More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Moore

Michael Moore

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Moore

This Tax Day, Make Them Pay

Posted: 04/15/11 04:01 PM ET

Do you wonder (like I do) what the tax accountants and executives are doing over at GE this weekend? Frantically rushing to fill out their IRS returns like the rest of us?

Hardly. They're taking the weekend off to throw themselves a big party and have a hearty laugh at all of us. It must really crack them up to see us like suckers scurrying around to make sure we report everything to Uncle Sam -- and even send him a check, if necessary.

The joke's on us, folks. GE and tons of other corporations will have a tax bill for 2010 of ZERO. GE had $14.2 billion in profits in 2010. Yet they will contribute NOTHING to the federal government while every last dime is soaked from us.

In the latest budget deal, our politicians could have tackled the deficit by stopping the flow of these ill-gotten billions to corporations. Instead they cut billions from "wasteful" programs that do "wasteful" things, like create new jobs, drive economic growth, and help the needy and our nation's children. It's democracy in reverse and it sickens me.

GE spends $20 million a year to lobby Congress to throw themselves this party. But do you know what speaks louder than $20 million? 20 million votes! 20 million people, and more, standing together and taking to the streets. That starts now, with you.

This coming Monday, April 18th, is Tax Day -- and that's the day when "we the people" will demand our country back from these corporations in events all across the country. You can find the nearest event to you here.

MoveOn members -- along with union, community, and environmental allies -- will gather outside the headquarters and local offices of the biggest corporate tax dodgers to deliver tax bills from the American people. And we'll demand that our leaders make these corporate deadbeats pay.

We're doing this because we don't buy into the Big Lie: that greedy teachers caused the crash on Wall Street! That the selfish firefighters sent millions of jobs overseas! That pregnant woman, infants, and children are sending us into deficit!

No, it was the big corporations that did this. It was the CEOs and the top 1 percent of the country. THEY brought on the mortgage crisis. THEY made off with trillions of dollars from our economy. THEY are systematically destroying the middle class. And THEY have bought and sold the very people elected to represent us!

On Monday, we will have something to say to Exxon, Chevron, and the big banks that crashed our economy and got billions in bailouts, like Citigroup and Bank of America, who pay little or no federal income tax. In fact, the IRS will likely give them a tax REBATE. If that doesn't boggle your mind then nothing will.

The Tax Day events are about sending this message: We are coming after you, we are stopping you, and we are going to return the money, jobs, and homes you stole from the people. This is your tipping point, Corporate America. And I, for one, am glad it's going to happen this Monday.

If you've never been to an event like this before, this is the time. And don't go alone, because none of us can win this fight by ourselves. Plus, it's more fun and exciting to go along with friends and family to be part of real democracy in action -- not the store-bought kind Big Business gets on Capitol Hill.

I really hope you can make it. This is our chance, my friends. Take the time on Monday to make your voice heard. I can guarantee you I will. Please join me.

P.S. In case you missed this story in yesterday's New York Times: "In Financial Crisis, No Prosecution of Top Figures." It exposes how the leaders in both parties made sure no one on Wall Street was going to jail after the collapse of 2008.

 

Follow Michael Moore on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MMFlint

Do you wonder (like I do) what the tax accountants and executives are doing over at GE this weekend? Frantically rushing to fill out their IRS returns like the rest of us? Hardly. They're taking the w...
Do you wonder (like I do) what the tax accountants and executives are doing over at GE this weekend? Frantically rushing to fill out their IRS returns like the rest of us? Hardly. They're taking the w...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 607
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
06:44 PM on 04/18/2011
For some twisted reason people have been calling Paul Ryan's ( pro-ruling) class agenda brave.That is the agenda based on giveaway's to the wealth hoarder's and destroyer's whilst kicking the working and middle class.Wow this is what passes for bravery these day's..i'm so pleased that the World War Two allies didn't show that type of bravery in the face of the armies of tyranny and oppression.What Ryan and his ilk do is akin to forming a gang .picking up a baseball bat and repeatedly smashing it into the face of an old person unlucky enough to be in need of support from society .How much longer are the mass of people going to subsidise the activities of the greedy few ..those greedy few whose whole parasitical existence is objectively shown to be value negative.Would you pay someone to steal your belongings ?well actually you already do..as do I..a hard working Brit,whose standard of living here has been severely cut in order that the corporate clique can continue to enrich themselves and carry on screwing up the world.The world needs democracy as never before and if you think our interconnected economies are run along democratic ,fair and just lines then you are either a Koch or have been the victim of a scam..Personally I would demand my money back..personally I think we should all be asking for our money back.
photo
Vicki MeltonMiller
Graduate Student
12:47 AM on 04/30/2011
As usual, you make a number of excellent points, using an impressive combination of logic, common sense, and eloquence. Ryan and other Republicans want to cut Medicare benefits and other social programs while giving tax breaks to large corporations and the extremely wealthy. How fortunate that we have you, and others like you, with the intelligence and analytical ability to identify the inconsistencies and true motivations behind the conservative agenda, both in the U.S. and the U.K.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
honky1234
Choose wisely
06:39 PM on 04/18/2011
The national debt is increasing at a rate of $55,000 per second.

