More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mike Lux

GET UPDATES FROM Mike Lux
 

The 99% Tide is Rising

Posted: 12/15/11 03:29 PM ET

The way you know a movement is starting to have an impact is when the powers that be start to respond to it. This has been happening for quite a while now with the 99er Movement (it's Occupy but a lot more than Occupy). Republican politicians have been lashing out, and corporate and Republican insiders have been starting to worry and plotting strategy to respond. Democrats have been responding cautiously but more positively than not, and have sure been noticing and watching with a lot of interest.

Now, though, even more tangible -- and more positive -- responses are starting to pop up. The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) leadership has introduced a bill this week that is about as direct a response to the flowering 99er movement as a piece of legislation could be, from its name to its messaging to its content: the Restore the American Dream for the 99 Percent Act.

Check out the materials and messaging from the press conference: this is all-99 percent, all the time. The content flows from the movement as well: it taxes Wall Street and the 1 percent to pay for more than 5 million jobs for the 99 percent. The 99 Percent Act includes every economic provision from The Contract for the American Dream, which was crowd sourced from hundreds of thousands of Americans. Tonight, the leaders of the CPC will be talking about what the bill does on this webcast that is worth checking out as well.

This legislation could turn into a big deal. The conventional wisdom will be that a bill introduced by progressives in the minority party in the House doesn't matter because it can't pass, and of course as long as the Republicans control the House it won't. But the 99er Movement is rising, and I think there will be a lot of interest in this bill by the movement -- groups like Rebuild the Dream, MoveOn.org, and the AFL-CIO are pretty excited about this bill. If there is a push by those groups, I think it could easily pick up enough co-sponsors over the next few months to have a solid majority of Democratic House members, and a majority of the candidates challenging Republicans endorsing it as well. If the Democrats retake the House (which is not at all out of the question), a solid majority of the new House caucus is supporting this bill, and the Democrats have won sounding as populist as they are sounding today, the 99 Percent Act will be at the center of the economic debate at the start of 2013. That would be a pretty impressive achievement for this movement given where the political and legislative dialogue the first 11 months of this year has been.

There are a lot of important rumblings going on in American politics right now. People have taken to the street, bank lobbyists and Republican operatives are nervously trying to figure out how to respond to the 99er message, and a lot more Democrats are even beginning to sound like Democrats again. On issues I am working on like the bank settlement talks, I am seeing policymakers far more nervous than they have ever been before about looking they are cutting sweetheart deals with Wall Street. And can I just say something? It's about freakin' time. Census numbers came out today showing that half the country is now considered poor or low-income. The middle class in this country is being crushed, and God help any young or poor person trying to climb their way into it.

Politicians who just operate on the business-as-usual model are making a huge mistake. The ones who are bold and respond positively to the 99 percent are making a good bet. Now is the time to respond to the tide that is rising.

 

Follow Mike Lux on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ProgressiveLux

 
 
  • Comments
  • 161
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:57 PM on 12/17/2011
As an Occupier with Occupy Washington DC we do not back any political party. The system broken. Groups such as Moveon do not speak for Occupy Washington DC. We will not be bought or sold.
07:10 PM on 12/16/2011
When a Conservative backwater like the area I live in can have frequent Occupy protests, along with favorable coverage in an admittedly Conservative daily newspaper, you KNOW the times, they are a'changin'!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
Give peace a chance
09:43 AM on 12/16/2011
If politicians were truly smart and of the people, they'd be meeting with OWS supporters to understand the fundamental issues and work towards addressing them rather than trying to suppress and ignore them. Unfortunately corporations own our politicians and would frown upon that type of behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hk usp 45
Hell No
08:38 AM on 12/16/2011
Does rising mean a 23% approval rating and falling?
08:13 AM on 12/16/2011
... you mean the masses.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windy33
08:01 AM on 12/16/2011
koch brothers, karl rove, alecs money WORTHLESS

the 99% voters in 2012 PRICELESS

BYE BYE REPUBS AND T-PARTY
12:29 AM on 12/29/2011
I don't understand why you only single out republicans.

are there no democrats who fall into the 1% category?? or do you just plan on remaining blind and hypocritical?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windy33
07:37 AM on 12/29/2011
if you follow anything you will see that the ones that attack the 99% are the repubs who want total control and want to put this country into slave labor they are the ones who are attacking the poor the elderly the cops the teachers the snow plow drivers womens rights, health care of any kind but they get their off the backs of us they don't give a dam about the 99% jujst listen tot hem and maybe you will get a clue
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arion
07:45 AM on 12/16/2011
The way I see it: OWS is crucial to American politics today. It's the only counterpoint we have to Fox News and Rush. But it's not electoral politics, at least for now. Its proper role is raise public awareness and inspire legislators. So far, the results are terrific, but OWS has to maintain momentum. Protesting foreclosures is good step, but we need more.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThinkinPerson
07:14 AM on 12/16/2011
Thank you for putting forth concrete plans that reflect the wish of the people. Unlike legislation that is being passed at lightening speed that no one wants. Watching our constitutional rights depleted. The submitted plan is how a democracy works. Not selling votes for cash.

