iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
MJ Rosenberg

MJ Rosenberg

Posted: October 14, 2009 12:16 PM

Is Israel's New Ambassador Trying To Squelch J Street?

What's Your Reaction?

Israel's ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, is boycotting J Street's first annual conference. J Street is the new pro-Israel, pro-peace political action committee which has made remarkable strides in its one year of existence. 160 House members and Senators have signed on as "hosts" of the conference.

But the ambassador is not coming because, in the embassy's words, J Street could "impair Israeli interests."

That is a pretty incredible statement. J Street is an American organization dedicated to working toward Israeli-Palestinian peace because peace is in America's interests. It is made up of individuals who are also deeply concerned about Israel's security and well-being. Nonetheless, the ambassador's language is offensive.

Here is what Jeremy Ben Ami, Executive Director of J Street, said in an "open letter" to Oren.

Public comments by your spokesman last week indicate that you have 'concerns over certain policies [of J Street's] that could impair Israel's interests.'

I'm sure you also have concerns and disagreements over policies advocated by certain political parties and their leaders in Israel. That's democracy - and it is fitting that there would be deep disagreements at moments of important communal decision.

We too have our own serious concerns over the policies of the present Israeli government and its impact not just on Israel's interests but on our interests as Americans and as American Jews. As Jews who care about Israel, we fear that, on Israel's present path, we will see our shared dream of a Jewish, democratic home in the state of Israel slip through our fingers.

As Americans, we worry about the impact of Israeli policies on vital US interests in the Middle East and around the world.

Finally, as American Jews, we worry that the health and vitality of our community will be deeply affected by what happens in the region, how the world perceives Israel and by how our community here at home deals with increasingly complex conversations around Israel.

Oren's decision to boycott the conference is self-defeating. Why would he not want to discuss Israeli policies at J Street? It is a Jewish organization composed of people who care deeply about Israel (why else would they get involved with a pro-Israel organization like J Street?).

Apparently, the ambassador believes that an organization dedicated to the two-state solution and ending the occupation is, by definition, unfriendly to Israel. If so, his tenure as ambassador will not be a happy one.

Most Americans who care about Israel understand that the only way to preserve Israel as a Jewish state and a democracy is by implementing the two-state solution. The alternative is the perpetuation of the status quo which will inevitably result in an Israel in which Israelis are heavily outnumbered by Palestinians. That would mean the end of the Zionist enterprise.

Oren knows that. But he wants to send a message. It is: don't criticize Israeli policies if you want the ambassador to honor you with his presence.

That is an odd message to come from a diplomat.

If Oren is to succeed here, he needs to understand that American Jews are Americans and, as such, hold all kinds of views on all kinds of issues - including Israel. That is not going to change. If he is smart, he will want to add his unique voice (he's a former American citizen in addition to being ambassador) to the mix.

Even if J Street was not pro-Israel, which it most emphatically is, he should welcome the opportunity to share his views with its members. That is, after all, the American (and Israeli) way.


Crossposted on Media Matters Action Network

 
 
Israel's ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, is boycotting J Street's first annual conference. J Street is the new pro-Israel, pro-peace political action committee which has made remarkabl...
Israel's ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, is boycotting J Street's first annual conference. J Street is the new pro-Israel, pro-peace political action committee which has made remarkabl...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
07:17 PM on 10/20/2009
remember the neo-cons saying about patriotic americans the same type of thing michael oren is saying about people who are pro-israel? why? to forward his own domestic politics.
01:15 PM on 10/15/2009
This is all part of the current Israeli government fighting what it sees are dangerous anti-Semitic tendencies to criticize Israel.

The worry is that Israel will suffer the fate of apartheid South Africa with respect to world opinion. And the wold opinion that matters the most is US opinion.

Those who know their Holy Land politics know the import of Dov Weissglas's statement

"Weissglas said Israel is dependent economically on Europe, and militarily on the United States. "$4 billion, a quarter of all American military aid, goes to Israel.

"Without Europe and the States we'd be like the Palestinians, surviving on $200 a month," he said.

"Now that we've left the Gaza Strip, we will give back the rest of the territories sooner or later, and every single settler will have to leave," he said.
01:21 PM on 10/15/2009
Here's the link to the quote.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1112572.html

I've included it here because the last time I tried to post a link to Haaretz, the censor wouldn't let me.

Which is undertandable I suppose as for some folks it's just one step above the "Dearborn Independent".
11:51 AM on 10/15/2009
"Most Americans who care about Israel understand that the only way to preserve Israel as a Jewish state and a democracy is by implementing the two-state solution."

Any state that's central identity is based on religious/ethnic discrimination is NOT a democracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheLonelyGod
The oncoming storm
10:17 AM on 10/21/2009
I guess we shouldn't create a Palestinian state then?

