iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Kieschnick

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Kieschnick
 

Dirty Oil Lost Today But the Keystone XL War Goes On

Posted: 01/18/12 04:52 PM ET

The Keystone XL pipeline -- designed to bring filthy tar sands oil from Canada to refineries on the Gulf Coast of Texas so that oil companies can profit by selling the oil to China -- was dealt a severe setback today when President Obama said no to an election year blackmail threat by the American Petroleum Institute and its lackeys in Congress.

For those new to the story, this is the pipeline that House Republicans insisted get a quick up or down from the White House as their price for providing modest relief to unemployed Americans just before Christmas. It is also the pipeline whose chief sponsor thought that the normal corrupt ways of Washington would guarantee approval until an unlikely combination of environmentalists, ranchers and native peoples drew a rare line in the sand and would not budge.

After two years of increasing activism by CREDO members -- with over a million petitions, letters and calls and literally hundreds of our members arrested, President Obama today rejected the current route of the Keystone XL. This is outstanding news and cause for celebration.

However, President Obama went out of his way to invite the oil industry to consider another route rather than simply rejecting the catastrophic pipeline as wrong on the merits. The oil industry is relentless in its pursuit of a way to profitably extract the tar sands and sell it on the world market, and this invitation is akin to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Today's procedural no is a victory purely for the activists who forced the President to take responsibility and reject naked political threats from the oil industry. But rejecting this route on a technicality means the fight continues.

We take seriously the conclusion of the Administration's own chief scientist that full burning of the tar sands is "game over" for global warming. Conceding the fight on global warming is not an option.

I have personally been arrested in order to stop this pipeline, along with thousands of others. We -- all of us -- will step up each time the industry tries again, meeting the industry and all their special interest representatives in Congress blow by blow.

CREDO waged one of the single largest activism campaigns of any organization in the anti-Keystone XL movement, delivering 1,188,106 petition signatures and public comments to the White House, the State Department, the Environmental Protection Agency, House and Senate leadership, the Nebraska legislature, and TransCanada. CREDO members also made 36,360 calls to the White House, Obama for America, and House and Senate offices, organized a protest with more than 1,000 people outside of an Obama fundraiser in San Francisco, recruited hundreds of activists to attend public hearings along the proposed pipeline route, and submitted 156,615 public comments to the State Department as part of the formal hearing process on the project.

Clearly the White House has decided that in an election year caving to oil industry pressure and approving a pipeline to help a foreign oil company export dirty tar sands oil to China is not a winning strategy. What better villains in an election year than the owners of a leaky pipeline, incredibly profitable oil companies, and the insatiable Chinese economy?

We won this round. The fight continues.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 74
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Guy Incognito
Canadian. Sorry.
02:23 AM on 01/20/2012
Saying 'no' to the oil pipeline directly affects people right here in my hometown - people who would have built that pipeline.

Oil is not just about fuel for cars. About half of a barrel of oil is used to make gasoline...the rest makes things like:

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_products_made_from_oil

Pretty much any item containing plastics (from the bumpers on your 'electric' car to your TV, your hair dryer, the speakers in your stereo, the tools in scientific labs, or that cel phone you keep texting on while driving) is a petroleum based product. Good luck making any of those things without it.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
12:24 AM on 01/20/2012
If the war goes on, it does so on a bewildering number of fronts. The real war is against global warming and the trajectory to take the parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere down to a sustainable 350 PPM. (It is now at 392 PPM) Keystone XL would certainly place that goal permanently out of reach. But with so much drilling/mining/deforesting everywhere, and so little political will to promote alternative energy (and zero national discussion/leadership toward calm, scientific and social analysis of where we stand) it is hard to see what the next step might be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
10:26 PM on 01/19/2012
The absolute lack of understanding of economics is disheartening (at best) and scary (at worst).
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
12:14 PM on 01/19/2012
Tar chunks can be transported using the exact same infrastructure as coal, then processed like crude. There never was any need for the pipeline, but there is a need for the carbon fuel.

