iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Winship

Michael Winship

Posted: December 8, 2010 11:44 AM

There's this old joke about the French Revolution. A group of prisoners is lined up before the guillotine. One by one, their heads are lopped off. Then, the next man is put in place. The lever is pulled, but the blade stops just inches above his neck. This must be a sign of divine intervention, the judge in charge declares, and the man is freed.

The same thing happens to the next prisoner, and the next and the next. Finally, as the very last man is prepared for execution, he looks up at the mechanism and exclaims, "Wait! I think I see your problem!"

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you President Barack Obama, providing needless aid and comfort to those who would do him wrong, handing over his own head without a fight, afflicted with a curious syndrome we men of science have decided to call Premature Capitulation.

Backing away from myriad campaign promises, giving in to health care, economic stimulus and financial reform compromises -- in some ways these were par for the course, the unfortunate price of governing and politics in a polarized America. But in the few weeks since the midterm elections, the affliction of Premature Capitulation has become more and more endemic, whether it's dissembling on our policy in Afghanistan or backing away from a moratorium on settlement building in the West Bank, announcing a Federal workers' wage freeze (which would have been appropriate for the higher ranking civil servants but is pandering to the right and downright cruel to those government employees who barely make enough to live on) or the continued kowtow to the moneyed interests who, if they pat him on the back, do so only to find the place to insert their knives.

And now this deal to extend the Bush tax cuts for two years, continuing breaks for the wealthiest Americans, as well as a similar extension of the capital gains top rate -- 15% -- and a raise of the estate tax exemption to $5 million per person, with a maximum rate of 35%. In exchange, Obama is supposed to get a 13-month extension of unemployment benefits for the long term jobless, an expanded earned-income tax credit, equipment purchase write-offs for businesses, a reduction in the Social Security payroll tax and continuation of the college tuition tax credit.

Not so bad, you may think; in fact, many are viewing what Obama has gotten as a de facto second stimulus, but chances are Republicans would have yielded to public pressure on unemployment, especially during the holiday season, and as James Kwak points out on The Baseline Scenario website (which he founded with economist Simon Johnson), "The Bush tax cuts were always bad policy. After the last election, President Obama will be able to accomplish precious little. But he could easily have killed the Bush tax cuts and thereby done more good for our nation's fiscal situation than anyone will be in a position to do for many years to come. Killing the tax cuts would alone reduce the national debt by roughly as much as the deficit commission's entire proposal. And killing the tax cuts was the path of least resistance. Obama could have done it by doing nothing. Or he could have done it by taking a strong negotiating position and being willing to walk away from the table...

"Instead we got a two-year extension as part of an overall package that adds $900 billion to the debt... And Obama will no longer be able to say the tax cuts were a mistake made by President Bush that he was letting expire. Now he owns the mistake."

What's more, while the president's brief announcement of the deal Monday night was matter of fact, the press conference on Tuesday -- calling out progressives as sanctimonious purists -- was a defensive display of petulance more appropriate to the sandbox than the White House.

Mr. President, up to now at least, progressives have been the loyal opposition. You're wasting ammo on the wrong guys. Stand up, aim in the right direction, and fight. Because if you think the tax breaks will lead to further logrolling or concessions from congressional Republicans you're wrong. Now that they've gotten what they want, for the next two years of your term they will not yield much of anything else. Their nihilistic, scorched earth brand of politics leaves nothing behind but ash.

And so this latest compromise may prove a Pyrrhic victory. Or is that being premature?


Michael Winship is senior writer at Public Affairs Television in New York City.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanblack
06:36 PM on 12/09/2010
I have a feeling these tax cuts will expire as intended. Dems have no choice but to hold Obama to his campaign promise.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:18 AM on 12/09/2010
Biting the hands that feed him - and got him elected - is not the best idea. Makes one wonder if those who call Obama a Republican in Democrat's clothing are right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chesterrush
Screw the 2nd Amendment
12:15 AM on 12/09/2010
Yes, you are being premature. Without the tax cut deal, NOTHING would get passed in this lame duck session. NOTHING. Senate GOP would see to that. So before everyone prematurely passes judgement on this tax cut deal, saying it's a bad deal, let's just wait and see what else they can manage to pass before the end of the year. Whatever else gets done, be it the DREAM act, the START treaty, repealing DADT, whatever it is, it too must be factored into Obama's "deal". Without the deal, there would be no hope for any of these other items on the agenda.
01:16 PM on 12/08/2010
Another person who thinks Obama should have just walked away from the table. What would he do after that, pray-tell? Would the new congress be more willing to cut a deal? How long would a stalemate have lasted, before something could be passed that helped the jobless, or middle class?

I've read lot of people's comments regarding this, but no one goes further down the path of consequences. Some people seem unable to look beyond their nose.
02:26 PM on 12/08/2010
If the choice is to let all tax cuts expire, or have this deal, I need no more information. Let them expire!
jhNY
Mercy.
03:00 PM on 12/08/2010
Agreed. Waiting for the Republicans to react to scolding and shaming by a party with no real power to do what it pretends to want to do is a guarantee of but one thing: a very long wait.

But the Dems are used to waiting-- they waited till it was too late to get anything else done re the Bush tax rates besides extension of them all, given Republican intransigence on this matter, unemployment and stimulus. They could have crafted their own tax plan and campaigned for it in the mid-terms; they could have brought the cut extension for the middle class to a vote then too, but they waited until the Republicans, flush with victory through nihilism, won back the House and nearly the paralyzed Senate. Now in their last hours as a mjority of the House, they flail about mightily and give birth to this sorry deal--- as if they hadn't been waiting to do just that all along.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dnlmsstch
too much for so few words
01:16 PM on 12/08/2010
If the president had campaigned on:
A public Option - unless the republicans and insurance companies object
Repealing the bush tax cuts for the rich - unless the republicans object
Closing guantanamo - unless the republicans object
Investing in a Green Economy - unless the republicans and Oil and Coal industry object
Passing a finacial reform legislation and ending too big to fail - unless the republicans and wall street object

He would still be a senator

The way he is going in 2012 he wont be either senator or president.

Michael Miss you and Bill - Friday on PBS is just not the same
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bones4209
08:24 AM on 12/09/2010
Excellent!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
12:43 PM on 12/08/2010
Just because the Capitulator-in-Chief doesn't have courage and strength doesn't mean WE have to be weak and wimpy.

Call your Senators and Representative today and ask them to oppose this deal.
photo
angry in ct
You can't fight in here, this is the war room
12:33 PM on 12/08/2010
Saw this quote today;

Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good.
- Thomas Sowell
jhNY
Mercy.
03:02 PM on 12/08/2010
If that's Sowell talking, you'd better believe he wasn't talking about the destruction of the social safety net, or the ascendency of money above all in politics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
12:20 PM on 12/08/2010
I agree, this proposal is a defeat for the Democrats and Obama. It would be far better to let the Republicans block extending the date to apply of unemployment (extended benefits). It would have been nice if the 'benefits' included support for the millions, like myself, who still can not find employment after exhausting all our extended benefits (99ers). However, in the haste to make something work, the Obama plan regretfully ignored us, and instead felt giving the rich more was a better choice. Oh, there are a few 'trinkets' for the working class. a 2% reduction in withholding taxes, which businesses will suggest is their 'new raise'. Essentially eliminating any long term benefit. The come February, all the benefits will have to be canceled because the Government will exceed the debt ceiling. It is a serious problem that the Republicans have created and orchestrated at the expense of more than 80% of Americans.
Until the Democrats and Obama expose the thug like behavior of the Republicans, the work class will suffer needlessly as we all donate more to the rich and their Republican puppets.