iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mike Elk

Mike Elk

Posted: November 22, 2010 01:08 PM

Temporary workers taking the place of locked-out union employees at a uranium enrichment plant in Illinois appear to be woefully unprepared to run the sensitive facility and were coached through recent safety checks, according to a reading of the inspection report. The scab workers, who the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has repeatedly warned have substandard qualifications to run such a plant, took safety tests with managers present who identified parts. And the workers were able to watch other workers take the test before taking it themselves and often provided with answers ahead of time, according to a report filed by NRC Inspector Joselito O. Calle.

According to NRC Inspector Calle's publicly available report:

"the inspectors noted that evaluator coached the candidate several times during task performance and therefor did not allow the candidate to completely demonstrates his ability to demonstrate his ability to independently perform the task For example: 1.) the evaluator provided coaching when he showed the candidate the locations of several components when the candidate was unable to locate them. 2.) the evaluator coached the candidate when the evaluator showed the candidate where the candidate was in the procedure and, 3) the evaluation coached the candidate when the evaluator helped the candidate follow the procedure." NRC Inspector Calle cites these violations as well providing scab workes with copies of test material and allowing them to observe the tests as violations of NRC License Condition No. 18 (VIO 40-3392/2010-002-01).

The less than impressive test results come after an operator error nearly led to massive fatalities in the surrounding town of Metropolis, when a safety valve damaged by failure to follow proper safety procedure burst sending out particles of deadly toxic UF6 gas. According to former Honeywell environmental safety officer Mitch Lagerstorm, the gas leak, had it not been stopped in time, could have killed the nearby town.

For the first time in more than 60 years, Honeywell's uranium enrichment facility in Metropolis, Illinois is locking out its workers and running the plant with scab employees. The plant's owners have never been allowed to bring in temporary replacement workers in the past, because regulators feared such workers would not have the site-specific knowledge to operate this facility. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) officials told union members and community members in town halls leading up to the current lock-out that they thought it would be very difficult for safety reasons to open the plant without the normal team of fully-trained union workers.

In fact, the NRC did not allow the plant to recommence production of the deadly toxic UF6 gas for over two months from the time Honeywell's ongoing lock-out of the plant workers began. Finally, after much pressure from Honeywell, the NRC approved the re-opening of the plant. Since then, there has been a large explosion, leaks of non-toxic gas, and urine tests indicating extraordinarily high level of uranium flowing through the replacement workers, as HuffPost previously documented here.

Questions linger as to why the NRC took the unprecedented step of allowing the plant to operate on scab labor. Honeywell CEO David Cote's has an extremely close relationship with President Obama; Honeywell is the number one corporate political contributor to the Democratic Party. It has increased its political contributions by 400% since Obama took office in 2008. President Obama has routinely described Honeywell CEO David Cote as one of his closest advisers in the business community. Cote recently accompanied Obama on a trip to India and was the President's pick to serve on the Bowles-Simpson Fiscal Commission.

The NRC has traditionally been an industry-friendly regulatory agency. Jim Riccio of Greenpeace says that "the Nuclear Regulatory Commission [is] to the nuclear industry what the Mine & Mineral Services was to BP. "

A new NRC inspection report sheds light on why Honeywell was able to keep their plant open. The report published online in the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System entitled "NRC Inspection Report No. 40-3392/2010-002 and Notice of Violations by NRC Inspector Joselito O. Calle shows that Honeywell was able to re-open the plant by cheating on the safety tests of scab replacement workers. Honeywell's failure to follow proper safety procedures led to the release of deadly toxic UF6 gas, which could have killed dozens had it not been quickly contained.

According to the NRC's recently issued report on safety violations at the Metropolis facility, Honeywell safety evaluators coached scabs in order to pass the on-the-job evaluations necessary to work in the uranium facility. When workers were unable to identify key parts of the equipment processing the uranium during safety tests, evaluators pointed out and named the equipment. Additionally, the scab replacement workers were often given access to material with the answers to the safety tests during safety exams themselves. According to the NRC, these violations are what the NRC classifies as examples of a Severity Level IV Problem.

