Race Is All the Clintons Have Left

Posted May 7, 2008 | 03:42 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Sitting there on the set, listening to the endless wrap-ups and explanation of the exit polls, I was on the verge of faking my own death on national TV in order to go talk to myself about the obvious, unspoken equation in the little there is left to this fight between Obama and Clinton. The beast that is nearly always there in American life, the danger that rustles the shrubs at the edge of our daily existence -- race -- was routinely ignored in the recitation of numbers pouring out of North Carolina and Indiana.

Now, faced with a mathematical mountain climb that even Stephen Hawking could not ascend, the Clintons -- and it is indeed both of them -- are just about to paste a bumper sticker on the rear of the collapsing vehicle that carries her campaign. It reads: VOTE WHITE.

That's the underlying message propping up a failed candidate. Check it out, you superdelegates: the buttoned down black guy is having trouble with blue collar white guys so cast your vote with the white chick who has transformed herself into an arm-wrestling, shot and a beer, kitchen table advocate for the working class and now it's on to West Virginia and Kentucky where she'll prove it.

So, after all the years they have been with us, after all the triumph and tastelessness, the accomplishments and embarrassments, we're about to watch them act out an updated, mixed gender re-make of Thelma and Louise with Bill behind the wheel, the two of them sharing a knowing look, a wink, in the front seat as they take the Democrat party right off the cliff, the whole thing crashing and burning in a racial divide both he and she sought to heal all those years ago in Little Rock and then Washington.

Look at the numbers, the Clintons say: Your son didn't get into the college that was his first choice but the black kid with lower SATs did? Your brother didn't get the civil service slot on the fire department because he was white and there is an unspoken quota? You didn't get the promotion because corporate diversity policy mutely suggested a person of color get it? Your kid is being bused an hour and half a day to a public school with low reading scores?

Scratch a sore, baby. Vote for Clinton.

Her campaign began -- When? Last year? Last century? It moved across the landscape a summer ago like a cash cow, arriving at each stop surrounded by an air of incumbent expectancy, never sensing, never seeing the black guy who had the audacity to get in her way.

It was a campaign run and dominated by a fat, arrogant pollster, this Penn who once conspired to concoct a question in order to figure out where the Clintons would swim one summer. Martha's Vineyard or Wyoming? In the past few weeks, Geoff Garin has turned Hillary Clinton into a very formidable candidate by doing something that apparently never occurred to the numbers cruncher Penn: Having her behave like a human being. Clearly, if Garin had been in the driver's seat from the start of this spectacle, Obama would have a lot more time to watch White Sox home games.

But presidential politics does not exist in the land of 'what if.' It is an exhausting, seemingly endless process, fueled by money and ego and an ability to withstand mistakes of commission or omission as well as hands coming out of the recent past, like the strangling grip of Jeremiah Wright, a racist himself, who still might inhibit any chance of an Obama success.

It's been an amazing ride, this whole campaign. It has three actors left on the stage, all with compelling personal stories to tell in this land of ours, itself the greatest story ever told. Everyone knows McCain's history, an epic of the age. And more and more are getting to know Obama's; a black guy from Chicago who, two, three years ago, would have had difficulty hailing a cab on a rainy afternoon in midtown Manhattan because of his skin color, suddenly within striking distance of being nominated for president by one of our two major political parties.

And Hillary Clinton, always ambitious, an over-achiever, tough, smart and resilient. And now on the edge of writing a truly ugly chapter for all to see.

Read more reactions from Huffington Post bloggers to the Indiana and North Carolina primary results


 

Comments
277
Pending Comments
0
Post a Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

The writing has been on the wall for some time about Hillary winning...Super delegates listen what she is saying "I will not leave this campaign until there is a nominee." It's up to the Super delegates to step up and end this, she is telling you this...How much damage do use wish to do this party.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 05/11/2008

Seth,

Sadly, you know not of what you speak.

Blaming Bill Clinton for the Republican Baclash midterm is just as bad as throwing the proverbial baby out with the bathwater.

Blame fellow Americans who voted the creeps in but don't give Bill Clinton the shaft because of it, it's not historically accurate.

