Another Mass Shooting Blamed on Gun-Free Zones

06/19/2015 08:27 am ET | Updated Jun 19, 2016

I really don't want to write this piece, not just because it's about the unspeakable tragedy that took place this week at the Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, SC, but because I knew that by today, the usual pro-gun sycophants would be lecturing us all on the dangers of gun-free zones. Actually, they couldn't even wait until today, although by yesterday morning, the gun "experts" on Fox & Friends were already advising their audience that if someone in the church had been carrying a gun, "they would have had the opportunity to pull out their weapon and take him out."

But one of the real experts on gun-free zones didn't even wait until the shooter was captured to tell us not only why the shooter, Dylann Roof, chose the historic Black church to practice target-shooting with live targets, but also why the now-dead parishioners were really to blame for their self-massacre because they weren't all sitting there armed. I am referring, of course, to Maestro John Lott, who regularly orchestrates a chorus about the dangers of gun-free zones whenever a particularly nasty shooting takes place.

Lott announced the shooting on his website with a headline which read: "Another Shooting in a Gun-free Zone." He then went on to insist that virtually every mass public shooting since 1950 has taken place in a gun-free zone, and then finished up by letting it be known that the Charleston church was a strong supporter of gun control and regularly opposed concealed-carry and stand your ground laws.

Remember the loony statement by Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell who blamed the World Trade Center attack on America's moral decay? Now I'm not saying that Lott has become that crazy, but that he couldn't even wait 24 hours after the unspeakable event to begin peddling a shabby version of "they got what they probably deserved," speaks volumes about the motives and agenda of this self-proclaimed academic researcher on guns. And for that matter, it also says something about the way in which pro-gun mouthpieces like Lott and others respond every time that a shooting takes place which provokes horror and dread.

Because the simple fact of the matter is that mass shootings aren't supposed to happen in churches or schools. These places are sanctuaries in every sense of the word, and when we send our children off to school or we ourselves go off to a house of prayer, there's simply no good reason on God's Earth why we should stop and consider, even for a second, about whether there's any chance at all that we or our children will face the horrific trauma of a gun barrel being pushed into our face.

But, of course, John Lott knows that we wouldn't have to give it a moment's thought because he also knows something that nobody else knows, namely, that shooters who go into gun-free schools or churches or movie theaters do so because they know that nobody is carrying a gun. After the 2012 shooting at the Aurora, CO theater which left 12 dead and 70 wounded , Lott stated that the reason James Holmes chose the Cinemark theater, even though it was neither the closest theater to his apartment, nor did it have the largest audience, was because it was the "only one where guns were banned." The trial of Holmes is actually going on right now, but from the time of the shooting until today, Holmes has never once said to anyone that he chose the Cinemark theater because nobody in the audience would be carrying a gun.

If the parishioners at Emanuel AME had just talked to John Lott, they would have realized the error of their ways and would have been carrying guns. And, of course, Dylaan Roof would have attacked another church. And, of course, he's already told John Lott that he walked into Emanuel AME because he knew it was a gun-free zone.