iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Morgan Guyton

GET UPDATES FROM Morgan Guyton
 

Sister Simone: The Pro-Life Movement's Best Witness

Posted: 10/16/2012 2:31 pm

The abortion debate has become a quagmire in which both political parties have latched onto it as a wedge issue to trap the votes of either women or evangelical Christians. Both presidential candidates have ambiguously moderate positions on the issue. Obama says that he believes in the sanctity of life, but has gotten a lot of mileage out of stirring up fear about the more radical pro-life position of Paul Ryan. Romney was pro-choice when he needed to be in Massachusetts and had a change of heart during the Republican primaries after which he backpedaled to the middle this past week. In the midst of a situation in which perpetuating the quagmire is in the best interests of both political parties, it's time for the pro-life movement to abandon its partisan approach to this issue. This is where Sister Simone Campbell emerges as a hero in this struggle. She is ardently committed to defending the lives of unborn children; she is also committed to the lives of children after they are born. She has been campaigning on a nationwide nun bus tour about poverty, and she was a keynote speaker at the Democratic National Convention. If I were a strategist within the pro-life movement, then I would want to find as many Sister Simones as I possibly could to represent my cause because the only way that anything will ever change regarding abortion in this country is if a critical mass of Democrats come to see it as a justice issue for unborn children instead of an individual rights issue.

I became pro-life when I was a high school teacher after learning that a girl in my class got pregnant and had two abortions in one year. I don't think that should be allowed to happen. It goes against the "Do no harm" ethic in the Hippocratic oath of medicine. I'm not an absolutist. I don't view legislative prohibition as the only relevant solution. I don't demonize pro-choice people. I also recognize that as a man, it's easy for me to talk about something that my body will never go through, so I must do so with humility. But I reject the individual rights paradigm from which reproductive "rights" are derived, because the same individualism which says, "It's my body and I can do what I want with it" causes others to say, "It's my money and I can do what I want with it." I believe that every conceived human being is an icon of the living God whose life has infinite sacred worth. Furthermore, as icons of God, our bodies do not belong to ourselves; they are temples where God is to be glorified (1 Corinthians 6:19). I'm not saying that you can't be a Christian without sharing my view; I'm just explaining where I come from.

Having said all this, it offends me incredibly when people who have no interest in the lives of poor children after they leave the womb try to use this issue as a partisan vote-trap. That's why Sister Simone's witness is such a blessing to me. She refutes the argument that being against abortion is mostly about being against feminism (which it is for the Todd Akins of the world). To someone like Sister Simone, if abortion is murder, then cutting health care for poor kids in order to pay for a tax cut is genocide (and no, health care for poor kids does not "create dependency"). Not only is Sister Simone consistently pro-life, but she has patiently built rapport with people who disagree with her on this issue by working side by side with them in advocacy over issues that they can agree on. This is the tactic that all pro-life activists would engage in if they were serious about ending abortion: patiently building the trust and rapport with their ideological adversaries to make their case instead of trying to bludgeon and demonize their way to victory.

There will be no end to the quagmire as long as the abortion battle is about getting 51 percent of the people in the country to vote for one party instead of the other. A continuation of the strong-arm political tactics of the culture wars will only continue to accelerate the plummet in Christianity's "market share" of the population, so whatever political "gains" are made today will be wiped out in the backlash two decades from now. Furthermore, six years in which Republicans controlled every branch of government did not produce any substantive change in legislation on abortion, which makes me wonder if Republican leaders really want to resolve an issue whose endless perpetuation has been the lynchpin of all their electoral victories.

If Cardinal Timothy Dolan got on the bus with Sister Simone and actually stood up publicly for the position on poverty that the U.S. Council of Bishops has been quietly mumbling, it would change the political calculus for both Democrats and Republicans by smashing the artificial wall between caring about kids before they're born and caring about kids after they're born. Just imagine if an evangelical juggernaut like Rick Warren got onto Sister Simone's bus. That would be a complete game-changer. If people of faith in our society could come together and declare war on individualism itself, then we would have the basis for a powerful movement to create a safe and loving society where kids could thrive both before and after they're born. Cain was wrong; we are our brothers' and sisters' keepers. We are collectively responsible for each others' well-being, not only our core nuclear families that are contained inside the white picket fences of suburbia, but even more so the families and estranged individuals in our society who have no white picket fences to protect them. The details of how to accomplish this can be debated, but it's time to close the curtains on the age of selfish individualism and enter into the era of the kingdom of mercy and justice that God never stops making new.