GWB is a relic of those same voters but to blame Clinton you are just as much to blame as they are.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 AM on 05/11/2008

Quoting Barnicle: "Sitting there on the set, listening to the endless wrap-ups and explanation of the exit polls, I was on the verge of faking my own death on national TV in order to go talk to myself about the obvious, unspoken equation in the little there is left to this fight between Obama and Clinton. The beast that is nearly always there in American life, the danger that rustles the shrubs at the edge of our daily existence -- race -- was routinely ignored in the recitation of numbers pouring out of North Carolina and Indiana."

Thing is Barnicle, we need you to say these things while on the air, not just here in this blog, or when you are along talking to yourself after you have 'faked your own death on national TV'. When you don't speak up and out loudly and consistently (and I have heard speak truth to power on matters of race), you speed us all towards our own collective national death. I fear that you let the Rev. Wright bogeyman rob you of your voice. I know that the specter of the angry black man is something that instills fear in the hearts and minds of many, but I am hopeful that you regain your truth-speaking voice soon, particularly on forums such as Morning Joe.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 AM on 05/11/2008

To play the race card as Mrs. Clinton has, to highlight and encourage a sense that we are crudely divided as a nation, to make your argument a brute and cynical "the black guy can't win but the white girl can" is -- well, so vulgar, so cynical, so cold, that once again a Clinton is making us turn off the television in case the children walk by.

"She has unleashed the gates of hell," a longtime party leader told me. "She's saying, 'He's not one of us.'"

She is trying to take Obama down in a new way, but also within a new context. In the past he was just the competitor. She could say, "All's fair." But now he's the competitor who is going to be the nominee of his party. And she is still trying to do him in. And the party is watching.

LINK: http://online.wsj.com/public/article/declarations.html

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 05/09/2008

RE: Now, You Either Get it About the Clinton Con-Artists or You Don"t
'Clinton Con Artists History'
1. Bill Clinton calls himself the "come-back kid" in an election that he lost in N.H. (spin starts)
2. Whitewater (judgement?)
3. Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, et al (judgement?)
4. Bill Clinton lied about having sex with that woman- Impeached.
5. Hillary failed Health Care Bill (my way highway problem)
6. Bill Clinton Pardons brother, Mark Rich, and others-
7. Hillary Senate campaigns riddled with corruption-
8. Troubling finding of Clinton associates mysteriously falling by the wayside. (scary)
9. Hillary Presidential campaign management failures-
10. Hillary was always projected to win New Hampshire-
11. Obama wins Nevada delegate count.
12. South Carolina (Obama double digit surprise)
13. Obama wins eleven straight states-
14. Obama wins Texas delegate count.
15. New Ohio vote totals show 200000 more for Obama (single digit win)
16. Pennsylvania final results (single digit win)
17. Indiana final results now less than 1% win for Clinton-
18. North Carolina 14 point spread after Clintons hinted upset-
19. Now comes the transformation from $100,000,000 baby to "coal miner"s daughter" using
George Wallace tactics.
20. Now we await new Clinton Library donor revelations- the saga continues...

The Bosnia sniper fire was not mis-speaking- this is what they always do.... just maybe
those hard working white folks will vote for Barack on behalf of his mom, who was hard
working and white like them... [ghostwriter]

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 AM on 05/11/2008

Amabo,....Brilliant !!!

Bravo !

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 05/11/2008

Question: Are the Clintons now showing their white trash side?
This is despicable. Can't someone tell them to go away?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 AM on 05/09/2008

Don't insult white people by describing Clintons as "white trash." They're just trash, period. I'm black, and I object to the term "white trash." I find it offensive. More, importantly, the Clintons are so much worse than even that stereotype implies.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 05/09/2008

This post might end up being a repeat for which I apologize. I agree with your post,
calling someone white trash or trailer trash is appalling and hurtful. I think the
Clintons real problem, is a naked and ugly lust for power. I would like to include
a link that will help you understand my transition from once being a Clinton supporter
to utterly despising them. http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/050308.html

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 AM on 05/11/2008

Thanks for the link. An excellent expose of the Clinton campaign and its strategy to win the presidency. Also a great reminder for me of how I lost my long-held respect and admiration for Hillary Clinton and why she will never regain either. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me. I am out of the Clinton-Fool-Making Game.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 AM on 05/11/2008

Thank you for your thoughtful post. Its' never fun having your
illusions shattered, but it definitely beats the alternatives.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 05/11/2008

Mike must wear earplugs on all those MSNBC panels when they beat the role of the African-American vote like a dusty carpet on a clothesline, parsing it against all the other demographics till they drop from exhaustion.

