More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mike Lux

Mike Lux

Posted: May 15, 2009 01:41 PM

Why I Am a Progressive

What's Your Reaction:

One of the main reasons I wrote my book, The Progressive Revolution: How the Best in America Came to Be, was to give progressive leaders and activists a narrative about American history that would let them argue the progressive cause. I am delighted to pass the word on that members of the Democratic caucus in the House have taken that idea, and run with it. Congressman Keith Ellison and the Congressional Progressive Caucus organized an hour-long special order on the subject "Why I am a Progressive." The first half-hour was on what progressives have done to make America a better place, and the second was on what bold progressive vision for America could be now.

I was especially honored because Keith told me that The Progressive Revolution in great part inspired the idea of this special order, and because he used research and talking points coming from my book in his remarks on the floor.

This is what progressives should be doing, on the floor of the House and Senate, and in their organizing on behalf of progressive causes everywhere across this country: telling the proud story of the progressive movement, and why we should be bold in pushing for more and bolder progressive change.

Here are the thoughts I sent to Keith on their special order.

I am a progressive because progressives have always fought for Jefferson's idea that all of us are created equal.


I am a progressive because progressives embrace the idea of a government of, by, and for the people instead of a government run by the wealthy and powerful.

I am a progressive because we need an economy built from the bottom up, not the top down; an economy that is built on rising wages and an expanding and prosperous middle class, not one built on getting scraps trickling down from the rich and investor bubbles; an economy built on producing quality products, not one based on moving money around from one wealthy financial conglomerate to another.

I am a progressive because all of the great advances in American history come from the progressive movement, from people who believed in equality and democracy and justice and change fighting against the powers that be:

-The American Revolution and the Declaration of Independence
-The Bill of Rights
-The abolition of slavery
-The national park system
-Consumer safety laws
-Breaking up the big corporate trusts
-Women's suffrage
-Social Security
-Minimum wage
-Unemployment and worker's compensation
-Rural electrification
-The GI Bill
-Child labor laws
-The weekend and eight-hour days
-Ending Jim Crow
-Medicare and Medicaid
-Head Start
-Legal Services
-Clean Water Act
-Clean Air Act
-The EPA
-The Occupational Safety and Health Administration
-Martin Luther King Day
-Labor Day
-Family and Medical Leave
-S-CHIP

All of these gains for the American people came about because progressives had the idea, organized for it, and passed it into law.

If progressives could make all these things happen in our history, what can progressives do in our times if they think big and act boldly?

-Build an economy that is run almost entirely on wind, solar, and other clean renewable energy by the year 2020

-Create a health care system where every American has access to health care services, with their own choice of a high-quality doctor, whenever they need it, and where they and their doctor don't have to fight with insurance companies over the treatment they need.

-Create a full employment economy where everyone is paid a wage that will keep them and their families above the poverty line

-Create an educational system where anyone who wants to get a college degree is able to do so without going deeply into debt, and where every single K-12 public school succeeds at getting their students ready for life as productive citizens.

-Invest in a non-profit sector where citizens are empowered to build community organizations that make a difference in their lives.

I would love to know how you would answer those questions , and frame the progressive argument.

Here's some video highlights from the "Why I am a Progressive" hour on the House floor.

Congressman Keith Ellison: "Why I Am A Progressive" from Progressive Revolution on Vimeo.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 74
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:44 PM on 05/18/2009
I am a progressive, not a democrat or republican. In the mid 19th century the progressives were republicans (we'll always owe the end of slavery to the republicans no matter what else they've done to ruin our country). Now they tend to side with democrats. I side with whatever advances the human race.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joebhed
Greenback Revolutionist
04:17 PM on 05/17/2009
Dear Mike:

You write here:
" I am a progressive because we need an economy built from the bottom up, not the top down;...................., not one built on getting scraps trickling down from the rich and investor bubbles...."

