Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.
Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.
We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.
So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:
- Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."
- The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."
- Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."
- Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch."
- Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."
- Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."
And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!
WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets.
I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.
But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?
But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.)
Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?
Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.
Instead, secrets killed them.
For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his release today.
Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.
And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period.
I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.
P.S. You can read the statement I filed today in the London court here.
P.P.S. If you're reading this in London, please go support Julian Assange and WikiLeaks at a demonstration at 1 PM today, Tuesday the 14th, in front of the Westminster court.
Follow Michael Moore on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MMFlint
Julian Assange - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Julian Assange : Pictures, Videos, Breaking News
Julian Assange | Media | guardian.co.uk
Julian Assange: Latest News, Videos, Photos
Assange says he will be 'true to his ideals' as he appears in court
Intellectual life of WikiLeaks chief
Time readers select Assange as 'Person of The Year'
Frankly, I've already seen enough rich white men protecting fellow rich white men from rape prosecutions for political reasons. Never thought I'd see Moore maligning a survivor of rape for knowing her assailant, having a drink, or staying in an abusive relationship with her rapist, or whatever the latest derailment tactic is (the Knepperton* Post's official position seems to be that surviving rape is some sort of winner-take-all "suffering Olympics" and survivors of acquaintance rape don't make the cut).
The enemy of my enemy is not my friend, and that's Moore's argument. Everyone deserves his/her day in court, and Assange will get his, in a court that doesn't have much invested in the leaks (which, incidentally, the "strange" allegations PREDATE), but anyone rich enough to elude prosecution (for BEING A GODDAMNED SERIAL RAPIST, lest we forget) by GOING TO ANOTHER COUNTRY where he OWNS ANOTHER HOUSE doesn't need anyone to post his bail.
I now only have three words for Moore: Go. To. Hell.
*look Knepper up yourself. I challenge this paper to include an actual acquaintance-rape survivor voice in this discussion for once. Maybe someone to whom it isn't so abstract won't see it as a little foible one is prepared to overlook.
http://www.healthmantra.co.uk/detox_cleanse/madal_bal_natural_tree_syrup_lemon_detox_diet_1_ltr_cayenne
Madal BAL Natural tree syrup
And as for "I once worked at a rape crisis center, but..." it seems to be the new "some of my best friends are ____, but..." It certainly is in the cases of the last couple of Knepper Post columns I've seen on this.
I applaude your idealism, but there's no such thing as openess and transparency where state policy is concerned. That's at least what I learned in school.
So now, when I see Assange being held up as some sort of hero - I just can't help but to get all real on the whole situation. He poses no threat. His site poses no threat.
As I have said on my own blog: "no matter how brave and sexy this Julian Assange is looking to young anarchists and disillusioned state proponents, the truth is that he would have been done with months ago had he really passed his place."
That's kind of what realpolitik is all about...
~Addis
http://www.thoughtiswack.com/
Secondly as far as Assange's rape is concerned, anybody with a small sense of discretion can judge that all this is a concocted case. Both these ladies are ambitious and hoped that he will marry them. When they discovered that he is liasing with two of them, they felt that he is not serious and led them to connive to frame him up. Who knows, both of them may be instigated or paid to do so?
This is a case of immorality on these women. Why should Assange be implicated for nothing? This incidence took place in the early August 2010 and the rape is charged now. Just a laughable story.
God bless
Dr. O. P. Sudrania
This has nothing to do with him wanting to improve America and make her stronger and everything thing to do with his hate of free people everywhere.
If you want to hurt America you know you can count on moore and his ilk to come to your aid.
Reguardless of your feelings on wikileaks, (which most true Americans agree about the importance of a free press after so long without a voice in the media) please look to the motives of the actual people that are involved and what they stand for, hint: it is not a more free, stronger America.
In my opinion, MIchael Moore is a great AND REAL American. Whatever the hell that means. Anyway, he's a good guy who, like so many of us, is tired of all the lies and BS being constantly perpetrated upon us. How is his advocacy for truth and transparency hurting America -- or anyone, except for liars and secret-keepers?
As opposed to lies used to start wars, which drain our financial resources?
I don't get the idea that he supports Free Speech or Transparency. The instant he lost support from Amazon or Visa etc, he had his supporters attack them and shut them down! How is that Free Speech? Or is Free Speech only for him and those who think like him? I guess I'm just too old for the 21st century, which seems to me a disaster in the making.
you guys have been in charge the whole time, does "you reap what you sow" only apply to other people?
As for ordering the attacks, where's your evidence? How did he coordinate this from jail?
I look forward to the revelations on Bank of America, and hope he has lots of backup copies spread around the world.