iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Thornton

Michael Thornton

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Thornton

99ers and the Long-term Unemployed Are the Elephants in the Economic Recovery Room

Posted: 05/15/11 06:02 PM ET

The latest BLS employment report showed a gain of 244,000 jobs for April, which was trumpeted by the Obama administration and the media as a continuation of a rapidly improving jobs market. While job growth is important, it's also important to realize the jobs hole that needs to be filled. Over the past four months more than 800,000 jobs have been created, but in January 2009 alone, more than 800,000 jobs were lost. Since February 2010, 1.8 million jobs have been created, but 8.8 million jobs were lost prior to that period. That's a job shortage of 7 million and that doesn't include the 125,000 jobs each month that needed to be created to simply absorb new entrants into the workforce.

Additionally, the unemployment rate increased to 9%, since more people began looking for work. Returning job seekers is often considered an improved sign of job availability, but if they aren't hired, they will go back into hiding and the unemployment rate will decline. Because of returning job seekers, the number of officially unemployed increased 205,000 to 13.75 million, which is still historically high when compared to other jobs challenged times.

One of the few honest assessments of the current jobs market was offered by Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute:

At this point, coming out of a recession this deep, we should be getting unambiguously huge growth, of 300,000 to 400,000 [new jobs] a month," said Heidi Shierholz, a labor economist at the Economic Policy Institute. "And it's just nowhere near that." She concluded: "We're still in a rocky place."

The job market is admittedly improving for some, but it's not improving quickly enough for millions of jobless, especially the long-term unemployed. In April, the ranks of the unemployed who have been out of work for 99 weeks or more increased by 21,000 to a record 1,920,000. That equates to 14.5% of all unemployed.

Other long-term unemployed fared a little better in April compared to March. Those out of work for 26 weeks or more decreased from 5.839 million from 6.122 million in March. But their percentage of the overall unemployment rate remained elevated at a near record level of 43.2%. The percentage of those out of work for more and 52 weeks increased from 31.5% to 32.8% of all unemployed.

The Congress, the Obama administration and most media outlets are silent about long-term unemployment. How do they reconcile the fact that 244,000 jobs were created, but 21,000 additional workers have been unemployed for more than 99 weeks? How do they put on a happy face when a near record 5.893 million or 43.2% of all unemployed workers have been jobless for more than 26 weeks? How do they rationalize their cheerful statements of job improvements with the facts that job creation is very weak considering the trillions of dollars pumped into the economy to support Wall Street and fund tax breaks? How do they high-five the economic recovery when the labor force participation rate -- the share of people over age 16 who are either working or actively seeking work -- is at a low rate of 64.2%, a rate not seen since 1985? They can't. They generally ignore the issue; long-term unemployment is the elephant in the economic recovery room.

What is being done legislatively to address this elephant in the room? To date, nothing. The GOP controlled House has been busy attempting to cut the deficit, repealing healthcare funding, and restarting offshore oil drilling. The Republicans, with the help of some Democrats, are working to weaken Wall Street regulation legislation, end net neutrality, and are arguing the Defense of Marriage Act. They are pandering to their base, acquiescing to their corporate overlords and obliging their big-wallet campaign contributors.

Congressional leaders are more concerned with ideology than reality. They have not presented a jobs bill or employment training legislation, conducted investigations on how to solve long-term unemployment, or offered tax incentives for companies to hire the long-term unemployed. They have ignored legislation, such as Rep. Barbara Lee's H.R. 589, that would help millions of long-term unemployed, the 99ers, who have exhausted all unemployment benefits. While most of the blame can be placed at the door of the GOP controlled House, the Democratic controlled Senate and Obama have been suspiciously silent about the long-term unemployment problem.

Long-term unemployment is not only a national tragedy, but it is a personal tragedy as well. Rochelle Sevier was laid off in October 2008 while working as a recruitment coordinator for a biotech firm. Since that time, "I started my job search immediately. In addition to my job search, I attended various workshops at my local career center. As part of my search I attended job fairs, partnered with temp agencies, posted my resume online, and also submitted my resume to various positions." During the past couple of years Rochelle took part-time temporary positions that included folding sweaters and stuffing envelopes. Her unemployment benefits ended in September 2010 and she didn't find another job until January 2011 when an administrative position became available. Unfortunately that job ended six weeks later, "I finished out my 6th week and now I am back to square one. This rejection affected my emotional and mental state. I started to feel hopeless and depressed because I now feel like I will never work again."

