I was fortunate to serve on the Institute of Medicine (IOM) committee that published the report "Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education and Research," an effort that took rigorous data analysis seriously. The IOM report states that there is a "moral imperative" to treat pain. The report also points to legislative and regulatory barriers that may make it harder for people living with chronic pain to access care and treatments they need. Legislators, regulators, and other policy makers clearly have duties and responsibilities associated with the "moral imperative" principle as it relates to pain in our society. Two important public health policy matters that require the attention of policy makers seem to be constantly in tension with one another: the under-treatment of chronic pain and the abuse of prescription medications.
Unfortunately, the notion that there is a causal connection between prescribing medications for chronic pain and the abuse of these medications is held by many, including policy makers. This belief is based on a lack of understanding about the management of chronic pain, the paucity of data related to these matters, sloppy media reporting, and pressure from special interest groups. As a consequence, knee-jerk policy decisions have been made that make the lives of those with chronic pain even more miserable.
In forming policy, we must always acknowledge what we don't know. Despite numerous and easily-misinterpreted reports, we still lack meaningful data about abuse and addiction of prescription pain medications. Prescription drug diversion, abuse and misuse are terms that are related, but often incorrectly used as interchangeable and belie the importance of whether outcomes were caused by intentional acts, as in the case of abuse. Patient error is also behind some reports of misuse, as well as efforts to treat one's pain, only using someone else's medication. Clearly, different approaches would be taken to address prescription medication abuse and misuse.
In the absence of good evidence about the source and circumstances surrounding prescription drug abuse, there is a risk of shifting the brunt of the diversion problem onto pain patients -- either directly, through refusal to treat people with pain, or indirectly, through policies that not only enable, but encourage physicians to abandon their moral responsibility to ease pain and suffering.
Nearly a decade ago, David Joranson, founder of the Pain Policy Studies Group at the University of Wisconsin, and an expert consultant to the World Health Organization, recommended the creation of state pain commissions in response to this problem. Some states proactively acted on this recommendation. Other states created pain commissions in an effort to fix unintended consequences of previous policy decisions. However, the time is now for ALL states to establish a pain commission.
Policy makers bear significant obligations, and they deserve the benefit of unbiased, well-researched, objective information. They also deserve access to experts from a variety of disciplines and perspectives who can inform their process and, if not eliminate, dramatically reduce harms to innocent people as a result of ill-informed policy decisions. In our current environment of confusion and bias, the formation of state pain commissions offers an opportunity to truly transform the way that pain is treated across the country and in our own back yards.
Radley Balko: The New Panic Over Prescription Painkillers
Radley Balko: The War Over Prescription Painkillers
Michael Friedman, L.M.S.W.: Prescription Painkillers: When Are They Too Much of a Good Thing?
Swati Desai, Ph.D., LCSW: Take Away Suffering From Chronic Physical Pain
Chronic Pain: OTC or Prescription Medicine?
10 Warning Signs of Prescription Painkiller Depend - Chronic Pain ...
Pain Medication for Pain Relief: OTC and Prescription Pain Relievers
1. Chronic opiate exposure creates "rebound" pain, which keeps people hooked on opiates
2. Some headache patients have their pain disappear after they discontinue all prescriptions
3. Tobacco use amongst pain patients is disproportionate; tobacco may amplify pain
4. Government policies and professional conferences have encouraged the overuse of opiates, leading to misuse and overdoses.
5. Irrational fear and bias have kept doctors from appreciating how safe and effective Cannabis products are (many patients can drop opiates altogether)... Nobody dies from cannabis yet thousands die every year from opiates.
6. Chronic pain comes in many flavors and varieties, so to use the terminology "chronic pain" is like trying to approach "cancer" in a general way, rather than more specifically.
Doctors have no incentive to spend the time necessary to make a proper diagnosis. Big Pharma actually has a disincentive to heal people because they would then be free of their drugs. If someone truly has a painful problem which can't be cured, long-term pain medication may be appropriate.
A more common scenario is the patient with low back and buttocks pain, and a herniated disc detected on MRI. The doctor will assume the herniated disc is causing the pain (even though herniated discs appear frequently in asymptomatic people), try to treat it, and when the pain doesn't resolve, send the patient to pain management, ostensibly for the rest of his life. The pain could very well have come from the SI joints, hips, or abdominal organs, but no real effort was made on the diagnostic end to figure out why the patient was suffering.
If your doctor's proposed treatment plan involves managing pain, yet he hasn't even diagnosed the problem, find a new doctor. Otherwise, you have no hope of getting better. Pain is your body's way of telling you something is wrong. Chronic, neurological pain is a malfunction of that alarm system. Trying to silence the alarm with medication won't fix anything.
Having state pain commissions and or having more experts in pain care- we already have state pain inititiatives in most states- they have failed to stem the tide of ever rising prevalence of pain conditions. Congress and states routinely defer to experts when it comes to any medical issue- including pain care- and there is no shortage of experts in pain on advisory committees at NIH- or on the NIH. I dare say the experts have failed the American public when it comes to pain care- as evidenced by the ever rising prevalence of most painful conditions and the ever rising economic burden to the rest of society for the failures of experts. Ms Christopher and her colleagues are not visionaries- they have failed to jump over the shadows in pain care to create the symbols of a new day. Their ideas are underpowered, lack expertise in design, and arent ambitious enough to transform pain care.