More

Mike Doyle

Mike Doyle

Posted: December 11, 2008 01:39 PM

Clout Gate


Clout Gate. I'm coining the term here and now. I can't think of any better reason than clout to explain why an Illinois governor elected on an anti-corruption platform and ending up under long-term federal investigation would think he could get away with disgraceful deeds the likes of which got Rod Blagojevich arrested in his jogging suit by the F.B.I. on Tuesday morning.

Anyone reading this outside of Illinois might take clout as a noun. They would be mistaken. In the Central Time Zone, clout is very definitely a verb. Mike Royko, Chicago's patron saint of news columnists, said it best back in 1973:

"What clout is in Chicago is political influence, as exercised through patronage, fixing, money, favors, and other traditional...methods."

Clout is not the payoff. Clout is putting out your hand to receive the envelope that you have no doubt will shortly be sitting in your palm.

There is no more clouted person in Illinois than its Governor. For better or worse, even Mayor Daley knows that. The State Constitution's lack of a recall mechanism virtually guarantees that whatever antics are undertaken by the occupant of Springfield's executive office will not generate real political consequences.

Not unless outrage brings clout out into the open. That rarely happens. In the history of Illinois, it's never happened to this extent.

Clout is demanding the head of a children's hospital make a donation to your re-election fund to free up millions of dollars in state aid.

Clout is shaking down a billionaire to pack the editorial board of a major American newspaper.

Clout is trying to sell the vacated Senate seat of America's first black President-elect. (And it's also not a little bit stupid, considering it was the President-elect, himself, clouting for his preferred candidate.)

And while it may be a great friend to those who have it, it is an enemy of those who don't. For clout is a zero-sum game. For those who swear by it to prosper, the sly-wink, under-the-table, knowing-nod means by which this happens means someone else is going to get screwed. Maybe a lot of people. Unfairly. Illegally.

Because if clout could work the miracles that it does without causing harm and injustice, it would be out in the open. There wouldn't be a shadow market for political favors, much less a carpet-bagging federal prosecutor in long-term Windy City residence.

Clout has been considered natural law in these parts since long before anyone reading these words was born. It is a myth that clout makes the world go 'round, yet lack of clout can stop your personal world in its tracks.

On its own, it does not make the sun set or the moon rise. It is not responsible for the tides. It makes no eternal breezes blow, though it can be responsible for the winds emerging from the mouthpieces of certain politicians.

Clout will not regrow your hair, remove your wrinkles, or reduce your turkey neck. Nor, contrary to popular belief, will it rescind your erectile dysfunction.

Left unchecked, however, clout will seek to fulfill itself by taking advantage of everything in its path. Good judgment. Good government. Social justice. Citizenship.

Rolling full speed ahead, clout will trample compassion for your fellow man into the dust, barely breaking a sweat and feeling no remorse in the process.

When completely run amok, clout becomes an enemy to all. This week in Illinois, apparently even to those who have it.

It doesn't have to be this way. For clout is one thing more: it is a choice. Clout is neither handed down from God nor taught in school. Instead, it is a deliberate strategy of individuals too fearful of mind to believe in their own ability to succeed, and too cynical of heart to understand that violating another is never done without God--and occasionally Patrick Fitzgerald--watching.

In this, it is a problem of an entire society. Is it really any wonder that elected leaders, appointed officials, and duly sworn functionaries would come to believe that growing their personal wealth is a function of raping the public weal in a world where most of us cannot say words like love, honesty, and compassion with a straight face?

Clout will remain the scourge of civil society in the Great State of Illinois and elsewhere until we--as an electorate and as a people--realize the miracles we are capable of making happen every day from now until forever by merely standing together instead of tearing each other apart.

And as long as clout remains unchallenged, it will also remain the reason for the sudden waning of Chicago's equally sudden waxing of credibility on the national stage. Because the coattails of Obama's hometown media spotlight will stick around long after he's gone away to Washington.

And maybe long after Blagojevich goes away to prison, too.

