In the circus that is the Texas State Board of Education (SBoE), no act has become more troubling than that of incumbent Ken Mercer. Mercer is, after all, the person who has defended the SBoE's attack on evolution by writing, in an op-ed piece in the San Antonio Express News, the following bizarre sentence: "For example, have you ever seen a dog-cat, or a cat-rat?"
In fact, I'm certain you haven't seen a "dog-cat" or a "cat-rat." But then again, evolutionary theory doesn't predict that such hypothetical organisms would ever exist. Such details aren't going to get in Mercer's way, though.
Mercer is up for reelection to his District 5 seat on the SBoE, and he's campaigning on his role in the Board's decisions to attack evolution last year, to rewrite history this year and to protect third graders from a popular mathematics textbook two years ago. At every turn, Mercer sees religion playing the dominant role -- even in basic mathematics education! Although the math text was used successfully in many districts across the state to improve student performance, Mercer bought the argument offered by Educational Research Analysts, described by the Dallas Morning News as "a Christian conservative group." Educational Research Analysts offered the following in-depth criticism of Everyday Math: "Replacing standard algorithms with haphazard searches for personal meaning unconstitutionally establishes New Age religious behavior in public school Math instruction." [Emphasis in the original]
Mercer's opponent, Rebecca Bell-Metereau, is not shy about voicing her opinions about Mercer's positions. In an interview with me last week, Bell-Metereau, referring to Mercer's "dog-cat" absurdity said, "Such ignorance is almost staggering. It shows that he's discussing the issues at such a level of nonsense." She went on to lament that "it's like arguing with a five-year-old about the tooth fairy."
And that's where Bell-Metereau's argument comes up short. "Arguing with a five-year-old" about the tooth fairy or anything else means that although they both have something to say, Mercer has refused to engage his opponent in any formal debate. In fact, he's opting to boycott the September 28 debate being sponsored by the League of Women Voters. Mercer is hiding behind the advice of Texas Republican party chair Steve Munisteri who recommended he skip the debate because the League of Women Voters is "unsuitable and unqualified to serve as a neutral, non-partisan debate sponsor." The League of Women Voters?
Bell-Metereau, an English professor at Texas State University at San Marcos, is a thoughtful candidate who is troubled by both Mercer's positions and the SBoE's actions. She believes that if there's some turnover on the Board, with people like herself replacing extremists like Ken Mercer, the Board will be able to revisit some of the egregious curricular decisions made in recent years.
This is her first attempt at electoral politics, and she's running, in part, because she's upset with the Board's consistent refusal to respect expert opinion. Past Board chair and creationist Don McLeroy made the case against expert opinion clearly and succinctly at a Board meeting during the evolution fiasco. Rather than rebutting the data offered by experts on evolution, he simply ranted. "I disagree with these experts," McLeroy said. "Somebody's gotta stand up to experts."
Mercer stands fully-behind McLeroy and went so far as to claim that his non-reappointment to the chair's position by the Texas Senate was due to McLeroy being a Christian. In a bizarre comparison, Mercer compared McLeroy to Carrie Prejean, the Miss USA contestant who spoke out against homosexuality during her beauty pageant interview. As I said above, Mercer believes religion plays a dominant role in every aspect of Texas politics.
Rather than relying on experts, Mercer seems content to permit citizens to decide on scientific ideas. He regularly notes that his constituents often write to him about what should be taught in the curriculum. Bell-Metereau likens this way of deciding curricular content to permitting people "to vote on what time it is. The Board is not doing its duty if they're just reflecting the opinions of their constituents" rather than offering Texas school children a world class education or even a nominally adequate one.
Beyond the obvious craziness, Bell-Metereau sees some very troubling similarities with the SBoE's attack on science and its attack on social science. In both cases, she argues, the Board has opted to remove the material that provides the context for meaningful study. As the great geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky has said, "nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." Remove evolution as the centerpiece of biological evolution and students are presented merely with a random collection of facts. Within the social science curriculum, the Board has opted, in Bell-Metereau's words, to include "a random list of thinkers," rather than provide a context for learning. She argues that memorizing names of people associated with the Enlightenment is very different from learning what the Enlightenment is all about. Speaking about both science and social science, she laments that "without a context, you can't explain and predict. Education should teach people how the world works."
Voters in Texas's 5th District have the opportunity to put an end to the embarrassing and anti-intellectual actions that have diminished education across the state, and that's an opportunity that will likely impact text book choices around the rest of the United States. I, for one, hope that they opt to do just that by replacing Ken Mercer's madness with Rebecca Bell-Metereau's thoughtfulness.
Follow Michael Zimmerman, Ph.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mzclergyletter
Michael Zimmerman, Ph.D.: Creationists Destroy Creationism with Their Own Words
Michael Zimmerman, Ph.D.: The Texas State Board of Education: Now Promoting Islamophobia?
Christopher Brauchli: Russia, Texas and Evolution
Texas Association of School Boards
Bryan Monroe: How Texas' School Board Tried to Pretend Slavery ...
"Somebody's gotta stand up to experts."
'Let's round up as many ignorant people as possible' appears to be the battle cry
Frome the Invisible He made all things Visible, Himself being Invisible.
All of chirst works his miracles, Christ words, Chirst works, Christ obedience to God's Laws only, not man. Chirst manifested, His great Faithfulness to God, through Christ visible works, words, deeds, so the Invisible God's Image could be seen. We are all here not to get rich, but to come into the perfection of God's Image, that is all good. To accept what God has made us all to be, some great, some small. But to come into that perfection in accepting the goodness God has given us all to become and do the best we can and not whine.
God did not pay his chosen ones $100,000 a hr, or made them rich, or powerful in the flesh did he? All were crushed, greatly persecuted, suffered much, but strong in great faith and trusted in God only. God cannot use those who are big, or those who boast of their self righteousness.
God uses the crushed, the broken, who have accomplish great things for God. A flower when it is crushed, gives off the most strongest beautiful scent. Wheat when it is broken, crushed, it to can be used for bread, to feed many.
God spoke to all 7 Churches, as if all were ONE..Told them all better change, their ways or else right? God spoke of all their sins.
Christ sent all His disciples where? To all the Churches why? God also says when He returns, God will has return the Trible of the Levi Priest. They only will be God's Priest. Christ God said is the High Priest for ever, over the Body of God Church, us. We are the church, it is not a building.
God said: Do you not know YOU are the temple of the Lord. Christ came to start God's spiritual church on earth. Us. God said: The Earth is My Foot Stool, what can you ever build me, to contain me? nothing. Christ did not come to die for land did He? God said I am coming with a New HEaven (earth) and a New Jersulaem. I ask God must not be pleased with any right?
Christ came to teach liberation, that the Real and only -Divine Authority- over us, has been placed within every heart, the understanding to know right from wrong. We needed no one to teach us. Nor have to pay anyone to hear th word of God either. christ charged no one, but fed all his 5,000 listeners who were poor outcast refugees, labors, widows, orphans, diseased etc. All races, all skin tones, all faiths, pagans heathens etc even Roman military, Jews, all different tribes, believers and non belivers, Greeks, all travellers going through, came to listen and hear Christ preach. In other words all were sinners. Chirst came to serve, not be served either.
Christ said: My Fathers House is a House of Prayer, not a Den of Thieves. We are to share all we have with all those who live around us, our neighbors, those we see and hear in need right in our very own communities daily.
Cheers, David R
Please visit voterebecca.com for more information on my views.
Rebecca Bell-Metereau
Candidate for Texas State Board of Education District 5