More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Shaw

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Shaw
 

Reading the Pictures: As Agitators Occupy Occupy, Will Media Call It Out?

Posted: 11/07/11 09:34 AM ET

(Click for full-size)

Shame on the Sacramento Bee for attributing the violence late Thursday night to Occupy protesters when the chaos was clearly and identifiably the responsibility of an outside contingent of black bloc agitators sporting black shirts, bandannas and backpacks for their spray paint, sticks, clubs, fire retardant and other equipment.

What's strange is that The Bee makes the distinction itself with its headline, "Occupy protesters disavow Oakland violence." From there, though, they undo the difference by repeatedly referring to these hooligans in their photo captions as "Occupy protesters." (See most of the first ten photos of the slide show.) This is most evident in the photos of the black shirts that took over a building late that night. In the photo above, by the way, notice the phrasing of the caption (describing how they "occupied" -- rather than "took over" or "commandeered" -- the building) linguistically connecting the actions of this militant element to the name of the non-violent movement.

What's very dangerous, at this point, is the media neglecting to educate the public about the nature and source of the violence -- as CBS clearly does here. It's a development we warned about weeks ago. It doesn't take too many errors of omission to convince a large swath of the American people that Occupy, itself, is a powderkeg.

2011-11-07-OWSsecuritymanhandled.jpg

It wasn't just The Bee, though, which fed the misrepresentation. Consider this photo from a Getty package at Zimbio. In the photo, we see an Occupy security member (the same one who was overrun in this video we highlighted last week, and seen again here) being manhandled by the black shirts. Thing is, when you read the caption:

Demonstrators clash during an Occupy demonstration November 2, 2011 in Oakland, California. The group called for a general strike Wednesday, and planned to march on the city's port later in the day.

what you get -- far from the sense of a struggle between Occupy and these violent outside agitators -- is they're all one family, and looking for trouble.

See our complete OWS coverage at BagNews: http://bit.ly/BagNewsOccupy

 

Follow Michael Shaw on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bagnewsnotes

 
 
  • Comments
  • 403
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sam green 31605
fireobama2012 dotcom
11:17 AM on 11/08/2011
you have made the base of your organization anarchists and radicals...now you wish to ignore the fact that they are as much a faction of the protest as the peacfull side. in your own playbook you must have what the guys in black do (anarchists)
10:12 AM on 11/08/2011
I don't think the OWS supporters get it. They have invited the disgruntled of all persuasions (the 99%, remember) to join in their acttivities. There is virtually no organization or control, and anarchy is invited. Of course they will be held responsible for the violence and damage to property which their aimless anger generates and makes possible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeW CA
Liberal: 1 who doesn't pass the conservative test
09:40 AM on 11/08/2011
The powerful 1% who run corporate media expect violence because, deep down, they know they deserve it. I admire the Occupy protesters for their success in not giving it to them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Napoleon3
09:17 AM on 11/08/2011
I like this Occupy Wallstreet. It allows us to rename homeless, unemployed liberal art students, laid off baristas are now protestors .
This must be a community organizer thing.
photo
novenator
Bold Progressive. Deal with it.
08:44 AM on 11/08/2011
This is the same thing that happened to the G20, anti-Iraq War, and World Bank protesters, a few Black Bloc folks showed up and broke some windows, and got 99% of the media coverage when 99.99% of the protests were completely peaceful. The corporate media is of course protecting their corporate masters and deliberately trying to portray #ows as "violent", and many in the corporate right are more than eager to parrot this MSM narrative.
lastpost
see biography
07:11 AM on 11/08/2011
"Will Media Call It Out?"
Its difficult to imagine that the authorities do not have their own undercover agents on site. Hence, they must either be aware of this infiltration, and choosing not to flag it up. Or, they are complicit in those activities and aims. Similarly, honest media would have its own reporters mingle with that melee. In order to report on exactly the tactics being deployed, to covertly corrupt that community. Much as Wall Street itself has been subverted from the inside, and is in desperate need of independent investigation.
03:23 AM on 11/08/2011
It's no different than the media referring to marijuana as a 'drug' and sometimes even a 'narcotic' while referring to tobacco and coffee as just that, tobacco and coffee, not 'drugs'.
10:39 AM on 11/08/2011
Oh the humanity, the travesty of justice that weed isn't legal!
12:55 PM on 11/08/2011
Marijuana is no more dangerous than beer. If it were legalized, it would save billions in court fees plus it would create a whole new public revenue stream. Win-win.
10:53 PM on 11/08/2011
No, the travesty is that greed IS legal!! As long as greed is legal, injustice will not be far behind!!
photo
Transit
"Hunger is the best pickle"
01:43 AM on 11/08/2011
The very nature of news reporting means the media is a day late and a dollar short in trying to cover the Occupy movement. Just as the media was about fifteen years too late in reporting on the growth in suburbia and what that meant during the middle of the twentieth century, they're about 25 years too late reporting on the massive upward redistribution of wealth that has spawned today's Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement.