The long-term unemployed are also part of the growing ranks of food stamp recipients, personal bankruptcies, foreclosures and healthcare uninsured. Ellen Turner, who was laid off from her job in December 2008 has struggled with healthcare costs since her COBRA plan ended in June 2010.

"Now I have nothing. Hoping I can stay fairly healthy till I reach 65, and I can get Medicare. I have one knee without cartilage that has to be replaced... at a cost of 10k. Can't do it. I have severe osteoporosis; I need fusions of reclast every year. This year, the pharmaceutical co. provided the reclast, I only have to pay for the doctor visit and lab fees: $136 bucks total. I am fortunate that I can pay this, while others at my age cannot. I turned 63 on May 10th."
Ellen is now one of the more than 50 million Americans who do not have healthcare.

Susan R. sent the following cry for help:

"Any idea on what is happening with HR 589? My unemployment ends end of the month and I cannot get a job. I have tried everywhere. I used to be a legal secretary but now they want college which I do not have, Now you have to apply for stores, etc. online and I never hear back. I think my only hope is to kill myself. There is no hope. Also they keep saying things are getting better but I don't see where and neither does anyone I talk to. Everyone says things are bad!!"

H.R. 589 is legislation designed to help the long-term unemployed by extending Tier 1 unemployment benefits 14 weeks. Those 14 weeks could be a financial lifesaver for millions of unemployed. Although the legislation has been discussed for months, moving it forward in a Republican controlled House will be challenging. How challenging? House Republicans are hoping to introduce legislation that could cut extended unemployment benefits in favor of lower business taxes and allow states to spend that money on other programs: The Ways and Means Committee passed a bill by 20-14 today that lets states shift some of the $31 billion they are set to get for extended unemployment aid to prevent the tax increases, pay back federal loans or fund job-training programs.

While those are all commendable options, they are long-term rewards that won't help those that need immediate financial assistance. Oil companies have reported record profits, but the GOP favors giving them billions in taxpayer subsidies while at the same time forcing the long-term unemployed to suffer without any financial assistance.

The latest H.R.589 update comes from Crew of 42's Lauren Victoria Burke; the news is both positive and disappointing:

The good news for 99ers: The president mentioned he wants to possibly attach the 99ers money to some other big piece of legislation somehow... which piece, how and when is unclear...


The bad news for 99ers: The president does not seem deeply motivated to to actively support unemployment benefits in general terms.

Congress needs to address the elephants in the room, since millions of Americans are being sidelined by a relatively weak job market. That needs to change quickly and dramatically or more hard-working individuals such as Rochelle, Ellen and Susan will continue to bare the financial hardship and personal pain of long-term unemployment. Open your eyes now, Congress. The elephants in the economic recovery room won't simply go away if your eyes remain closed.

 

Follow Michael Thornton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/layofflist

The latest BLS employment report showed a gain of 244,000 jobs for April, which was trumpeted by the Obama administration and the media as a continuation of a rapidly improving jobs market. While job ...
The latest BLS employment report showed a gain of 244,000 jobs for April, which was trumpeted by the Obama administration and the media as a continuation of a rapidly improving jobs market. While job ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 383
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
10:06 PM on 06/21/2011
The repulsive republicans are doubling down on the premise that if they continue to destroy the economic landscape left behind by the white collar theft of 2008 they can get the strange one out of the big house and clean up America. The repulsives have fostered in an era of rob creation as their political mandate. They are robbing the long term dislocated workers of any chance to connect with the economy and shore up their human capital. The repulsives would tell you that human capital is a thing of the past and that a bad economy may be good for the economy. They are robbing seniors of social security and health security in their twilight years. The war on seniors may be the ugliest of the conservative agendas. They are robbing older workers of a chance to get back in the game after the economic meltdown of 2008. The repulsives smile whlie robbing future generations of a society built on trust and compassion rather than hate and prejudice. The repulsives hate the deficit class and enjoy inflicting more misery on struggling families rather than seeking ways to help. I know I've been robbed, HOW ABOUT YOU?
03:12 PM on 06/14/2011
Kai-HK: That is probably the most ill thought out comment I have ever read...unemployment is NOT a free handout...I worked hard for my employer as that money was paid into an account for MY use when I lost my job due to no fault of my own...a free handout is when someone gives you a box of food, which no one ever has, or someone hands you money free and clear which no one has...only someone who is either not able to work and getting either ss or ssi would say something that callous and cruel..btw your ss is paid for by the working class now..if we're not working or making less money that's less you'll be getting...and if you stop and think about it, if you are on ss or ssi you are the mooch, because your ss deductions went to those who retired before you, our ss deductions are going toward those who are retired now!! Next time look before you leap, think before you speak! Less min. wage means less ss deductions and less money retired mooches will get!
12:37 PM on 06/09/2011
99ers and all unemployed are Americans. Americans are supposed to help Americans. When do we become so apathetic? Alot of people wonder what they can do. There was a Million Man march on Washington. Why not the same for the unemployed and their supporters. Obviously, money to go to Washington isn't a priority but a walk to large intersections in our cities to protest doesn't cost a thing. Maybe the attention it will get will sink into Obama's and Congress' heads. There are petitions that can be signed. Here is one that costs nothing to sign. http://signon.org/sign/tier-5-approval-by-congress-2