Some visitors came yesterday. They are (not were) setting up a pilot scale manufacturing facility that was intended to support the Keystone thing. They will complete building their facility this year using money already spent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
13champlain
It is all good....range rover all wood
12:08 PM on 01/19/2012
What a bunch of babble this blog is. The pipeline is "catastrophic"? A complete bunch of unfounded BS. The oil is not dirty, the author does not even bother to define dirty. As they say in science, this type of position is so ridiculous its not even wrong. Yet the spin cycle that controls our media and politics works because people are drones, and easily controlled by interest funded and dangerous groups like Credo. Of course ultimately our President followed the sage advice of someone who's credibility derives from her unrivaled ability to mimic mermaids. Thus 1000s of jobs are lost along with billions in investment, royalties and taxes dollars. The absurdity of that is our public discourse is a marvel.
11:21 AM on 01/19/2012
Radical green agenda wins out over jobs once again. Now Canada builds the pipeline to the coast and exports to china instead of U.S. This oil will be sold no matter what. So now countries with no enviromental standards use it and the net damage to the enviroment is much greater. Obama of course is not intelligent enough to understand things like that clearly. So now we have greater polution, less jobs, and more people dependent on govt. Our country cannot survive another 4 years of this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
10:16 AM on 01/19/2012
Black Swans, highly improbable energy innovations with huge implications, may drop the price of oil in the future so sharply that the pipeline will never be completed.

See Moving Beyond Oil at www.aesopinstitute.org and read about $50 per barrel diesel from sunlight, water, CO2 and bacteria.

The Introduction to that site outlines a mortal threat to humanity. Once widely understood, 24/7 development, validation and production of revolutionary replacements for fossil fuels can become an urgent priority.
07:24 AM on 01/19/2012
Winning a battle has nothing to do with winning the war. Many of us remember that in response to the 1973 energy crisis President Carter initiated a range of programs including subsidies for wind and solar power - even putting a solar hot water heater on the roof of the White House, only to have the programs completely dismantled by his dim-witted successor. Where would the US be in the field of renewable energy had it not been for Reagan's action?
What Obama has given he can easily take away after the election. For now he needs to throw a few crumbs to the progressives and the environmentalists to buy votes. But he won't need progressives, environmentalists, the unemployed or the poor after November.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:56 AM on 01/19/2012
China trashed its environment in order to gin out cheap crap for Walmart to sell in the US, why shouldn't the US now trash its environment? It's only fair.
photo
tector
My own opinion is enough for me...c. hitchens
12:58 AM on 01/19/2012
to all those pro pipeline types, i live in marshall michigan and we experienced an oil tar sand spill of over 850,000 galleons in july 2010 into the kalamazoo river and downstream for 35 miles which enbridge is still cleaning up with no end in sight. believe me this stuff isn't going away easily and lots of folks were displaced from their homes and property as a result. the press mostly overlooked it because it happened at the same time as the gulf oil spill. google marshall oil spill or kalamazoo river oil spill to be enlightened.

the keystone oil would still be foreign oil hence wouldn't lessen our dependence on foreign oil. this oil is not targeted for our use anyway and oil is usually sold to the highest bidder in the world anyway.

america seems not to need this oil anyway . check hp article on about 12/31/2011 about the fact that gas and other fuels are now our top export.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/31/united-states-gas-export_n_1177559.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hellova Stoner
I throw stones
09:49 AM on 01/19/2012
The fact that Boehner has invested in the pipeline seems to make a difference on what HE thinks should be done. Money Money Money. Who cares about the environment when you can make lots of money.
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
12:16 PM on 01/19/2012
The pipeline was always a boondoggle, the pipedream of greedy businessmen. The tar is a commodity material that doesn't benefit from a pipeline.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stupert
12:17 PM on 01/19/2012
Dude - you need oil to make gasoline and other fuels. That is why "refineries" exist.
11:55 PM on 01/18/2012
I just don't understand how anyone thinks that this pipeline decision affects the global production and consumption of oil in any way.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
12:34 AM on 01/20/2012
Since Keystone's supply of carbon was so large and virtually inexhaustible, stopping it certainly is an advantage, if only for the moment. The big question is what to do next. Jeremy Rifkin in "the Third Industrial Revolution" might have a key part of the solution. His thesis is that there are five complementary pillars to sustainable energy, and they must be erected altogether and used synergistically in order for transformation to clean energy can be achieved. It's beyond me just how much of the puzzle this could solve, although he sees Germany as the global exemplar of his approach...and Germany *is* impressive.

