EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Mitchell Bard

Mitchell Bard

Posted January 20, 2009 | 03:51 PM (EST)

Inaugural Address Shows that Barack Obama is Worthy of the Number 44


?>

As Dianne Feinstein introduced Barack Obama as the 44th president, and as Obama noted in his inauguration address (you can read the full text here) that he was the 44th person to take the oath of office, it struck me that 44 is about as apt a number for the Obama presidency as you could find.

Why? Well, as a baseball fanatic, I relate most numbers to the sport. Sure, 42, worn by Jackie Robinson, the man who broke Major League Baseball's racial barrier, on the surface, would seem to be the most appropriate number for Obama. But for someone of my generation (much to my chagrin, I am not old enough to have seen Robinson play), the number 44 carries more emotional resonance.

On April 8, 1974, I sat in my living room with my parents and watched as Henry Aaron, wearing uniform number 44, hit a home run to break Babe Ruth's long-standing career home run record. I, a seven-year-old devoted to baseball, looked on, mesmerized. As Aaron rounded second base, two fans ran up behind him. (You can watch the home run at the end of this video.) My parents gasped, but the men innocently patted Aaron on the back, congratulating him. I asked my parents why they were worried, and they nervously explained to me that some bad people wanted to hurt Aaron because they didn't want a black person to break Ruth's record. I remember being confused and upset. To my mind, why would anyone want to hurt the great Henry Aaron? He was a hero! It was one of my first lessons in racism.

Three years later, Reggie Jackson would join my team, the New York Yankees, and wear uniform number 44. Jackson spent most of the season at odds with teammate Thurman Munson, manager Billy Martin and owner George Steinbrenner, but I thought he was a great player, and he quickly became my favorite Yankee. Which was why I was thrilled when I sat in Yankee Stadium on October 18, 1977 and watched Jackson hit three home runs (on three consecutive pitches) in Game 6 of the World Series to power the Yankees to victory over the Dodgers and their first World Series title in my young lifetime (and first since 1962).

While baseball might seem trivial on such an important day, I couldn't help making the connection. Barack Obama, the 44th president, is a pioneer, much like Aaron, who started his career in the Negro Leagues. And his skill and intelligence, on display in his inaugural address, showed the superstar abilities of Aaron and Jackson. I, like many Americans, have hope that Obama is capable of successfully leading the country back, much like Jackson did for the Yankees in 1977.

The historic nature of Obama's election has been well-chronicled, and rightfully so. The elevation of an African American to the presidency, coming against the backdrop of hundreds of years of racism and oppression of blacks in this country, marks a powerful moment, one filled with symbolic and actual meaning. Watching Obama stand on the steps of the U.S. Capitol, taking the oath of office, inspired a sense of pride in my country that has been lacking for the eight years of the Bush administration. After all, we are told that Europeans are more progressive than we are, and yet the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain and Italy have never elected a black leader, nor have nearly every other country on the continent.

But as great as it was to watch an African American man take the oath using Abraham Lincoln's bible, I was even more moved listening to Obama's inauguration address, because it showed that after eight years of the Bush presidency, we finally have a worthy leader. Sure, I had felt throughout the campaign that Obama was the best man for the job, a leader of intelligence and talent. But seeing him on the steps of the U.S. Capitol on January 20 really hammered the idea home. This was real. Obama was the president. And I was proud, and it went far beyond his race.

In the summer of 2004, I spent three months living in Helsinki, Finland. By my second week there, I realized that when meeting new people, I had to change my introduction from, "Hi, my name is Mitchell," to, "Hi, my name is Mitchell and I didn't vote for him." Bush's absolute contempt for government and the constitution, as well as the rest of the world, tarnished what it meant to be an American. (Keith Olbermann did a great job summarizing the failures of the Bush administration in this segment of Countdown last week.) With Obama taking office, the job of restoring the shine of being an American is off to a rousing start.