End corporate welfare.
11:03 PM on 04/18/2011
End government rip-offs.
12:22 PM on 04/18/2011
I agree with Mike Moore about who's making off with all the $$$ in this country...but he forgot to mention Union Bosses. They are crooks as well.
12:51 PM on 04/18/2011
In what way?
03:35 PM on 04/18/2011
Right, get rid of the unions so the Democrats lose a lot of campaign donations.
05:18 PM on 04/18/2011
That was too easy!
12:13 PM on 04/18/2011
What most people do not realize is these corporations that don't pay their fair share......don't pay their fair share of taxes on PROFITS. This is leftover money after all the expensies have been paid. Back in the 60s when companies paid 50% in taxes, rather than give that money to the government in taxes, they would use all of their profits by investing in the company. That way they didn't pay taxes on it, and their company grew due to investments. Which created jobs. Now that the tax percentage is so low, they would rather pocket the money instead of re invest. That's why there are no jobs. If they cranked up the tax rate, these companies would rather invest it than lose it in tax payments. That would create more jobs.
01:06 PM on 04/18/2011
What "progressives" totally ignore is that THEY brought in the progressive income tax with its myriad loopholes and appurtenant cronyism, courtesy of Woodrow Wilson and the 16th amendment.

And what "progressives" NEVER own up to is THEY LOVE CRONYISM, IE government manipulation in everybody's face, SO LONG AS THEY RUN THE GOVERNMENT, AND GET THE RESULTS THEY WANT!

And what "progressives" NEVER realize is that, if they're NOT in charge of the government, they cannot get the outcomes they so desperately insist on.

And finally, what "progressives" TOTALLY ignore in their quest for earthly nirvana is COMPETING IN THE OPEN MARKETS, letting us all make choices for OURSELVES, they offer their own menu without cramming it down our throats!

Were "progressives" in the latter mindset, they would ELIMINATE the income tax and all its IRS-enforced crony loopholes; and go for a CONSUMPTION TAX, a national sales tax; tax people when they SPEND, let 'em earn as much as they can and want (say, wouldn't that unleash GROWTH, the main component for raising government revenues, since historically revenues are around 18-20% of GDP REGARDLESS of tax policy?), have a "prebate" given by the government to EVERYBODY annually that equals the national poverty level, so the poor pay NO TAXES, or very little, compared to the evil rich.

Now, doesn't that, or something like it, make sense??
04:14 PM on 04/18/2011
IT' CALLED DICTATORSHIP AND BRAIN-WASHING !










1
12:10 PM on 04/18/2011
Corporate tax returns are due on March 15, not April 15th.
10:41 AM on 04/18/2011
The US needs publically financed election campaigns and time limits set on campaigning. Large campaign contributions are basically legal bribes. Time limits such as 90 days before election day would limit the cost of campaigns, relieve citizens of all the hyperbole and allow our elected officials to spend the time actually working on what they are paid to do rather than campaigning and fundraising.

Lobbying is useful in that it provides elected officials with information that they woud not otherwise receive. It is truly amazing how little some of our elected officials know about some of the issues that they vote on and promote.
03:07 PM on 04/18/2011
But you miss the point, so long as the tax code remains in the hands of the politicians they will be lobbied to change it to benefit some special interest. term limits and other election gimmicks will not change this. If a corrupt person runs for office and knows they can't do it again soon they will do everything they can from day one to take advantage. Term limits and lobby controls will only accelerate the corruption.

