mike Huckabee crossed the line when he criticized Joe Biden, a candidate's charitable giving has never been considered fair game in the political arena. Now that both men are inviting us to focus on the topic, let's consider what religious donations mean.

In Romney's case, his donations to the Mormon church are routinely raised to deflect concern about his devotion to tax evasion schemes that allow him to pay at a rate below 15 percent, which is far lower than the rate paid by typical middle class Americans. The idea here is that since he gives to his church, he's generously engaged with others, and sacrificing in a meaningful way for the common good.

He is not.

Unlike dollars paid into the general tax fund, which are divvied-up to pay for national defense, education, etc., dollars paid to a church cannot be traced. No accounting is required, and no mechanism exists for donors to demand one. However, what little we know about how churches spend money shows that donations are deployed primarily to benefit the churches themselves. They are used to erect and maintain buildings, buy assets (like the new $2 billion Mormon shopping mall in Utah), pay for staff and recruit more members. Indeed, if what you seek with your charity is to help others in need, giving to a church could be the worst choice you might make.

The best estimates available put church spending on basic, non-religious charitable activities -- where non-members are eligible for service -- in the single digits. This is true for Mormons, Catholics and others. Paltry as these effort may be, faith-based organizations often get much more credit for these activities than they deserve. This is because a substantial portion of the financing for church affiliated service organizations is provided by state, local and federal governments. Our tax dollars, for example, pay for much of the work done by Catholic Charities, although churchmen like to take the credit. Churches also benefit from about $70 billion worth of tax break per year. (Like the special tax treatment given to investors, religious tax exemptions give religiously based enterprises a government-sponsored competitive advantage over others in the marketplace.)

The pitiful truth of church spending on pure charity would not surprise anyone who has ever visited the offices of a typical bishop (or other administrative leader) and then the site of an ordinary church social service operation. Whether you are at the Archdiocese of New York or Mormon headquarters in Salt Lake City, church leaders will welcome you into plush offices that are well appointed and technologically up-to-date. (Lunch, if it's served, will be good.) Church service organizations are, without fail, provided in far grittier settings by workers who are underpaid, over-burdened and often seem poorly nourished. Sometimes it is difficult to tell the difference between the caregivers and the folks seeking help.

Given their low priority placed on helping others with no religious strings attached, it's hard to understand how donating money to a church qualifies anyone as a humanitarian act. In fact, donations made to churches mainly serve to reinforce the private segment of society that you have either joined voluntarily or entered as a birthright. (In almost all cases the members of these subgroups consider themselves better than others and entitled to special treatment in the afterlife.) Considered this way, tithing not so much an investment in humanity as it is an affirmation of people like yourself, and a down payment on your eternal fate. And anyone who mentions religious giving in the context of taxes, is making an argument for private engagement over the truly public good.

Finally, in Mitt Romney's case, church giving is not a simple matter of generosity. Unlike other churches (including Joe Biden's Catholic church) the Mormon faith denies full status to anyone who fails to donate enough of his or her annual salary. Mormonism is, in this way, a pay-to-play religion. Without paying the tithe, a believer may not enter a Mormon temple or participate fully in the activities of the faith. This is why Mormon giving is so much higher, per capita.

Like so much of what politicians say, a close examination of giving to churches reveals nuances and meanings that contradict the easy claims of superiority. Mitt Romney's donations to a self-interested group that requires such giving if you are to be a full-fledged member say nothing about a his worthiness to hold public office, let alone his goodness. Similarly, Joe Biden's lesser claim to charitable giving tells us little about his character or qualifications. Perhaps the politicians who went before were smart to keep their mouths shut on this topic.

 
FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 478
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
10:55 PM on 10/16/2012
Pardon me for challenging an apparently unquestioned assumption, but when and where has Mitt Romney "made a show of his church donations?" I haven't seen it. What I have seen is that he released his *tax returns* which of course showed his claims.

And, IIRC, they showed that he donated considerable amounts to causes other than his church.

Ignore his tithes, and he still out-donates Joe Biden, and not by a small margin.

And just as a matter of interest: why should anyone "donate" taxes above and beyond their lawful obligations? Taxes are an involuntary impost, and no government is a charity.