Instead of hammering those people who helped create the inequality under the guise of the "American Dream" and searching for solutions, they run about like wannabe combat reporters about to come in their pants at the first sign of violence or omniscient armchair critics who so obviously haven't the fog of an idea what it it's all about.

In reporting, a journalist attempts to describe an event to which there were witnesses. The general public depends on this account. But the witnesses will know if it was the truth. The more times they get the story right the more their believability (i.e. integrity) grows. That's the only thing a journalist possesses. Stone, Cronkite, Murrow, Moyers and Rooney all have had it as well as many others.But too many are lacking and without it they bring not only disrepute upon themselves but damage a foundament of our democracy as well.

So yes... Shame on you Sacramento Bee and all those who blindly went with the story.
12:58 AM on 11/08/2011
Black Bloc = Cops
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotorhead1871
who are you jivin' with that cosmic debris?...
12:02 AM on 11/08/2011
the Bee has better sources than you do....
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
11:40 PM on 11/07/2011
americans are ignorant from too much tv -- they don't know the black bloc from the black caucus. enter ailes, stage left. can't have a smart populous or they would see through the poop.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bishop999999999
11:04 PM on 11/07/2011
That's what scares me about the Left taking charge of the country: their complete inability to take responsibility for their actions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pyro
Fire in the kilns, lets fill all empty bowls.
01:55 AM on 11/08/2011
You aparently didn't read the article, or have problems with comprehenstion.

WTF are you talking about.
photo
JimInHouston
Arma virumque cano...
03:21 PM on 11/08/2011
These are YOUR guys, part of YOUR movement. Deal with it. Denial is SO juvenile.
04:34 AM on 11/08/2011
LOL what scares mindless kneejerk reactionary right wingers is anything with the label of "left"
09:35 PM on 11/07/2011
The OWS movement has taught me on thing. I desperately want to be part of the 1% now. If the alternative is to be part of this group, you can count me out. I want nothing to do with this "movement".

I'd rather be rich and free then occupied any day.
06:28 AM on 11/08/2011
Why pretend you are anything but a 1%er?
07:47 AM on 11/08/2011
Part of the 40% who wish they were part of the 1% and fantasise that they someday could be. It would only be sad but they vote on the side of the 1%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2warvet
I have nitrogen narcosis, what's your excuse?
09:18 AM on 11/08/2011
I think rich is a relative term to the left. If you have more money than they do you are rich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
08:00 PM on 11/07/2011
It's the oldest trick in the book for entrenched power to infiltrate populist organizations and try to disgrace them. The press is owned by the 1% and only exosts tp echoe their message and manipulate the public. The lesson that needed to be learned years ago is NEVER trust the corporate press.
09:23 PM on 11/07/2011
Ok, time to take your medicine and put your tin foil hat back on.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
11:42 PM on 11/07/2011
once you get the depends off your head. painting a gadsden flag on them still doesn't make appropriate headgear. even if it is winter and you live under a bridge.
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
12:24 AM on 11/08/2011
Yep. The same thing happened during the Vietnam War protests. Any real grassroots group that threatens the status quo should expect to be infiltrated.
07:53 PM on 11/07/2011
.....

such great care in distinguishing one group from another

but it seemed like the opposite was applied during the Tea Party events
.
Sergeant
Dress Right
08:24 PM on 11/07/2011
I don't recall the Tea Party trying to occupy private property without permission. And when they made their point, they went home.
09:25 PM on 11/07/2011
I also don't recall the Tea Party urinating and defecating in public places either. Or starting fire to anything. Pushing old ladies down the stairs. Or even have encounters with police for any reason. Show me one time that tear gas was needed for the Tea Party.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
11:43 PM on 11/07/2011
actually they went to the buffet at western sizzlin after they spent a long day sitting in lawn chairs.
photo
elsquibbs
Socially liberal, fiscally prudent atheist.
08:30 PM on 11/07/2011
Distinguishing different factions within the TP did not fit the intended narrative of the most vocal opponents.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gcogs
"You can fly?" "No, jump good."
10:04 AM on 11/08/2011
I agree completely.