Maybe if people knew where to go to see and sign these petitions we could jolt the thinking of our govenment.
08:50 AM on 06/10/2011
I just joined a group that is trying to plan a march on Washington. You can join and help, even if you can't go.
becountedmarch@groups.facebook.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KWiedemer
Denver Unemployment Examiner
03:21 PM on 05/18/2011
Great report as always, Mike-thanks!
Denver Unemployment Examiner
09:47 AM on 05/18/2011
May I suggest a simple solution to unemployment in the US?

Since millions of US manufacturers have outsourced both their manufacturing of products and service support employees, and foreign countries and interest own trillions of USA Treasuries, the solution is simple and in accordance to the basic principle throriy of free trade.

Milton Friedman sold the US Congress on the benefits of free trade being that US dollars would return to the US when the holders purchase US products. Instead, the foreign holders have bought Treasury Bonds instead of US products and services, resutlting in huge unbalanced trade deficiets unfavorable to the US, thus creating huge unemployment in the US.

Just ask the foregn holders to start buying US products instead of US IOUs that have to be repaid by future US generations.

If anyone believes this will happen voluntary, they also believe in the tooth fairy.

The only solution to high unemployment is the following solutions.

Do not alllow forrign investors to buy US Treasuries. Make them buy US products and services only with their accumulated dollars.

Tariff all countries that contribute to unbalaced trade to the US.

Don't spend more on government services than tax revenues allow. That will end the need to sell Bonds in the first place.
S M V
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses
01:52 PM on 05/18/2011
"Don't spend more on government services than tax revenues allow. That will end the need to sell Bonds in the first place.”

Stick with this one. All of your other solutions either make the problem worse and/ or cause additional problems.
09:16 AM on 05/19/2011
Your reply only solves one part of the unemployment equation.

The core problem of unemployment is unbalanced trade. You tell me how to get the foreign interests to buy US products with the dollars instead of buying Treasury Bonds. Your free trade theories are not working.Whether the root cause of unbalanced trade is products, services, or oil.

Pleas keep in mind that US workers can not survive on $2.00 a day wages and the US needs more people to make livable wages in orde to qualifiy to pay Federal taxes. Do you also know that 1 in every 6 US resident is now receiving food stamps?
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
05:05 AM on 05/18/2011
Mr Thorton:

Excellent article. It looks as if people can no longer depend on free handouts from the government they are now starting to turn back to fending for themselves. This is truly good news.

If only we would drop the minimum wage now to spur new hiring even further.

Kai
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
01:06 PM on 05/18/2011
What a bizarre interpretation of this article. Are you being sarcastic?

None of these people want "free handouts from the government". Only someone who is fortunate enough not to have been hit by unemployment in this recession would believe that the unemployed want "free handouts". What planet do you live on anyway?

These people have been "fending for themselves" since they were unemployed, and it isn't pretty. Do we really want a country in which people in their 50's and 60's who have worked for decades now find themselves without health care, dependent on emergency rooms, clinics, and county hospitals... and dependent on food stamps, dependent on housing vouchers and heat vouchers? Is this your idea of "fending for themselves"... sick, perhaps homeless, more and more dependent on government services? Waiting until they are either disabled enough that they can collect disability... or old enough to collect social security? While they collect a few bottles or cans to sell for a few bucks? Is this really the kind of country in which you want to live?

