More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Fauntroy

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Fauntroy
 

Cain, Coulter, and Irresponsible Race Talk

Posted: 11/04/11 03:08 PM ET

The revelation that Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, as CEO of the National Restaurant Association, engaged in behavior that led the organization to enter into financial settlements (including non-disclosure agreements) with two employees has left a wake of collateral damage and irresponsible race.

The most notable damage has been done to Cain's campaign. While I never thought he had a serious chance of winning the Grand Old Party's presidential nomination, this pretty much seals the deal. Unworkable tax plans, a narrow world view, and, now, a history of contractually-acknowledged questionable sexual behavior towards women is not the making of a winning politician in a party that has become, for some, a magnet for racial hostility.

The more important damage has been done to our already weakened racial discourse. The problem here begins with Cain, who has played cute on race. As a graduate of historically Black Morehouse College, he should know better than to ignore the racism that exists within the ranks of some Tea Party supporters while, out of the other side of his mouth, contend that Black people cannot think for themselves and are brainwashed by a "Democratic plantation."

The irresponsible race talk is made worse by conservative talking heads who have used Cain's race to obfuscate the facts in this matter. Ann Coulter is leading the this-is-nothing-more-than-liberal-media-going-after-a-conservative-Black-man. The argument is so weak, than Coulter was reduced to digging up and using Clarence Thomas' tired "high tech lynching" line; it was a ridiculous then and remains so today. The Irresponsibles, as I call them, are throwing dust in the eyes of the public trying to get people to believe that the issue is Cain's ideology and race rather than behavior. My answer to those who claim the media never goes after liberal Whites in this way? Bill Clinton.

Coulter, as usual, leads the parade of The Irresponsibles. Her quip that "our Blacks are so much better than their Blacks" suggests to me that she views Black people as mere trinkets for conservatives to carry around in their pockets. Are the "better Blacks" on her side of the fence not offended by her continued condescension on race? They need to know that silence is consent.

Ultimately, The Irresponsibles are silent on his behavior -- sufficiently egregious in the eyes of NRA lawyers and board members that they had to pay two employees to literally buy their silence -- and the issue of sexual harassment in the work place. In being so irresponsible on Cain, they give cover to those who do not want to take workplace harassment seriously. They are so blinded by rigid ideology that they cannot wrap their heads around the facts. The NRA signed an agreement with the accusers. He acknowledged the agreement. While he initially lied about whether there were actual charges, throwing liberal-media-is-out-to-get-me dust in the air, his defense has never been believable. Yet The Irresponsibles continue their march off the cliff of reason and into the valley of ideological lies.

Michael K. Fauntroy is associate professor of public policy at George Mason University where recently convened a national conference on race and public policy. He is also author of Republicans and the Black Vote. He He blogs at MichaelFauntroy.com.

 
 
 

Follow Michael Fauntroy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MKFauntroy

The revelation that Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, as CEO of the National Restaurant Association, engaged in behavior that led the organization to enter into financial settlements (inc...
The revelation that Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, as CEO of the National Restaurant Association, engaged in behavior that led the organization to enter into financial settlements (inc...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Genco
06:45 PM on 11/04/2011
How come you left "tingles" out of the conversation?
05:28 PM on 11/04/2011
So there's the author of the article whining about the fact that the tactics the liberals have used for the past 2+ years are now being shoved right back in his face. If you didn't like the irresponsible use of the word "racism" you shouldnt' have been so flippant about using it as a political battering ram to bully anyone who dares question or criticize Obama.

You've played with a very ugly word. Now reap the consequences.
videopage
These comments are posted by the editor-in-chief o
04:43 PM on 11/04/2011
I think that people on both sides of the political aisle will agree that Ann Coulter is a great book marketer, and towards that end will make outrageous statements. So, taking her recent claim that her blacks are better than the liberals' blacks, I have a suggestion that might appeal to both Ms. Coulter and the left wing: put together a large sum of liberals' money and try to convince the Republicans to sell some of their blacks.

This would be a win-win situation. The Republicans could get some badly-needed campaign funds, the liberals would balance out the alleged 'black' inequity balance, and the blacks would get better health care.

Gene Grossman - LegalMystery.com
04:06 PM on 11/04/2011
70% of the GOP didn't agree with Cain before this.

I hate the arrogance of his supporters. Cain is making the whole GOP look bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
voodoo8
I don't know and neither do you
03:07 PM on 11/05/2011
the GOP already looked bad.

