More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Nancy Doyle Palmer

Nancy Doyle Palmer

GET UPDATES FROM Nancy Doyle Palmer

Charlie Sheen, Lindsay Lohan and Britney Spears: Boys Will Be Boys v. Girls Gone Bad

Posted: 02/ 3/11 05:43 PM ET

So I was walking the dogs with my friend Kerry, and truly out of the blue, because she doesn't even follow the celebrity stuff like I do, she says, "How come Lindsay Lohan and Britney are drunken bimbos but with Charlie Sheen it's boys will be boys?"

With Lindsay out of rehab but back in trouble and Charlie, back in rehab, sorta, and still in trouble, I decided to ask around.

Bob Thompson is Director of the Bleier Center for Television and Popular Culture at Syracuse University:

"Yes it's a double standard," he says, "Charlie Sheen is from the silent film era -- he's a rounder, he gets drunk and stumbles -- Chaplin played this character. This idea of the dissolute, drunken and fun-loving guy who always manages to get caught -- just out there sowing wild oats -- and he plays that character to great effect on his show."

In other words, he says, "What we hear confirms how we see him on his show -- there's a lack of dissonance that makes people just not that outraged, unlike, when Michael Richards (aka Kramer) went on that racist rant -- I was never able to watch him on Seinfeld again but if I turn on Two and a Half Men it's just like a scripted form of TMZ from the night before!"

Rationally, he says, "We should be more sympathetic to a Britney Spears or Lindsay Lohan, only because we can say Charlie's a grownup and should know better, but it just isn't so. We've watched these young women grow up, there is this "child star gone bad" element, and Lindsay has been quite contentious, said and done things that invite the desire to see her knocked down a few pegs."

Dr. Carole Leiberman is a Beverly Hills psychiatrist and author of Bad Girls: Why Men Love Them and How Good Girls Can Learn Their Secrets. She agrees there is a boys will be boys attitude versus a jumping on women for doing similar things.

"I'm wondering if it could be because men still have more control in Hollywood and feel more taken advantage of, more vulnerable and more angry at girls and women who are 'bad'."

She continues: "Men have been hurt by women like Britney and Lindsay, men who control what gets on the news, they have had their hearts broken by these bad girls yet continue to have fantasies about enjoying the life of the bad boys," she says, "and the news would be more skewed to naughty girls than Charlie just being a bad boy."

Yana Walton, Vice President of Communications for the Women's Media Center gets pretty specific.

"The media has always glorified men's misbehavior, and the underlying assumption is that women actually like the 'bad boy,' or that this behavior is somehow humorous. Yet what this does is legitimize violence and abuse of women," she says.

"Conversely, when women stars struggle with addiction and the destructive behaviors that ensue, the story is framed as a voyeuristic decline for viewers to generate entertainment value from, rather than addressing a society where women in the spotlight experience much more pressure than men to have perfect bodies, relationships, and behavior," she says, and adds, "Such coverage further exacerbates the problem."

Dr. John Sharp is a Harvard psychiatrist and Executive Medical Director at Bridges to Recovery in Los Angeles and the author of The Emotional Calendar. He emphasizes that has not treated Sheen, Lohan or Spears but offers this:

"I do have that sense that guys can get away with this more -- especially in terms of work. Charlie Sheen is showing up," he says, "and he seems to handle his PR a little better. He hasn't been an angel by any means but when asked about it he has an answer and a shrug."

Lindsay Lohan, on the other hand, "Has coming of age star struggles... and while Charlie has had his share of legal troubles Lindsay has had difficulty trying to face up to her legal problems, when she defies judges orders people react differently."

Dr. Sharp points to an extra edge to Sheen's popular notoriety. "His combination of alcohol, sex, drugs and porn is, in a way, consistent with a certain sub cultural idolatry."

Everyone I spoke to offered real sympathy and compassion for the difficult combinations of addictions and celebrity.

"It's like watching a train wreck, like Anna Nicole Smith," says Dr. Carole, "What's so sad about Charlie Sheen besides the fact he has these very strong addictions is that he's such a successful actor but really so miserable inside. For all his money and all the esteem he is held in he can't form fulfilling relationships, he picks these women who are Barbie dolls. There is a lot of comedy in Two and Half Men but even on the show he's wistful about wanting a relationship and not being able to have one. In real life it's not as funny."

And Dr. Sharp points to the near-crippling levels of enabling that go on in Hollywood. "One of the big problems with celebrity is you think you live in a consequence free environment with people who yes you and want a piece of you. It's easy to lose touch with reality."

Equal rights demons for the wealthy, hot and famous but it still seems like the guys get more of a free pass.