Finally, just to address another popular canard: the City Creek Mall in SLC was not financed from donations. It's an investment, funded from investment income.
07:08 PM on 10/19/2012
Investment income from what? Where does the church get the investment money in the first place?
12:45 PM on 09/24/2012
As a minister of a small church with a congregation of about 50 I feel I have to take issue with the mean-spirited comments about church donations. In the past three years, we have purchased a building and made it beautiful. We have also given several thousand dollars each to our local food bank, animal league, community children's center, and a South African orphanage that was a pet project of one of our members. We helped buy and fill 235 backpacks for our local elementary schoolchildren, whose family income average is less than $30,000.
We tithe 10% of our income to our community and outreach programs.
Please don't say that giving to your church is useless. When we know of a need in our community, we put it out to our congregation. After Katrina, we helped send a packed RV to Slidell that was used to feed and transport lost animals to new homes.
Churches are the places where people come to nurture their spirit and to support and nurture each other. When we know of a cause that needs us, we step up -- way beyond the call of duty.
Perhaps not all churches are like us, but I would bet a paycheck that we are closer to the norm than the picture you have painted.
Rev. Donna Maurer
Sonoran Desert Center for Spiritual Living
Amado, AZ
07:12 PM on 10/19/2012
Why can't the people just donate that money directly back to the community and outreach programs? Sure, you're doing a good thing, but you're only acting like a middle man. With the exception where the church acts as the outreach program (packing backpacks).

Regardless, I thank you and your church for your absolutely terrific deeds. I wish I could sit here and know for certain that all churches were like you. Unfortunately, I do not think that is the case. Therefore, you need to be diligent and ensure that you lead by example, and that others take notice of your example and follow suit.
10:54 PM on 11/04/2012
It's because the author would prefer that instead of giving the money to churches to use some for general charity and some for charity/amenities for there congregations, we give our money to the IRS to use some on general charity, and most to dump into the bureaucratic sinkhole we call the federal government.
06:51 PM on 09/21/2012
The Mormons are not a "self-interested group." to the contrtary, objective scientific studies have found that Mormons are more generous to ALL people, not just other Mormons, than members of any other religious denomination.

As to investing in a shopping center, it is a comoplete residential office, and retail complex. the land has been owned sinice the Church settled the land in 1847. The Church opened the fi8rst department store in America, Zions Cooperative Mercantile Institution, as a coop to help support locally made products (a green practice, right?). The Church already owned the land, the question was only, what is the best use of it. The new construction employed over a thousand construction workers during the recession, and the stores will emply hundreds. If the Mormons had built this in Detroti, they would be praised to heaven. Jobs are far better than handouts.
06:51 PM on 09/21/2012
When Mormons give aid, such as after a natural disaster, there are NO stringhs attached. No one is required to listen to the missionaries.

The Mormon Church supports the three Brigham Young University campuses in Utah, Idaho and hawaii so that tuition is affordable, less than half wehat the state university I teach at part time charges! Isn;t that a charitable purpose?

Donations in the Mormon Church are totally voluntary and private. No one knows what you have donated except you and the bishop and the financial clerk. There is no plate passing, no public comitments of donations. The people who donate a full tihing believe that the Church ordinances are valuable, and are happy to make donatuons to help support the temples where the ordinances are conducted. If you don;t believe in those ordinances, no one is going to force you to pay tithes.
06:41 PM on 09/21/2012
Much of the funding goes into church buildings. Because the Mormon Church doubles in size every 20 years, it needs a LOT of new buildings. And tithing pays the utilities too. there is no need for a parsonage. The Mormons who meet in those buildings teach each other to be kind and charitable. The University of Pennsylvania just completed a study which found that Mormons are not only the most generous in making donations of time and money, they donate as much as ANY members of any church do to OUTSIDE charities like United Way.

The authors of the book American Grace found that Mormons LIKE people of other faiths at a higher rate than any other religion LIKES people of another faith. The Mormon religion teaches that people who do NOT belong to the Mormon church will NOT--repeat NOT--go to hell, but go to heaven and live forever with Jesus. Mormons do not think opf themselves as superior to others, especially because half of Mormons are converts from other faiths, and they have often devoted two years of their lives to inviting people to join them in Mormonism. You cannot do that effectuively without loving people, and the Mormons are effective.
photo
xxixpines
Truth often causes wailing and gnashing of teeth
09:49 PM on 09/22/2012
Can you quote any scripture belonging to any faith where Jesus taught or advocated the building of lavish temples and giving a miniscule amount of wealth to the poor?
04:59 AM on 09/23/2012
In Matthew 16 - "6 Now when Jesus was in Bethany ...

7 There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious aointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat.