Here's a progressive clue for you, Mike.
You're almost talking about economic democracy here.
But economic democracy would be a little TOO progressive for those among us claiming the mantle of the day, yourself included.
The Krugmans, the Kleins, the Kuttners (the K-group of economists), the Galbraiths, Bakers and Bonddads among them.

If you want to try a truly progressive policy idea that can actually get you want out of this economy, then read up on the Chicago Plan for Monetary Reform.

It is a plan designed by truly progressive economists to replace the failed Federal Reserve debt-money system with full-reserve banking and government-issue, debt-free money.

For crisake, get the freaking lead out progressives.
Take some bold action.

You guys are resting on some well worn-out laurels that have nothing to do with solving today's economic-financial-social problems.
Monetary reform.
And, NOT Glass-Steagall.

The Chicago Plan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
awake108
12:44 PM on 05/17/2009
I have another progressive idea. Lets tax all the corporate lobbiest or at least charge them a lobbiest fee and use it for publically funded elections. If you look at the amount these corporations spend to lobby they usually give to both sides. Maybe a little more to one side but they want to cover both sides so they can have influnence with who ever wins. Just as with health care once they see that it could ultimately save them a lot of money they might go along with it. If all the people of this country are to prosper we need we have to curb the greed of the corporation/finicial interest.s. There is enough wealth in this country for every one. It is when the few try to take it all that the economy crashes and everyone loses.
03:35 PM on 05/17/2009
Here is another progressive idea. Eliminate lobbyists altogether or have members of all interested parties at the table. No exceptions.
12:42 PM on 05/17/2009
I am proud to be a progressive.
11:31 AM on 05/17/2009
...and where all the children are above average.
10:52 AM on 05/17/2009
Mr. Lux blithely claims for the petty bourgeois liberal ideology the many successes of American socialist and communist movements.
06:32 PM on 05/16/2009
More reasons to NOT be a Progressive/Liberal............


http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/letter_of_amends_from_a_recove.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomFox
05:47 PM on 05/17/2009
Yawn....

Conversion stories are a dime a dozen from both sides...I could tell you my story and I get a bunch of people "welcoming me back"
06:19 PM on 05/16/2009
I was unaware that progressive were around in 1740-1800 era. Other than that, maybe the author should not be so BOLD at this POOR attempt at revisionst history. Skipping the first two of his points. I thought Lincoln was a REBUPLCAN as was TR. TR didnt get elected as a member of the Progressive party. These two men cover 5 or 6 of the authors points. And EVERYONE knows what is happening the Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid both measures passed by a Democratic majority. There is not enough room here to go point by point to dispute him but I suggest you do some research on your own to find the ACTUAL truth. I am NOT saying that progressives can NOT have good ideas as can Democrats. This is WHY Lincoln and TR are so revered. They took the BEST ideas and implemented them.

The reason that I am a conservative can be SIMPLY stated as GOVT should NOT be allowed to EXCEED the powers given to it BY THE PEOPLE per the Constitution. How much was your vehicle registration this year??? Just wait until they raise that with the new carbon taxes that are coming.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Social Construct
Go left, young man.
06:47 PM on 05/16/2009
I am not conservative by any means, or by any means I am willing to admit to, but I do agree with your premise on constitutional government's powers. However, I am not inclined to cede a society's power to an elite group that has influence over economic matters, either. I believe that the people, through government, have the right and responsibility to control or regulate any faction positioning itself for greater power over others. Power corrupts, it should be the role of government to limit the damage of that corruption and not become a party to it.
09:45 PM on 05/16/2009
"I am not inclined to cede a society's power to an elite group that has influence over economic matters"

Nor am I. I would say that would go for ALOT more sectors of daily life also.