Never mind the teenagers who get all grossed out with tents and urine and can't find anything better to do than mock earnest people who are speaking and have a right to speak and be heard, laughing to see people have their heads bashed in, could care less about what is happening in this country.

OWS was no fringe group. Many people couldn't make it down to the square but supported in many other ways.

I am further divorced from MSM as a result of their lack of coverage, questioning, and so impressed by the many citizens, and the journalists who started asking and had been asking questions.

When I read about Congress messing up our rights, attacking the internet for the MPAA and cyber military contracts banking 5 billion dollar contracts, buying new military equipment for the police and bringing war tactics home, its very sad, unbelievable really.

Where our mind goes, so creates reality.

I am inspired by Americans, of both parties, who also recognize something is wrong and it must be corrected if we are to have a shot at leaving a great country to our grandchildren.
photo
bridgeman
Jesus was a Jazz fan
06:17 AM on 12/16/2011
The tide is rising?

POTUS has turned his back on it, mayors and city councils have forcefully removed their presence,
the media has all but forgotten about it.

If that is rising...then I would hate to see what receding looks like.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bishop999999999
03:12 AM on 12/16/2011
The Occupy movement: sound and fury signifying nothing.

Is this really the best that the "99%" can do? A blatantly partisan bill submitted by a distinct minority in the House that has absolutely no hope of passing? Please. The spin that Progressives are putting on OWS is so obvious that the movement is suffering for it. What change? What victory? Alright, a few more of you have police records now. What have you really accomplished?

"We changed the dialogue in the country!"

You're a mob in the middle of NYC, of course you're going to get coverage. Your message wasn't too bad, although it did suffer from a lack of focus, but the abhorrent behavior of the protestors themselves was what took center stage, not your ideas.

Occupy Wall Street: just another protest.
07:21 AM on 12/16/2011
Sorry, I must respectfully disagree with your "abhorrent behavior" comment. The only abhorrent behavior I saw was the NYPD's penning, pepper spraying, and sucker punching non-violent American citizens on the sidewalks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheIndependenceParty
Cranky yankee and a rehabilitated ex-Republican
08:02 AM on 12/16/2011
Straight out of the mouths of Frank Luntz - "I get it!" and Bill Clinton - "I feel your pain".

What did the protests in Selma and Birmingham, or Kent State achieve?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bishop999999999
08:39 AM on 12/16/2011
"What did the protests in Selma and Birmingham­, or Kent State achieve?"

More than Occupy Wall Street?
12:31 AM on 12/29/2011
Seriously, you did not just draw a parallel between ows and selma, did you?

Really? How old are you, like 10?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Don't settle for less evil, demand good
01:46 AM on 12/16/2011
If politicians "got it" there wouldn't be a need for OWS. Politicians should be allowed in by invitation only.
01:02 AM on 12/16/2011
Jeffrey Sachs summed it up pretty well with the following.....
At the root of America's economic crisis lies a moral crisis: the decline of civic virtue among America's political and economic elite. A society of markets, laws, and elections is not enough if the rich and powerful fail to behave with respect, honesty, and compassion toward the rest of society and toward the world. America has developed the world's most competitive market society but has squandered its civic virtue along the way. Without restoring an ethos of social responsibility, there can be no meaningful and sustained economic recovery.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
05:13 AM on 12/16/2011
Saw that...thought it was wonderful.
04:32 PM on 12/18/2011
I couldn't agree more yintwin -- exactly so. Many have gone far beyond any relationship between obtaining money and any realistic spending needs -- even at the level of comfort and security they are accustomed to, even of children and grandchildren. It is has become a greed that is unsatiable with some, and is reaching the point of destroying the very economy and society that enriches -- in otherwords, against their own vital interests.