 

Follow Morgan Guyton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/maguyton

FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:26 AM on 11/04/2012
Pro-life or pro-choice, we all want the same thing: less abortions. Nobody thinks abortion is a good thing. The real issue with the pro-life movement is that it isn't based in reality. Extensive studies on other countries have shown beyond any shadow of a doubt that making abortion legal actually lowers the abortion rate. This has happened time and time again in country after country. When abortion was made legal, the rate of abortion decreased considerably afterwards and stayed low. Why? That's a great question. I have no answer for you, but it is reality. Making abortion illegal will not decrease abortion. It will lead to more abortion related deaths however.

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_IAW.html

The real answer to decreasing the abortion rate in the US is birth control. A recent study showed that when given access to free birth control the effective rate of teen pregnancy in St. Louis decreased by almost 70%. Experts believe that the ACA will actually lower the abortion rate by 75% due to the fact that it makes birth control available to everyone. Statistics prove it. Studies prove it. You can argue that it isn't moral, and you're welcome to that opinion, but you're still faced with the reality of the situation. You can either make birth control available to everyone, including teenagers, or you can do absolutely nothing about the rate of abortion.

http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/sexandgender/6501/barack_obama,_pro-life_hero_/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ecotopian
I am nerd, hear me geek
03:26 PM on 10/18/2012
I found it chilling that you're reaction to this teenager's abortions was "it should not be allowed" rather than "how could they have been prevented." It's all well and good that you and the missus use birth control, but don't you think this teen should have had access to the same knowledge you have? What did you do to ensure that teens in future have this kind of knowledge to prevent abortions from happening? This knowledge is important and must be spread.
alien brain
I'm stuck here and I can't get home.
01:04 PM on 10/18/2012
I will always fight against sancumonius gas bags like sister simone from trying to control how free people choose to conduct their lives.
photo
Morgan Guyton
United Methodist Pastor, Blogger
01:43 PM on 10/18/2012
There are sanctimonious gas bags involved in this debate unfortunately, but I can assure you that Sister Simone is not one of them.
alien brain
I'm stuck here and I can't get home.
10:36 AM on 10/19/2012
Talk to the hand pastor.
05:06 PM on 10/18/2012
Sister Simone is out ther WORKING for those who cannot help themselve. Before you decide to call her names, could you please elaborate on what you're doing to benefit others?
11:50 AM on 10/18/2012
I'm not sure if I could call Sister Simone "the pro-life movement's best witness" because I really don't see her as being part of it. Part of that is because the pro-life movement as currently constituted really has no room for someone like her. (It had no room for us either; we started All Our Lives because people who are pro-life, pro-improving women's lives, and pro-family planning freedom had nowhere else to go.) I also haven't really seen where she's been "ardently committed to defending the lives of unborn children," though that may be because the people who are always writing about her rebukes of Republicans and her efforts to eliminate poverty don't want to talk about that. I'm not saying that isn't her belief, but it just doesn't seem to come up much. I'd love to see a really strong editorial or video from her talking about how including the unborn in our circle of concern is a natural extension of caring for everyone, especially the most vulnerable. She'd actually have the credibility to say that, unlike someone like Paul Ryan in the VP debate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Craig 212
Tide goes in, tide goes out.
06:31 AM on 10/18/2012
My first thought after reading this was, "Fantastic. But how does she feel about contraception?"

After reading some of the comments, I see I was not alone in thinking it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Morgan Guyton
10:31 AM on 10/18/2012
My wife and I use contraception that is paid for our church-funded health insurance. See what I wrote below. It's completely ludicrous for evangelicals to opportunistically jump on the bandwagon and call this a "religious liberty" issue. Catholics I can respect doing that, but the evangelicals are being cynical.
11:37 PM on 10/17/2012
Personally I would be very happy if the Catholic church would stick to their own and Rick Warren would stick to his own and the politics of this country would be done honestly and not with the Pope intervening. These extreme religious groups have been the bain of our government.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Morgan Guyton
10:32 AM on 10/18/2012
Here's the good news: Jesus is saving America from His people because enough of us have grown completely disgusted with the culture wars and we want to get back to the business of sharing God's love.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jie Jones
"Eat me!" -- Jesus, at the Last Supper
04:01 PM on 10/17/2012
All this talk about abortion, but no talk about contraception, Mr Guyton?