8 But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?

9 For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor.

10 When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me.

11 For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always.

12 For in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for my burial."

From FAIRLDS: "Just as this event served to prepare for the eternal sacrifice of Christ, even so Temples serve to the eternal blessing of the rest of us and make Christ's sacrifice effective to the exaltation of others. The reality is that eternal salvation is the point of this earth life. Poverty, while deserving of our individual sacrifices, will only pertain to this existence. We all must seek to find the appropriate balance."

What you mean by miniscule amount of wealth? The Church has given at least $1 billion to humanitarian aid. And most charity work is done off the books by volunteers of local congregations - go to Sunday school and be swarmed by clipboards volunteering projects to see what I mean.
06:36 PM on 09/21/2012
Mormons fast from two meals on the first Sunday each months and donate the food money saved to help feed and care for the poor. When an unemployed Mormon is cared for, that is one less need that other sources (including government) have to worry about, so there is a direct financial benefit to society's general ability to care for the needy.

The Mormon Church owns farms and food processing facilities. The farms sustain themselves with sales of their products, but much of production goes into a food distribution system for those in need. This was featured on NBC News "Rock Center". The people who work in this food distribution system are all vounteers, although some of them volunteer because they are the recipients of the food. Other volunteers are retired lawyers and college professors and military officers, etc. They are not "deprived".

The Mormons have a Perpetual Education Fund that gives low interest loans to members ini developiing countries. It helps them care for their families.
06:29 PM on 09/21/2012
Mitt Romney did not "make a show" of his charitable donations, including tithing to his church. The people who have cried out to see his tax returns have to swallow the bitter with the sweet: The guy is much more generous relative ot his income than Barack Obama. Biden gives less than 1% of ihis iincome to charities. In one year, Romney has given 3 to 4 million to charities, including universities (which will tell you they are absoluitely charitable organizations!). That was not someting Romney did to show off; he disclosed his income tax returns only in response to attacks by people like you.

Your primary claim, that donations ot the Mormon Church don;t count as "charitable", is invalid as a matter of tax law. You just hate churches. And you can;t get the facvts straight about Mormon Church finances. Donations "benefit the church"--That is what they are supposed to do. "The Church" is 14 million people who need buildings to meet in, that are heated and clean. Where the Mormons are numerous enough, a single building is used by 4 different congregations each Sunday! Mormon pastors are all part time volunteers who support themselves with regular jobs.

The Mormon church provides humanitarian aid at places like Haiti and Japan and the Gulf Coast after Hurricane Katrina, at the rate of about $50 million a year, comparable to other churches. In addition, Mormons donate their time to cleanup damaged homes and provide medical care and other aid.
03:54 PM on 09/20/2012
So, this entire article is reasoning for why we should pay higher taxes to the government to redistribute instead of something of our own choosing. I really hope I don't have to end up fighting people like you the near future. I think I may enjoy it too much.
03:29 PM on 09/21/2012
Give all you want to your church--but don't call it charity.
07:15 PM on 09/21/2012
I don't give to a church and I don't even go to church. Want to try again? I give food to the needy directly and I volunteer for SECULAR charitable organization, got it? What do you give? I don't make much at all, but I'll gladly give over the last few bucks in my pocket to someone who needs it or even help total strangers out simply because I'm there and I can. What do you want to call what I do? Tithing? Should I have to do the same with the government and just hope they can do a better job acting as a middle man? I don't think they will...with where our democracy is at right now, it's all downhill from this point. It's the natural evolution of a democracy and we get to help further it along. Cheers bud.
09:30 PM on 09/18/2012
As much as I think Mitt Romney is full of more crap than a Christmas turkey, I also take issue with what you say happens to money given to churches. It is grossly misleading.

First, there are some mega churches who never want for anything, but most churches struggle to make ends meet from week to week. We balance what we spend to just keep things up, to be a presence in the community, and try attend to the welfare of those in our community. Most in our community are not rich like Mr. Romney. It is the widow's mite that keep so many going.

Second, money does not buy salvation. It is not always the people with the most who make sacrifices for the good of the whole. Sad to say, the church is not that much different from my own family.