Maybe, they cue him with a flashing red light.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 AM on 05/09/2008

Yes, but they don't call black people lazy on those panels. Hillary did. It's not the same.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 05/09/2008

"Hard-working" voters, white or otherwise, is campaign boilerplate (unless you're crawling through the underbrush with a magnifying glass, desperately groping for more "proof" of racism).

Extrapolate till you drop... you'll NEVER find a quote of Clinton calling ANYBODY "lazy".

Ooh, and look, over there... in the corner. There are people talking. They're probably talking about you. You know how THEY are...

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 PM on 05/09/2008

By singling out one race as "hardworking" the implication that other of a different race are lazy or not hard working is not even subtle. Hillary knew full well what she was saying and what she was doing - driving a wedge between white and black.

How amusing! Hillary's supporters always like to tell everyone how smart she is but when called on her nasty tactics, they always put her in the role of playing dumb.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 PM on 05/11/2008

If any republican today said what Hillary has said, the media and the public would be screaming bloody murder. It is so over-the-top that I almost don't believe it myself. She is a woman that has no scrupples what so ever.
What no one seems to be mentioning is the fact that she's apparently thrown the latinos under the bus too. Are gays and lesbians next?
So much for the big tent that used to be known as the democratic party.
People of integrity, that genuinely still believe in the long standing struggle for civil rights and the principals of the democratic party, throw this evil woman off our bus.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 AM on 05/09/2008

An EXCELLENT point, gjklbc. Apparently now it's the "White way or the highway" for Clinton.

We don't have to throw her off the bus, gjklbc. All we have to do is to open the door and turn away as she and Bill get off. Don't Blacks, Latinos and Gays live in New York? How long will New York's women continue to support the "new" Hillary Clinton? I suppose we'll find out in 2010.

The disintegration of the Clinton campaign AND legacy has been breathtaking because of its breadth and depth. I would have NEVER imagined that someone so respected in DEMOCRATIC circles would CHOOSE to channel Karl Rove and throw away so much so fast. Rod Serling couldn't have written a more surreal episode of the "Twilight Zone" than what has been the 2008 Clinton campaign.

One is left to wonder if this is what the Clintons were about all along. Were Dems, who stood by both of them during their lowest points ("Don't ask, don't tell," failed health care proposal, Whitewater, Monica Lewinsky, etc.), sold a bill of goods? Or is this just the despicable response to a coronation that did not happen?

Either way, I'm not sure that it matters now. The road to hell is paved with good intentions and political campaigns and the Clinton's "Bridge to the 21st Century" has been engulfed in a self-set conflagration of myopia, hubris and arrogance.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 05/11/2008

The last thing in the world this country needs is a race-baiting, lying, polarizing President who brings out the worst in everyone. Everytime I think the Clinton's can't sink any lower, they prove me wrong. She, quite literally, turns my stomach.

A once casual supporter of Hillary, this 40-something white woman who would rather cut her own arm off than vote for Hillary.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 05/08/2008

As a white guy, I'd be a lot prouder to lose the general election supporting the black guy over the white woman who managed to 'inspire' the ignorant white segment of our country to vault herself into the nomination.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 05/08/2008

Thank you. As an African American, I cannot tell you how much it means to me to read your words. I was so worried white voters would not recognize how dangerous she is. Thank you

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 AM on 05/09/2008

You do not need to thank anyone. As a feminist, I have been appalled by her willingness to play the gender card and the race card simultaneously. It's such a sign of moral weakness.

Women, minorities, gay/lesbian/transsexual should all be working together to shift societal behaviour towards equality. You don't throw one under the bus to get your way. To think at one time I actually admired HRC and to see what she has become really saddens me.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 05/11/2008


As a white woman, I am also appalled by the Clintons' race baiting and so are millions and millions of others.

You do not need to thank anyone. We are simply standing up for what is moral and decent, and for our core beliefs.

No need to be grateful ! We are all in this together.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 05/11/2008

It appears that the Clintons took notes from your blog.