From the report's findings it is clear that poor training lead to a small release of deadly toxic UF6 gas on September 6, 2010 that had it not been stopped quickly could have killed the whole town. NRC Inspector Joselito O. Calle confirmed to this reporter that at least one worker did not follow standard safety procedures in the hours leading up to the leak. Calle would not comment further on whether the worker in question was a scab replacement worker, since the matter is still under ongoing investigation by NRC.

According to Calle's report, the failure to follow established safety and operating procedures is what led to the release of the UF6 gas. The poor training and failure to follow proper procedure led workers to inadvertently damage the isolation valve, which could have caused a massive fatal radioactive accident.

According to Mitch Lagerstorm, a former Honeywell environmental safety officer at the Metropolis plant,


Considering that the valve was damaged due to operator error (not following the procedure) it could have completely failed. If that happened up to 10,000 pounds of UF6 in the cylinder could have been released. Running the EPA's RMP*Comp software, if 10,000 pounds of UF6 were released, the plume would travel with the wind killing everyone in that direction up to 5.8 miles." When inhaled, smoke containing high levels of UF6 is deadly."[errant quote mark?]

Also, according to the NRC report, "examination of a number of similar valves stocked in a supply of spare valves that were thought to be ready for service indicated similar types of damage although none appeared to be as severe." It is unclear why such a large number of spare safety valves were damaged. The NRC did not ask questions of Honeywell during its inspection pertaining to why so many spare valves were damaged. Furthermore, Honeywell spokesman Peter Dapel refused to comment on the matter.

One could speculate that so many spare valves are damaged because Honeywell bought cheap valves that were already damaged and didn't inspect the valves upon receipt. Or that Honeywell was storing safety valves that were damaged in operation. According to Honeywell former environmental safety officer Mitch Lagerstorm, "Either would display a lack of sufficient training and adherence to plant procedures." It remains unclear, however, why Honeywell has so many damaged spare safety valves.

Regardless, local community members seem worried about the poorly trained scab replacement workers operating the uranium facility in Metropolis. "I want to believe that the NRC, as a credible government regulator, is doing its job regulating the plant," said Metropolis Mayor Billy McDaniel. "However, I would feel more comfortable sleeping at night if I knew the trained union workers were operating that plant instead of the replacement workers. I hope the company allows the union workers to return soon, so we can all rest easy."

The question remains why is it worth it for Honeywell to risk the safety of the nearby community in order to keep the trained union workers locked out and bust the workers' union? Financially, Honeywell has suffered heavily for locking the workers out.

With the lockout in its fifth month, Honeywell has spent more money keeping workers locked out at the Metropolis facility than it would be spending if it were providing the workers what they want. According to union officials, Honeywell has already spent or lost at least $48.8 million to keep the workers locked out over a four month period. By contrast, agreeing to workers' demands that Honeywell maintain their current health and retirement benefits would cost the company only $20 million over the life of a three-year contract.

Honeywell, though, is willing to bear any financial costs, or put the community at risk, because it aims to bust the thousands of unionized workers in its employ. Honeywell has told other unions preparing for collective-bargaining negotiations that they better accept what Honeywell wants or suffer the fate of Honeywell's Metropolis workers according to USW spokesman John Paul Smith. Honeywell is a corporation willing to do whatever it takes to prevent its workers from exercising their legal rights to organize and bargain collectively for decent wages and benefits.

The bigger question is why then did President Obama travel around India with Honeywell CEO David Cote at his side? With friends like these, it is no wonder that for the first time in over a generation, a majority of union members did not vote for the Democratic Party in the mid-term election.

 

Follow Mike Elk on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MikeElk

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
12:59 PM on 11/23/2010
Trust big businesses, they love you, they would never cut corners till things break. How dare you say such anti business, anti multinational things. Nuclear power is a safe a mothers milk, radiation is good for you, Chernobyl can never happen again, There is no waste problem, there is no proliferation problem, there is no terrorist problem, nuclear power is all good. Just keep repeating that over and over and over, and you have the nuclear power industry PR campaign. rooftop solar, offshore wind and waste bio char fuels are cheap enough now, the cheapest energy for million of American and billions of people around the world, and getting cheaper all the time. Stop believing big business cares about anything but money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
10:05 AM on 11/23/2010
I love how HP edits posts it doesn't like. If you do a search for the report referenced in this article, you will only find it on the USW website. Read the report. Things don't sound quite so onerous as Mr. Elk or the union would like you to believe.