 

Follow Nancy Doyle Palmer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NancyDPalmer

 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:49 PM on 02/28/2011
I dont at allmagree with the premise of this commentary. There is common behavior here using controlled substances, and other crimes - but where this differs is attitude.

Sheen represents megalomania, and now threats of violence.

Lohan exhibits some megalomania but I don't recall her threatening anyone with violence.

Sheen is clearly the more disturbed. I've joked with friends that he and Lohan are actually engaged in a competition, and he's winning the downward spiral.

I don't see anything like "boys will be boys" here. My friends, male and female alike, think he's a very sick and disturbed man.
01:58 PM on 02/07/2011
Talent aside- and I do think he is a talented actor- I just think Charlie Sheen is gross. I just don't get the attraction anymore. Maybe the bad boy act was cute when he was in his 20s, but now? I wouldn't want to date him and if a girl friend of mine was going to, I would advise against it. Lindsey and Britney- they need to get their acts together too, no doubt about it. But I for one do not give Charlie Sheen a pass just because he is a guy. At his age, a guy who is still so messed up is just sad and pathetic IMO, not sexy and 'bad boy'. I don't watch his show because when it dovetails with his personal life you see what REALLY happens to guys that behave that way- not just the funny sitcom version. Too bad...
12:51 PM on 02/05/2011
Charlie Sheen has talent, though, so that's something. But, who says "boys will be boys?" I can't stand the kind of people like Charlie Sheen who engage in that kind of behavior, and I don't think I've ever heard anyone defend him. But, I think the real reason why he still has a career is because when it comes to work he's professional. He makes money for his employers and that's all that they care about. Meanwhile Lohan and Spears have made irrational decisions that have most certainly cost people around them a lot of money. IMO it's more the fault of their narcissistic families that pimped them out at such a young and vulnerable age. We can give the girls a break for their behavior. I'm the only one that I know that supports Lohan and thinks she's been overly gone after by the justice system. But, all the same I think your premise/conclusions miss the mark.
06:16 PM on 02/05/2011
I completely agree! Charlie got a pass as long as he continued to do his job, and viewers forgive him because he's only being in real life the same person he is on the show. Doesn't make it right. But explains why it was tolerated. Lindsey and Brit, on the other hand, failed to do good work while they were using, and they cost people money. Hollywood's a tolerant town if you bring in the bucks.
10:07 PM on 02/04/2011
Sorry, but this is the wrong example for your premise. Sheen is WAY beyond "boys will be boys." The guy's life is a train wreck.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cheryl tobin
Alpha Dog with my pack!
03:24 PM on 02/04/2011
I didn't have to read this article to know sexism is still alive and well in America. Justice Scalia stating women didn't have rights covered by the constitution was enough for me to realize women still have a long way to go to achieve equality. Even black men have achieved more civil rights and societal acceptance then women.
11:51 AM on 02/05/2011
Uh, Cheryl, bubby, it's 2011, you might want to reconsider your "go to" social pariah group. "Even black men"?... double yikes.

Here's some more modern (and enlightened) alternatives:

"Even 'Wall Street traders' have achieved more civil rights..."
"Even 'hedge fund investors' have achieved more civil rights..."
"Even 'Halliburton' has achieved more civil rights..."
"Even 'coke-and-hooker loving sitcom stars' have achieved more civil rights..."
"Even 'The Real Housewives of (insert city)' have achieved more civil rights..."

You get the drill. I'm here all week.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cheryl tobin
Alpha Dog with my pack!
02:12 PM on 02/05/2011
Dear Goodmandown, I referenced black men because they have also had to fight for their civil rights unlike the your modern/enlightened alternatives. I have been proud to be part of the civil rights movement for both women and black people since the sixties. I'm glad black men have achieved the status they have today but the truth is women, including black women, have not made the same progress. If Justice Scalia had stated black men were not covered by the 14th amendment, riots would have broken out for Scalia's impeachment but when he states that about women the majority of men, black and white, just shrug. Why in 2011 are we not suppose to talk about this truth?
12:27 PM on 02/04/2011
There definetly is a double standard and it is very sad becuase it sends mixed messages. Boys can do whatever they want but girls have to stay home and bake pies. It's sad and silly.
While I don't consider any of these people role models - with the exception of maybe Robert Downey Jr. because he managed to get cleaned up and seems very happy and successful now - it is very hard to live in contantly in the spotlight with cameras following you everywhere and people willing to sell them out to any rag mag that will pay. It seems that especially with young stars they are not getting proper guidance, especially Lohan and her nutzo family, that they really need to live and work in hollywood.
11:19 AM on 02/04/2011
Charlie Sheen is also 45 years old. And I don't remember him ever being considered a role-model for teenagers.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
09:14 AM on 02/04/2011
So, what's the solution? Don't be born female?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janetk
04:23 PM on 03/12/2011
I believe they tried that in China and it didn't work out so well.......oh except for the blow up doll & robot companies
08:11 AM on 02/04/2011
This is true, Lindsay is seen as unemployable while Charlie's job waits for him.

