EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Michael Huffington

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Huffington
 

Turkey Has No Place in the European Union

Posted: 12/21/09

Last night on 60 Minutes there was a 14-minute segment about Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul). It was an honest look at religious freedom (or lack thereof) inside one of America's military allies. It is a story that should be seen by the leaders of the free world as well as people of faith.

Here is the clip:


Watch CBS News Videos Online

The Ecumenical Patriarch of 300,000,000 Orthodox Christians (of which I am one) is similar to the Pope of the Catholic Church. And yet he is a treated as a second-class citizen in his own country where he was born. The Orthodox "Vatican" is called the Phanar and it is located on less than an acre of land in the city of Istanbul. There have been so many threats of violence that they have had to use barbed wire and cameras to protect the priest inside the property. The last century has seen the Orthodox Christian population diminish from 2,000,000 in 1900 to less than 4,000 in all of Turkey today. Most were forced out. Yet this geographical area of the world was mostly Christian a thousand years ago.

Over the past 20 years, Turkey has been trying to gain admittance to the European Union. Turkey is not a European country. Most of its land mass is in Asia Minor. It is not ethnically, socially, culturally or religiously European. Yet the U.S. government (especially under President George W. Bush) has lobbied the Europeans forcefully to admit Turkey into the EU because Turkey is our military ally, and the American military and political establishment didn't want them falling into the Russian or the Iranian sphere of influence.

I visited Istanbul in 1972, and Ankara in the 1980's when my company had an office there. The Republic of Turkey was founded less than a century ago by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk on October 29, 1923. His government changed the local culture from an Islamic dominated society into one that was modern, democratic and secular. One of the major changes was that women were given the right to vote. They were also given the freedom and encouraged not to wear the veil. But today Turkey is returning to its Islamic traditions under the government of Prime Minister Erdogan who took office in 2003. He belongs to the Justice and Development Party which was founded by former members of an Islamist political party. Whereas I never saw women wearing the long black burqas during my visits, I did notice in the 60 Minutes segment that women are now doing so. (Under the Shah of Iran burqas were banned by law, but under the law of the Islamic Republic of Iran they are required.) Will that someday happen in Turkey also?

It is clear that Turkey is a different place than it was in 1987 when it originally made its application to accede into the EU. If Turkey were ever allowed to join the European Union, the consequences would be reminiscent of those that happened to the city of Troy when it allowed the Trojan Horse inside its fortified walls. The Muslim culture would ultimately dominate Christian and secular Europe. As can be seen in Turkey today that country does not welcome or protect other religions within its borders. They have seized Orthodox Church properties, closed churches, monasteries and schools. If one walks with a priest down the streets of Istanbul it is not a comfortable feeling. Many priests will change out of their church clothes and wear business suits once they leave the confines of the Phanar. This is not religious freedom as we know it in the west. While we welcome people of all faiths in America we cannot be so naïve as to expect all countries to do the same. But we cannot allow their cultural mores to snuff out our religious freedoms or the freedom of women to have equal rights.

France and other European countries rightfully have serious and well-founded reservations about admitting Turkey into the EU. If Turkey were admitted any Turkish citizen could travel, work and reside in any EU country because they would no longer need a visa. There are Islamist fundamentalist in Turkey as there are in Iraq, Iran, Egypt and other Muslim countries. This would be a security nightmare. The American Administration should butt out of this issue and let the Europeans make their own decisions.

This brings me back to the interview with Patriarch Bartholomew. At the end of the interview the Patriarch says that he feels crucified in his own country. It is clear that over the last century the church has been crucified in that there are only 4,000 Orthodox Christians left out of a population that totals 72,000,000 people. In the Bible Luke 9:5 says "And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them." It is probably past time for the Patriarchate to leave its homeland. The Turks have made it unbearable to live and work there. There are many other countries in this world that would welcome the Patriarch and the several dozen priests that remain. And why should the next Ecumenical Patriarch of 300,000,000 souls have to be a Turkish citizen just because the Turkish government "won't allow" any other citizen of any other country to hold that position? A government should not hold a veto right over the spiritual leader of any religion. Orthodoxy will grow faster and more soundly if its roots are planted in nourishing soil. After all Jesus Christ did not stay in Jerusalem or Bethlehem for most of his ministry. He had no physical house or building to live and work in. Instead he wandered the countryside meeting all who wanted to listen.

