More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mike Elk

Mike Elk

Posted: November 8, 2010 07:05 PM

Amid all the bad news for workers from last week's midterm elections, you probably missed one very good election result: 3,000 workers with Piedmont Airlines, a subsidiary of US Airways, voted to become members of the Communication Workers of America (CWA). The election results are a great victory for workers not just at Piedmont Airlines, but throughout US Airways.

All of US Airways' gate and ramp employees are currently unionized, with baggage handlers making $20 per hour. But baggage handlers at nonunionized work subsidiaries of US Airways Express, like Piedmont, make just half that. With Piedmont previously unorganized, US Airways is able to shift its passengers and flights to one of its nonunion subsidiaries, undermining and decreasing the need for the company's unionized gate and ramp workers.


But because Piedmont workers are now organized into a union, not only will Piedmont working conditions improve, but unionized US Airways employees will no longer be threatened by having work shifted to lesser paid Piedmont employees. (Full disclosure: I began working as a part-time consultant on CWA's campaign to organize airline workers in September.)

Piedmont workers overcame a tough campaign of employer intimidation, including firings, which I highlighted on this website back in September ("Despite New Hailed Organizing Rules, Airline Workers Still Face Tilted Playing Field"). But workers were aided by the National Mediation Board (NMB) ruling, which governs labor relations in the airline and rail industries, making it easier for unions to organize. Under the older rules, as we highlighted in May, "If a worker didn't vote in a union election, that person's "vote" was counted against the prospective union."

Last year, when CWA tried to organize Piedmont Airlines, workers faced exactly this problem. Not a single worker voted against the union, but the union still lost the election by 58 votes because only 49% of the total workers voted. Piedmont further stacked the deck against the union by adding to the potential voters list workers who could not vote because they were dead, didn't work at Piedmont anymore or were serving overseas in the armed forces.


Defeat at Delta, but campaign continues at American Airlines


CWA didn't fare well across the airline industry last week, however. Despite the improved NMB ruling, the union lost by 328 votes out of 18,760 cast at Delta Airlines last week. As a result of this ruling, 7,000 Northwest employees, whose airline is now part of Delta Airlines, will now lose their union representation.

Flight attendants allege massive illegal interference and union busting on the part of management. Management made harassing phone calls to employees hammering home Delta's talking points on the union election, they allege.  Union elections observers also say the turnout in the election was unusually high with 94% of eligible workers voting. They allege the reason for this high turnout was that management used sophisticated computer technology to manipulate the voting.

According to AFA-CWA General Counsel Ed Gilmartin,

Flight attendants would log in for their flight assignments, as required, and the first screen that popped up for be one asking if they had voted and directing them immediately to the NMB site. It's clear to us that Delta was tracking the voting. This kind of surveillance is a violation of the confidentiality and secret guarantee of the voting process under NMB rules.

Undeterred by the results at Delta, CWA plans to take advantage of the momentum from the Piedmont Victory to organize 13,000 agents at American Airlines, where unionization drives have failed in the past as a result of the old NMB rules. The union expects an election at American Airlines sometime next spring.

Full Disclosure: I am so excited by the prospect of organizing 13,000 American Airline workers, a huge number by labor movement standards, that I have signed up to work as consultant on airline worker organizing for CWA.

 

Follow Mike Elk on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MikeElk

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:46 AM on 11/10/2010
It's funny when ever we see a union story we get blog posts about how horrible they are and expensive to the company, but no one ever mentions how upper management pays themselves 600 times the average workers salary. Maybe if these companies would look at their pay structure people wouldn't have to fight so hard to get a fair share. How do you rationalized someone making 600 times more than the people who actually produce the companies product? So if somene makes 10/hr why would a ceo make 600/hr? This is the real company killer. Especially on a product like airlines that have had horrible leadership by these 600/hr uppermanagement folks. Which is really more corrupt.
10:20 PM on 11/11/2010
Difference is there is one CEO, and thousands of workers.

And while I'm sure most workers think they could do the CEO's job, that is far from reality.
11:52 PM on 11/09/2010
So you, a paid consultant to a labor union, are telling us that it's good that Piedmont workers unionized. I can't say I'm surprised. And that's more than full disclosure; it's significant bias.

