Why I've Decided to Support Barack Obama
Dear Arianna,
On March 15 of 2007, I wrote you a letter at your request based on our discussions about what qualities I think our next President should have. At that time, I told you that it was still too early in the race and that I still had a number of questions and that therefore it would take me some time to really look at the field and make up my mind. As you know, I have a number of people whom I consider friends in the race and I certainly didn't want to be disrespectful to any of them.
I also told you that I am only one vote and that I doubted that anybody really cared. Quite frankly, I was surprised at the reaction to my article that you published on the Huffington Post
In that article, I enumerated a number of criteria upon which I would make my decision as to what candidate I would support in the presidential elections. I wrote that while I have a number of personal reasons to support my friends, I would come to a conclusion after listening carefully to all the various parties, and that only then would I present my thoughts to you. I wrote that I would arrive at a decision that, while still bearing some emotional taint, would best represent my thoughts on who should be President.
My first criterion is trust. Trust is the basis of every relationship and clearly, the American people s trust and faith in our government have been eroded by the past seven years of the Bush/Cheney administration. There has been a distinct lack of independent thinking in the Judicial, Executive and Legislative branches of our government. I know about compromises, but some of this has gone beyond compromise.
Politics has become an ugly game. During the Clinton administration, America's image was that of a strong, confident and kind world leader. Today, that image has been deeply soiled both in the eyes of the world at large, and in those of our own citizens.
Since then, I have been looking for a leader who, above all, will lead by example and who is above politics and special interests. I have been looking for a leader who is smart enough to align him or herself with the majority of Americans, but willing to side with the minority if he or she believes that this is right for the future of our nation. I have been looking for a leader who is willing to compromise to get things done but does not let the polls decide the nature or strength of his or her beliefs. I have been looking for a leader that will practice the politics of inclusion and will help solve the many challenges that are facing us today and will best represent the next generation, who, after all, have everything at stake.
I have listened to the arguments that neither a woman nor a minority could get elected in this country. I have even heard the argument that some will not vote for such a person because they think others will not vote for them. These assertions I find to be ridiculous. If everybody thought that way, nobody would vote his or her conscience. The herd would decide. In my mind, American people are far too intelligent to decline to vote for a deserving candidate because of that candidate s gender, race or religion. Incidentally, I find the argument made against Mitt Romney, based on his religion, to be just as silly and unfair.
I am a legal immigrant whose parents went from Russia to China to Chile to finally reach the United States and thereby give me a chance to have a better life. I served six years in the US Army Reserve, went to college, have a successful career and have dedicated my life to being a good citizen. I have lived the American dream and that is the dream I want for our children and all children everywhere. I see that we are facing economic challenges and that the way in which we meet these challenges will have an immense impact on all the other trials we must face. It is not only about cutting taxes, it s about balancing our budget and living within our means. We cannot be a shopping mall for the rest of the world.
We cannot hope to improve our environment without making sacrifices. Our parents made sacrifices during World War II and the war in Vietnam. We owe them a willingness to do the same, especially when it comes to health care and social security. We need to provide for our children an educational system that is better than anywhere else in the world. We owe the less advantaged, the elderly and the sick the best of our efforts. We face a nuclear threat and the threat of terrorism. I believe it was Einstein who said that he did not know all the weapons that would be used in World War III, but he believed that World War IV would be fought with sticks and stones.
We have to live by what we preach. We are all God's children and I think it is naïve to think that one person could solve all of these problems. It is really up to all of us to shake off the politics of division and demand a change. We need more than 47% of the people to show up to the polls representing the other 53%. We live in a shrunken world in which everyone sees what everyone else is doing, as though we re all living in a glass house. The fact that this glass is breakable forces us to ask ourselves serious questions about the nature of humanity. We have all been sold a bill of goods, packed with lies and corruption, that highlights the differences between all of us. The future of our country and our world depends on our ability to start highlighting the similarities, the common ground upon which we can all stand. We need to be a part of the Global Community, not a self-proclaimed brothers keeper.