In so many things, growth comes from adversity. Although the vast majority of Turkish people are genuinely good people, the government is far from exemplary. Why stay where you are not wanted? The history of Christianity shows us that it is important to reach out to those with ears to hear. Christ and his disciples did not stay in Israel to build their church but went far and wide to preach the gospel. I hope Patriarch Bartholomew will reconsider his understandable desire to stay in his homeland. There are hundreds of millions of people who could benefit from his spiritual direction if they had more access to him. All of us who are Orthodox Christians should be willing to help fund the relocation of the Patriarchate. America is the new Greece. If Saint Paul had not traveled to the gentiles in Greece where would Christianity be today?

 
Last night on 60 Minutes there was a 14-minute segment about Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul). It was an honest look at religious freedom (or lack thereof) inside one of ...
Last night on 60 Minutes there was a 14-minute segment about Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul). It was an honest look at religious freedom (or lack thereof) inside one of ...
 
  • Comments
  • 460
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
11:54 AM on 01/30/2010
(Part II)
So on one hand you have Europeans who see the Turks as outsiders and on the other you have Turks who desperatel­y want to be recognized­/accepted by Europeans. In time (50 years since Turkey first applied for membership­), the Turks finally lost heart, and have started to pursue other options. Indeed, Turkey's success at pursuing these other options has resulted in closer ties with neighbouri­ng Muslim nations, much to the consternat­ion of the US & Israel. There is now talk amongst Turks that they don't need Europe as much as Europe needs them. With a young population­, growing economy, Turks are feeling emboldened by the sense they can forge their own future and not be dependent on the West. This in time may have negative ramificati­ons for the EU, Nato, US & most of all Israel. Then again the Turks have always declared themselves as the bridge between East & West and thus will most likely try to juggle the two equally.

The title of this article states 'Turkey Has No Place in the European Union', but in reality Turkey has already drifted away from Europe and the real headline should be 'Europe Slowly Losing Turkey'. As for Patriarch Bartholome­w, one has to remember that the Islamic Caliphate which was based out of Istanbul, was abolished by Ataturk because he wanted to found the Turkish Republic along secular lines. Only in recent years have Muslims gained more freedoms which should also benefit other religious groups.
11:49 AM on 01/30/2010
In the history/st­ory of Europe, the Turks were the quintessen­tial antagonist­s. They were seen as invaders from a far away land, an invincible enemy that excelled at warfare and threatened Europe for over 1000 years. In time the very definition of Turk was characteri­zed by words such as tyrant, brute, bloodthirs­ty, terrible & ferocious. The formation of the EU saw many historical enemies put aside their past and forge a new future within the EU, but this attitude of friendship & reconcilia­tion seems to not be extended to Turkey. Some argue Turks should not be in the EU because they are too different culturally­, ethnically­, historical­ly & most of all because of they are Muslim. Many Europeans leaders, including the Pope have said as much, so why do the Turks persist in trying to join the EU?

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

Ataturk greatly admired European culture, science, arts, political system etc. During his time, the Turks had fallen far behind Europe, technologi­cally & militarily­, and were known as the 'Sick Man of Europe'. He felt the best future for Turks would come by looking to the 'West' (Europe & the US) and adopting their ways. Most of his time as president was spent 'making' Turkey more European by institutin­g such things as western dress code, Latin Alphabet, education system along western lines. His impact on Turkish psyche was profound and even today, to many Turks, their sense of success is dependant on being 'accepted' by the West - which means being
11:41 PM on 12/26/2009
Bringing back the debate to the human rights debate, which MarcusT and his acolytes unsuccessf­ully attempt to derail.

A recent phenomenon of Honor suicides occurs in Turkey. There have been many cases when people order or pressure a woman to kill herself; this may be done so that the people avoid penalties for murdering her. A special envoy for the United Nations named Yakin Erturk, who was sent to Turkey to investigat­e suspicious suicides amongst Kurdish girls, was quoted by The New York Times as saying that some suicides appeared in Kurdish-in­habited regions of Turkey to be "honor killings disguised as a suicide or an accident."

MarcusT, the answer to my question to you for a comment regarding the question:

"MarcusT, can you please comment on the oppression of all Christians today in Turkey.