While the upper 1-2% get richer and richer?
02:37 PM on 05/18/2011
Wow you like to get dramatic when on the subject of the less than fortunate. Bottles, cans, cigarette butts. This condition is nothing new...been around for along time. We all know it exists, and most of us know enough about it to avoid ending up in it. Most people that are homeless will tell you its self inflicted. Like success is a choice, being homeless is also...I'll put it this way. Is not being homeless a choice?
12:14 PM on 05/20/2011
If you don't want the handouts, then don't apply for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:05 PM on 05/17/2011
Until the unemployed show up en masse on the White House lawn, pitch their tents with children and pets and basically squat, this issue is a non-issue for our elected officials. Crying on a computer is not going to do it. They need to actually see people in all their destitution before even acknowledging there's a problem. If the unemployed are unwilling (where there's a will there's a way) to show themselves and demand their rights, again this is a non-issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
07:04 PM on 05/17/2011
I agree... There need to be marches in the streets. I've heard several groups (not just the unemployed) are planning marches over the summer in Washington.
12:18 PM on 05/20/2011
In some areas marching in the street would be a bad and dangerous idea. They tried it on wall street last year and were further denigrated and brushed aside as freeloaders...you should not advocate putting your peeps in these unwinnable ad unsafe positions. Keep this in mind. Most are too unmotivated anyway, so I don't expect too much of a turnout.
08:38 PM on 05/26/2011
The best idea I've heard yet.
04:47 PM on 05/17/2011
I just read comments form other sites telling the unemployed to take a lesser paying job! this was my reply:

Everyone working has the answer! “You have to take a lesser paying job”. There are no jobs period! Allow me to repeat for that for the reading impaired “THERE ARE NO JOBS”. Even the government realizes there are at least 5 people for every job opeaning (this is understated there are actually more, ask anyone looking for a job). This includes fulltime, part-time even the McJobs. Ignorant (ignorant does not mean stupid it means uninformed) people are quick to point out, get a McDonalds job. 99ers around the country have been living over a year without any income, unemployment or otherwise! Don’t you understand that! At this point even a McJob is better than no income at all, if McJobs were available. Also remember school is about to recess for the summer. Think about all those kids competing for jobs with adults that have families to support. So please limit the GET a McJOB comments. Thanks!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
05:32 PM on 05/17/2011
Seems folks just do not get fifth grade math.

