President Obama announced an executive order in the Wall Street Journal not long ago to revisit our regulatory agencies to make sure that they promote economic growth and other public values in the areas of safety, health, and the environment. The point was widely misunderstood as an attempt to cozy up with business.
Instead, the idea is for government agencies to stop coaching from the sidelines. Government must coalesce today's unruly combatants -- progressives and teapartiers, liberals and conservatives -- into a team. This means inspiring an appreciation among members of the team of the value that our combatants in other venues bring to the table.
Nonetheless, Thursday's release of preliminary progress in carrying forth this directive makes clear that much more work must be done. We can not cut our way to prosperity, be it regulations or taxes.
Our deficit isn't going anywhere any time soon. We must learn how to move away from a vision of shared sacrifice to one of shared prosperity. This means de-levering our public balance sheet while catalyzing much greater private investment into our real economy.
We will not grow our economy and produce the needed jobs if we continue to fight over slices of a shrinking pie. Enormous sums of private capital sit on the sidelines, or our recovery in the bank accounts of pension funds, Asian sovereign funds, petrodollar funds, equity funds, and hedge funds.
The most pressing challenge of regulatory reform is to modernize our federal agencies so that they can bring this money to bear on our enormous challenges. We face an astounding shortfall in nearly every area essential for an emerging economy, oil and gas, transportation, water, clean energy, metals and minerals, manufacturing, agriculture, etc.
Today, we would rather bicker amongst ourselves than find ways of working together as a team to open up the economy, and rapidly grow our pie. As a result, we find ourselves embracing a no-jobs in our back yard philosophy.
Yesterday, I released a Guide -- Partnership Projects: Government as Player/Coach -- for federal agencies and key stakeholders to understand the challenge faced as well as a nuts-and-bolts approach to moving forward, including the proposed bipartisan American Infrastructure Bank introduced by Senators Kerry (D-MA), Hutchison (R-TX), Graham (R-SC), and Warner (D-VA).
Jagadeesh Gokhale: Higher Taxes or Smaller Entitlements: What Should Voters Choose?
Bob Burnett: Libya: In America's National Interest?
Dan Solin: Mega-Deficits and Your Investment Portfolio
Deficit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CBO: U.S. budget deficit to hit $1.5 trillion - Politics - More ...
Astronomical Deficit Forces Downsizing of U.S. Telescope Projects ...
Pretty much all the private capital that did anything cool in my lifetime was applying and adapting the discoveries of publicly funded R
He goes on to say, "Enormous sums of private capital sit on the sidelines, in the bank accounts of pension funds, Asian sovereign funds, petrodollar funds, equity funds, and hedge funds." It sounds to me like he's suggesting we find a way to get that private capital in the game by promising the private investors some kind of return on those dollars. The public gets needed infrastructure improvements beyond what we would be able to afford with our taxpayer dollars and the investors see enough of a return to put their money into these investments rather than their other investment opportunities elsewhere. That would be the 'shared prosperity' part of the deal.
In his continued references to the "shrinking pie" and the deficit he is acknowledging the inability of taxpayer dollars to go the distance.
The big question is how to balance returns to private investors with public needs.