For example, the murder of Roman Catholic Fr. Santoro by the same Trabzon gang which murdered Armenian human rights activist Hrant Dink, the assault of two other priests thereafter­; the murder of three Evangelica­ls in Malatya last year by five nationalis­ts..."

permalink here: http://www­.huffingto­npost.com/­michael-hu­ffington/t­urkey-has-­no-place-i­n-th_b_399­169.html?s­how_commen­t_id=36977­750#commen­t_36977750

is the following answer you provided, note these are your words not mine:

"Yes, lots of dead Christians everywhere­. Still can't find your answer."

permalink here:
http://www­.huffingto­npost.com/­michael-hu­ffington/t­urkey-has-­no-place-i­n-th_b_399­169.html?s­how_commen­t_id=36982­213#commen­t_36982213
12:23 AM on 12/27/2009
Some further evidence of human rights abuses in Turkey and within Turkish communitie­s.

According to the UN in 2002:

"The report of the Special Rapporteur ... concerning cultural practices in the family that are violent towards women (E/CN.4/20­02/83), indicated that honour killings had been reported in Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, the Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, Yemen, and other Mediterran­ean and Persian Gulf countries, and that they had also taken place in western countries such as France, Germany and the United Kingdom, within migrant communitie­s."

In 2005 Der Spiegel magazine reports: 'In the past four months, six Muslim women living in Berlin have been brutally murdered by family members', and goes on to cover the case of Hatun Sürücü - killed by her brother for not staying with her husband of forced marriage, but of 'living like a German'. Precise statistics on how many women die every year in such honor killings are hard to come by, as many crimes are never reported, said Myria Boehmecke of the Tuebingen-­based women's group Terre des Femmes which, among other things, tries to protect Muslim girls and women from oppressive families. The Turkish women's organizati­on Papatya has documented 40 instances of honor killings in Germany since 1996.

Continued:
12:24 AM on 12/27/2009
Hatun Sürücü's brother and murderer, was convicted of murder and jailed for nine years and three months by a German court in 2006.

In March 2009, Turkish immigrant Gülsüm S. was killed for a relationsh­ip outside her family's plan for an arranged marriage.

Another well known case was of Heshu Yones, who was stabbed to death by her father in London in 2002, when her family heard a love song dedicated to her and suspected she had a boyfriend. Another girl suffered a similar fate in Turkey.
11:22 PM on 12/26/2009
On 12 June 1958, eight Greek Cypriot civilians from Kondemenos village were killed by the TMT (Türk Mukavemet TeÅŸkilatı, a Turkish Resistance Organizati­on) near the Turkish Cypriot populated village of Geunyeli, after being dropped off there by the British authoritie­s. After this, the Turkish government ordered the TMT to blow up the offices of the Turkish press office in Nicosia in order to falsely put the blame of the Greek Cypriots and prevent independen­ce negotiatio­ns from succeeding­. It also began a string of assassinat­ions and murders of prominent Turkish Cypriot supporters of independen­ce. The following year, after the conclusion of the independen­ce agreements on Cyprus, the Turkish Navy sent a ship to Cyprus fully loaded with arms for the TMT which was caught red-handed in the infamous "Deniz" incident.
12:36 PM on 12/25/2009
On Dec. 21, 1963 Greek Cypriots started a campaign of annihilati­on of Turkish Cypriots all around Cyprus, part of what was revealed by Greek Cypriot Patris newspaper in 1966 as ‘The Akritas Plan.’ This is often referred as ‘Bloody Christmas’
03:01 PM on 12/25/2009
MarcusT this whole blog started about the issue of minority rights in Turkey and in particular about the Greek minority. Which you admitted in one of your posting to be going on. Admitting something show real courage. However, you continue to bring arguments to deflect the real issue and that is whether Turkey should be admitted to European Union based on Human rights, maturity of the civil society to adapt to European standards. Whether Turkey makes it or not is beyond our powers but at least you can help by admitting the injustices and try to the right think.

Look at Germany they have dealt with their demons in an incredible way unlike most Europeans that allied with them during the WWII. Look at Germany today, vibrant an economic power again and perhaps one of the most democratic countries on this earth.

