Huffpost WorldPost
Michael Nevradakis Headshot

Chaos, Hypocrisy and the Greek Elections

Posted: Updated:

Chaos. This Greek word aptly describes the climate surrounding Greece over the past several weeks, at least if the Greek and international media are to be believed. In the weeks leading up to the parliamentary elections of May 6, and the upcoming elections of June 17, the climate that has been cultivated by the media has been one of polarization and fear. Unelected bureaucrats from the European Union and politicians from Germany, France and elsewhere have repeatedly issued stern warnings about the cataclysm that will follow if Greek voters do not elect the "right" parties. Meanwhile, Greek television has featured an endless parade of candidates appearing on talk shows and in unofficial debates, while commentators continuously warn voters of the consequences of not making the correct choice on June 17.

2012-06-17-IMG_3206.JPG




2012-06-17-IMG_3208.JPG

Shuttered businesses, such as this storefront in Thessaloniki, have appeared throughout Greece over the past two years, as the economic austerity policies imposed on Greece have led to reduced incomes, increased unemployment, and much less consumer spending.


This polarized climate was exemplified by the now-infamous incident involving Ilias Kasidiaris, a member of the far-right Golden Dawn political party, who slapped longtime Communist Party MP Liana Kanelli on live television. This is but one example of the polarization seen in Greece, however. Since the elections of May 6th, campaign dialogue has consisted of a number of odious "either-or" scenarios for Greek voters, such as a choice between the Euro and the drachma, between Greece remaining in the E.U. or abandoning Europe, and between austerity and an alternate path forward for the country. With most of the major media outlets in Greece being openly pro-memorandum, this has resulted in skewed coverage that has sought to manipulate public opinion. An example of this was seen in the reporting of the results of a poll that found that 88 percent of respondents were in favor of Greece remaining within the Eurozone. What the media conveniently ignored was that 54 percent of respondents supported retaining the Euro only under favorable terms. International media outlets have brazenly followed suit, with the Financial Times recently calling for Greek voters to elect the pro-memorandum New Democracy party, instead of the left-wing Syriza political party. Foreign politicians also have not resisted the temptation to intervene: President Obama recently called on Greece to "meet its obligations," ignoring his own numerous broken campaign promises.

2012-06-17-IMG_3589.JPG




2012-06-17-IMG_3590.JPG

In the days and weeks leading up to the June 17 election, campaign posters from multiple parties have appeared on bus stops, walls, and lampposts all throughout Greece.

While Greek voters are being terrorized about the choice that they are to make on Sunday and criticized for not electing a "pro-Europe" party outright on May 6th, Greek political parties were admonished by international commentators for not forming a unity government. This ignores the fact that these same "pro-Europe" political parties are the ones which helped lead the country to its present state. It overlooks the fact that last year, Belgium set a record for most consecutive days (535) without a government. It ignores the fact that an unelected government led by former banker Mario Monti remains in power in Italy, and it ignores the problems that we have faced in the United States, such as in 2000 -- when it took months of recounts and a Supreme Court decision in order for the loser to be named the winner of the presidential elections.

2012-06-17-IMG_3588.JPG

A Syriza campaign booth in central Athens.

Lost within the cacophony of voices that are chastising Greece and its voters, is the will of the Greek people, and the significance of the choices that they have already made. In October 2009, the two longstanding political powers, PASOK and New Democracy, received 77.4 percent of the vote. On May 6th, that percentage nosedived to 32 percent, shattering the two-party system and discrediting most pre-election polls. While commentators claimed that Greek voters sent a signal in favor of "unity" across the political spectrum, in my opinion, the message was clear: Greek voters want change. Greek voters are tired of the scaremongering, tired of being portrayed as the poster-child for the ills of Europe and tired of the broken promises made by the "major" parties. They are tired of the promises that were made by the EU and IMF that the austerity measures would bring growth in 2012... or 2013... or perhaps in 2015, or that the measures would not affect the poorest members of society, as the IMF's Poul Tomsen claimed in an interview with Greek newspaper Kathimerini in May 2010. And while many Greek voters may desire political unity, such unity is undesirable if it means continuing the failed policies that have led to sharp reductions in salaries and pensions and skyrocketing taxes and unemployment.

On June 17, the Greek voters will make perhaps the most important decision in the country's history, and while they are being warned about the chaos that will follow if they do not vote in the "proper" manner, the true chaos has already occurred: with the wholesale destruction of an entire economy, with the democratic deficit of the European Union becoming openly evident, and with the less-than-veiled efforts to instill fear in voters. It is this chaos that Greek voters will have an opportunity to end on June 17.