What is a major cause of abortion?....hmmm, inadequate knowledge about and availability of contraception.

Let's hear what you and the Sister have to say about that!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Morgan Guyton
10:30 AM on 10/18/2012
My wife and I are both Methodist clergy who use contraception that is paid for our church-funded health insurance. We do so because we want to be good stewards of our bodies and because we are in the age range where there is a high risk for having a child with a lot of special needs who we would never abort but love dearly but who also would likely compromise our ability to be as available to our church.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jie Jones
"Eat me!" -- Jesus, at the Last Supper
02:38 PM on 10/18/2012
It is extremely intellectually dishonest and shameless to not to discuss EXACTLY which contraception choices the good Sister advocates. We are all aware of the integral role that contraception plays in the abortion rate.  The article is not about YOU and your contraceptive choices...it is about the Sister. Are you always this smarmy?
02:51 PM on 10/17/2012
"Furthermore, six years in which Republicans controlled every branch of government did not produce any substantive change in legislation on abortion, which makes me wonder if Republican leaders really want to resolve an issue whose endless perpetuation has been the lynchpin of all their electoral victories."

Yes. Exactly. I mentioned that to someone recently and I could tell the person was shocked at the idea, but maybe actually thought I was making a good point.
11:32 AM on 10/17/2012
It's great that Sister Simone and the author care about the poor. What are their thoughts on contraception? On sex education? Because the only way to decrease and maybe even end abortion is to make sure that people are educated about sex and have full access to contraception.

Abortion will not be ended by making it illegal! Pro-life movement should stop trying to achieve that and instead should be trying to achieve eliminating the need for abortion. And I don't mean by preaching abstinence.
12:42 PM on 10/17/2012
Thank you. I am pro-choice but your words are the first pro-life words that have not hurt me. I too am horrified by the actual process of abortion. But I think that if we were able to know the circumstances of the women who get them, that we would no longer be able to judge them, but we would understand. I need to post again here to explain what I mean, and to address something else.
01:25 PM on 10/17/2012
Than you! I'm pro-choice too. I disagree with but understand the pro-life position but what I don't understand and never will is not in any way trying to minimize the circumstances leading to abortions, and actually pursuing an anti-contraception, anti-sex ed agenda. 
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Morgan Guyton
02:10 PM on 10/17/2012
It's the system that needs to change. The women themselves are to be healed, not judged.
04:20 PM on 10/16/2012
God seems to be okay with destroying the unborn in Hosea 14:1: http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt1314.htm 75% of human conceptions are naturally miscarried anyway. I believe that the human soul comes into a fetus sometime before birth--but not immediately at conception, mostly because of that 75% which are naturally aborted. Now, somewhere in America, a woman is being raped every two minutes. Teen girls who are victims of ongoing incest have no protection against pregnancy. Also, all birth control methods have a certain percentage of failure--and in these cases, no female should ever be forced to be a mother just because she happens to be a victim of these circumstances. Do you have any idea what you are asking of a person when you ask the law to force her into motherhood? 9 months of pregnancy is no fun! Do you know the incredible pain of actually giving birth? It is about 40 times the pain of breaking bones. As for adoption--there is a powerful biological bond which develops in those 9 months which even involves the mother's body producing milk for a baby that she will never hold again. But if she keeps it, a new baby is a 24 hour, round the clock, seven day a week job which is a 2-decade commitment. Do you want to legislate that kind of burden and that kind of decision on people just because they happen to inhabit female bodies?
03:41 PM on 10/17/2012
[Hosea 14:1: http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt1314.htm ]

"Samaria shall bear her guilt, for she hath rebelled against her God; they shall fall by the sword; their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up."

This appears to be speaking about the consequences of where of a certain cultural and religious group is rebellious against their Protector. If this behavior persists, protection will be withdrawn and they will now fall to their invading enemies , who by their tender mercies that invaders employ, visit upon the conquered all the stuff described. God seems OK with it because the rebellious Samaria seems ok with it; else-wise, I imagine, they would not rebel.