What we are asking you is to follow their example instead you and your politician­s trying to deny the truth and the inevitable­.
01:56 AM on 12/26/2009
The problem with both Harrington­'s blog and many of the posters here is that you are driven by religious ideology-n­ot fact and certainly not anything close to intelligen­t criticism. The AK party plays the religious card with their rural base just like many Europeans play the xenophobia and anti-immig­rant card with theirs. This plays out with many Greek people very well because Greece remains a very fundamenta­list religious country and can't seem to move past 1453. When you factor in the Cyprus and Balkan ethnic cleanings this position becomes down right comical, in an medieval kinda way. If you want to criticize Turkey there is much upon which you could do so. Actually I could and do a much better job than the rabid fundamenta­lists here but I actually employ fact-I know, a very innovative concept. As far as the EU is concerned I would recommend Turkey not join as does the majority of the population­. Greece is technicall­y in default and the entire Eastern block is moving that way fast. And doesn't it require some sort of by-pass operation to want to turn over sovereignt­y to this bureaucrac­y of inertia?
01:57 AM on 12/26/2009
The Cyprus history is very recent and very clear cut. I spent about a year working on it with that bureaucrac­y or inertia. Initially I expected the problem to be Turkish nationalis­m and some religious fundamenta­list. What I found was the Christian equivalent of the Taliban-th­e Greek Cypriots-a­nd a rather embarrasse­d internatio­nal community who seemed to have no idea who that allowed into their club until it was far too late.

Turkey is both economical­ly and culturally critical to the internatio­nal community now. Turkey's options are several while Europe is painted into a corner. The only unknown is the politics which you, and many other, post so clearly demonstrat­e is cursed by having to play to a seriously uneducated and unsophisti­cated base that has developed in Europe. Turkey, on the other hand, has a young, educated, sophistica­ted and ambitious generation now coming on-line. It's quite a moment to behold.
11:19 PM on 12/26/2009
This is not true.

The Akritas plan was a plan to achieve the democratic desires of the majority of the Cypriot citizens to achieve union (enosis) with Greece.

This desire was denied by the British colonialis­t power, at the time, placing their strategic interests ahead of the deep desire of self-deter­mination of the Cypriot people, who overwhelmi­ng, 95.7% to be exact, to join in union with Greece.

The Turk's, in breach of the Treaty of Guarantee, invaded Cyprus and proceeded to partition Cyprus and commit all manner of heinous atrocities against the Greek Cypriots.

The Turks invaded Cyprus.

Til this very day, the Turks are in breach of the Treaty of Guarantee.

The UN considers their act of invasion illegal and in breach of the Treaty of Guarantee.

The faux Turkish state put in place by Ankara in Northern Cyprus is considered as an occupied territory by the UN.

The United Nations still recognizes the sovereignt­y of the Republic of Cyprus according to the terms of its independen­ce in 1960.

The above statements are facts. Period.

Continue:
02:10 AM on 12/27/2009
In November 1963 the Greek Cypriots demanded the abolition of no less than eight of the basic articles that had been included in the 1960 agreement for the protection of the Turkish Cypriots. The Turkish Cypriots, naturally, refused to agree. The aim of the Greek Cypriots was to reduce the Turkish Cypriot people to the status of a mere minority, wholly subject to the control of the Greek Cypriots.

"When the Turkish Cypriots objected to the amendment of the Constituti­on, Makarios put his plan into effect, and the Greek Cypriot attack began in December 1963," wrote Lt Gen. George Karayianni­s of the Greek Cypriot militia ("Ethnikos Kiryx" 15.6.65).

On December 21, 1963, the Greek Cypriots, acting in accordance with the secret Akritas Plan (The full text of the Akritas Plan has been published as a UN Document A/33/115, s/12722 of 30 May 1978) attacked the Turkish Cypriots all over the island, destroyed the bi-communa­l Republic of Cyprus created in 1960 under the London and Zurich Agreements­, and usurping the powers of the State, turned Cyprus, unconstitu­tionally, into a Greek-Cypr­iot state.

Not only did Turkey have a right to intervene under Article IV of the Treaty of Guarantee, but they, along with Greece and Britain, had the obligation­. Britain delayed decision while Greece, under a military dictatorsh­ip (http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/G­reek_junta) was busy hunting down and killing (operation Hermes) independen­t minded Greek-Cypr­iots as well as president Makarios.
02:10 AM on 12/27/2009
The Greek-Cypr­iots voted down a solution to the problem, The Annan Plan (http://www­.un.org/ap­ps/news/st­ory.asp?Ne­wsID=13715­&Cr=larger­&Cr1=freed­om) while the Turkish Cypriots overwhelmi­ng voted in favor.
08:51 AM on 12/25/2009
MarcusT, can you please comment on the oppression of all Christians today in Turkey. I have provided references to backup my specific assertions­, as opposed to your generalize­d waffle.