Finally, churches have to be incorporated and give annual reports like other corporations. There are a some, like in the secular world, who need to hide the truth. Most of us are living on manna. We have just enough for today, and we have little to hide. If you can't get a financial report, it might be time to reconsider your participation in the organization.
berzsa
For I was lost and now I'm found!
11:55 AM on 09/15/2012
I have seen with my own eyes in a third world country's capital city in an upscale neighborhood, on a corner lot, a man-made hill, on manicured lawns and blooming flowers.....the most obnoxious, ostentatious, shining marble cathedral erected by the Church of Jesus Christ of the Later Day Saints. I keep mentioning this because I think this to be obscene.... A whole city block of lower income housing could have been built with a modest chapel, if they felt they needed to push their religion, and they still would have had funds left over for a school and a free clinic. Somebody else proposed this, and I think it to be reasonable, that to retain their tax exemption, churches should give at least 50% of the donations they receive to working, living, charitable endeavors.
photo
pmb1
raging leftist hippie
10:02 PM on 09/14/2012
This is great, and completely blows the 'religious groups are so much better at charity than the government' argument out of the water. Religious groups like putting their names on charities and getting the kudos, but they really aren't morally superior, and certainly don't do more in providing for those in need than the government.
10:05 AM on 09/14/2012
Some of the comments here are over the top. The writer was not disparaging the good work done by religious organizations, he was simply pointing out the fallacy of the argument that uses tithing to justify not paying taxes in terms of having equal value in contributing to the larger common good. This is the same fallacy that has been used for years to play up "faith-based" organizations over public programs. Being Catholic, I'm very aware of how much of our contributions go to charitable efforts and how much go to parish maintenance, because the bulletin has a financial statement every week. The special collections are often done for special causes, but some of those causes are specific to the Catholic Church, such as retirement funds for priests and sisters. Catholic Charities is a wing of the Church's organizational structure that provides some wonderful services, but it makes heavy use of public funding as well as contributions. There may be added public value in it to the degree that the infrastructure is provided by donations so the public money can be used (perhaps) more efficiently than through a bureaucracy such as the state department of human services. But this is all dependent on the operations, not the basic model. Catholic Charities does not discriminate in terms of religion in the delivery of services, but the recent fights in Illinois about foster care and adoption services excluding same-sex families as potential homes (as well as the contraceptive coverage controversies) point to
10:02 AM on 09/14/2012
I would have been more impressed if he (applicant to be an AMERICAN President) gave an extra 10% voluntarily to the IRS so that AMERICAN schools and roads could be improved. It seems to me that his tithing should only matter if he was running to be the leader of Mormonism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freepernix
09:36 AM on 09/14/2012
I worked in the administrative office of a church. I was not a member. Ever since the economic downturn in '08, GIVING to the church was down, but the needs of the community surged. Three times per week (at least) someone was ringing the bell asking for food, gas to get to work, or a vital prescription paid for. The Pastor of this church did what he could with limited resources. The church I attend allows people to come in and fill out a benevolence application for food, utilities, and other needs. Church members get first priority, then the general public is considered. There are no government grants. All the monies used for benevolence come from direct giving from church membership. The exempt tax dollars go directly to serve the community and in order to serve, they have to keep the lights on.

Please don't lump all "religious organizations" into one big heap. Some churches actually heed the call Christ made to feed, clothe, and look out for the poor.
photo
MonkeyDaddy
Agent of Evolution
07:16 AM on 09/14/2012
I knew a man who was Mormon and tithed for decades. When he lost his job after an accident and couldn't tithe anymore, his church did absolutely nothing for him and his family and they fell into abject poverty. It seemed more like he had been paying private club dues all those years than anything intended to be used for true eleemosynary purposes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluecatb
FORWARD, the ONLY way to go America!
08:14 AM on 09/14/2012
My Aunt back in 1991 was a devout Mormon in Chesterfield VA. (magic draws and all) The Mormon church also/loans/couples/married in their/church a home/interest/banking/morgage, ONLY thing when you finish paying and die, the house goes2the church. She was fully paid on her home, Mormonshave a med/facility&clinic w/doctors. ONLY thing. they had her on 30/mind/altering/drugs for a backdiscdeterioration2/b/taken daily. Her/once healthy/body/started/failing. She was50&her husband worked/servicing/utility/line. Well one day she got so frustrated at the red tape of waiting for a birth certificate to arrive4ID, she/threatened3runthe/car&my small children into a tree. My Uncle,had also noticed/behavioral suicidal/episodes, told her she needed/help. Hosp/doctors/said/would/take/a/month/introvenious/cleanse/blood&organs2remove/chemical/med/cocktail. She/went2natural/herbal/remedies&Uncle/saw/improvement. His back went, late 50's the church was of no help when they couldn't make tithe/Auntie "woke up" She cut/em off, sought a lawyer and she and my uncle battled for what they worked hard all their lives for. A home.

Just some common references that I've experienced.
It's like they are renting soul coverage or an insurance policy to get to (planet Kolos?)

Give me a break~! Jesus says come as ye are
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmasvoice
09:39 AM on 09/14/2012
This is truly sad that a religious organization would abandon this family.