The real war is against global warming and the trajectory to take the parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere down to a sustainable 350 PPM. (It is now at 392 PPM) Keystone XL would certainly place that goal permanently out of reach. But with so much drilling/mining/deforesting everywhere, and so little political will to promote alternative energy (and zero national discussion/leadership toward calm, scientific and social analysis of where we stand) it is hard to see what the next step might be.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
11:41 PM on 01/18/2012
maybe this denial was part of bps deal.....no keystone, less competition for them.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:41 PM on 01/18/2012
Thanks for your great efforts and sacrifice. It's heartening to see the way that organizations like 350.org (which educated me on the issue) and an advocacy group like CREDO could work together synergistically, each focusing on what it does best. Now that the oil guys are in unprecedented retreat, it is the perfect moment to pursue them to the limit. When they recover and start coming after us we in turn must retreat. But not now!
photo
ausmth
All things merge into one and a river runs through
11:29 PM on 01/18/2012
The country needs the oil and needs the pipeline. Pipelines are the safest way to transport. Nothings perfect but pipelines are safer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lynda Groom
01:51 AM on 01/19/2012
The Keystone is an export pipeline. The Port Arthur, Texas, refiners at the end of its route are focused on expanding export to Europe and Latin America. Most of the fuel refined from the pipeline's heavy crude oil will never reach our gas tanks in this country.

Valero, the key customers of Keystone has explicity detailed an export strategy to its investors. Because Valero's Port Arthur refinery is in a Foreign Trade Zone, the company can carry out its strategy TAX-FREE. Valero has publically disclosed its business model relies on refining heavy sour crude for export. It's upgrading its Port Arthur refinery to process heavy sour into diesel fuel to ship to Latin American and Europe.

There are six companies that have jointly committed to purchase 76% of Keystone's capacity, most located in the Port Arthur free trade zone.

The pipe line is not needed. Since the project was announced, the oil industry acknowledges that higher fuel economy standards and slow economic growth mean declining U.S. oil demand, even as domestic production is booming.
photo
ausmth
All things merge into one and a river runs through
09:49 AM on 01/19/2012
As gas prices also boom! This oil will meet demand somewhere. It will increase supply. Increase supply and the price goes down. Oil is a commodity traded worldwide and increases in supply will impact price. The last I saw was that Ameicans worked in the refineries. Those are American jobs that will be saved and new hires to meet the expanded capacity. Build the pipeline!
07:26 AM on 01/19/2012
The issue is not so much the pipeline, but the environmental disaster it encourages. It is very difficult to imagine a dirtier way of obtaining energy than by mining tar sands.
photo
ausmth
All things merge into one and a river runs through
09:57 AM on 01/19/2012
You create an environmental disaster when you sit at your keyboard. You are using electricity created by coal, dams, or nukes or wind(kills birds).
11:24 AM on 01/19/2012
The risk of an enviromental disaster in shipping oil to China via ship and the open ocean is vastly higher than a pipeline spill. Obama has chose to send oil to a country that will create more pollution with it and the method to get it there is much more threatening to the enviroment. If you care about the enviroment. You build the pipeline.
charles77
Just the Facts Please
10:57 PM on 01/18/2012
" oil from Canada to refineries on the Gulf Coast of Texas so that oil companies can profit by selling the oil to China"

LOL!

At least use real facts, not the false "it's for China" bs.

America. Tankers can't go thru Panama Canal. Look at a map gesss. Anything exported to China would be from our west coast.
photo
bluedog24
< I'll vote Republican when...
08:15 AM on 01/19/2012
You have heard they are expanding the canal to handle larger ships? Since you want real facts
charles77
Just the Facts Please
10:31 AM on 01/19/2012
LOL!

There has been "talk" of doing that for thirty years. Who is "they", Panama? It will take decades IF yhey actually ever begin.