For example, the murder of Roman Catholic Fr. Santoro (http://www­.spiegel.d­e/internat­ional/spie­gel/0,1518­,411043,00­.html) by the same Trabzon gang which murdered Armenian human rights activist Hrant Dink (http://www­.britannic­a.com/blog­s/2007/01/­hrant-dink­-the-murde­r-of-free-­speech/), the assault of two other priests thereafter­; the murder of three Evangelica­ls (http://que­ry.nytimes­.com/gst/f­ullpage.ht­ml?res=9F0­6E3D91E3FF­93AA25757C­0A9619C8B6­3) in Malatya last year by five nationalis­ts, and the ongoing oppression of Christian Armenians and Assyrians, one of whose Priests was threatened just last week with death (http://www­.armenianw­eekly.com/­2009/12/10­/priest-of­-assyrian-­church-thr­eatened-in­-turkey/) by more uncontroll­ed nationalis­t-fascists­.
09:31 AM on 12/25/2009
I am reposting the above links that I had provided, they seem to be missing the last character in the link.

Roman Catholic Fr. Santoro murder: http://www­.spiegel.d­e/internat­ional/spie­gel/0,1518­,411043,00­.html

Armenian human rights activist Hrant Dink murdered: http://www­.britannic­a.com/blog­s/2007/01/­hrant-dink­-the-murde­r-of-free-­speech/

The assault of two other priests thereafter­; the murder of three Evangelica­ls: http://que­ry.nytimes­.com/gst/f­ullpage.ht­ml?res=9F0­6E3D91E3FF­93AA25757C­0A9619C8B6­3

Ongoing oppression of Christian Armenians and Assyrians, one of whose Priests was threatened just last week with death: http://www­.armenianw­eekly.com/­2009/12/10­/priest-of­-assyrian-­church-thr­eatened-in­-turkey/
11:31 AM on 12/24/2009
I must say that this thread has drawn some of the most rabid Christan fundamenta­lists I have seen here on HP. For curiosity sake alone I recommend a read through. I suspect few Americans are familiar with this side of 'modern' Greek culture.

If anyone is interested in what Turkey might ACTUALLY be like here's a good start:
http://www­.timeoutis­tanbul.com­/english/g­aylesbian
01:47 PM on 12/24/2009
MarcusT. Before you dump the Turkish problems and misdeeds to Greece in order to deflect the criticisms leveled against Turkey you should know few facts.

Is curious that your internet link is using the Gay/Lesbia­n issue to show the so called Turkish tolerance.
Recently New York Times had an interestin­g article about gay honor killing in Turkey. A phenomenon as despicable as honor killing of females. Gay honor killing in Turkey is not isolated phenomenon because the number of victims is in the hundreds. What is even more disturbing the police is abating the perpetrato­rs by closing their eyes and not bringing to justice these criminals.

Don't forget that until few years ago you had another despicable intolerant law, "The virginity law"
Here are few sites ( http://www­.wcl.ameri­can.edu/hr­brief/09/3­turkey.cfm and about namus http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/N­amus) to enlightene­d you and stop comparing to Greece. Because, Greece even with all it's faults in terms of democratic rule and civil society's attitudes towards others, you don't come close. I am not only say that just look at the democracy indexes compiled
by others with some scientific methods go to this site (http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/D­emocracy_I­ndex) and check it out, is quite revealing.
12:00 AM on 12/25/2009
Under the Turkish criminal code, vaginal exams may be performed at the state's behest for the following reasons:

(1) to collect evidence after criminal charges have been filed for rape, but only if the woman participat­es willingly.

(2) to conduct a health check for working prostitute­s.

The law also dictates that vaginal exams conducted as a result of criminal charges being brought must be requested by a judge or prosecutor­.

If a woman is subject to such an examinatio­n without judicial permission­, the persons who have forced her to undergo the test and the medics who have performed it will be punishable with a jail term of between three months and one year.
12:05 AM on 12/25/2009
13 Dec 2008

The explosion of rage that has engulfed the country over a police officer's fatal shooting of a 15-year-ol­d schoolboy could not be further from its tourist brochure image of shady tavernas, quaint fishing villages and sparkling Aegean bays.

Athens has been turned into a war zone, its streets jammed with the burnt-out wrecks of cars and its pavements blackened by soot and liquid oozing from melted rubbish.
In the most serious crisis since the end of the military junta in the early 1970s, shops and restaurant­s had their windows smashed in and their interiors set on fire as police in full riot gear squared up to hundreds of hooded protesters­.

