Dodd-Frank isn't stopping this baby from going under once again.
That's according to at least one former commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Roberta Karmel
told Bloomberg Law on Tuesday that Dodd-Frank financial reform isn't strong enough to stop another financial crisis.
"This is not a recipe for strong regulation,"
said Karmel, who is now a professor at Brooklyn Law School. "We not only did nothing to change the balkanization of the regulatory system; we actually made it a little bit worse by creating FSOC [the Financial Stability Oversight Council]."
Karmel said that the Dodd-Frank Act "has improved some financial regulation, but it did not work any real structural change either in the regulatory system or in the financial system."
"What we've moved away from is holding people responsible for business failure," she added.
"We have to eliminate the problem that comes along with too-big-to-fail: that of socializing losses and privatizing profits,"
Karmel told Barron's. "Such a system is antithetical to any notion of the capitalist ideal."
Some critics say that the Dodd-Frank Act,
signed into law by President Obama in 2010, is unlikely to enact tangible change within the financial industry. Former Federal Reserve chairman
Paul Volcker, the inspiration behind a rule to prevent banks from making risky bets with their own money, said in September that Dodd-Frank is "nowhere near what we need."
The question of too-big-to-fail banks, he said, has "not yet been convincingly settled."