Instead lets make this change - any company that receives a contract of any kind from city, state and federal government must pay 90% of all gross profit in taxes. Eliminate the carrot and the hogs will go elsehwere.
02:38 AM on 04/18/2011
"Progressive" tools like Michael Moore make us ALL pay, in taxes and dumbed down opportunities, with a government on steriods in our face all the time.
07:52 AM on 04/18/2011
A true Senator Kyl Comment Philclock.
12:55 PM on 04/18/2011
That's fine, but what say YOU??

Evidence for my argument is all over the place, agree??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bagelmaven
11:06 PM on 04/17/2011
Michael for president!! Love Michael. He is 100% correct in everything he says.
09:09 AM on 04/18/2011
I'm with you. I would love Moore to run for President. A guaranteed win for a Republican.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bagelmaven
09:16 AM on 04/18/2011
OF COURSE I jest....really I would LOVE Trump to run or better Bachmann a guaranteed win for a Democrat!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
thinklib
I will not mince words.
10:50 PM on 04/17/2011
Mr. Moore-

Why is it that Democrats are the ones against tax reform?

Every time a Republican floats the idea of a flat tax or a fair tax (both of which would eliminate loopholes), it's Democrats who kill it before it even gets started.

You know what? I'll answer the question for you. The Democrats are against tax reform for two reasons. 1) as it is, the tax code allows them to demonize "the rich" and get people emotionally riled up to vote for them. If there was a flat tax or fair tax, Democrats couldn't use the tax code as a political wedge. 2) as Howard Dean admitted, Democrats are in the pocket of lawyers. That includes tax lawyers. Democrats don't want to reform the tax code because it will eliminate the jobs of some of their biggest and most consistent donors.
06:27 AM on 04/18/2011
Democrats are not against tax reform, just what it always comes down to. Republican don't want to pay any taxes and so the use tax reform to gut revenue and by extension certain programs.

Tax reform should not always mean lowering taxes.