The entire speech was brilliant, and many lines will be held up for praise. But to me, personally, here were some moments that jumped out as I watched, signalling that a new, better era had begun:

- "On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord."
One of the legacies of the Bush administration will be its use of fear to ram through policies that threatened our democracy. Those days have ended, at least for the next four years.
- "In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of shortcuts or settling for less." And later, "What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility -- a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task."
We have become a nation of shortcuts. This sense of entitlement has been pervasive, infecting everything from television and movies to politics. It was satisfying to hear a leader come out and say that things have to change, that to solve the myriad problems facing the nation, we, as citizens, have to start doing the right thing, not necessarily the easy thing.
- "As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our founding fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations."
Music to my ears, more pleasing than the joyous vocals of Aretha Franklin singing "America." Translation: No more using terrorism as an excuse to torture. No more using terrorism as an excuse to take away the rights of American citizens (and non-citizens, too). No more using terrorism as a premise to destroy the ideals of the American democracy. And no more using terrorism as a political ploy.
- "For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers." And later, "We will restore science to its rightful place..."
After eight years of Bush injecting religion into every aspect of his administration, both expected (stem-cell research) and unexpected (150 graduates of Pat Robertson's low-ranked Regent University School of Law getting jobs at the Justice Department because they had the "right" religious beliefs), the fact that a president would legitimize the position of non-belief and extol the virtues of science was welcomed.


No matter how you slice it, today was a great day for the United States. The problems we face are daunting, both in number and depth, so much so that they may be beyond any president to solve. But it's nice to know that the guy in the batter's box taking his hacks to try and fix them is worthy of the number 44. I'm sure Hank Aaron and Reggie Jackson would agree.

 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Geoffrey Dunn
12:41 AM on 01/22/2009
I've got two words for you: Willie McCovey. 44 is also known on street corners in the ghettos of America as "eight the hard way." Obama doesn't have any street cred. Hank and Willie Mac both put up big numbers in an era of Gibson, Marichal and Koufax. Let's see what Obama does. He's got a lot of at bats down the road.
12:28 PM on 01/21/2009
Hammering Hank suffered no fools, keep them away Rahmbo.
11:36 AM on 01/21/2009
I think this speech will go down in history as one of the greats, perhaps edging out JFK's inaugural speech, but this will only happen if the actions of the administra­tion in the next year fulfill the promises Obama made. Not promises to do specific things (and that omission may be one reason some people are unhappy with it), but promises to govern from a very different place. The line about growing up: I heard an African American preacher decode it and suggest that it was aimed at black citizens in particular­. When I heard President Obama say those words, I immediatel­y decided they were a shot across the bow to Republican senators. In truth, of course, they apply to all of us. The speech, unlike so many others of its ilk, was truly a "governing­" speech and not just recycled campaign rhetoric . As such, it can only be evaluated in conjunctio­n with actual governance­. So let's meet again next year and re-evaluat­e, re-discuss­, and re-decide how we feel about what we heard yesterday.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AnnfromCA
11:01 AM on 01/21/2009
I liked this speech much better than others he's made. I was amused to see the critiques suggesting it wasn't rhetorical­ly satisfying to others or deemed, too pedestrian­.

I found it very reassuring­.
10:08 AM on 01/21/2009
Mr. Bard,
Funny you mention the significan­ce of the number 44! It has been in the back of mind for quite some time and I was waiting for someone to point it out. I hadn't thought of Hank Aaron but as a Syracuse grad (Go Orange!) I can't help but mention Jim Brown (who was denied the Heisman because of the color of his skin) and Ernie Davis, the first African American to finally win the Heisman. Both wore the number 44 lending even more significan­ce to your article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
salamanca1
Stupidity: our one inexhaustible resource
02:16 PM on 01/21/2009
You stole my thunder, Proud. I'm an old Orange fan, and you're right, 44 was famous before Hammerin' Hank glorified it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mitchell Bard
03:53 PM on 01/21/2009
Thanks ProudAgain­44 and salamanca1­. Anything to add to my 44 sports mythology ...
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RButler
"Who wouldn't love a person who had a pony?"
08:36 AM on 01/21/2009
"Irrationa­l exuberance­" combined with uncritical and unquestion­ing belief in anything has gotten this country in trouble more than a few times recently. I already read people commenting that Obama is the best president ever. Huh? The danger in this over-hyped presidency is not just that there will be disappoint­s but the possibilit­y that we could could over a cliff before we know it if he makes some bad decisions.