Must be the GOP/TP syndrome!
02:40 PM on 05/18/2011
That can't be any worse than the freeloader mindset.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:58 PM on 05/17/2011
For every job opening there are hundreds of people applying. This is not a 5:1 ratio. More like 500:1.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msanonymous222
Dismiss whatever insults your own soul.
05:50 PM on 06/05/2011
The ratio means that there is only one job available for every five people, instead of five jobs available for every five people. It has nothing to do with the number of applications.
04:45 PM on 05/17/2011
I have a suggestion since we can’t get the main stream media news programs to broadcast our critical unemployment situation referred to as 99ers, why don't we flood the internet with our plight?
**For over a year, millions of Americans called 99ers have gone without any income or jobs, because none are available. We are not being covered by the news stations. We need your support! We need Jobs or help not welfare. For more information please Google “99ers” “Tier V”.**
**“Wikipedia says” “99ers is a colloquial term for unemployed people in the United States, mostly citizens, who have exhausted all of their unemployment benefits, including all unemployment extensions”. We need your help and support because The President, The Senate, Congress and the News Media have ignored suffering Americans with families and no means of support. We are becoming, homeless, destitute, suicidal and plain desperate. We need the help and support of every American to support our cause until jobs become available.**
Apparently there is $31 billion sitting in a bank account which is unemployment money we have paid in. Republicans wants to take that money and turn it over to the states to use to give more tax cuts to the corporations that downsized our jobs. This is a diversion and misappropriation of public funds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
07:35 PM on 05/17/2011
The $31 billion is the money earmarked but not yet spent for unemployment extensions for the rest of the year. It is the money that is earmarked for those long-term unemployed who have not yet gotten the 99 weeks of benefits to get their full 99 weeks. Under the proposed "JOBS" bill, states would have the option of using their portion of the $31 billion for other things instead of paying their citizens the unemployment insurance that was promised to them in the December compromise. Now, that bill will probably never make it past the Senate and I can't imagine O signing it. But that money is allocated as there are many long-term unemployed who have not yet exhausted 99 weeks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
08:27 PM on 05/17/2011
G, I have checked and checked. I am about 95% sure that the $31 billion is the money earmarked for long-term unemployment benefits in December. It is not "free" or unallocated money, which many 99er sites seem to believe. I just posted this on a 99er site, but I don't think I will find a very receptive audience.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ringo3khan
11:01 AM on 05/17/2011
Frankly, it's my opinion that no, this unemployment isn't cylical, it's structural and will continue to be a significan part of the economic landscape of the U.S. for generations. There isn't any solution to this problem; it's much like the failed education model and in large part, it's born of the failed education model. This rate of unemployment, isn't uncharacteristically high for late term failed economies which this is and may very well go higher as the U.S. sinks into a double down on the Great Recession.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
procrustes13
01:49 PM on 05/17/2011
The unemployment is not structural, it's the result of the de-leveraging brought upon by the simple fact that corporations padding their profits and executive salaries and bonuses by short-changing the workers and having the workers take on debt to compensate is unsustainable, that now the debts are being paid and demand has collapsed. If there is a structural problem it's that the rich own the system, they want to keep padding their profits and executive salaries and bonuses and short-changing the workers, and they've successfully used the crisis to deepen the tendency. They are the problem and they are the ones that must be taken care of.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Joseph LeCompte
The USA isnt broke.It was robbed.
09:50 AM on 05/17/2011
The economy is 70% consumerism. Giving free loans to bankers doesnt help 3/4 of the economy(all it did is re inflate a market and commodity bubble plus tons of inflation). Trashing unemployment benefits, public transportation, and welfare doesnt help either. No jobs(even temp/depression era WPA ones) are being created because we have no demand or Congress refuses to stimulate. The bailouts/ tax cuts helped the wealthy. They put that money in their pockets. Increases in luxury items wont drive a recovery. If you need the other 90% of the population to thrive maybe you should help them not hurt them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
01:11 PM on 05/18/2011
You are quite right. f & f
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlanBannacheck
President of the Deep Thoughts Association (DTA)
05:00 AM on 05/17/2011
It will be the enslavement of millions of people. Work camps for people that owe debt will be forced to farm the fields like back in the old days. Jails will pile up as millions seek shelter in foreclosed households. The remainder will be watching the tele, completely convinced that they deserve it because they are a burden to society. Meanwhile profits will continue there usual up and downs, executives will fly first class and be pampered despite the eight dollar per gallon price of gasoline.

A combination of "individualist" thinking, cheap energy, capitalism, conquest, and the whole timeline of the human condition perhaps are the reason for such a worse case scenario outcome.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:28 AM on 05/17/2011
Elderly inmates impact state budgets...

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/facebook/7566086.html
Elderly inmates put a burden on Texas | Facebook | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle

"A growing population of elderly inmates is driving up prison medical care costs to the point that some Texas lawmakers would like to see more of those who are feeble and chronically ill released early.

In the last decade, the number of inmates 55 and older has spiked as much as 8 percent each year, growing to about 12,500, while the general inmate population has remained fairly flat.

In prisons across the country, inmates grow old serving longer sentences and enter prison at an older age. Between 1999 and 2008, the number of inmates 55 and older in state and federal prisons increased by 76 percent to 76,400 inmates, according to the Federal Bureau of Justice Statistics. The general population grew by 18 percent.

With rising medical care costs and dwindling state budgets, policy-makers and prison officials have struggled to keep pace. Elderly inmates in Texas make up 8 percent of the state's prison population, yet they account for more than 30 percent of prison hospitalization costs.

In fiscal 2010, the state spent more than $545 million on inmate health care. It paid $4,853 per elderly offender for care compared with $795 for inmates under 55, according to the Correctional Managed Health Care Committee..."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
01:19 PM on 05/17/2011
I think your take is more likely to be correct. It is expensive to house and provide for older people, and the prisons won't want that task. They'd rather release them so they can manage on their own... though most of the older prisoners who have spent decades in prison are better off in prison and will probably d/ie very quickly on the street.

Our hard line on crime is coming home to roost.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:32 AM on 05/17/2011
"Open your eyes now, Congress. The elephants in the economic recovery room won't simply go away if your eyes remain closed."