Clout Gate. I'm coining the term here and now. I can't think of any better reason than clout to explain why an Illinois governor elected on an anti-corruption platform and ending up under long-term fe...
Clout Gate. I'm coining the term here and now. I can't think of any better reason than clout to explain why an Illinois governor elected on an anti-corruption platform and ending up under long-term fe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric8869
04:23 PM on 12/14/2008
You call it "Clout Gate" I call it "The Bean" - (just joking)
06:46 PM on 12/13/2008
Mike, you are clearly not yet fully aware of the realities of your adopted city. The notion that Rod Blagojevich ever had more clout than Mayor Daley is just laughable. Blago has dealt with opposition from within and without his party since Day 1. Mayor Daley appointed more than half of the City Council and is approaching 20 years of uninterrupted and largely unimpeded rule of the City.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mike Doyle
11:31 PM on 12/13/2008
Manny, I disagree. By dint of the state's purse strings, the Illinois governor is more clouted than the Chicago mayor. The governor can dictate to the mayor–and has–on issues involving state payments and funding. The state coffers are a huge well of clout--and one which forces the Chicago mayor to play nicely with the Illinois governor in order to receive a fair share. That’s why even up to this point you have not heard Mayor Daley lambaste Blagojevich. The latter can still fiscally screw the former’s city. As his own father-in-law (Chicago Ald. Dick Mell) has said, Blagojevich is not very mindful of honoring the support that got him into the governor’s office in the first place. Blago may not be able to dictate what happens in Chicago, but he can certainly decide whether state-funded programs and priorities that affect this city see their funding dry up.
04:08 PM on 12/14/2008
I don't see how you're using Royko's definition of clout to make your case at all. Does Chicago need money from Illinois? Sure. Does the State have any choice other than to give Chicago money in most cases? No. More to the point, the State government's ability to fund some City programs says nothing about Blagojevich's personal clout as compared to Daley's.

Where is Blago's influence shown? He had a legislature that routinely fought him whereas Daley gets virtually everything he wants. Indeed, the structure of government is such that Chicago's mayor has much more control over the workings of the city than Illinois' governor does over the state.

Patronage has been so bad in Chicago that the federal government has intervened. State government has not had anything close to that. In fact, how many employees does the City have and how many does the State have? By virtue of the direct services that a city provides as opposed to a state, my hunch is that Daley has a more to use as chits.

Can you provide some real examples of where Blago has shown control over the City and done something the City didn't want?
04:24 PM on 12/12/2008
Nice job with this post. I'm almost there with you. My thought is that we need to figure out a way for politicians to tell "the truth" about how political office is maintained. In today's arena where significant cost is incurred to attain the office, it's unrealistic to believe many contributors will not believe they "buy" access. I see a need to bring this to the light of day, like illegal drugs, so the spoils go to the State rather than a politico's pocket.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mike Doyle
12:51 PM on 12/13/2008
Thanks, nurunr. If nothing else, the Blagojevich indictment and its sweeping worldwide press (Blago always wanted to be a big name--he sure is now, isn't here?) are helping that to happen, at least here in Illinois.

I don't know what it will take to get an entire state full of politicians to realize that the world is watching and pay-to-play in the end just doesn't lead anywhere except to jail. It's not good enough to bring it even further under the table, the people of Illinois deserve better than that, no matter how weary of and used to it we are after all these years.

It is not acceptable, it is not legal, and it is not moral. Major cities like New York figured this out more than a century ago. It's the turn of Chicago--and Illinois--to finally dismantle its 19th-century machine system.

Before federal prosecution continues to do it for is. Because that isn't ending anytime soon.
07:49 PM on 12/11/2008
This was a terrific article. Thanks for putting down what many people in Illinois and Chicago feel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadeba
02:24 PM on 12/11/2008
You act as if this only happens in Chicago - get real, Texas is as dirty as they come - the difference is, no one does anything about it or bothers to expose it. Look at Alaska, with their scant population, Stevens and Palin alone place it ahead of Chicago.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mike Doyle
02:34 PM on 12/11/2008
The point is not that Illinois has a license on corruption like this, although this week it's certainly got near-monopoly status, but that individual choices are key to keeping it around. In my book, such complicit individual choices include "get real" attitudes like the one represented in your comment, which are akin to shrugging morality's shoulders at the problem and deciding it will always be with us.

Saying it's everywhere says nothing. I'd rather hear what you think we as an electorate should do about it. A comment like that really would be getting real.