This society, this world, must reach some level of mutual concern and guarantee. Its all too interdependent and interactive today. When I am the nose on my brother's face, a basic law of my own survival is that I am my brother's keeper.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lane Campbell
Say what?
12:47 AM on 12/16/2011
Here we go again with recycled Bolshevism. Why am I saying that? Because the people who keep shouting, "We are the 99%" and trying to create a "99er" movement are walking in the same shoes as Lenin & Co. did in the last century. The self-proclaimed "Bolsheviki" (majority) was actually a minority faction in the early revolutionary coalition; but it kept repeating the same Big Lie until enough people believed it, allowing them to leverage their way into power. No we've got a bunch of philosophical rip-off artists trying to do the same thing in our century.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
radiojunkie
tune addict
02:19 AM on 12/16/2011
The commie argument is stale. The historic tax-rate has been as high as 91% already so lose the scarecrow. Trickle down doesn't work unless you care about less than the macro economy. Every statistics in the book proves supply-side economics doesn't work - when what's happening behind the scenes, i.e. starve-the-beast renders supply side a sock puppet. Breaking (anything) beyond repair is no repair tactic.

The Fortune 1000 workforce has shrunk, not expanded in the last 30 years. The argument, (aka lie) for fattening the top -in reality- shrinks everything else.

19th century narrative is no match 21st century, 20/20 hindsight accounting statistics. You'd be fired from a corporation for substituting past philosophy over numbers. Even Republics respect the value of numbers and historic trends, if only in business.
08:17 AM on 12/16/2011
Socialism is a beautiful theory that just doesn't work very well except at the family/tribe level.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lane Campbell
Say what?
11:58 PM on 12/16/2011
Statistics are wonderful things. You can "prove" anything with them. For instance, the Fortune 1000 employment numbers. You're talking about an aggregate of "mature" (i.e. stagnant) corporations that needed to shed fat in order to survive. While they were shedding that fat, smaller entrepreneurial firms and startups were creating the lions share of new jobs.
As for macro-economics: Supply-side economics works when the problem is a supply-side problem. The converse is also true for demand-side economics when the problem is on the demand side. The trick is knowing which is which.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Bartholomew
My micro-bio isn't empty.
02:21 AM on 12/16/2011
'... the people who keep shouting, "We are the 99%" and trying to create a "99er" movement are walking in the same shoes as Lenin & Co. did in the last century. The self-procl­aimed "Bolshevik­i" (majority) was actually a minority faction in the early revolution­ary coalition ...'

I hadn't noticed that commonality until you point it out. I suppose if it worked for Lenin & Co. ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lane Campbell
Say what?
11:53 PM on 12/16/2011
It worked for Lenin & Co. as a bunch of political opportunists. But did it work for Russia? I submit that it condemned Russia to 75+ years of hell, from which the country and its society emerged as damaged goods.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aldous Jose A Castro
12:40 AM on 12/16/2011
So how many 99% Politicians will they get elected?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Bartholomew
My micro-bio isn't empty.
02:23 AM on 12/16/2011
We may never know. How would you recognise a 99% politician? Perhaps by the fact that he or she is missing a little something?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Breedlove
Curmudgeon of Lucidity
10:19 AM on 12/16/2011
By the fact that they have a heart and a soul and are not the puppets of corporate cash.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheIndependenceParty
Cranky yankee and a rehabilitated ex-Republican
08:14 AM on 12/16/2011
If "they" get any elected, ... they won't be politicians at all. They will be representatives, or congressmen, mayors, or city councilmen. But you will know them when you see them because they will vote and act for the general welfare for a change, which is what the Constitution demands.
11:48 PM on 12/15/2011
Right on;
The Tea Party was a wave the 99ers are a tsunami. The silent Americans that have carried the burden of keeping America Great finally have a voice and that voice is getting louder and louder.

We are the 99% and we expect to be heard. The 1% have been listened to long enough this is the 99%'s country. Money Should Never Rule it should be the Majority that rules. We are the people spoken of in the constitution that begins in bold letters WE THE PEOPLE of the United States of America. Politicians made an oath to follow protect and defend the Constitution of the United States that means they are suppose to listen to WE THE PEOPLE and not banks,, corporations, lobbyists or special interests.

The People of the United States must be heard by their Representatives in Washington first and foremost.
01:58 AM on 12/16/2011
What a story...So what is it you expect? If you tax me more, it still won't create a single job. But you'll get even, which is what you really want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheIndependenceParty
Cranky yankee and a rehabilitated ex-Republican
08:15 AM on 12/16/2011
Taxing you less hasn't created any jobs either. So, yes, ... we are going to try it the other way around for a while.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Breedlove
Curmudgeon of Lucidity
10:24 AM on 12/16/2011
If we tax you more and put that money to work on our infrastructure it will create many more jobs than the "Jobs Creators" have done in the last decade. Trickle Down was actually Tinkle Down, the idea that all money must pass through the kidneys of the rich so a glorious "Golden Shower" would rain down upon the Pe(e)ons. It didn't work.