I'm usually skeptical when people are hyped beyond reason. For example, why weren't Michael Jackson and Whitney Houston performing at he inaugurati­on? Remember how fabulous we were told they were. I'm not saying Obama is going to do something corrupt or illegal but people need to keep their eyes open so they can see clearly.

There will be criticism of Obama and it needs to be examined to see if it's valid and not simply dismissed or the critic demonized.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mitchell Bard
09:29 AM on 01/21/2009
I think people's eyes will be open, RButler. Nobody is giving Obama a pass. And it's not like it's common for anyone to say he is the best president ever (I haven't heard anyone say it).

It is entirely reasonable that the American people (include me in this category) were thrilled to see a president stand in front of the American people and make sense. To understand the essence of what makes America special. To have the right approach to the problems. And to be smart.

After eight years of a diasastrou­s presidency with a truly horrible leader, we have a right to be excited and happy. I'm not sure why that would bother anyone.

When the time comes that Obama screws up (and he will, since nobody is perfect), we will all be there to push back. But for now, why not give the guy a chance?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RButler
"Who wouldn't love a person who had a pony?"
08:03 AM on 01/22/2009
I agree with you that we've just come out of a disastrous 8 years but you have to admit some of the comments and pundit commentary about Obama has been way over the top. Remember how Bush was given almost the same treatment for the first few years by the press while we wondered where the real journalist­s were. I'm withholdin­g assessment­s on his greatest till he's been president a while and produced some positive results.

His smooth transition has been frequently compared to Clinton's bumpy one yet Clinton did give us some good results in the economy, left a surplus, caught the guys responsibl­e of the WTC bombing and we didn't have any more attacks during the rest of his presidency on American soil. So, a smooth transition doesn't necessaril­y guarantee anything. And Clinton did this with the worst the republican­s could throw at him from the beginning.

Remember how excited the republican­s were when Reagan succeeded Carter and they're still enthralled with him despite some real questions about his presidency­. They wanted to put him on Mount Rushmore. Are the Democrats going to be as giddy with Obama?
07:42 AM on 01/21/2009
Obama's speech was bland and totally deviod of substance.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mitchell Bard
09:26 AM on 01/21/2009
Beachrunne­r, read it again. It's packed with specific things that were done wrong, and specific things that have to change. He just said it with subtlety and tact, since the architects of the mess we're in were sitting feet away from him.

It was an inaugurati­on speech, not a policy address to a trade associatio­n.

Anyone upset with the speech has to be looking for ways to cut Obama down. No reasonably objective person would use the word "bland," and nobody without an agenda would accuse an inaugurati­on address of lacking substance.
10:23 AM on 01/21/2009
Mr. Bard, I just wanted to thank you for responding to comments like this, especially so for rephrasing your opinion and why you disagree with the comment.

This time is bringing out the best in of all of us. Wasn't it something President Obama said about 'our better angels?'

Keep up the good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
salamanca1
Stupidity: our one inexhaustible resource
02:14 PM on 01/21/2009
Were you listening with one year while you had your ipod plugged in the other? Apparently you have no idea what constitute­s substance. Obama ripped the Bush administra­tion's eight years a new one, right there in front of the Decider, and mapped out a new course of action on domestic, internatio­nal, social and economic fronts.
07:15 AM on 01/21/2009
I guess it isn't right to impart anything I feel on anyone else but for the life of me I cannot see how any responsibl­e citizen anywhere in the World could not have been heartened and pleased and more hopeful after yesterday. I certainly feel that from the many people around me and in the World (and I read foreign news sources and have intimates abroad).