Very much a double standard.
07:29 AM on 02/04/2011
This is ridiculous. Nobody is excusing Charlie Sheen from his antics. How could you have missed the all the late night monologue jokes where Charlie Sheen is the punchline? It's never in a "boys will be boys" context, it's always in a "look at how insane this guy is" context. What Mel Gibson is for racially charged diatribes, Charlie Sheen is for drugs and hookers.

The double standard is fading as I can't find any examples of womenizers who the public actually likes. Look at the Jersey Shore. The men and women on that show are both extremely promiscuous and neither are favorably viewed. Nobody wants to be like any of them unless they're idiots. So I don't buy this line that these men have it easier in the media.

Sure, there are high profile playboy celebrities like George Clooney, but for the most part he stays in serious relationships and for each male celebrity you find, there is another example of a female celebrity who does the same thing and is also viewed well. Look at Jennifer Aniston. She's been in how many relationships in the past few years and everyone loves her.

John Goslin is one of the most hated men in America BECAUSE of his fooling around, same with Jesse James. You can also see Kelsey Grammar leaving his wife and now being the target of a lot of anger. I don't think it's unjustified, but I hardly think they're getting off easy.
photo
Rickst75
Intellectual Superior and Insufferable Know-it-all
06:20 AM on 02/04/2011
While there is a double standard in our society, this is a bad analogy.

Lindsay Lohan has had, I believe, more than one DUI arrest. Has been accused of being violent and actually assaulting people. And has been accused of stealing while in rehab. All this while a judge tells her over and over again that if she doesn't clean up her act she will go to jail. Yet the behavior, aside from the addiction, keeps getting worse.

Charlie Sheen on the other hand is pretty much in his own personal tailspin. Yes it's destroyed 2 of his marriages, and most likely damaged his relationship with his kids. But it's primarily destroying only his life. And the only incident of any alleged violence came with him yelling and punching a wall while supposedly yelling an unexplained racial epithet. No DUI's. No punching a woman in the face. No stealing while in rehab.

In fact Lindsay is 3 years further along the process than Charlie is. Now it would be fair if he keeps failing at rehab, and keeps getting arrested after this point.

It's more fair to compare Lindsay to Robert Downey Jr. And He didn't really get a pass. He spent time and jail, and had all sorts of stories pop up during his recovery. But, therein lies hope. Now that he has finally gotten his act together, he's very successful. Lindsay, and any who would use the double standard argument, should look to Mr. Downey, not Mr. Sheen.
04:46 AM on 02/04/2011
The media judge women more harshly but the public dont IMO.

Charlie Sheen's cocaine use has no doubt killed many many Mexicans
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pab08
Partisan agendas can't compete with objective fact
02:27 AM on 02/04/2011
The truth of the matter is that no one with an IQ greater than a radish really cares about the expolits and illnesses of "celebrities." No. One.
Stop paying attention to them. You are only feeding their egos and therby, their addictions.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
03:13 AM on 02/04/2011
But when it's a female, (that they "don't care about") the rhetoric gets a lot harsher and lasts a lot longer. Go figure.
12:51 AM on 02/04/2011
I see it more that Charlie Sheen is Hollywood royalty due to his 2+ decades of work plus his father and brother being in the biz. His career just happens to be on an upwind right now after being kind of bad in the 90s (Major League, Hot Shots). Similar thing happened with Robert Downey Junior. He was able to pull himself back from the brink.

I still think if Lindsey Lohan pulled her act together and did some quality work, she could be back on top. Everyone loves rooting for the underdog. But she also has to struggle with the shift from child to adult actress. A lot of child actors fall by the wayside, drug problems or not.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Craig 212
Tide goes in, tide goes out.
03:51 AM on 02/04/2011
Robert Downey Jr. hit rock bottom, went to prison, sobered up, and THEN made his comeback. Not really that similar to Charlie's situation.

I think Lindsay's career fell apart at least partially because her fan base was all teenage girls, who are notorious for their short attention spans. They just moved on to the next big thing, and Lindsay was left without a job. Of course, showing up on set late, high, or not at all didn't help.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janetk
04:25 PM on 03/12/2011
Ummm teenage girls have short attention spans, I'd like to read up on that, where can I go to get the facts?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sweet Liberty
12:36 AM on 02/04/2011
Double standard? Yeah, probably. But IMO these hollywood celebs deserve...no, EARNED their demise.