iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Wotorson

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Wotorson

Plan for Success of America's Students

Posted: 06/16/11 02:44 PM ET

Jobs are top of mind for most Americans, not only those needing work to help their families make ends meet, but also politicians who hope to keep their jobs on Election Day 2012. As many of us ask, "Where are the jobs?" an equally important question is, "Where are the workers?"

Business leaders who have asked that question don't like the answer. According to recent data from The Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, by 2018, our economy will fall 3 million employees short of the 22 million college-educated workers it needs to thrive. The bottom line is that millions of high school students who should be acquiring the education and skills that will enable them to lead the 21st century global economy are being shortchanged by America's public school system. Members of Congress have the opportunity to reverse that trend, and if they don't take action, our nation's future is in serious jeopardy.

A chorus of voices is now unified in challenging Congress to act immediately to ensure that our public education system truly works for all students through the long-awaited re-authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).

The Campaign for High School Equity (CHSE), a diverse coalition of leading civil rights and education advocacy organizations primarily representing students of color, recently unveiled its Plan for Success to guarantee that all high school students graduate ready for college or the workforce regardless of race, ethnicity, income, or ZIP code. The plan is a comprehensive framework for the strong federal leadership that is necessary to make this a reality.

When it comes to preparing our young people to meet the demands of the 21st century workforce, there are at least two things we know for certain:

  1. Quality teaching outweighs students' social and economic background as the single most important factor influencing student academic outcomes, including graduation.
  2. Strong school accountability is essential to ensuring academic success and lowering dropout rates.
A reauthorized ESEA must strongly support policies that ensure college- and career-readiness for all students by making effective teaching in every classroom a top priority. Teachers must have the resources and tools they need to help students succeed. It is also time to end the practice of concentrating the least experienced, least qualified teachers in high schools in schools that mainly serve students of color, Native students, and those from low-income communities--schools where the graduation rate hovers at just 50 percent. Under ESEA, Congress must truly ensure that these students are not disproportionately taught by inexperienced, under-qualified, or "out-of-field teachers."

ESEA must also guarantee a well-designed accountability system that ensures public access to high-quality and transparent academic performance and graduation data to make certain that schools are serving our children well. The purpose of strong accountability is not to unfairly penalize schools, but rather to identify low-performing schools and help them improve. Our accountability system, therefore, must require schools to accurately and publicly report the academic progress of all students, including racial and ethnic subgroups, and it must place graduation rates on equal footing with college- and work-readiness in determining school quality.

In order to make up the anticipated shortfall of highly educated workers, America must graduate a half million more high school students each year. Students of color are the fastest growing segment of the nation's future workforce. According to the Alliance for Excellent Education, by cutting the dropout rate of students of color and Native students in half, we can generate more than $4.5 billion in lifetime personal earnings and add $412 million in state tax revenue each year. Clearly, we have a tremendous stake in ensuring that all high school students have access to a rigorous and high quality education.

ESEA has not been reauthorized since the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. Every year that goes by without re-authorization is another year wasted--another year in which 1.3 million students leave high school without the education they need to succeed in the workforce and serve as informed participants in our democracy. One wonders exactly how many years we have left to give them the education on which our nation's prosperity and stability surely depends before the opportunity disappears--and we all pay the price.

 

Follow Michael Wotorson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@hsequity