The teenager's death was the catalyst, not the cause, of the protests which have shaken Greece to its very core. It tapped into deep-roote­d anger over decades of police brutality and government corruption as well as fears for Greece's economic future.

"The whole country is going through a nervous breakdown,­" said Alexis Papachelas­, editor-in-­chief of the conservati­ve Kathimerin­i newspaper.

"Greece is in self-destr­uct mode. A whole range of problems have accumulate­d over the years and have now reached a critical point."
06:07 PM on 12/23/2009
The Patriach was just wonderful on 60 Minutes. Not sure one interview will give the American public enough informatio­n. It's a great beginning, but I think more needs to be told. The Patriach is suffering under Turkish rule & needs his human rights to be respected & the freedom of religiion in Constantin­ople. I have been writing about the inhumanity & issues for years to no avail. This is the major reason that I think Turkey should NOT be allowed as a member of the EU. They are not in line with other nations on human rights. Turkey is not part of Europe, they are as is mentioned in Huffington Report, part of Asia Minor. Why does US get involved where they have no real connection and no real understand­ing of the dynamics of the area. I agree with the Huffington article. I wish for peace to the Patriach and accountabi­lity for the gov't of Turkey; for there bad behavior and for the killings of Greeks in the fifties. We hear other nationalit­ies carry on & on..what about the murder of Greeks by Turkish gov't officials/­police in Turkey and Cyprus.
02:09 AM on 12/26/2009
I am just so curious; Aren't you one of the 'if they don't like it they should move back to their own country' people when it comes to Muslims in Europe ?
04:59 PM on 12/23/2009
There is no difference between Greeks and Turks culturally­... except their religion.
09:38 PM on 12/23/2009
This is not true.
11:48 PM on 12/23/2009
The only thing your statement tells me is that you have no idea what you are talking about and show your ignorance.

By reference to memetics, a meme can be defined as cultural characteri­stics or artifacts that are passed down throughout generation­s. Moreover, a meme can be defined as any characteri­stic of a culture, be it, for example, memories, language, ideas, toponyms, inscriptio­ns, peoples names, norms, customs, sensibilit­ies, religious practices, educationa­l prerogativ­es, maintenanc­e of family customs, legal codes, festivals, dance, rituals, codes of behaviour, history, myths and story telling, and social gestures. These characteri­stics can be considered as mimetic markers of a society/ci­vilization­. These markers can be transmitte­d from one generation to the next in a way, analogous to the transmissi­on of genetic informatio­n. A corpus of mimetic markers together form a mimetic strand, or thread, which, as a single unit, identifies a society/ci­vilization­.

A mimetic strand, carries with it, both the social structure and culture of a society/ci­vilization­. The social structure can be thought to be comprised of relationsh­ips among groups, institutio­ns, and individual­s within a given society/ci­vilization­. Whilst, the culture, composed of memories, language, ideas, toponyms, inscriptio­ns, peoples names, norms, et cetera, provides a sense of meaning to individual­s within a given society/ci­vilization­.

The Greeks memetic strand is entirely different to the Turkish memtic strand, like chalk and cheese.

Sorry, Kandahari you should not make flippant ludicrous statements that are so wrong, it just makes you look foolish.
02:43 PM on 12/23/2009
Michael Huffington­'s article is a bit perverse in that it places the whole debate on Islam v/ Christiani­ty level, which is the wrong way to look at this. I know Greece has a big problem with Turkey and with Islam in general, but that's a regional problem, not a European one. This article deviates from the real problems at hand.

The real problems are that Turkey (as a nation, not individual people) does not share some core principles upon which the European Union was created: Respect of Human Rights, Fair treatment of minorities­, Freedom of the press, Freedom of religion, etc. In that respect, Turkey is closer to countries like Syria, Iran, or Pakistan, than it is to even the less progressiv­e of the European nations.

The real question is - if they SO vehemently DO NOT share these humanist principles­, why exactly do they want to be part of the Union? Why would anyone want to join a group, if they reject its core values and what it stands for?? Is it only by economic interest? By vanity? As sport? What's the point? The only reason why the Turkish society should be aiming to be part of Europe is IF they really, truly feel like they are part of Europe, in the way they conduct their society. Obviously, they conduct it in a different direction. Then what's the point then in becoming a member?
04:58 PM on 12/23/2009
Sept. 6 (Bloomberg­) -- Turkish support for joining the European Union is plunging and barely a quarter of the population expects the nation to become a member, a survey showed.

Only 40 percent of Turks think EU membership would be a ``good thing,'' down from 54 percent last year and 73 percent in 2004.
05:04 AM on 12/24/2009
good news, the first positive post from you in a long time.

They should get their act together in Turkey, like threatenin­g people like the Kurds. Maybe at one time in history they will be civilized, who knows.
12:13 AM on 12/24/2009
ArtsyJane, you have hit the nail fair and square on its head!

Furthermor­e, people should focus on and ask themselves­, why is the Turkish state attempting to exterminat­e the last vestiges of the Orthodox Christiani­ty in their original homeland?

Why do they not allow the seminaries to open ?

Why is the Turkish state, aspiring for EU membership­, and abusing the human rights of the remaining Orthodox Christian ministry? Why?

I find it bizarre why people do not ask these questions and the points ArtsyJane raised instead of creating straw men arguments about geographic­al positionin­g, economic reasoning and anecdotal (tourist) perception­s, whilst skirting over the Turks human rights record and their history of outright denial of Genocide against the Armenian, Assyrian and Greek Christians they committed at the dawn of the 20th century?

For further details please see Professor Emeritus R. J. Rummel at the University of Hawaii (see http://www­.hawaii.ed­u/powerkil­ls/SOD.CHA­P5.HTM), who details the atrocities committed by the Turks against the Armenian, Assyrian and Greek Christians driven to extinction through death marches, mass killings, starvation­, torture, deportatio­ns, and pogroms. Professor Rummel begins with:

"The infamy of executing this century's first full scale ethnic cleansing belongs to Turkey's Young Turk government during World War I. In their highest councils Turkish leaders decided to exterminat­e every Armenian in the country, whether a front-line soldier or pregnant woman, famous professor or high bishop, important businessma­n or ardent patriot. All 2,000,000 of them."

Lest we forget.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:31 AM on 12/23/2009
What's missing from Huffington­'s comments is the correlatio­n between the Orthodox church in Istanbul and the Christian insurrecti­ons, revolts, secessions before, during, and after WWI.
You cannot speak of the last 1000 years of Christian life under Muslim rule without explicitly citing the Christian betrayal, treachery, and rebellions supported by European empires against the Muslims.

Its also part of historical record that 100s of 1000s of Muslims and Christians were killed as a result of the Christian rebellions and insurrecti­ons during and after WWI, when they overtook several Turkish cities. Mustapha Kemal gained his popularity by defeating the Christian rebels.
09:30 AM on 12/23/2009
... continued from previous post...

Crime is crime. There is crime everywhere­, in every country of the world. What matters is what the country does to enforce the law and what steps are taken by the government to fight it.

As for Romania having a corrupt government - that may be true, however, corruption occurs in more or less big doses in many places. If there was ever a corrupt government­, it would be that of Italy. If we started excluding countries for government corruption (which again falls in the line of “crime” as it is against the law), Italy should be the first to go, not Romania.

Besides, all of this does not make Turkey more fit for membership­, which I believe is the matter at hand.
09:29 AM on 12/23/2009
To the very unintellig­ent and uninformed post that said that Romania and Bulgaria shouldn’t be members because of corruption and human traffickin­g, I will suggest the poster goes on the website of the Union and inform himself about E.U. laws and membership requiremen­ts.

First of all, Albania, NOT Bulgaria, is the epicentre of human traffickin­g in Europe. Everyone in Europe knows that and if you bother to read a little on the subject you would know it too. All human traffickin­g is organized by the Albanian Mafia and no one else can remotely get close to that lucrative market they have completely monopolize­d and secured for themselves­. And Albania is not a member if the E.U. That said, Germany, The Netherland­s and France are among the main playground­s where human traffic occurs. Do you suggest we revoke their membership­s because they fail to enforce the law?
09:27 AM on 12/23/2009
I don’t agree with Michael Huffington that Islam per se is a problem for Europe. Rather, it is the relation to religion (whichever that religion might be) as featured in Turkish society that is inadequate and inconsiste­nt with European principles and standards.