Afraid opening eyes won't open closed minds. It's ideology that's creating the appearance of blindness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ILoveGreatDanes
If you can read this,my cloaking device is broken.
09:38 PM on 05/16/2011
A lot of these folks (Republicans especially) blame the victim for their unemployment. The solution is always,"Get a job." Merely having a job does not solve the problem. Many jobs do not provide a decent wage, especially if you have kids, and it's even worse if you're a single parent with a deadbeat dad. Child care is also very expensive. In Texas, where I live, having ONE 4 year old child in a decent day care 40 hours a week costs about $600/ month by itself. Even if the job offers good wages, many don't offer health benefits, or if they do, adding family members is extremely expensive. So many hard working folks have a lot of strikes against them. Being broke is not always about being lazy.

I live in Texas, was married with no children, and got divorced. I lost my home to foreclosure because I couldn't afford my $700/month house payment with my "good paying" job of $14/hr by myself. The only reason I made that much was because I have a college degree. I also had free health insurance through my employer. When I got laid off, remarried, and moved into my husband's home, I tried to get on his insurance, but that cost us $500/month more and his insurance was free for just him, so I went without. The lousy economy is a major cause of Americans' financial woes. It's time for both parties to help create jobs for Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
11:47 PM on 05/16/2011
Exactly. Many people, perhaps most, of the long-term unemployed are people who have never had a prolonged spell of unemployment in their life. They are people who worked for decades, were laid off and then found that they could not get a job.

I'm very tired of the people who call the unemployed "lazy", who tell people that there is no reason that someone does not have a job after two years of unemployment, who tell people to just pull themselves up by their bootstraps, who suggest retraining or starting your business. People who have been unemployed a half year, a year, or longer have heard all of these things.

Retraining is a risk if you are older. Starting a business is a risk, especially if you need to invest any large amount of capital in the business.
09:26 AM on 05/17/2011
I am with you on being tired of the those who call the unemployed lazy, when they are no decent jobs to get. I got lucky after being unemployed for about 2 years and over 50. But there are many who are not that lucky. I did get retrained and the program I went through focus was to place unemployed workers over 45 back into the work force and had contracted with companies who where willing to help workers in this category. But I do live in a Democratic state whose focus tend to be more on growth and a working state produces more revenue so that is the focus.

I have learned in this life that you have to care about yourself or no one else will. I work part-time but I do have full benefits with good wages which is a blessing. My goal is to use my creative talents to supplement my income with an entrepreneur project starting with some of my income from my job.

After this experience, I feel very uncomfortable depending on someone elses job for my sole financial security. It is hard and life is a struggle especially when you are poor without any financial cushion from your ancestors to give you a head start. But I believe it can be done if we work hard and always keep your own best interest at heart.
rogergoldkin
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance
06:03 AM on 05/17/2011
In Dayton, Ohio it was just reported that of the 10 most prevalent job types in this area, 8 did not provide a living wage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
01:22 PM on 05/17/2011
No surprise there.... unfortunately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amber Berglund
Just say "no" to shiny pants.
08:56 PM on 05/16/2011
I think they want people to die. That's the only conclusion I can come to. They want to kill-off huge sections of the population. Through the meat-grinder that was/is Iraq and Afghanistan...high unemployment that leads people to suicide...huge numbers of uninsured Americans who do not have access to healthcare...banks foreclosing on people's homes, kicking them out on the street, to become homeless.
There's either going to be a gen-oc ide orchestrated by the corporations...or there will be a re vo lut ion organized by the poor. But, there is no mistake that the Corporations and the Wealthy are waging a war against most of us. Oppression, for sure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hendricks
see wikipedia
01:36 AM on 05/17/2011
There is a solution outside government. This week is National Hiring Day #3 that suggests a voluntary patriotism by every corporation in the US - to hire one or more. Here is more on National Hiring Day.

There is a solution to the jobs problem and it could quickly put hundreds of thousands of people back to work. It is not pro left or right. It is not from any corporation, it's outside the government control, it's totally voluntary, and helps all with little sacrifice from anyone.

National Hiring Day #3 is suggested for May 19, 2011. This is a day that corporations are encouraged to hire new employees. Corporations are called on to put patriotism first and help their country in hard times. Those corporations that cannot hire, are asked to stop firing for that month. The day was suggested by the 18 year Dallas art and media zine, Musea.
02:25 AM on 05/18/2011
I guess to them that would be one way to balance the budget instead of creating opportunities just let them die. I was just reading this article how Ron Paul view regarding the Mississippi River Flood Victims telling them to build their own levees. I would not be surprised if they did something to cause these floods. All this teabagger talk about smaller government I wonder do those who live in the states affected by this flood still want smaller government. Clear example of people voting against their own interest.

http://www.politicususa.com/en/ron-paul-levees