iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Nan Aron

Nan Aron

Posted: January 4, 2011 05:33 PM

No one who has followed the career of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is surprised that he has agreed to participate in a meeting of the so-called "Constitutional Conservative Caucus," organized by extremist Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.).

The decision by Justice Antonin Scalia to serve as a featured speaker in an event on January 24 organized by far-right Congresswoman Michele Bachmann's Tea Party-oriented "Constitutional Conservative Caucus," is just the latest in a series of actions and statements by the Justice that threaten the integrity of the federal judiciary.

A cornerstone of the American legal system is the notion that judges and justices interpret the law fairly and impartially. This fundamental principle of our democracy is undermined when Supreme Court justices serve as willing agents of a transparently political entity like the Tea Party movement, which has an aggressive legislative and judicial agenda that is directed, in part, at the Court itself.

Regrettably, this is not the first time Justice Scalia has shed any pretense of objectivity. His refusal to recuse himself in 2004 from a case involving then-Vice President Dick Cheney, with whom he had just completed a hunting trip, as well as his recent comments making clear that women stand no chance with him to protect their Constitutional rights, erode the expectations Americans have for the behavior of Supreme Court justices.

At the time of the Cheney incident Justice Scalia said, "I do not believe my impartiality can reasonably be questioned." Given his eager participation in tomorrow's Tea Party seminar, his words ring hollower than ever.

Justice Scalia should protect the integrity of the Court and cancel his appearance at this blatantly partisan, right-wing event.

UPDATE: Alliance for Justice had received incorrect information about the date of a closed-door Tea Party event featuring Justice Antonin Scalia. News reports indicate the event will actually be held on January 24. We regret the error and apologize for any confusion it may have caused. Dates have been corrected above.

 
 
 

Follow Nan Aron on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NanAron

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:12 PM on 01/19/2011
I am from mn 6th , I know poor me. I have contacted MB's office several times on this. I wanted to know if it was only tea party caucus or whole of congress as it would be a good idea for all to hear a Supreme on the Constitution and was told this "class" would be for all congress.

I really wanted to have a podcast, audio only would be fine, of this event. I was told it would not be happening. Woman said first it was technical problems. To which I said go and by a small digital recorder at Wal mart. Then it was security.

This is a joke. If a Supreme Court Justice is going to talk to the congress or even part of congress (which is ridiculous ) we should be able to hear. If the people are to be informed and therefor better able to participate in this experiment we have going we need information.

The Constitution is everyone's and I will not give it up to some small self appointed righteous group.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Villanova
average east coast bearish man
10:35 AM on 01/05/2011
I'm not surprised.
08:30 AM on 01/05/2011
Maybe Justice Scalia will stand and read the Patriot Act and inform the Tea party of exactly what this fine piece of Republican legislation means to "free" citizen. The fix is in folks, but you knew that!
EndTheGOP
I stand with Bob Costas.
08:05 AM on 01/05/2011
Impeachment of Scalia, Roberts, and Alito is called for, and necessary.
04:15 AM on 01/05/2011
Apparently Scalia is attending Bachmann's meeting to clue her in on his recent pronouncement that, as headlined in the Huff Post: "Women Don't Have Constitutional Protection Against Discrimination."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/03/scalia-women-discrimination-constitution_n_803813.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dorothy bnks
02:26 AM on 01/05/2011
Scalia's allegiance is to the Republican Party. The scary thing is he a Supreme Court Justice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alonzo
Discount anything I say about myself.
12:39 AM on 01/05/2011
Scalia's pals; Cheney and Bachmann. Need anyone say more?
06:35 PM on 01/04/2011
And obama's SC nominations are sooooooooooooo impartial...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
db08
Embrace each moment, each day!
07:40 PM on 01/04/2011
Yes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Les Kern
Tech Director
07:01 AM on 01/05/2011
Yes, yes they are. And to think as an obvious apologist you're okay with Scalia's latest antics saddens me. It really does.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lisakaz2
Da ministero dell'interno di Snark.
06:22 PM on 01/04/2011
I guess Bachmann is cool with Scalia opening the door to discriminating against women. She must think she's special and immune to it. (Many right wing women think something like that and that their legal protection is available only via a husband.)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sinister Minister
There's no way out of here alive.
12:17 PM on 01/05/2011
Being rich has a way of making one immune from discrimination and the law as well.