I believe that may be the BEST description of the LIMITED Govt principle that I have seen posted here. I would agree that govt should be as TRANSPAERENT as possible. We are not quite to the point where ALL Govt actions are recorded aka Star Trek, Stargate, pick your sci-fi series here but we are getting closer with the coming on the Internet. Im sure that eventually ALL will be known as to what actually happened with regards to detaniee abuse. I would hope that are military would primarIy be home before that happens. I have NO problem personally listening to progressive ideas ie social security reform, health care reform, etc. BUT it would be DIFFICULT to convince me that Govt can do something better than private industry can thus lower taxes the better. When was the LAST time Congress CUT their pay for the good of the country???? IF anyones pay should be limited, its the frakking politicians who are the ones that should get it not private industry professional who spent untold amounts on educations for the most part to get where they are.
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
11:53 PM on 05/16/2009
You're right! Lincoln was a REBUPLCAN. And abolishing slavery was a very progressive, and dare I say it, Liberal thing to do.

You being unaware that progressives being around in the 1740-1800 era doesn't mean that they weren't there. The idea of changing things for the better, going as far as breaking free of Great Britain was a very progressive/liberal idea. Our founding fathers just didn't call themselves progressives. It was the conservatives that wanted to stay with England.

Stating that you are a conservative because you believe GOVT should NOT be allowed to EXCEED the powers given to it BY THE PEOPLE per the Constitution, must mean that you were very upset with Pres. W. Bush because jailing people without a right to question the justification for the jailing is certainly exceeding the powers given to it by the people (due process). Approving that type of action means the government can arrest anyone, even an American, claim they are a terrorist, claim they are not an American, and that person has no recourse. A la the movie with Cheech Marin who loses his wallet and is swept up in an INS sweep, and can't prove that he's an American.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joebhed
Greenback Revolutionist
04:28 PM on 05/17/2009
Not only the freeing of the slaves, but also the taking on of the private banking institutions of the day, with the passage of the Legal Tender Act of 1862, and the GOVERNMENT issuing debt-free money, yes, the Greenbacks, and YES, these were very progressive ideals, picked up afterward by even more progressive groups including the Greenback-Labor party, the Independent and Populist parties.

The joke on 'conserv' is that the Republican party was the more progressive party for many years, and what he or she needs to do is to lose PARTY affiliation in discussing progressive ideals.

Solve the economic problems of the day - GREENBACKS !
Debt-free money of government issue.
It worked for the Republican Mr. Lincoln and it will work for the quasi-progressive Mr. Obama, as soon as he gets his financial head out of you know where.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Social Construct
Go left, young man.
04:31 PM on 05/16/2009
Ending the excessive influence that the corporatist sector has over government is necessary to allow true progressive rhetoric to be more than rhetoric and a concrete template to effect change for all and not change that benefits a small, well protected class. All of the above examples have originated from people that came from Democrats and Republicans. What is necessary is to provide a more even playing field for the individuals with a more populist bent, no matter their party affiliation. More transparency and media cooperation in exposing just where our elected representatives find the riches to fill their reelection war chests would give voters more insight. More mainstream media coverage of alternate political parties would allow for more informed voting, also. There are a lot of wolves in progressive clothing out there and we need the tools to expose them.
12:48 PM on 05/16/2009
It would be so much easier if ultra-conservatives admitted that they believe the following:
1) society is no different than the jungle, survival of the fittest 2) taxes should not be collected to support those who don't "succeed" in a lightly regulated capitalist economy. 3) if you lose your job or somehow don't have enough money to survive, you deserve to starve and die.

Just be open about it if that's what you really believe, then the nation can fairly judge if that's the kind of country they want.
01:52 PM on 05/16/2009
George Will did admit it on the Colbert show. He's the only one I've ever heard say it though.
03:46 PM on 05/16/2009
I've had this discussion with conservatives at work and they usually clam up or change the subject when the hard question is asked "what, if anything, are you willing to do to help the less fortunate?" In a followup discussion I clarified the argument for them by saying that the less fortunate won't starve, they'll show up at your doorstep with a gun.

As to the problem being handled voluntarily by private charities? Woefully inadequate and dependent upon the voluntary generosity of others -- in other words, probably won't happen.

