iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Nan Aron

GET UPDATES FROM Nan Aron

Federal Judge Deficit Threatens to Put Justice Into Default

Posted: 08/01/11 04:28 PM ET

While Congress is consumed with a bitter fight over the federal budget deficit, the federal judge deficit continues to fester. Today, there are 115 federal district and circuit court judgeships currently or soon-to-be vacant -- that's one out of seven seats. Tragically, that's actually more vacancies than existed at the beginning of this session of Congress. It's becoming increasingly clear that little progress has been made in filling the enormous gaps in the American judiciary, in spite of promises from Republicans to end their campaign of willful obstruction that left President Obama at the end of his first two years with the worst record of judicial confirmations in American history.

With the federal judicial system tottering under the weight of understaffed courts, the president has nominated a steady stream of highly-qualified men and women to the bench (many more than once) and the Senate Judiciary Committee, under the stalwart leadership of Chairman Patrick Leahy, has done its part to send nominees to the Senate floor for a final vote. But once that happens, nominees find themselves mired in legislative quicksand, blocked from confirmation by the stubborn refusal of the Republican leadership to allow final votes.

Promises made at the beginning of this Congress to regularize the confirmation process have clearly been discarded and Republican senators have resumed their obstinate tactics, allowing votes on only five nominees to lifetime seats in the last 10 weeks. As of today, there are 24 nominees awaiting final votes, all but one of whom were approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously or with only token opposition. Five more are expected to be cleared by the committee this week, which will bring the total backlog to 29, including 12 for courts officially designated as facing judicial emergencies.

Republican rhetoric aside, there are no ideological disputes at play here; virtually every nominee now being held hostage in legislative limbo would be confirmed unanimously or with overwhelming majorities if they were allowed to receive a vote. This is a blockade built purely out of spite and can only be interpreted as an effort to undermine the president, no matter what the consequences or who gets hurt in the process.

Ultimately, though, it's not the president being damaged by these tactics, it's the American people and the rule of law. The federal courts are not political playthings. They are a fundamental and essential part of our democracy. To casually damage them for no reason other than to use them as fodder in partisan warfare is an astounding abdication of responsibility, unprecedented in American history. It needs to stop now.

In the current contentious environment, the American people are desperate for constructive action from the Congress. One place to start would be for the Senate to give a final vote before its August recess to the 29 men and women who are ready, willing, and able to serve their country from the federal bench.

It's time to end the deficit of judges before justice itself goes into default.

 
 
 

Follow Nan Aron on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NanAron

 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
foresure
Brash and Harsh
10:47 PM on 08/01/2011
No, it is not the contentious environment. It is the desire of the Oligarchs of the United States who want to put an end to the Rule of Law.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marjorie Sager
08:08 PM on 08/01/2011
If in the last 8 years the Democrats had not done the same thing to Bush,this artical would make some sence.
markgoode
a voice from the center
12:38 AM on 08/02/2011
Bush made a ton of recess appointments, which is what Obama should do.
07:33 PM on 08/01/2011
Sorry, but the inmates have taken control of the asylum. Thirty million Americans voted to elect a group of children to Congress and they have no intention of acting like adults (by the way, other than a Republican, have you ever met anyone over the age of 15 who is enthralled by Ayn Rand?).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shanec90
Thought.
12:10 AM on 08/02/2011
That some Republicans read Ayn Rand and that some Objectivists are Republicans discredits neither group.

Closed-mindedness is bad no matter which side you're on.
06:35 PM on 08/01/2011
Don't expect any governance throughout the remainder of the entire 112th, the T-Frosh have proven they are there for only one thing. To make Obama look bad.

For a reason why, pick either one of the common prejudices, race or politics, it doesn't really matter "why", we will see this Congress go down in history a the most recalcitrant collection of obstructionists since the word "abolition" was first spoken on the House floor.

They should ALL be ashamed of themselves, they were elected to govern, not promote division between Americans.