More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Could Israel Be the First Fur-Free Nation?

What's Your Reaction:

In February 2009, an investigation by Israeli TV Channel 10, in cooperation with the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Israel, revealed that two top retail fashion chains in Israel were selling coats, sweaters, and accessory items that contained real animal fur, while assuring their customers that the items were made from synthetic fur. The investigation included a thorough laboratory examination, which proved the speculations of a few customers that the clothing contained dog, cat, and rabbit fur. In reaction to the televised investigation, the chains immediately removed the furred items from the shelves and promised to better enforce their synthetic fur orders.

The production of fur for fashion is one of the cruelest practices towards animals, especially in fur farms in China where there is no national animal welfare law. Millions of small animals like dogs, cats, and rabbits are raised on Chinese farms, first and foremost, to produce fur, and are killed solely for an indulgent purpose: fashion. Moreover, they are kept in atrocious conditions, are fed very poorly, and are barely given any water. Other animals - like foxes and raccoons - are captured through foothold traps causing the trapped animals to bleed to death or wait in dire stress and pain until the fur-farmers "rescue" them. When time comes to give up their "to die for" fur, they are killed by lethal gas, electric shocks, and, more often than not, are skinned alive to better preserve the quality of their pelts. This cruelty, documented by the International Anti-Fur Coalition, is apparently even cheaper in China than producing synthetic fur.

Whereas China has been expanding its fur farms in recent years due to growing world demand, the vast majority of fur farms are located in Europe and in the United States. However, owing to animal friendly social movements and activists, these countries are continuously amending legislation to limit unjustified cruelty towards animals. The United States, for instance, passed a law in the year 2000 - The Dog and Cat Protection Act - prohibiting any trade of dog or cat fur. The European Union passed a similar law that went into effect in January 2009. But no country so far has passed a comprehensive law against trade in animal fur.

Ninety-five percent of Israel's textile products are imported from China and real furred items are occasionally mislabeled as fake fur, deceiving both the retailers and the consumers. A survey, commissioned by the International Anti-Fur Coalition and Let the Animals Live, conducted immediately after the February 2009 media investigation, showed that 86% of Israelis believe killing animals for fur is immoral. Moreover, nearly 80% back a bill calling for ban of fur trade in Israel. This media exposure and public support, together with the long-standing joint efforts of the International Anti-Fur Coalition and the Israeli organization Let the Animals Live, recently pressured Israeli Members of Knesset to endorse a law that would limit or eliminate the fur trade in Israel.

In December 2009, the Knesset preliminarily approved a bill that bans trade in nearly all animal fur. The bill, first introduced by MK Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz) and reintroduced by MK Ronit Tirosh (Kadima), is now being extended by Agriculture Minister Shalom Simhon (Labor Party) together with the Minister of Environmental Protection Gilad Arden (Likud). The bill prohibits producing, importing, exporting, and trading in all animals' fur. However, it excludes fur and hides from cattle, camels, sheep, and goats, as these animals' skins are considered to be by-products of the meat industry. As a sensitive act towards the religious communities in Israel, the MKs who introduced the bill agreed to also exempt the import of fur for religious traditions, mainly for the Shtreimel fur hats - typically made from fox or sable fur - used by a small minority of the ultra-orthodox Jewish community.

Brigitte Bardot, the world-famous French actress and a long-time animal rights activist, sent a letter on Tuesday to the chairman of the Knesset Committee for Education, Culture, and Sport to support the new bill. This committee is responsible for preparing and approving the bill for the second and third readings, as required by the Israeli legislative process before it is finally passed into law. However, the ultra-orthodox communities - despite the exemption - are now blocking the bill (which they preliminary approved) due to fears that it would raise questions about the kosher slaughter of animals outside of Israel.

The Significance of the Bill
It is unclear if Brigitte Bardot or any other European or American activist will have the power to promote the Israeli law and bridge the gap between the ultra-orthodox and the MKs who favor the bill (including the chairman of the Committee for Education, Culture, and Sport - an orthodox Jew himself). But the majority, who are in favor of the law, must insist on advancing it, even without the approval of the ultra-orthodox, given its significance.

First, the bill shows that most Israeli Knesset Members from across the political spectrum can unite around a humane and Jewish idea of stopping wanton cruelty towards animals for the sake of indulgence. Judaism places great importance on the proper treatment of animals. In the Bible, those who cared for animals - such as Jacob, Moses, and King David, who were all shepherds and took care of animals - were perceived as heroes. Furthermore, unnecessary cruelty to animals is strictly forbidden, and in some cases, animals are accorded the same sensitivity as human beings: animals rest on the Sabbath; a person must feed his animals before he feeds himself; and it is forbidden to muzzle an ox to prevent it from eating while it is working in the field.

Second, although the near sweeping ban is not expected to harm the Israeli fashion industry since fur products in the Mediterranean climate draw little demand, it is an important statement and precedent emerging from the Israeli legislative body. This will make Israel the only country, hitherto, to impose a near total ban on fur trade.

And finally, this law, and the set of values derived from it, could appeal to other nations and potentially advance their legislation on fur production and trade, with the ultimate goal of ending needless animal cruelty. In fact, three leading activists from the United Kingdom and Canada visited Israel in February of this year in order to closely follow the legislative process and learn from it. Being the first nation to promote such a humane and comprehensive law illustrates an aspect of Israel's soft power and could be a first step to reaffirming Israel's once proclaimed goal of being a light unto the nations.