 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wayne the pain
01:28 PM on 06/22/2011
Quality of teaching does NOT out weigh social and economic factors. This is one of the old pie in the sky myths that still prevails in education. Ask anyone in the "trenches" and they will tell you it is a joke. This is an excuse to scapegoat teachers when "on average" poor kids don't compete with their middle and upper class peers. Are poor kids just as smart and talented as middle class kids, yes they are and in many, many cases more so! But to deny the fact that poverty is a terrible detriment to a child's education that teachers just can't over come is to deny reality. As long as we cling to myths like this and try to "fix" the wrong thing, we will never be successful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Vineyard
Dem turned Repub Constitutionalist
12:06 PM on 06/20/2011
I graduated highschool in 2007 and I can tell you first hand high school is a complete joke. I never once took homework home, I never once studied for a test. If I had to write a paper I would do it during our advisory period in about 20 minutes. I never once failed a class in highschool and graduated with a 3.8 GPA. There is something seriously wrong with how easy school is.
11:33 PM on 06/20/2011
What's more troubling is the fact that so many are failing in such an "easy" environment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wayne the pain
01:41 PM on 06/22/2011
You are correct. We have dumbed down the curriculum so a chimp can get a diploma! Why did this occur? Teachers were failing to many kids, kids that deserved to fail. Schools had to have good public relations so we had to lower our standards to keep the "community" happy. Then when they realized we were graduating kids that couldn't read then we became failing schools. We can't have it both ways. You have to have standards and fail kids that can't measure up and find something else for them or continue the current system, there is no in-between.
10:55 AM on 06/20/2011
If you read the report that Mr. Wotorson uses to support his claims, you will find that there is no indication that the educational sector is failing to teach the students in its charge. It simply says that we need more college graduates. He wants to push his agenda of "accountability" and "quality teaching" (his two unsupported, "things we know for certain") so he ignores the one thing that we really DO know for certain--that if those from the lower economic rungs can afford college they stay in it longer and do better. When the New York City taxpayers supported free tuition in the public colleges, thousands and thousands of those of us who had no money (my family spent several years on Welfare) were able to go to college, get our education and contribute to our families, our community and this country. Not only that, but private colleges had to keep their costs and fees down and provide substantial grants to attract strong students or go out of business. Now that the richest Americans are allowed to pay less in taxes, and the middle class is sick of paying more than its share, the poorest students have to do without the education that will fill those jobs. The students I have taught, overwhelmingly drop out of college not because they can't do the work, but because they can't afford it.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
11:15 PM on 06/19/2011
Actually, the single most important factor is student willingness to work and learn. Unless and until we hold students accountable for their part of the equation, we are just scapegoating teachers.
Before people call me names, think about this: in order to succeed in schools, many students must adopt attitudes and behaviors different from their parents, and this is particularly true of parents who did poorly themselves. When students are faced with choosing between parents and school, most will choose parents.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Vineyard
Dem turned Repub Constitutionalist
12:09 PM on 06/20/2011
Completely agree with you. There is a sub culture in American schools where its cool not to be smart. People scapegoat kids who actually study and answer questions in class. There needs to be a fundamental change where kids are rewarded according to their academic output and we need to put more emphasis not on just doing well on tests but actually solving real life situational problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wayne the pain
12:13 AM on 06/19/2011
Socio-economic status is the greatest predictor of academic success. Test scores very closely reflect the economic status of the kids being tested. It is difficult for me to believe that good teachers can trump poverty. Very few of the kids from hard core poverty communities will fare as well academically. As their middle and upper class peers. Clinging to solution myths is not the way to help our kids. Poor kids are as smart and as gifted as kids of any economic level. Middle class kids have many advantages and poor kids have disadvantages to educational success. Poor kids need real solutions to their educational needs not old myths that scape goat teachers for the test performance disappointments of many of these poor kids.
06:01 PM on 06/20/2011
It's unfortunate the media focuses so much on failure that you don't know that great schools exist in low income communities that are eliminating the achievement gap. These schools are district, charter, independent, and parochial. They collaborate and share effective practices with each other as Schools That Can http://schoolsthatcan.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wayne the pain
07:56 PM on 06/20/2011
I like your attitude. We must and we can find solutions so all kids have a shot at success. keep working and it will happen!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:15 AM on 06/18/2011
Mr. Wotorson makes some good points in his article, the main idea being that all students deserve to attend well-equipped schools with competent teachers. Of course. Who could dispute that?

But, predictably, he is wrong about most of the points, such as a "great teacher" can overcome any problem studetnts bring to school and that bringing down the hammer of "accountability" (funny how that only seems to apply to education these days--not anyone else) is the cure for all educational challenges.

Thomas Friedman--who is so brilliant and is able to get to the reality of issues--had this to say about why America is not "number 1": http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/12/opinion/12friedman.html . Pay particular attention to the paragraph about student motivation. He writes exactly what the systemically insumountable obstacle is in just a few sentences. Then, he goes on to explain how a flat world is much different now than it used to be.

This is why the people who keep insisting that America is #1 and we need to "take our county back" will be forever disappointed that they can't go back in time when America was the only super power. Now the power is more distributed than concentrated, and they can protest and pretend all they want, but the world is going forward, not backward. And students do have to work to be part of it, but that Mr. Wotorson and others refuse to acknowledge.
08:53 AM on 06/18/2011
Studies by Harvard found 2 major factors influencing minority achievement...poor attendance and whatever happens at home BEFORE children start school. Hmmm.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
08:20 AM on 06/18/2011
Is there any sentence in this article that is not stuffed with smoke and covered in banana oil?

You know what American industry can't find enough of?-- welders. Send me a qualified welder and I can have him well-employed tomorrow.

Not enough college grads? I'd love to see some figures on that, but how we got from that assertion to the notion that US high schools aren't coming through is a mystery. We might as easily conclude that in the current economic climate and with college tuition going through the roof, college has become a privilege for only the very wealthy.