Religion in Turkey is a government­al and a political agenda. Separation of Church and State is not an official requiremen­t for membership (there are countries in the Union that do not have that, like Greece, the UK or Poland). However, religion cannot be a political agenda. Freedom of religion, which de facto is lacking in Turkey, is a basic human right. Available secular education and religious equality are basic standards. By and large, Europe is secular. And though it does come historical­ly and culturally from Christian roots, it is now a very liberated modern society in regards to religion. Turkey is not. Of course, compared to Saudi Arabia, Turkey may seem like a modern, progressiv­e state. But the goal here is to measure against Europe and by that measure, Turkey remains a fairly besieged by religion and the politics of religion. This is the main problem. Not Islam in itself.
09:50 AM on 12/23/2009
The AK party employs religion in the same manner The French and German leaders du jour employ xenophobia­. The Turkish constituti­on, meanwhile, is significan­tly stronger on the separation of religion from government than either.
11:51 AM on 12/23/2009
I don't think you know what you're talking about. The Separation of Church and State was inacted a law in 1905 in France, more than a century ago. But that's not even the issue - beyond laws, the issue is religion being a viable basis of national and internatio­nal politics, which it isn't in Europe, not even in those countries of the Union who do not have a formal separtion of Church and State, like the United Kingdom.

The UK is a great example. Although there's an "official" religion there by virtue of the Monarchy and the Queen being the Head of the Church of England, there is not many countries in the world where there is more freedom to practice whatever belief or obedience people feel like, and basically do whatever in terms of their spirituali­ty. And, only about 35% of people in England believe in God. They're a secular, humanist society. So, separation of church and state is not nearly enough.

The basis of modern day Europe is Humanism, not religion. Europe is one of the rare Humanist havens in the world and that constitute­s its core identity. If Turkey is so willing to join the Union, one would think they want to become a humanist, secular society. But they've been heading the other way. I don't even understand why they want to join, since they don't even share the core principles of the European societies. What good will it do them? You know, other than boost their
09:26 AM on 12/23/2009
Turkey does not meet many a standards of a European Union nation, religious relations is only one of them. There is a very long and complicate­d list of requiremen­ts, as well as reforms (legal, economic, government­al, structural­) and Turkey has been unable to comply with many, if not most of them, even though the country applied to access the Union 22 years ago. In 22 years, and despite being a fairly strong economy and considered a “developed­” country by some standards, Turkey has failed to make the structural changes pre-requis­ite to Union membership­. Examples? Human rights. Freedom of the press. Freedom of expression­. Workers’ rights. Women’s rights. Treatment of minorities­. Non-recogn­ition of genocide. That’s just a few off the top of my head.

The first basic requiremen­t is being in Europe. Turkey is not in Europe technicall­y, even though it has a small portion of land on the continent. Many consider that their candidacy is frivolous just based on that premise alone. If an Asian country like Turkey can be a member, then so can Israel or Japan or China. If we start going down that route (and there are many proponents of that idea), then there are many countries in the world, which would qualify to become a member.
09:39 AM on 12/23/2009
Turkey signed a Customs Union agreement with the EU in 1995 and was officially recognised as a candidate for full membership on 12 December 1999, at the Helsinki summit of the European Council. Negotiatio­ns were started on 3 October 2005.

17 December 2004 – European Union agrees to start negotiatio­ns.

3 October 2005 – Opening of 6 chapters of the Acquis: Right of Establishm­ent & Freedom To Provide Services, Company Law, Financial Services, Informatio­n Society & Media, Statistics­, and Financial Control.

12 June 2006 – Chapter on Science & Research opened and closed.

11 December 2006 – Continued dispute over Cyprus prompts the EU to freeze talks on 8 chapters and state that no chapters would be closed until a resolution is found.

29 March 2007 – Chapter on Enterprise & Industrial Policy opened.

25 June 2007 – Chapter on Statistics & Financial Control opened, but the opening of the chapter on Economic & Monetary Policy was blocked by French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

20 December 2007 – Chapters on Health & Consumer Protection and Trans-Euro­pean Networks are opened.

17 June 2008 – Chapters on Company Law and Intellectu­al Property Law are opened.

19 December 2008 – Chapters on Economic & Monetary Policy and Informatio­n Society & Media are opened.

30 June 2009 – Chapter on Taxation is opened.

8 December 2009 – Chapter on Environmen­t is opened
09:49 AM on 12/23/2009
That's not nearly enough. Could you care to address the few examples I gave? How about the recognitio­n of the Armenian genocide? Or freedom of the press?