Cain by his comments, is making it harder for anyone to agree with him.
photo
freedomscribe
Government is never good, at best necessary.
03:31 PM on 11/04/2011
I don't agree with the author's premise or conclusions. Cain is leading in polls.
photo
freedomscribe
Government is never good, at best necessary.
03:28 PM on 11/04/2011
Cain seems to be weathering the storm - record contributions - statistical dead heat with Romney.
photo
freedomscribe
Government is never good, at best necessary.
03:25 PM on 11/04/2011
How about . . Cain's campaign not collapsing:

A new ABC News / Washington Post poll has Gov. Mitt Romney with a 2-point lead over Herman Cain in the 2012 GOP Presidential Nomination race. Romney leads Cain 25%-23%. Just over one month ago, Romney led Cain 25%-16% in the previous ABC News / WAPO Poll.
http://freedomslighthouse.net/2011/11/04/new-poll-has-romney-cain-at-the-top-of-the-gop-field-newt-gingrich-continues-to-make-gains/
03:44 PM on 11/04/2011
Just wait.
03:01 PM on 11/04/2011
So, labeling everyone who doesn't worship at the foot of Obama IS responsible race talk?
03:45 PM on 11/04/2011
Who does this?
04:08 PM on 11/04/2011
Pretty much every single liberal. YOU'RE the ones who redefined the word as "any white person who disagrees, in any way, with a person of African heritage" So don't complain about the irresponsible use of the word when YOU were the ones who were massively irresonsible with it in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msladydeborah
I am a Main Street Person!
04:52 PM on 11/04/2011
If racism does not exist and this has been Cain's premise, then how is his race a factor as he claimed earlier this week? It is not an on again off again state of reality. Cain is the one who started out talking about race was not important nor was it a factor in his success. Now that he is catching some predictable heat as the front runner, he wants to throw it out as a factor. That is not in line with the belief system that HE claims to be foundated upon.
05:44 PM on 11/04/2011
Nobody said racism doesn't exist. It most certainly does. However, when that word has been used so flippantly by everyone on the left, it hurts the very people who experience REAL racism.

It hasn't been Cain who's been playing games with the word "racism" It's been liberals who have been doing it for 2 years. And now that the tables have turned, they whine about it. Turnabout is fair play. You wrote the rules...don't complain when those rules are used against you.

You've played with a very ugly word. Now reap the consequences.
02:54 PM on 11/04/2011
I agree that Ann Coulter's comments aren't pollically correct, but they are correct none the less. Give me any one example of a black democratic politician that has done anything even semi producive in America. I can think of several black republicans that have been successful. Thats because there aren't any successful black democrats. Black democrats are the bottom of the barrel people who typically think that they deserve handouts or reparations. I'll tell you what both parties in this country stink but most of the stench comes from the left. Journalist were quick to pick up the Cain scandal before they even had any facts to back up their claims. This is an obvious ambush on Herman Cain, and I like a majority of his supporters can see the blatant attack. These attacks will only reinforce his support.
03:47 PM on 11/04/2011
No. Journalists researched the story for weeks and got multiple sources before they asked Cain for comment and then got no response until they published 10 days later.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:47 PM on 11/04/2011
You can easily do a search of successful accomplished blacks and come up with long lists of names in about every field imaginable. Other than the political and civil rights figures which are obvious, the lists are not about their political affiliations.

So I guess you are claiming, without specific information about the political leanings of all of these notable figures, that they are all Republicans. Well, that's fitting, as it's the sort of depth we have come to expect from those who make preposterous statements such as yours.
02:31 PM on 11/04/2011
Ah, I finally understand now. Thank you for clarifying this: The charges of racism made for decades--righteously and in defense of all human decency and equality--in defense of minority democrat/liberal candidates are, of course, "irresponsible" race talk when said in defense of republican/conservative candidates from minority backgrounds (e.g., Thomas; Estrada; Rubio).

Again, thank you for the clarification. I totally get it now. Let's be clear: It has nothing to do with the fact that a loss of either the african-american or hispanic demographic would mean the end of the democratic party. These republicans are just totally off-base--we all know the democrat party would never stoop to cynical, racially-motivated tactics to remain a viable political party.

Again, nice work here.
03:48 PM on 11/04/2011
Actually, The democratic party is expanding. That is why republicans have been trying to stop people from getting registered and stopping people from voting.