Tell that to them, see how far you get. That is, if you don't want to endorse a double standard.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doughnut70
06:19 PM on 10/23/2009
Maybe not, but at the moment, a country functioning as a safe haven for Jews is a necessity. You are refighting past battles. If you remember, after World War II there was some discussion about taking land from Germany, creating a Jewish homeland there and pushing the Jewish residents of Palestine to move there. Unfortunately, the winning allies (including the Russians) said that they doubted the people of Europe at that point in time after having gone through that long debate over Anti-Semitism that Hitler caused would tolerate a Jewish State and Stalin warned that such a move could even lead to a revival of the Nazi movement. Let's face it. Jews have been discriminated against since the early church preaced hatred towards them as part of their faith. But as they have had their own country, that discrimination has dropped dramatically. Why would we want to change something that is actually working.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FrankCornish
07:42 AM on 10/15/2009
Go J Street!!

The Likud and elements further to the Right in Israel will fight tooth and nail against J Street. They should wise up. US ability to project power in the region is slipping. No one else will so unequivocally take Israel's side. If Israel does not make a just peace soon, in ten years or less they may actually be faced with the "existential" crisis they constantly claim to be in.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo
semantics shamantics
05:08 AM on 10/15/2009
"to share his views with its members. That is, after all, the American (and Israeli) way"

Are you so sure it is "the Israeli way" ?
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
07:13 PM on 10/20/2009
it certainly used to be. israel's government since the millenium has suffered the same sort of arch-conservative takeover that we suffered under bush. Just think of Bibi and Avigdor as Israel's Bush-Cheney, and Israel as a country in dire need of their own Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
10:09 AM on 10/21/2009
But compared to Hamas and Fatah, they're practically left-wing!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheLonelyGod
The oncoming storm
10:18 AM on 10/21/2009
I guess you must have missed the years that Olmert and his Kadima were in charge of Israel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olmert#Prime_Minister
04:02 AM on 10/15/2009
Great post Mr Rosenberg. Let us hope that Jstreet marches on for the good of everyone in the Middle East.
If Bibi & his racist foreign minister instruct their US ambassador not to talk it speaks volumes, more than if they had talked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RogerHWerner
01:27 AM on 10/15/2009
What a wonderful post and that;s for writing it. Eric Altermann has expressed similar sentiments many times. It remains to be seen when our government is going to recognize that most Americans Jew and non-Jew do not support our Middle East policies. A blind person should be able to see that Israel's policies towards the occupied territories and towards Palestinians generally, is self defeating and our carte blanch support for them contrary to US interests in the region.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fireslayer
11:23 PM on 10/14/2009
J Street is a welcome development . These folks are ready for negotiations and real give and take. Not so Netanyahu and his cronies.

Oren's ultra-right wing posturing is a stark warning as to the difficulty of dealing with Netanyahu & Lieberman who J Street knows full well are setting up to tip the canoe in a big way.

Good luck J Street. Any breath of sanity helps.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fein
Either everybody counts or nobody does.
10:46 PM on 10/14/2009
You Go, Jerry!

Haaretz made this comment about J-Street

An unapologetically pro-peace and pro-Israel political convention may prove to be a landmark event in American Jewish history...
10:01 PM on 10/14/2009
The two state solution is not possible if one looks at the strips of land left to the Palestinians.
A possible solution might be a United States Of the Middle East similar to the USA.
Let all the local countries join, they will have all the benefits our states have.
This has actually happened many times involving countries that have done more harm to each other
than the Israelis and Palestinians. eg European Union, United Kingdom.
12:21 AM on 10/15/2009
What, bring back the Ottoman? Look what happened last time, and why it was destroyed and broken up (we called it World War I, by the way).

How will reviving the Ottoman Empire succeed at the Zionist goal?
08:22 PM on 10/14/2009
finally......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
05:06 PM on 10/14/2009
I have no doubt that the Israeli ambassador is worried. J Street is getting significant traction as the alternative organization to AIPAC. It is succeeding where many progessive Jewish organizations opposed to the occupation of Palestine have had limited success. If J Street gets successful enough and can give cover to enough members of Congress to stand up to Israel, then the power of AIPAC, and the other "mainstream" Jewish organizations that are mere puppets of Israel will quickly evaporate.
11:11 AM on 10/15/2009
lbsaltzman
Thanks for your well intended post. Hope your vision comes to pass.
03:52 PM on 10/14/2009
160 members of Congress attending? Balderdash. Didn't you hear that many of the 160 Members of Congress are peeling off?
06:18 PM on 10/14/2009
Please provide proof of your statement. Or is it just that you want us to believe that J Street has no support in Congress?
12:41 PM on 10/14/2009
He studied at Bush's school of diplomacy (the younger, not the elder).
He will be welcomed by the Jews for Jesus crowd at least...