A Flat tax does not impact ever tax payer the same; so even though the number is the same it is not equal.
04:33 PM on 04/18/2011
EVERY ONE SHOULD PAY TAXES. IN A DEMCRACY, THERE ARE NO PRIVILAGES. ACCORDING TO OUR CONSTITUTION WE ARE ALL EQUAL. THE PROOF OUR LABOUR ARE SACRED TO OUR EFFORTS. BUT THE RESULTS OF THIEVERY SHOULD BE TAXED TWICE AS MUCH NOT LESS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mheister
Raconteur. Blog michaelheister.com
11:24 AM on 04/18/2011
Because a flat tax or a "fair" tax is anything but. Progressive taxation is actually fairer because it better takes into account ability to pay, which is derived from the benefits received from the society we all contribute to.
04:41 PM on 04/18/2011
SOCIETY DOESN'T CARE ABOUT THE LESS EMPLOYED NOR WHETHER THEY'RE HOMELESS HUNGRY. THIS IS WORSE THAN THE ME GENERATION. WE ARE NOW THE MOST SELFISH, AND HYPOCRITS. RESPECT SENIORS. WE SEEN MORE THAN YOU COUNLD EVEN IMAGINE. IT TAKES TOGETHERNESS TO SAVE OUR ECONOMY AND OUR BEAUTIFUL COUNTRY.
09:47 PM on 04/17/2011
According to the Forbes 400, America has 400 billionaires with a combined net worth of $1.3 trillion. Congress could confiscate their stocks and bonds, and force them to sell their businesses, yachts, airplanes, mansions and jewelry. The problem is that after fleecing the rich of their income and net worth, and the Fortune 500 corporations of their profits, it would only get us to mid-August.The fact of the matter is there are not enough rich people to come anywhere close to satisfying Congress' voracious spending appetite. They're going to have to go after the non-rich.
But let's stick with the rich and ask a few questions. Politicians, news media people and leftists in general entertain what economists call a zero-elasticity view of the world. That's just fancy economic jargon for a view that government can impose a tax and people will behave after the tax just as they behaved before the tax, and the only change is more government revenue. From Walter Williams. "Tax the rich good luck with that"
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:34 PM on 04/17/2011
Nice try. taxing income including capital gains at 50% would solve our budget problems in 10 years.
11:07 PM on 04/17/2011
Your numbers to back that up please.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
05:08 AM on 04/18/2011
Yes, that's called killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. That's why nobody's suggesting the we confiscate their stocks and bonds and force them to liquidate their wealth. That would be foolish, as it would destroy their wealth-creating ability. That's why the idea is just to tax them.
09:43 PM on 04/17/2011
This year, Congress will spend $3.7 trillion dollars. That turns out to be about $10 billion per day. Can we prey upon the rich to cough up the money?
According to IRS statistics, roughly 2% of U.S. households have an income of $250,000 and above. By the way, $250,000 per year hardly qualifies one as being rich. It's not even yacht and Learjet money.
All told, households earning $250,000 and above account for 25%, or $1.97 trillion, of the nearly $8 trillion of total household income. If Congress imposed a 100% tax, taking all earnings above $250,000 per year, it would yield the princely sum of $1.4 trillion. That would keep the government running for 141 days, but there's a problem because there are 224 days left in the year.How about corporate profits to fill the gap? Fortune 500 companies earn nearly $400 billion in profits. Since leftists think profits are little less than theft and greed, Congress might confiscate these ill-gotten gains so that they can be returned to their rightful owners.
Taking corporate profits would keep the government running for another 40 days, but that along with confiscating all income above $250,000 would only get us to the end of June. Congress must search elsewhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FreedomFreedomFreedom
07:30 AM on 04/18/2011
It's the disparity in income and the fact that the top 10% are not paying their share of income taxes that is the most damaging to the American society. While the top 1% had a 27% increase in their income in the 2001-2007 time frame, the bottom 90% had a 3% increase. Additionally, the attack on the middle class and poor by the government, both parties are attempting to solve the countries deficits by soaking every last penny out of these 2 classes, while one party publicly declares they will not raise taxes on the financial elite and the other just doesn't raise them, As a matter of fact the "Path to Poverty" GOP budget proposal wants to lower the top tax rate by to 25%, another 10% drop. And hidden in this poverty budget are a slew of policies that will effectively raise taxes on the lower 95% of Americans. With the bulk of the increase being taken from the lower 50%. America's poor and middle class are under attack by their own government and unless something is down soon our country will be plunged into a depression that will destroy us. The financial elite, as usual, are attempting to gain as much short-term profits as possible, while sentencing the near and far future of America to ruin. Raising taxes creates jobs, history proves this. History also proves the opposite.
07:37 AM on 04/18/2011
Do you "proud" republicans remember how Bill Clinton balanced the budget?
Along with maintaining modest tax increases, begun by Bush Sr., he also passed a 'regressive' tax increase. He added a small tax to every gallon of gasoline. Democrats were not happy about this, knowing that commuters and working poor were making up a large percentage of this tax base. But it helped our budget. And what did Republicans do after that? We didn't revoke the increase; it didn't stop - Instead we gave $400 billion of it to the super rich. So now we are all chipping in an extra couple cents per gallon of gas ...to give to the wealthy.

Return the tax rates to that of the 1950s.
And reduce the military budget to what Eisenhower would have been comfortable with.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:32 AM on 04/18/2011
And then he relaxed CAFE standard and created the SUV loophole. Clinton also vetoed the welfare to work bill twice before it passed in a override that he could take credit for.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seriouslyfalling
11:21 AM on 04/18/2011
Bill Clinton did not really balance the budget. Nor did he have huge budget surpluses. He DID lower the budget deficit, mostly because the dot com bubble brought in inexpected revenue. There is an excellent article explaining this if you are really interested in the truth.

http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16


And something we always seem to forget as we romanticize the Clinton era...it went out with a recession due to high tax rates and the bursting of the dot.com bubble! Bush lowered tax rates and the worst of the Clinton recession was averted.
09:24 PM on 04/17/2011
I blame Congress acting to resolve a 12.5% default rate on sub prime loans when the calculated default rate for them was 20%. Normal loans are 10% calculated default rate.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:36 PM on 04/17/2011
Blame them for deregulating swaps and killing glass stegal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:34 AM on 04/18/2011
That would be Robert Rubin, Goldman Sacks before he became treasurer, and then left to combine Chemical Bank into the first mega bank/investment firm (CITI)....and he is a DEMOCRAT...hell he even took Ken Lay's call and tried to help him out.