The World is relieved and rejoices. His speech spoke eloquently and forcefully and correctly to the us and the World. And people - I suspect all of goodwill -- are rejoicing over what they heard, and see, and feel in their hearts.

I could nitpick his speech -- I for one cringe at the injection of god into things meant for me too - bothers me intellectu­ally and also as a citizen.. but I mention this ONLY to say of course he could not be 100% perfect for everyone's tastes.

Hitting every note I or anyone else may have wanted was not important. What was important were the themes and the sincerity one can rightly infer. In this sense he was perfect.. the the World for the most part REJOICES and we should too!!
02:41 AM on 01/21/2009
My Brother was born Jan. 20, 1965, the day Johnson was inaugurate­d, exactly 44 years ago today. Cue Twilight Zone music.
11:31 PM on 01/20/2009
On this day one more wall has been torn down.but there are so many more to go.Tonight belongs to the Obama family.But tomorrow the real work begins.Our nation has a lot of work to do and those who
don't want to help do the work may want to get out of the way.Becaus­e you will be left behind and wondering what happend.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zeroes
09:49 PM on 01/20/2009
America put on a classy act today.
10:26 PM on 01/20/2009
!!!!!!!
09:24 PM on 01/20/2009
Re: no memorable phrases - On the West Coast, so late to the blogs. Hope I am not repeating what has been said. A number of cultural observers have said that the American people are fed up with high rhetoric. If they are correct, then President Obama has surely heard the message. The speech was more down to earth than high-minde­d; more Carl Sandburg and Studs Terkel than Greek philosophe­rs and Shakespear­e; more earth and water than wind and fire.
President Obama did reference an American popular song in his speech, “Pick Yourself Up”, written by two children of Jewish immigrants Jerome Kern and Dorothy Fields: “ Pick yourself up, dust yourself off, and start all over again”.
And that’s how we will form “a more perfect Union”.
08:18 PM on 01/20/2009
Great post! And I totally agree w/ it. The Inaugural speech was absolutely brilliant, and way exceeded my expectatio­ns for what I thought I would hear.
Furthermor­e, I find myself believing, that we as a nation are going to accomplish everything he has proposed!!­! Yes, we did... elect him. And, Yes, we can!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Obamaismyguy
12:17 PM on 01/21/2009
I agree with you completely­. I was expecting higher flying rhetoric and was very happy to see him being serious and talking about what we need to do and where he hopes to take us. If he had been more "high flying" he would have been criticized by the haters as being an "empty suit." There is no pleasing them. They will find fault with him no matter what he does, but I bet they won't return their tax cuts to him.
08:00 PM on 01/20/2009
Intelligen­t people and pundits use a great degree of nuance-- nuanced writing requires a greater deal of intelligen­ce in a writer than literal blah, blah, blah....we as a nation- are so used to so ,so many years of pablum being fed -- it is time for grown up nuanced rhetoric- and grown-up discipline­d responsibi­lities--
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
threegoal
06:30 PM on 01/20/2009
Actually, he is the 43rd person to take the oath. We get to him being the 44th President by counting Grover Cleveland'­s two separated terms as two presidenci­es (#22 and #24). Well and good, but we can't count him as two persons, even if he was a big man. If Taft counted as only one man, no one else can count as two people.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mitchell Bard
08:25 PM on 01/20/2009
Yeah, threegoal, I read that too. But the point was that I heard him say it, and it made me think of Henry Aaron and Reggie Jackson. The fact that there were only 43 men to take the oath doesn't retroactiv­ely take the thought out of my brain!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
threegoal
01:44 AM on 01/21/2009
Agreed. It was just the engineer in me coming out. A fine post on your part.