It's interesting how people in some European countries like France practically revolt at the first mention of the word "layoff." We seem to crawl in a hole like it's all our fault.
11:49 AM on 05/16/2009
NO, Progressives are liberal extrimists... You think liberal got a negative , progressive is so much worse... Our greatest 20th century president said "Government is not the solution to the problem , Government is the problem"..... and
12:58 PM on 05/16/2009
"Extremists". Oh and btw, Reagan was right about government being the problem. He proved that by the way he governed.
01:56 PM on 05/16/2009
exactly,, He took Big government out of the equation, let capitalism and conservatism flourish and we experienced decades of prosperity until the Clinton era and progressives finally brought it down.
01:54 PM on 05/16/2009
Reagan also said in the early 60s that implementing Medicare would be the end freedom in our country. He didn't know what he was talking about and he was a mediocre president at best.
05:48 PM on 05/16/2009
"Medicare, the government health care program for seniors, is projected to run out of money in 2017"

Hmm, what will the progressives do to fix this I wonder??

Raise taxes??? Ration health care??? Lower the point at which one becomes eligible ??

Reagan may have ben a little smarter than you think. Ohh thats right, he went to PUBLIC university. He can not be THAT intelligent!!!
BrighterStar
Let Freedom Ring
11:40 AM on 05/16/2009
I think you are very confused about the political realities of today. If you believe in big government you necessarily believe in a country run by the powerful elite. That what big government means. If you do not want nation run by the powerful elite you would be a conservative who wants to reduce the size and power of government.
12:55 PM on 05/16/2009
The "elite" the writer refers to are the "American Royalty". The wealty, influential families who comprise the powers that be, so to speak. I do not think he refers to people of humble beginnings who rise through the ranks to achieve political office.
02:49 PM on 05/16/2009
"Big government" is a meaningless bumper sticker slogan. Liberals believe in a government that works for the people and provides those services which cannot be effectively provided for in the private sector. Even conservatives, most of them, believe that government should provide some services, such as security. Or do you advocate private armies, private policemen, etc?

75% of the American people also think the government should provide a public health care solution, social security, etc. A lot of conservatives really want those things also. I don't know a single one who has turned down unemployment, social security, or medicare. They just don't want to pay for it. They even cheat on their taxes to avoid paying their fair share.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
kjstjohn
06:59 AM on 05/16/2009
I like "Progressive." Reagan made "liberal" a derisive term that tapped into deep wellsprings of resentment in white people--in my opinion arising mostly out of the civil rights movement.

We can bemoan the power of propagandists to taint honorable words. I say we should just use "Progressive" until Reagan's generation passes.
BrighterStar
Let Freedom Ring
11:41 AM on 05/16/2009
It is the Ideas and not the name that most people do not like.
12:52 PM on 05/16/2009
By most people, do you mean you 18%ers?
02:01 PM on 05/16/2009
Actually it is the opposite. People do not like the name "liberal" due to conservative propaganda and frequently label themselves as "conservative." However, when question more deeply on the issues, such as abortion, gay rights, health care, etc. those same people take the "liberal" position. ie) 75% of the people believe in a public health care solution. Of course, recent Republican actions are changing things. "Conservative" may start to become the dirty word that "liberal" used to be.
photo
Dredd
Our government is a wartocracy.
05:55 AM on 05/16/2009
Most Americans hold to progressive values. It is just that power corrupts and when anyone gets a taste of it they must stand up:

http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2009/05/rip-rubber-stamp-congress.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J.C. Convery
01:01 AM on 05/16/2009
Well yeah if the founding fathers had been conservatives we would be British. Fortunately they embraced change because not only was it the right thing to do it was inevitable.
02:51 AM on 05/16/2009
So true!
BrighterStar
Let Freedom Ring
11:42 AM on 05/16/2009
The founding fathers would be appalled by the policies of the Obama administration. They were very skeptical of a powerful government.
02:03 PM on 05/16/2009
The founding fathers would be impressed by the policies of the Obama administration. They were men who believed in the constitution and separation of church and state. President Obama is a constitutional lawyer who has actually read the Federalist Papers. Bush didn't even know what they are and he shredded the constitution.