 
In February 2009, an investigation by Israeli TV Channel 10, in cooperation with the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Israel, revealed that two top retail fashion chains in Israel w...
In February 2009, an investigation by Israeli TV Channel 10, in cooperation with the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Israel, revealed that two top retail fashion chains in Israel w...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:51 PM on 04/17/2010
Any step toward kindness is a step in the right direction, whether toward people or non-human animals.
One does not discourage the other. Also, there are animal humane organizations in the Palestinian territories, too.
I live where people used to trap a lot, and you could hear dogs, coyote pups, cats, foxes and other animals crying in the traps for days.
Good for Israel!
12:49 PM on 03/13/2010
Why is this something to be so afraid of that you have to make it illegal?

Native American Indian Traditional Men Dance Competition
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0WQ8eLY2gs&feature=related

I am seriously wondering what is wrong with these people, maybe someone can explain it to me.
05:06 PM on 03/12/2010
"showed that 86% of Israelis believe killing animals for fur is immoral. "

The word "Immoral" screams out from Palestine, but a bit of animal fur has 86% of them all a twitter?
First things first Zionists, first the human rights, then the animal rights.
12:39 PM on 03/13/2010
I think it has something to do with religion. Is there some fur related prohibition in the bible?
03:08 PM on 03/12/2010
Do Palistinian scalps count as fur?
12:32 PM on 03/13/2010
Why are Jews so hung up about this aspect of Native American culture, specifically eliminating the wearing of fur?

They can do what they like in their own country, of course, but I don't get it. Do I sound defensive? You bet I do! This behavior of chipping away at us has a long history and it has not stopped yet. I really wonder what they have against my religion.

Nations built by ethnic cleansing: the U.S. and Israel
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0MKY/is_2_29/ai_n9770588/
11:48 AM on 03/12/2010
The article states that," The production of fur for fashion is one of the cruelest practices towards animals, especially in fur farms in China where there is no national animal welfare law."

This is true, but its also important to point out that in the U.S. fur farms are not regulated under the federal Animal Welfare Act. In farms in the U.S. and Canada are completely devoid of any regulation relevant to animal welfare.

A report released this year by Born Free USA "Cruelty Uncaged" details the lack of regulation in the North American fur industry http://www.bornfreeusa.org/furfarmreport

The report also details the animal welfare issues and the environmental impacts of fur farming.
12:34 PM on 03/13/2010
So they are worried about cruelty to animals in China, but not the people trapped next door in Gaza. What is wrong with these people?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ramblin jack
08:52 AM on 03/12/2010
I see no problem with real animal hair in clothes and all you that act like your all holy and surpreme can take a flying leap as if I want to wear fur why not. The western world spends way too much money and time worrying over animals to the detriment of humans it is really sickening.
11:02 AM on 03/12/2010
Your attitude toward animals is what's sickening. Good for Israel for taking this stand.
02:55 PM on 03/12/2010
Right on.
12:35 PM on 03/13/2010
If you eat meat and wear leather, what difference does it make to wear fur? And are you suggesting wool sweaters are "sickening"?
07:44 AM on 03/12/2010
"it is an important statement and precedent emerging from the Israeli legislative body. This will make Israel the only country, hitherto, to impose a near total ban on fur trade."

Someone has to be the first to stand up against the inhumane treatment of animals...let it be Israel, they seem to be one of the few countries with both integrity & courage.
11:55 PM on 03/12/2010
What they need to do is form a Society for the prevention of cruelty to Palestinians.
01:05 AM on 03/13/2010
They already did that but the "palestinians" bombed it
06:44 AM on 03/12/2010
I would Rather wear A baby Deer Jumpsuit than Placate PETA....lol
05:07 PM on 03/11/2010
I have been to Israeli beaches. The men, and some women,certainly, need no animal fur, as some are apparently born with beaver pelts permanently attached to their backs.
04:32 PM on 03/14/2010
While there may or may not be an element of truth to this, it is off-topic and irrelevant.
03:56 PM on 03/11/2010
I hope more countries follow suit!
11:03 AM on 03/12/2010
I completely agree. It'll probably be the only time we agree on anything Israel-related, but hey...
02:54 PM on 03/12/2010
LOL Rat, well it's a start :)-
02:59 PM on 03/11/2010
This would be the ultimate irony that a terrorist state like Israel who violates human rights without batting an eye would stop wearing animal fur because it offends their sensibilities. I can't stop laughing.
03:31 PM on 03/11/2010
Well it didn't take the Israel haters long to change the subject. Israel attempts to do a decent thing, and boom, they are called terrorists. The Mideast is a complicated place with plenty of blame to go around. This is a piece about the grisly world of animal exploitation, not geopolitics. Your oversimplification of the situation indicates you are not well versed in history, religion or, for that matter, animal cruelty.
03:55 PM on 03/11/2010
Spot on DC
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
05:59 PM on 03/11/2010
It becoming increasingly hard to feel good about Israel. their human rights record is appallinig. I am glad they are banning furs, but I wish they would stop their cruelty to animals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
03:37 PM on 03/11/2010
It's possible that animals have not spent the past sixty years trying to destroy their country.