It is for all of these reasons that my vote will go to Barack Obama. His policy proposals are very close to those of his Democratic rivals with a few exceptions. He has flaws like all of us. Politics, however, like much else in life, is all about timing. That s what matters. It is about the face that represents our choice of leadership. That is why I supported John F. Kennedy, Gary Hart and Bill Clinton. They were the right candidates for their time. Senator Obama's journey is not unlike my own, though I am white, Jewish and have red hair. His face, in my view, best represents America an America that's willing to change. And yes, he's strong enough to take on military challenges.
Many people criticize Senator Obama based upon their perception that he's lacking in experience. In my view, it certainly seems that few people could hope to have as much experience as Vice President Cheney. It is less a matter of experience than one of judgment, I believe. There are a great many people around the world who believe that America has lost its moral compass. I believe that Senator Obama is the right choice to lead the next generation of Americans out of what appears to me to be a position of great peril. We need a leader who will follow his conscience at the helm of a nation of citizens who are not afraid to vote theirs. There are those in this world who will hate us no matter what we do, but following the compass of our consciences, we will have behind us the moral and legal justifications for our actions -- actions that for the first time in too long we can support together as a nation. America can once again lead the way to hope and human dignity for all.
In my view, the Obama Candidacy is about more than just an end to the war abroad. I'm not suggesting an immediate withdrawal of our troops from foreign soil. It is about an end to the war in America -- a cultural and religious war that eats at our nation's soul. Repairing America's image to the world is going to be one of the major challenges that this country will be facing. We are all immigrants, or the children of immigrants, who have come to this land looking for the American Dream. I believe that as the next President of the United States, Barack Obama can make this dream a reality.
Perhaps this will convince no one. But, now you have my opinion.
Warmest Regards,
Mike Medavoy
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
How can you honestly support Obama. He doesn't know from shinola. His arrogance is unbounded. This guy doesn't even show up to vote for cryin' out loud.
Pick somebody with experience - like Biden, Dodd, Richardson.
I would go with Obama over Clinton, but only because of her secretive nature and sleazy past.
I keep reading about this forced dichotomy between "judgment" and "experience" as if these two qualities are mutually exclusive. OK, so VP Cheney had all the experience but has not shown particularly responsible judgment. This does not imply that the next experienced person is liable to make similar errors in judgment.
But one thing we can be certain about - a person, who is lacking experience is more likely to make errors in judgment than a person who has all the requisite experience. In corporate America, responsibility and reward is directly proportional to relevant experience backed by sound judgment! And, so it must be with the presidency of the United States!
Also, let's not get carried away by oratorial eloquence that is not supported by demonstrable leadership - that is akin to "lots of sizzle and no steak!"
Our Consitution requires the President to have two things:
Be at least 35years old.
A natural born citizen.
What experience Washington have outside of the military?
What experience Lincoln have? What about JFK or Reagan.
If you don't support or want to vote for Obama, fine. But find another excuse.
Barak OBlah,Blah,Bama has proven himself to be all talk and little action.
In case you haven't heard, Mr. Medavoy, HE HAS A HABIT OF NOT SHOWING UP FOR CONTROVERSIAL SENATE VOTES, and I'm not talking about his days in the Illinois Sentate, when he at least showed up to vote "present".
As the MOST QUALIFIED CANDIDATE in this race, JOE BIDEN, said back in late January (and was unjustly vilified for): Barak Obama is ... clean and articulate
AND RAW AMTITIONT DOES NOT A LEADER MAKE.
(Ironically, the best thing I can say about Barak Obama as far as what I have seen him demonstrate (vs. just speechify about) was his defense of Senator Biden during the last debate, when the subject of that comment was again raised...O
I wonder, all of you who can't see past the media hype, how different this race would be if candidates like Senator BIDEN and Chris Dodd had gotten the same kind of media attention for their obviously superior records as Senator Biden's remark got back in January.
The media has been the tail wagging the dog.
Why on earth would any thinking person want to settle for only what the ass-end provides?
I'm just sayin...
Thank you, Sir Medavoy. Your words, written so so eloquently, have helped me in making my decision. I will vote for anyone but Obama.
I haven't decided on a candidate yet (other than knowing it WON'T be Hillary or Huckabee), but Barack Obama is the candidate whose message and conviction resonate for me. Thank you for an excellent and intelligent article, Michael Medavoy.
