Michael Mukasey says he needs more information to determine if the ancient Spanish Inquisition technique of waterboarding is torture as defined under US laws and treaties. Perhaps the Senate Judiciary Committee, with a little help from his Democratic enablers-- Sen. Chuck Schumer and Sen. Diane Feinstein--can help provide him with the necessary information.
Before the Judiciary Committee votes on his nomination to become America's top law enforcement officer, bring Judge Mukasey and an expert CIA interrogator before the Judiciary Committee for a scientific experiment in "enhanced interrogation techniques". While the CIA interrogator provides direction, Sen. Schumer can tie a rag around Mukasey's face and pin his arms behind his back. Sen. Feinstein can then pore water down Mukasey's throat for two or three minutes until his lungs are about to explode and the interrogator tells her she must stop because Mukasey is about to drown to death.
Schumer and Feinstein can then ask Mukasey again whether he has enough information yet to decide if waterboarding is torture. When he sputters that he still needs a further classified briefing from the White House before he can make up his mind, they can ask him to try the technique out himself on Rudy Giuliani (for whom Mukasey is a former advisor on legal policy), Mitt Romney are Fred Thompson, who are climbing all over each other to prove which of them love's waterboarding more.
These esteemed Senators can then vote to confirm Mukasey because, as Sen. Feinstein reassures us, "First and foremost, Michael Mukasey is not Alberto Gonzales."
And anyway, Sens. Schumer and Feinstein have to worry about Pres. Bush's "who's your daddy" challenge that if Judiciary Committee blocks Mukasey because of his noncommittal stance on the legality of waterboarding, it would set a new standard that could not be met by any "responsible" nominee for attorney general. After all Schumer and Feinstein wouldn't want to risk, by standing up to Bush, that the Democratic-led Congress's 28%approval rating might rise above Pres. Bush's 33% rating.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Miles and Board,
.bohemian. com/metro/ 01.24.07/d ianne-fein stein-0704 .html
.metroacti ve.com/met ro/03.21.0 7/dianne-f einstein-r esigns-071 2.html
Here are a couple of links that expose the truth about Feinstein.
http://www
http://www
She is quite simply a war-profiteer and will never vote to end these neo-con-flicts!
Please forward these links to any friends you have living in her district. We need to remove this woman even more than her Buddy Pelosi!
Torture is kind of like rape except that with rape it's about sex and the power but with torture its exactly the opposite.
Waterboard them all. Then whisk them off the streets to a black ops prison...n o contact with family or friends and no lawyer.
Wire tap their phones, put them on the no fly list, freeze their bank accounts and deny them health care.
Perhaps then they will understand that Americans want an attorney general who will restore the rule of law and adhere to the constitution.
Can January 09 come any sooner?
Based again and again on her voting record, despite the seniority that gives Dems some clout in the Senate, I will never vote for Diane Feinstein again.
She really is a centrist Republican, and whenever push comes to shove, with a few exceptions--such as with gun control, she is not to be counted on ever.
You are correct. Why would the Dem's want to be respected and have their favorability rating exceed "W"? The "We are keeping our powder dry" group will continue to do just, "keep our powder dry." What a miserable bunch of losers, cowards, spineless nothings. Feinstein and Schumer are the worst offenders. We need new, young blood, fresh ideas and people not "beholdin" to the Corp's. Can you recommend somone?
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with