Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mike Elk

Mike Elk

Posted: March 5, 2010 02:31 PM

If EFCA is DOA, Why Is the Chamber Still Lobbying Against It?

What's Your Reaction:

According to an article in the Examiner the other day, Senator Michael Bennet was shocked when a pair of Chamber of Commerce representatives came to lobby him against the Employee Free Choice Act. Bennet asked the lobbyists why they were visiting him for a bill that won't even be coming to the floor for a vote.

For months now in Washington, it has been known that the Employee Free Choice Act won't ever see a vote. However, this hasn't stopped the Chamber of Commerce to continue flooding Capitol Hill with lobbyists against a dead bill. According to the Examiner:

Executives and owners representing thousands of small and medium-size businesses from eight states flooded Capitol Hill yesterday with one message for their senators -- don't even think about trying to revive the supposedly dead Employee Free Choice Act.

An estimated 250 of the lobbyists-for-a-day represented state-level chambers of commerce from Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Indiana, Louisiana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Virginia. Their work was organized by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has been a vocal opponent of the proposal, which is also known as card check.

So why in the world would the Chamber of Commerce still be lobbying on the Employee Free Choice Act if it's considered dead?

It's because they want to crush the ability of organized labor to shape the agenda on labor law.

The labor movement has lost many big fights throughout the nation's history. The key has always been whether we continued to keep fighting afterward.

In 1886, a nationwide general strike of millions calling for the eight hour work day seemed to be on the verge of achieving victory. Then President Grover Cleveland called out the troops to violently suppress the strike, killing over 100 strikers. While labor lost the fight in the short term, they never gave up the call for the eight hour work day - winning it in various states and industries over the following decades. Eventually in 1938, the eight hour work day was achieved nationwide as Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Despite long odds and tough oppression, they never gave up their fight for change and eventually won.

However there have been other times when labor stopped fighting for change. After the PATCO strike was crushed in 1981, a vicious new wave of illegal, union busting was launched. Organized labor under the hapless leadership of Lance Kirkland dropped their previous demands to improve the already weak labor law. Instead, they merely fought to maintain what they had. As a result they were forced repeatedly to compromise - giving more and more concessions to weaken the already current law.

This lesson wasn't lost on Big Business. They want to beat up labor so badly that they will never push for the Employee Free Choice Act again. The Chamber of Commerce keeps pushing against the Employee Free Choice Act because they want to push the unions back into making concessions on weakening current law. We have already seen the success of Big Business to change the political dynamic by their ability to stop the routine nomination of Craig Becker to the NLRB.

While health care and jobs are getting more attention from labor activists as they look more successful, it's important that we not give up the Employee Free Choice Act.

If we don't keep fighting, Big Business will just start pushing more aggressive assaults on labor and weaken the political position of labor.

Remember the best defense is always a strong offense.

 

Follow Mike Elk on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MikeElk

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
08:47 AM on 03/09/2010
Thank you, Mr. Elk, for uncovering the latest scheme of the gargantuan Chamber of Commerce lobby, which strongly opposes not only the Employee Free Choice Act, but also the existence of Unions themselves.

This is especially ironic, since this mega- powerful lobby is constantly attacking ‘Big Labor’. And yet, the AFL- CIO’s Total 2009 Lobbying Expenditures were $3,848,000, whereas the US Chamber of Commerce’s Total 2009 Lobbying Expenditures were $144,496,000, or about 37.5 times greater.

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?lname=US+Chamber+of+Commerce&year=2009

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?lname=AFL-CIO&year=2009

If the average Worker is to have any leverage whosoever, we must keep on opposing all anti-Union, anti-EFCA lobbies:

http://www.aflcio.org/joinaunion/voiceatwork/efca/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidShort
12:15 PM on 03/08/2010
The very fact that if they don't, it is something that can be slipped in in the dead of night. I don't believe it is possible to be anti-union than am I, so I am glad they are reminding the Senator(s) of their opposition to this travesty of freedom.

If employees wish to unionize, good for them. But to have this forced on employees is violated the free association guarantee. And it goes further to protect the thuggery, extortion, and blackmail that are the hallmarks of the union movement.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
IntelligenceIsBliss
01:11 AM on 03/08/2010
In answer to your headline's question, I offer this.

Because the lobbyists and their capitalist benefactors know how to win. You crush your opponent, then burn his body to ashes, then scatter the ashes to the furthest reaches of the empire. It is the Cheney 1% Doctrine being used by business against the American people. As long as there is a 1% chance that a law could be passed that might negatively effect the income streams of the powerful, then that bill must be annihilated.
03:01 PM on 03/07/2010
My local chamber of commerce serves a small rural community I live in. My support for anything our chamber of commerce wants to promote is long gone. Community support is jeopardized, should more residents feel as I do. It's a shame. Times will get worse, before they get better, as a result of these slime balls. If they're allowed to continue their present course, they stand to ruin the country in the name of supporting Republican values.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ssfahrer
05:52 PM on 03/06/2010
No bill with 229 cosponsors in the House, which is more than 50% of the total membership of 435 (see http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1409) can EVER be DOA.... I'm sure there are ways that it can be forced to the floor WITHOUT a committee vote (perhaps the House has it's own form of 'reconciliation' , i.e., where a 50%+1 request could do it; the House has no filibuster like the Senate does). Therefore, CARD CHECK could be forced down America's throat. Why can't there be an option NOT to join a union???? Please let me also know why "union shops" are not "an illegal restraint of trade" (in laborers) under the Sherman Antitrust Act????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Irmanator
Romney fails the sniff test
08:07 AM on 03/07/2010
If more than 50% of elected representatives support something, it is not "being rammed down America's throat" basically, by definition. Don't worry, the corrupt and dysfunctional senate would never pass anything pro worker anyway.
04:01 PM on 03/06/2010
Good thing that the lobbists are continuing to march into Washington to advise and ask Congress to not consider reviving the Employee Free Choice Act. They have to keep a close eye on this administration. Andy S. may as well take up residence in the Lincoln bedroom, he spends so much time at the Whitehouse. Do you really think it would be a good thing for the workers if there were more of them contributing to retirement with the Unions? Their unfunded debt is so high. I feel kind of sorry for the 400,000 or so people in unions because they started out as noble and they just turned greedy making millionairs out of a few. Time to do away with the unions altogether.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Irmanator
Romney fails the sniff test
08:08 AM on 03/07/2010
Hooray for lobbyists! Workers don't deserve fair treatment! Concentrate wealth!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
pantherburns
labor creates all wealth
11:49 AM on 03/07/2010
You know nothing of unions, nothing of nothing of union pensions, and nothing of union history. That you are ready to disband all unions shows a shocking lack of perspective and no idea of the consequences of such a proposal. Unions have paid into their retirement as agreed in LEGAL CONTRACTS with their employers. Construction unions control their own pensions, and as such have generally well funded pensions. Other pensions that were controlled by major industries chose not to fund them in the manner they were obligated BY LAW to do. Many have used bankruptcy laws and a docile court system to shirk their legal responsibilities and CHEAT their employees. Unions are what MADE a strong middle class after WWII, and contributed to making the economy work for more people than ever before. You really need to spend a little time reading history before making such silly and misguided statements. Turn off the TV and open your mind.