Here we go again...
As Politics Daily's Patricia Murphy reported the other day:
Newt Gingrich, the former House Speaker and perennial big thinker in the Republican party, said this morning that he will likely run for president in 2012 if he and his wife, Callista, assess the field of candidates in 2011 and feel "a requirement as citizens that we run."
Please. This is what Gingrich always does to keep his name out there, and to maintain his quasi-celebrity status on the national political scene, more with the national media than with the party leadership or base.
He's an attention whore, you see. Whenever he's not getting enough attention, he floats the "I may run for president" bullshit, knowing that the media will lap it up and put him back in the news.
And he doesn't mean it. Honestly, what the hell does "a requirement as citizens" mean? He won't run, and never will, for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that he knows he'd lose, badly. He likely wouldn't even make it out of the Republican primaries, where his pompous, self-absorbed windbaggery would put him at a disadvantage against his sucking-up-to-the extremist-base rivals. (Sure, he'd suck up, too, and he's surely an extremist of sorts, but it's hard to see Republican primary voters trusting him.)
He also knows full well that all the old dirt would come out, and a lot more we don't know about yet -- the truth about the character and conviction of Newt Gingrich -- and it's that, one suspects, that motivates any reluctance he might have to re-enter electoral politics, perhaps even more than the fear of losing. Here's what I wrote back in June in a post on his silly attack on "paganism":
I'm not sure Newt was being so Christian when he was getting blown by his various mistresses (but not, he claimed, committing adultery, because oral sex apparently doesn't count) -- or when he demanded a divorce from his first wife Jackie in her hospital room, where she was recovering from uterine cancer surgery -- or when he refused to pay alimony and child support after their divorce -- etc., etc., etc.
The fact is, Gingrich enjoys a certain status on the national scene. Simply put, he is respected. Some of us find that respect seriously misplaced -- and I wish we'd dispense with the "big thinker" label for a self-aggrandizing partisan who is "big" only relative to the smallness that rules the GOP -- but the media love him, and not just the right-wing kind. And he's not about to give that up by risking the truth coming out, which it would, nor by fighting it out in the GOP gutter only to lose, which he would.
So please. Enough. Do the media really not know when they're being used and abused and lied to? (Because, in this case, that's exactly what's going on.) No, alas, no, which means we're likely to get much more of all this nonsense whenever Gingrich wants some attention.
(Cross-posted from The Reaction.)
Follow Michael J.W. Stickings on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mjwstickings
Ted Johnson, Maegan Carberry, Teresa Valdez Klein: Twitter Wars 2: Return of the Progressives!
Today on the radio show, we've got Jim Gilliam, co-founder of Brave New Films and Chief Technology Officer of Business.com, who recently created Tweetprogress.us, a directory of progressive tweeters.
Stefan Deeran: Liberals Try to Counter Conservatives on Twitter
Conservatives are currently better connected than progressives on Twitter through their use of hashtags, a code users paste inside each tweet which tags posts that are relevant to specific audiences.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
"Do the media really not know when they're being used and abused and lied to?"
No Michael, as a rule the media don't. For clarification we could ask Dan Rather about it. And the legacy of WMD and a little situation in Iraq that resulted are further proof.
And the fact is, in the shambles that the MSM finds itself these days, from discredited evening news to newspapers like the once esteemed Washington Post morphed into a neocon propaganda newsletter - well the media are the Republicans best friend.
From what you so aptly call Newt's "windbaggery" to Palin's idiotic word salad and all GOP points in between, the media has trumpeted their nonsense as actual thought and positions, rather than the blast of hot air it is. At this point the GOP and the media have a sort of symbiotic relationship.
As an Obama voter, I NOW freely admit that "I made a huge mistake." He's not what I thought I was voting for. I'm now very worried that 3 more years of Obama will drastically hurt this country and Newt may well be the only person that can fix the damage that Obama, and the statist type people around him, are doing on a daily basis. Although I don't think Mr. Gingrich is a tough fighter, as far as politicking goes. He would much rather a whole lot of voters come to him and say "please run, and here's enough votes for you to win without having to run." I'm not sure that is going to happen this next cycle. I think after America's first black President, Americans are going to want a female President, and Palin fits that bill perfectly. And I think she could fix the damage from Obama and the libs. Although a Newt/Palin ticket would be a winner, too!
Yeah. Right. You were an Obama voter. And I can wrap my leg around my neck 3 times and tie it in a bow. lol
Wow! You really are taking it hard that S. Palin was a HUGE joke.
Oh well!
I fear the media really doesn't know it's being used! Balloon (or should we call him garage attic) boy proved that! I totally agree with your take on newt (sounds like some sort of salamander), he's been a very bad boy and that will catch up with him.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with