The industry's labor costs are high enough as it is without throwing a union into the mix. Most of the big airlines went bankrupt in part because their operating costs were too high. The industry is finally starting to recover from the worst decade of its existence and now along comes the labor movement to drain any efficiency or profit from it.
05:10 PM on 11/09/2010
I am a flight attendant for Delta Airlines, previously Northwest Airlines. AFA had the rules changed to their benefit for this latest election, still they lost....3 x in 9 years Delta flight attendants have voted to remain free from AFA. I am shocked that AFA is now screaming interference....these allegations are somewhat twisted...the pop-ups were reminders to vote, not how to vote. The company and the union alike sent information to our homes about the facts of each cause....after years of paying dues to what appears to me to be a corrupt union, I voted NO...so I can see what it is like to work for a company that seems to take very good care of it's employees....they have great benefit choices, higher compensation, more vacation days....I have never had bad letters or discipline problems....I am not worried to go without this "protection"?....the only interference I felt was from AFA calling and asking if and how I voted, and showing up in our lounges and pre-flight breifings, then telling some of our pursers who voted NO---and I felt a campaign of fear and lies, and intimidation from AFA....I am not anti-union--I just saw AFA and what they stood for deteriorate over the years....they do not have our best interest at heart...they lost, and it was a fair loss....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
02:00 PM on 11/09/2010
Perhaps there is a reason why the baggage handler is make half of the agents are making? They are basically unskilled labor.

"The election results are a great victory for workers not just at Piedmont Airlines, but throughout US Airways".-Can the author explain what he means by this?

Mr. Elk is not really reporting on a story but offering his opinion and interpretation on union activity.
"I am so excited by the prospect of organizing 13,000 American Airline workers, a huge number by labor movement standards, that I have signed up to work as consultant on airline worker organizing for CWA".-Perhaps the author should disclose if this is an paid or unpaid position. Also, will he continue to be paid if a contract is ratified.

"But because Piedmont workers are now organized into a union, not only will Piedmont working conditions improve, but unionized US Airways employees will no longer be threatened by having work shifted to lesser paid Piedmont employees".-Can the author explain how working conditions will be improving?
02:00 PM on 11/09/2010
Long ago, unions provided a worthy service to workers when working conditions were at times unsafe, young children were utilized, and fair wages were nonexistent. These issues have been resolved and are under constant government supervision and regulation. Many of today's union leaders have lost sight of the fact that their unreleatic demands have driven up the price of business, and therefore are causing companies to either downsize or move portions of its workforce overseas. In regards to the airline industry, one such example is the mass exodus of carriers' maintenance to foreign repair shops. It is simply more cost effective for these companies to employ maintenance and overhaul crews in El Salvador rather than here in the US. Just ask any of the former AMFA members at NW how that worked out for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:04 PM on 11/09/2010
US Airways will just close them down...they havent invested one red cent into the operation in decades anyway and all they operate are beat up old Dash 8 turboprops! See ya!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skeptical Patriot
09:10 AM on 11/09/2010
I guess this is definition of a "reporter". Complete partisanship. What is the impact the competitiveness of the airline, the cost of service to consumers, the number of jobs that will be lost due to higher cost structure? I guess this part of reporting the story is not important.
11:46 PM on 11/08/2010
Piedmont Airlines was once the best small airline.  This would have been back many years ago.  Today, it is barely a shadow of itself.  I can also remember a time when American airlines was fantastic.  This too would have been many years ago.  I happen to have a family member that worked for American for her entire working life.  She would agree along with her flight attendant friends that American is a junk airline today.  See, I remember when TWA, Continental, United, Braniff, Delta were all class acts.  Not today.  Actually SW and Delta were revered because both were nonunionized and at one time paid their flight attendants the best wage. 
I have lived in two mid size towns that once had great economies with flourishing downtowns.  Today they are eeking by.  What happened?  They both relied on two union plants of substantial size to buoy their economies.  Eventually union demands killed profits and the businesses left the country.  Left behind are enormous buildings. 
I saw the same thing in upstate NY when I was a young adult.  All that was left of union paper plants was ghost like empty mills.  What a horrible sight. 
Or how about the unino textile industry in the south?  Yup, all the sock companies and cotton mills are gone. If they didn't become unionized the threat alone forced the business out of the country.   I once work at Cranston Print works  which made cotton fabric.  That was a union plant as well. 
How about RCA?  That was union as well.  I worked there for some time as well.  Unions killed that business as well. 
How about Uniroyal or Roper Industries?  Yup, another union success story.  They are gone as well.
Hey, how about Amtrak?  That is unionized and losing about 30 bucks a ticket. 
Unions have been a massive failure.  A recent poll said that about 70 percent of union workers want to fire their union bosses.  I don't blame them. 
Oh, should we forget the tremendous loss of jobs in the auto industry?  Again, another union success story.  NOT.
09:56 PM on 11/08/2010
It appears that if the current guys in charge had made labor a close to the top priority the economy would have been guaranteed wage and job stability. That would have lead to consumer spending and the economy would not be stagnate as it looks to be for years to come. Wall Street makes out, main street dies and our new masters have just convinced a majority of the nation that in the house up in down and in is out. History is made of small decisions that end up allowing major changes in society. Unions can only give the working classes a voice in their nation.