But the most ridiculous assertion in this stack of ridiculous assertions is that ESEA would help with any of this. NCLB has guaranteed that schools will produce students less prepared for college (unless you're sending them to the University of Bubble Testing).
01:33 AM on 06/18/2011
Where is Mr. Wotorson's supporting data for his claims? Did he simply watch "Waiting for Superman?" While quality teaching and accountability is important and we shouldnt want unqualified teachers in the classroom, we need to realize that economic factors dramatically affect student performance. Many charters (including Canada's schools in Harlem) get results not simply on quality of teachers but on their social programs that provide the community including healthcare. To truly address the education issue we must discuss the system that is allowing for such inequality and poverty. Yet, this would mean discussing serious issues like our economic system and their results on society. It would mean attacking those corporations that instead what to present the teachers and the education system as the problem and them as the saviors. There is a reason why corporations are such advocates of the new reform movement and are unwilling to even discuss poverty as a influence in education, it is to dodge any blame. And finally is there really a shortage of educated minds? Unemployment is around 10%. College unemployment is also very high (hitting an all-time high). While many of the good paying jobs need a college degree there are many jobs out there that are based on a trade. Getting students into college to go into debt and earn a meaningless degree is not going to help everyone. The best national education systems dont simply advocate college preparation and neither should we.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
12:32 AM on 06/18/2011
Public schools have been sending graduates to college for degrees for several decades now. No more trade school, now it's college bound.

Well, where are the jobs we're preparing our students for? They're being outsourced overseas to save a buck and boost profits.

Sorry but I'm not taking education direction from the corporations of this country. Some of the same ones that contributed to our current economic disaster. They aren't going to balance their account books using education tax dollars. That's their goal. Privatization is all about getting the money, no educating students or "reforming" education.

Mr. Wotorson needs to display his research skills. First he needs to read about he five myths about education because he's promoting some of them. Second, he needs to back up his claims with citations. Please prove through independent peer reviewed research that: 1. Quality teaching outweighs students' social and economic background as the single most important factor influencing student academic outcomes, including graduation and 2. Strong school accountability is essential to ensuring academic success and lowering dropout rates.

Reauthorizing ESEA can't be done without revisions.

But NCLB and Race to the Top need to go. they are hurting students, not helping them.

Mr. Wotorson. You know the one thing that will support achieving your goals. A certificated teacher librarian in a library in every public school K-12 to start. Pre-school of all right behind. Ready to put your money where your mouth is?
12:01 AM on 06/18/2011
Mr. Wotorson repeats a serious mistake made by many journalists and education "reformers." He states that "Quality teaching outweighs students' social and economic background as the single most important factor influencing student academic outcomes, including graduation." This is not correct. It should read:

Quality teaching outweighs students' social and economic background as the single most important SCHOOL factor influencing student academic outcomes, including graduation.

The single most important factor influencing student academic outcomes are the parents. Does this really surprise anyone? There is a mountain of research to support this, but if that doesn't convince you, just use common sense. Yes, the parents are more influential than teachers.

This mistake, constantly perpetuated by the media, hurts disadvantaged children the most because it misleads their parents into thinking they can just turn their sons and daughters over to the school "to get educated." In the meantime the parents of the privileged children are out buying educational toys and books before the child is even born. Research tells us that the achievement gap is firmly established before the child even enters school. This is because the informal education provided by the parents is the most powerful in a child's life. Of course, familial attitudes and values are extremely important too.

Please, Mr. Wotorson, do a little research before you write another article on this subject. This bit of misinformation has been extremely harmful to education. Parents need to know they are Number One in the education of their children.
06:40 AM on 06/18/2011
Interesting fact I've come across in research: in-school factors, taken as a whole, account for 4%-18% of the variance in student test scores.
12:01 AM on 06/18/2011
The basic "facts" you state are dead wrong. You would like them to be true, because if they were you could justify your program. But they are not.

Family background and environment dominate over the quality of the teaching. When my kids have a bad teacher, I teach them. Homework has to be done before TV and video games. I drilled my kids on their math facts - flash cards anyone - until they knew them. I took them to the library once or twice a week. I prefer that they be taught in the schools - it is much easier on my wife and myself. But it is our responsibility to see that they are properly educated and when the schools fail, it is our job to make sure that they learn and to make sure that they work - and learn to work.

It is not the school's responsibility to force educate unwilling students - nobody and nothing can do that. It is the school's responsibility to provide an opportunity to learn and an environment that is conducive to learning (the second is less common than the first). Hopefully, students will find teachers that inspire them, but this is not a requirement for teachers - it is too rare and probably requires an psychological match that does not occur frequently
09:50 PM on 06/17/2011
Maybe Super Teacher can just parachute in and take care of all that bad poverty. Teachers can fix the world. Give it a break. Enough of this global economy baloney. Businesses will outsource jobs to the cheapest country. Now the corporations are a little worried cause they don't have enought lackeys but never fear it is race to the bottom lead by the obligarchy.
07:41 PM on 06/17/2011
Teaching and school accountability are the only requirements to student success? Really? How about student and parent responsibility? How about creating a joy and love of learning in those students and parents? We need to market education, folks. Really. Where there is no demand there is no desire. If Businesses and industry did not market their "useful" product no one would want it. We must, we need to market education as something parents and students want, not just something and some place to be sent off to.
06:27 PM on 06/17/2011
Ignorant boilerplate from someone who apparently has no idea what he's talking about. He lists things that we "know for certain," but they're things that anybody who has actually studied education realizes are false.

To anybody out there who wants to do the right thing for kids, but doesn't want to take the trouble to get informed: find out what this guy suggests, then do the opposite.