Michael Wolff

Michael Wolff

Posted January 28, 2009 | 12:25 PM (EST)

Left, Right, Gay, Straight -- Who Will the Times Take?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The New York Times is now involved in one of its earnest, baroque, hair-splitting and hair-pulling discussions about who should replace William Kristol on the op-ed page.

Kristol, you remember, is the Fox News commentator hired by Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. to be, along with David Brooks, an official conservative on the op-ed page (and to buy the Times some protection from the attack dogs at Fox News). Now, it used to be that you got to be a columnist at the Times because of worthy service to the paper. But in the Times' efforts to be with it and relevant in an opinionated world, it adopted the ideological bent, with Kristol being its highest concept example. This didn't work out, because pretty much as soon as Kristol was hired, the conservative epoch began to end, and because Kristol, in ideal circumstances not the best writer, didn't have his heart in it. In the end, the Times audience probably does not feed the ego and the glory of a red-blooded conservative.

The Times is now both frantically and painstakingly making lists. Who are its kind of conservatives?

After a period of this, of finding every conservative to be either quite a fuddy-duddy or quite crazy, which pretty much defines conservatives these days, some determined maverick at the Times will suggest they get a liberal. There will ensue, then, a long and complicated discussion about Rachel Maddow and the idea of not just a liberal columnist, but a gay one too, which the Times has never had (not openly).

Continue reading at newser.com

 
Comments
8
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Suggestion: Replace all your writers with letters to the editor and put it on the Internet. Oh, nevermind, I am already reading the future of newpapers. I stopped paying for government propaganda 15 years ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 01/29/2009
- rixter1965 I'm a Fan of rixter1965 7 fans permalink

I don't understand why the honchos at the NYT would pay anyone to write a column on a regular basis when they then go on FauxNews, etc., and denounce the New York Times as archaic, biased, and part of the liberal-bi­ased/mains­tream media.

If there exists a conservative who earns his lucrative income from speeches,books, etc., how about someone who would accept no pay from the NYT, but be allowed space on a regular basis to express his views!?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 01/28/2009
- Clavis I'm a Fan of Clavis 38 fans permalink

I nominate John Boehner. It saves money by cutting out the middleman. Now, the NYT can endorse a position inherently identical to that of the radical Republican minority. All they'll have to do is publish Boehner's notes for the week, and they've got their column.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 01/28/2009
- klondiker I'm a Fan of klondiker 48 fans permalink

Names that I would suggest:

1. Peggy Noonan
2. Arianna Huffington
3. Christopher Hitchens
4. Andrew Sullivan
5. Martin Amis
6. Noah Feldman

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 01/28/2009
- chagedorn I'm a Fan of chagedorn 18 fans permalink
photo

I think they'll probably end up hiring Andrew Sullivan

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 01/28/2009
photo

I like his writing. Unlike Kristol, he's more careful with his facts. I'd like to see a liberal, but I could live with Sullivan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 01/28/2009
- Rrhain I'm a Fan of Rrhain 12 fans permalink

You mean the same Andrew Sullivan who condemened anybody with HIV who had condomless sex to be a killer...only to find out that he, himself, advertised for condomless sex? The same Andrew Sullivan who declared anybody who was against invading Iran to be a traitor...and still hasn't admitted he was wrong?

That Andrew Sullivan?

If the Times should, as you suggest, hire someone who is careful with his facts, why on earth would they choose Sullivan?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 01/28/2009
- kps888 I'm a Fan of kps888 9 fans permalink

How hard can it be to find an opinionated hack who is wrong about everything?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 01/28/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect