More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Pina

Michael Pina

Posted: November 12, 2009 03:32 AM

What Do Jordan's Bulls Have in Common With Garnett's Celtics?

What's Your Reaction?

Remember when Michael, Scottie, Dennis and Phil ran through the league like the bulls (no pun intended) in Pamplona? It was the 1995-96 season and there was simply no competition. No other team could so much as lay a penny down on their tracks to derail this once in a lifetime runaway train.

Besides the obvious fact that they had a cogitative basketball mind at the helm, the best player of his era, a sidekick who was named one of the 50 greatest players of all time and the most useful role playing rebounder in league history, the Bulls won the championship because of one underlying reason. Defense.

As stated in an old Sports Illustrated feature that was written right before that fateful Finals against Seattle started:

"The Bulls' defensive prowess often gets short shrift because of their other, more spectacular attributes. It is not well known, for instance, that Chicago tied for second in the league in fewest points allowed (92.9 per game) during the regular season...Entering the Finals they had allowed a measly 85.7 points per game in their 12 postseason games, and they had given up more than 100 points only twice. It took overtime to bring one such lapse, a 102-99 Eastern Conference semifinal victory by the New York Knicks in Chicago's only loss of the playoffs."

After a league record 72 wins were racked up, Jordan was asked during the post-season what he felt his team's biggest strength was.

"Our offensive execution has been up and down," he said. "Our shooting has been up and down. But our defense has never deserted us."

Those are wise, wise words from a man who knew what it took to win a 48-minute basketball game. It was known at the time that Michael could drop 50 points any time he stepped on the court, but where he truly cemented his legacy was on the other end. When he pulled his shorts up high on his thighs, got on the balls of his feet and made his opponent wish he'd gone to law school, that's the Michael Jordan we knew and loved.

The Bulls that season had three players (Jordan, Pippen and Rodman) who finished first team all-defense. To put that in perspective, there are five players in the entire league who are named to that team with no respective designation to position. Meaning if no point guards in the league play a lick of defense one year, they would just add an extra forward or vice versa. So three players from that Chicago squad made it which means those three were in the top five in the entire league on the defensive end of the ball.

This boggles the mind.

Throw in Ron Harper, a man who could probably touch both ends of a field goal post if he were standing in the middle, to guard the other team's floor general and Chicago was an absolutely ridiculous group of defensive talent.

Which naturally brings us to the Boston Celtics. Rasheed Wallace, a man who may have made one or two obscene predictions in his lengthy career, stated that the 2009-10 Celts could and would break the 72 win record that some feel can never be sniffed at.

Much like that team in Chicago, which started a 32-year-old Jordan, a 30-year-old Pippen (who had just started having back pain), a 32-year-old Ron Harper and a 34-year-old Dennis Rodman, Boston isn't exactly young. What they are is experienced; they have a much younger bench, an all-star point-guard and a defensive minded bulldog starting at center.

Through the first eight games of the season, the Celtics are leading the league in opponent points per game (84.4), forced turnovers (141) and steals (80). They stand at fourth best in the league, holding their opponents to just 42% from the field and with Garnett, Wallace and Perkins roaming the open plains, Boston is tied for third in blocks with 43.

Here's a small sample that occurred in the season's fifth game. On the road to square off against a Philadelphia team that was averaging just over 115 points a night, the Celtics came into the Wachovia Center like a city block sized spider web. The Sixers scored 74 points.

While Boston still has the same old offensive talents in Paul Pierce, Rajon Rondo and Ray Allen, through the first eight games they're just slightly above the league's scoring average and fourth in their own division. Of course nobody in green could care less. From the door they've decided the one way to 73 wins and an 18th banner is stops.

Like the lanky Harper once said, "Defense is our little secret."

14 years later, it's Boston's too.


 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:03 PM on 11/12/2009
Speaking of the Celtics, would someone care to comment on one of the Celtics owners (Capauano ?) who is running against Martha Coakley for the vacant Kennedy senate seat? Just a publicity or vanity thing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheKurgan
Prof Musician,Socialist,Bridge Life Master
06:11 AM on 11/12/2009
I agree. Michael's Bulls were overrated since there was practically no competition in the league in 1995. Can you see Jordan's Bulls trying to play with the 1986 Celtics, the 1985 Lakers, or the 1983 Sixers? Or even the second tier teams like Portland and Houston then. There was no expansion to dilute the talent pool.

86 Celtics started: Bird, McHale, Parrish, D. Johnson, and D. Ainge. BILL WALTON was their sixth man. They held the opponents to barely 100 points a game in a time when zone was illegal and you had to play man to man all the time.

85 Lakers started: Worthy, Scott, Jabbar, M. Johnson and could run with anyone. And, much as I hated them, they had Kurt Rambis (the ultimate in tokenism), and he was cool with his deflector shield glasses.

Sixers had Dr. J, Mo Cheeks, Moses Malone...

The NBA of today cannot hold a candle to any teams from the man to man era. Zone just makes defense too easy. It's a different game today. I have to say, though, that I'm glad the stupid "anyone who is 6'10" and can dunk can play" days are gone. That part of the 1995 era teams was annoying. No one shot Jumpers anymore except small guys from "down town." A nice jumper is better than a dunk any day.

Just my rant for now.
07:42 AM on 11/12/2009
Gawd, but it was glorious to be a Celtics or Lakers fan in the mid-80's..... basketball is only just starting to get interesting again for me!