HP should not have a problem posting this so please stop regulating content.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mike Elk
11:40 AM on 11/23/2010
I highly suggest you re-read the report and then read the quote from Mitch Lagerstorm, a former Honeywell environmental safety officer at this plant and put them into context
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
11:57 AM on 11/23/2010
I will certainly do that.
12:34 PM on 11/23/2010
I had no trouble finding the report thru NRC's site using ADAMS. The entire report is available as a PDF, altho reading dry technical descriptions is not the easiest. Cheating by coaching (or subtle hints) defeats the whole purpose of proficiency testing. Whether these "scabs" were managerial type replacements or new hires does not matter, only demonstrable skills pertinent to the work matter and Honeywell clearly took end runs around the process, thereby putting lives in danger. This plant is not just comparable to something such as operating a cement plant or some such. This is a dangerous, technical and potentially lethal operation and as such deserves every bit of adherence to regulatory procedures.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
09:24 PM on 11/22/2010
Let's hear it for right-to-work laws!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
09:12 PM on 11/22/2010
This situation is an outrage. This power plant should be shut down until trained workers are located and employed. The nuclear power industry is too hazardous. The process is too expensive. The threat of terrorist atack and theft of materials is a risk unique to nuclear power. Most of the plants in the us have had radiation leaks. visit www.ucsusa.org
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
08:16 PM on 11/22/2010
Let me confess that the real reason my previous comment was not very flattering toward Honeywell is that, through my friend, who is fiercely Republican (ok, maybe friend is a bit strong, maybe informant would be more accurate), it is pretty clear that she is happy to find herself among so much Republican-think, from the bottom to the top. She was furloughed for several weeks to save the company money, yet defends the CEO's enormous raise during the same timeframe -- $72 million if I remember correctly. To me, she seems like a brainwashed martyr, and Honeywell's CEO seems like a typical near psychopath Republican obsessed with profits regardless of risk.

Obama can't win. He is being accused constantly of hating business, obstructing business, etc. so now just traveling with a CEO of this ugly kind makes him look complicit in destroying jobs. No doubt the right wing plotted very carefully the timing here to help make Obama look bad to his real base. It's a shame for Democrats -- they have made many trade offs to prove that they are not the enemy of business, and it never gains them anything.
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
07:55 PM on 11/22/2010
Was this plant always under Honeywell? Any chance that it was formerly under UOP, which in rather recent times became part of Honeywell? UOP was apparently the reincarnation of Union Carbide, the U.S. company that was implicated in the Bhopal, India, disaster. I figured this out after I innocently mentioned Bhopal as an example of what can happen when safety is under-emphasized, to a friend who worked for UOP/Honeywell, and she got way too bent out of shape about it. Union Carbide, as far as I know, never admitted wrong-doing and maintained that they were framed or something along that line. I'm in no position to know, but that something went terribly wrong is not debatable. My friend is a staunch defender of the technical people and their devotion to safety. It is hard to believe that Honeywell would take such risks after associating themselves with such a human disaster as Bhopal.
08:55 PM on 11/22/2010
This particular plant was once Allied Signal before the merger with Honeywell.
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
09:20 PM on 11/22/2010
Thanks. Honeywell has become quite a different company now than we once knew, I think.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
09:16 PM on 11/22/2010
It is not uncommon for companies to cheat safety regulations, it is happening in all sectors. The disasters of BP, Massey mining and nuclear power all resulted from management cheating on safety in order to put extra money in the bank accounts of management. The public suffers death and injury and the management has not been held accountable.
06:42 PM on 11/22/2010
Words can't describe the magnitude of shock, anger, and disgust I feel after reading this article.

Wow!