Heckuva job there Rubin
09:23 PM on 04/17/2011
This is the outcome when the GOP convinces the American people that taxes are an ill to society. Next thing you know you have corporations generating insane profits without a dime going to the land that enabled them to be so successful. It all goes back to McCain Feingold; if corporate lobbying interests could be curbed, the American citizenry may be able to take back the machinery of government...but not until then I suppose.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:36 PM on 04/17/2011
Worse, The republic is the enemy and corporatism is our god!
07:24 PM on 04/17/2011
I've got a proposal that both sides could possibly agree to:

Cut the Corporate base tax rate to somewhere between 20-25% (this is the sop to the Conservatives) Create a Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax of 5% of Profits. This would mean GE (for example) would pay $730 Million on their $14.6 Billion profits,

Would like to see a CBO score on this.This'll be great for small businesses.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:38 PM on 04/17/2011
Lowest taxes on the rich since before the great depression, figure it out. really. Raise taxes on corporations, you think BP deserves NOT to be taxed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jf1936
04:03 AM on 04/18/2011
genius you'll never get more taxes out of corporations. Why, after decades of living proof, do you not comprehend that a tax increase on ANY business merely means a higher price to the end user?

Do you not comprehend human behavior? If you are BP and the government tries to take an extra 100 million in taxes from you, are you simply going to go to share holders and say "Gee, I'll guess we'll make 100 million less this year." ?? NO you are going to say "that's nice, now gasoline is 4.75 a gallon instead of 4.65"

Get a clue dude! You are living in a dream world! The government will NEVER attain more than 18% GDP. Even when Eisenhower taxed top income earners are 90% the government couldn't breach the 20% of GDP revenue mark, because people are not going to sit back and let the government take their money. It never has worked that way and never will. That's why liberals are musicians and artists and Republicans are business people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seriouslyfalling
11:32 AM on 04/18/2011
Who do you think pays the taxes that government puts on businesses, large and small? The consumer. Businesses do not just take a massive tax hit by writing a larger check to the government. They raise prices, cut size of their product, use cheaper ingredients, cut benefits, cut jobs, cut wages and expect more productivity. Our government MUST cut spending...and until they have cut THEIR expenses, waste, fraud, overruns, etc. to the bone...not one more dime should be demanded of hard working Americans. The Ryan plan is a good start, but it is only a start.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtx47
05:58 PM on 04/17/2011
DevonTexas: In a supply and demand ecomony, if the people stop purchasing­, the gov't needs to make up the difference­. If they don't we have a Great Depression­. Hoover could have avoided the Great Depression of made it less dignifican­t it he would have increased gov't spending at the start of 1930. He didn't and we had the Great Depression­.
---------------

The "Supply and Demand Economy" appears to have served us well. But has it?

Over the last few decades we've accumulated annual federal budget deficit (1.6 Trillion), and a total federal debt (15.5 Trillion), State and Local debt 3.5 Trillion, and federal govt's unfunded pension obligations (3.5 T) which includes 2.6 Trillion owed to Social Security Trust fund.

Additionally, there's corporate debt and personal debt which alone is 13.4 Trillion. Dollar costs does not factor human (individual/ family) and social cost of buy, borrow and spend. We are like a dog running around a lamp-post trying to catch its tail.

To a stranger, this picture would be asenine. For many the above is a larger version of "Ownership Society" which permitted Americans to own a home on borrowed capital and use the same home to borrow even more. As we know, this collapsed like a 'house of cards' have an estimated 3 Trillion dollar cost both here and abroad.

The "Supply and Demand" is not sound economy. It's a "bubble economy" only sustained (if one can use that term) by "boom and bust cycles."
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
06:22 PM on 04/17/2011
Agreed!
09:52 PM on 04/17/2011
We have the demand, but we have to ship in the supply, but if we had the supply also, well our economy would be alot better,