Headline today:
Clinton: Obama Not Winning Over "Hard-Working Americans, White Americans"

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 05/08/2008

Mike Barnicle is a bit gruff, but he is generally on the mark with his political assessments. Here he is correct on the Clinton's using race for political gain. Where I find the problem is in his assessment that Jeremiah Wright is a racist. This must have been an MSNBC extra credit project.
Wright's comments might be considered unpatriotic, but Wright has not talked about race. The comments that so upset the nation were about his version of US history. I am concerned that the MSNBC gang, including MB, have been beating the Wright horse so incessantly. Now it seems that this bizarre obsession has become outright disingenuous.
I don't appreciate some of what Wright said, but this level of frequency is kind of freaky.
Let's hear a little more about Hagee and others who have made comments that would make even the Reverend blush. McCain has not been forced to renounce or reject Hagee. Why???

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 05/08/2008

I believe Hillary would make a better president but I will support whomever the party nominates. What bugs me is the thin skin (whatever color) people who oppose Hillary seem to have. Toughen up. The Repubs. have already sharpened their attacks on Obama and are all but ignoring Hillary now. You think Clinton played the race card? Wait 'till the Repubs. start their push polls and racist ads and phone jamming, and vote tampering, etc. The speech Obama gave on race was so wonderful because he spoke to us like we were adults. It was a mature, realistic look at race in this country-no histrionics or baiting. I hope Mr. Obama stays positive. I hope he defends himself against the inevitable lies that will be told but I hope he stays on message. He also needs to rest. He's looking tired and thin lately-not good. Maybe some chicken soup? Couldn't hurt.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 05/08/2008

The Republicans don't have to play the race card, Hillary's already done that for them!

Karl Rove gave strict instructions to surrogates and PACS not to go there if Obama was the nominee as it would anger large groups of Americans, including the Latino vote that historically votes Republican. The Republicans have a horrible racist reputation but Karl Rove's got to be laughing his ass off right now. Hillary's done such a job on Obama that the GOP doesn't even have to lift a finger!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 05/11/2008

It is not "thin-skinned" to question racism and race-baiting. It is ethical. What happened to your integrity? Did you vote it away when you voted for Hillary Clinton. Shame on you. Are you saying we should tolerate racism to prove that we're tough? I guess you think Martin Luther King was a thin-skinned wimp.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 05/09/2008

Right-on. Mike hit the nail on the head. Hillary and her husband are determined to drive this Party over the cliff; they are ready to obvertly play the race card. They have been hinting at it, winking and nudging those among us who still wear the White sheet. The SD need to dump her now. Donors need to direct their donations to the DNC. Stop her now.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 05/08/2008

The fact that the Clintons have assumed the Republican strategy on election day in state after state--voter suppression--says it all. If you've been involved on primary day, you've seen it. If you've been involved in more than one, you've seen it every time. Not just AA's, but students as well. That's why her claims re: her motives about MI and FL ring so hollow. She has no more interest in counting votes than Karl Rove.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 05/08/2008

The ease with which the MSM pigeon-holed the electorate into categories base most often on either on race, age, education or income level is what we should all remember from this train-wreck campaign. The young AA I"m now training as a back-up for me here in the lab expressed his outrage quite simply, "Why can"t they just talk about voters, not white voters vs. black, rich vs. poor, smart vs. dumb¦.it just pisses me off, all I want to be seen as is an American. That"s it, nothing more or less. Why is that so hard for them to do? Do they really think blacks don"t hear the racist BS on every channel?"

He sees this for what it is. The campaign has painted for us all a starkly rancid picture of America in 2008. That we have a long way to go towards equality is of no surprise. That we continue the discourse couched in such hideous language on every TV channel (they all do it) should make every American shutter in revulsion. While I understand that there is some cause to breakdown the voting patterns for the viewers as information, there is absolutely no reason to harp on that information like a kid with an old toy, rediscovered from the back of the toy closet. The viewing public must find a way to express some outrage at this, now. Turning the TV off is not an answer.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 05/08/2008

The question is will the Black vote finally override the redneck vote? For years the deciding factor for the Democrats was the redneck vote termed the solid South. Then with Democrats leading the charge for civil rights in the early 60"s the rednecks vote fled into the open arms of conservative Republicans and became termed Regan Democrats. In this current Democratic primary season Regan Democrats have been going for Hillary, but it would seem in many states the Black vote for Obama has become the deciding factor. So once again, the question is will in the general election the educated, upscale and younger vote, along with the Black vote, finally override the traditional redneck victory margin that conservative Republicans have in recent years been so successfully exploiting.?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 05/08/2008

MIKE BARNICLE.....Your article nails it. A reminder to us all that the so-called "redneck philosophy" IS NOT resigned to the South. Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, Wisconsin, New Hampshire....Do you get it?