For such a long post, it doesn't really say very much about anything.
That Obama stated he will INCREASE Pentagon funding his first year was enough to indicate that he is as wasteful as his predecessors and just as militarily gung-ho. No thank you , please.
It is preferable to have a common sense leader for CHANGE like Dennis Kucinich.
Mr. Medavoy:
Thanks for your well reasoned article and thoughtful conclusion. In contrast, however, the tenor of far too many of the appended responses reflects a debilitating, "can't do, won't do, and won't even try" negativity, that seems to be largely fear-driven and much too pervasive.
I vividly recall the lock that the tobacco industry and its lobbiests had on Washington, up to about 20 years ago, despite the obvious public health concerns from tobacco use. After all, tobacco was popularly called 'King' and a major component of our economic growth. Then, to my astonishment and delight, even politicians began to respond to public demands for protection against the effects of tobaco smoking. Today, smoking in public places is banned, which, frankly, I never thought would happen. But, as you have stated, "Politics, however, like much else in life, is all about timing."
For those reasons, I share all of your views in this post and congratulate you for your bravery and honesty, in sharing them.
WintonyMay.
Blowing Smoke.
Michael Medavoy talks about his "feeling" and his "belief" that Obama will make a good president based on "what?"?
Medavoy talks about Obama plans to keep the troops in Iraq, for at least 5+ years,
Also keep them there to protect the military bases in Iraq which Bush have made premanent. Obama has advoided to vote on some issues which could political hurt him.
The Health plan Obama has stated he would "force" on all Americans to pay.
This shows you that the "wealthy" are just blowing smoke or they have not done the research to realize that Americans don't have health insurance because they do not have the "MONEY". They is due because of shipped out jobs, low wages and their need to pay for inflated prices in the last 7 years of food, shelter and transportantion to get to work and then, there is nothing left and their credit cards just keep getting larger while the corporate pocket book keeps growing and growing..
As a person who has been a lawyer for 30 years, my problem with Obama is his lack of experience as a trial lawyer. I am looking for a candidate who truly knows how to make war on the insurance industry. Obama simply does not have that experience.
Yes, he's a very bright man. He was an editor of the Harvard Law Review. But his campaign biography and his Wikipedia biography hide the name of the law firm for whom he worked during the first two years after he graduated from law school. If Obama was applying for a job with me, I would immediately discard his resume because of that omission. This omission from his resume would also trouble most other lawyers.
Two years after his mystery job, he worked for an inconsequential law firm for 3 years. He then became a lecturer (the lowest rank of law school teacher...
Obama is typical of many very bright people who come out of law school. He speaks well, and is well intentioned. However, he does not have the experience as an in the trenches lawyer who has learned what is necessary to make war on the insurance industry, let alone corporate America. Obama would have to rely on the advice of other more experienced people to guide him in the fight against the health insurance industry.
In leading battles, Army and Marine generals greatly benefit from what they've learned as they worked their way up through the ranks. Would any sane American want someone with less than 5 years experience leading an on the ground battle against our adversaries? Of course not.
Obama does not have the skills to be President at this time. Plain and simple.
Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clintons, Clintons.
No thanks.
Obama is terribly naive if he thinks the corporate special interests and their conservative Christian enablers who are running this country into the ground are going to suddenly decide to play nice. At any rate I predict he will fail in the primaries. Not because of racism but because of voters' fears of other people's racism come the general election. A sort of "meta-racism".
Clinton or Edwards experience will give us the same White House that Bush did. America wants truth for a change we can believe in! Obama 08!
Why are so many elite men turning their back on their workingclass brothers and sisters who have overwhelmingly backed John Edwards (and to a lesser extent, Hillary)?
What a load of privilege to think that we need someone to bring us together (per Joe Leiberman) instead of someone who will kick ass and fight for us! Isn't that what we blame Congress for--conciliating? I think it's way past time to support a candidate from the workinglclass who's for the workingclass--and would be a badly needed shot in the arm for the Democratic Party as well!
So, the Obama candidacy is being sold on the basis of spinelessness and niceness. Big deal. What we need is more partisanship, to repair the damage done by Bush, not more spineless movie executives weeping for a happy ending. It doesn't work.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
