iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Nancy Keenan

Nancy Keenan

Posted: May 24, 2010 10:05 AM

One Year Later: Honoring Dr. George Tiller

What's Your Reaction:

We are days away from marking the one-year anniversary of the Sunday morning Scott Roeder walked into Dr. George Tiller's church in Kansas and shot him at close range.

After his murder, many women and men came to our blog to express their appreciation for what Dr. Tiller had done for their sisters, wives, relatives, and friends. Many of these women had found themselves in desperate and heart-breaking circumstances and turned to Dr. Tiller in their time of need.

Karen from Saylorsburg, Pennsylvania gives us one example of what Dr. Tiller meant to women:

Dr. Tiller, you saved my niece Jeanette's life, you helped our family through one of the darkest, most desperate and unthinkable moments we ever experienced. When we thought there was no where to turn, there you were. I called you the 'Wizard,' because of the incredible journey we had taken to find you, in Kansas. You are, and will always be my Hero.

It makes me angry when I think about how Roeder sat through his trial without showing any remorse for his actions. He reached new lows of callousness and disrespect for the Tiller family and for families like Karen's. It's equally infuriating that the same people who spent years harassing Dr. Tiller and his patients outside his health center showed no remorse. They rejected the notion that their pattern of inflammatory rhetoric could lead to violence by the more extreme elements of their own anti-choice movement.

We didn't have to wait long for the intimidation to resume. Less than four months after Dr. Tiller's murder, the members of the notorious Operation Rescue picked up their signs and bullhorns and moved 328 miles north to Omaha, Nebraska. Dr. Tiller's murder didn't change their tactics; they just changed their mailing address -- and their target.

They took aim at Dr. LeRoy Carhart, who is one of the few abortion providers to whom women in heart-breaking circumstances can turn. Many of these women have wanted and cherished pregnancies but something goes wrong, such as a fetal anomaly or a condition that threatens their life or health. These circumstances are of no interest to Operation Rescue. Their goal is to close his clinic, too.

I am proud to report that pro-choice Americans in the heartland sent a strong message to Operation Rescue. On the day of Operation Rescue's protest, pro-choice activists outnumbered their protesters two to one.

Unfortunately, our numbers weren't as strong when it came to the Nebraska Legislature, where anti-choice lawmakers hold an overwhelming advantage. What Operation Rescue couldn't achieve through violence and harassment, anti-choice politicians in Nebraska made possible through legislation. Just this spring, the state enacted a divisive and invasive anti-choice law aimed directly at threatening Dr. Carhart and the women he serves.

In a further sign of disrespect for women, the National Right to Life Committee's Mary Spaulding Balch told Politico how her group capitalized on tragedy for political gain:

When George Tiller was killed, LeRoy Carhart had national attention...That alerted Speaker Mike Flood to the problem in Nebraska and he worked to address that.

An anti-choice operative's callous words that reduce women in tragic situations to pawns in a political game are outrageous -- and we cannot let them go unchecked.

As we mark the one-year anniversary of Dr. Tiller's murder, those of us in America's pro-choice majority must be vigilant about telling our friends and family that what happened in Kansas was not an isolated incident. It is a part of an ongoing campaign of threats -- in legislative chambers and outside abortion providers' offices and homes -- to make it more difficult and dangerous for women to access abortion care.

Frankly, we cannot control anti-choice lawmakers or Operation Rescue, but we can call out their outrageous statements and aggressive tactics.

We can take inspiration from the pro-choice activists who stared down anti-choice demonstrators in Omaha. Not all of us can go to Nebraska, but we can join others in sending messages of support to Dr. Carhart. We can share our reasons for being pro-choice and standing up for women with friends and family. We can pledge to only vote for pro-choice candidates at all levels of government, so that groups like the National Right to Life Committee can't coerce their followers into attacking women through the legislative process.

We can -- and will, I have no doubt -- pay tribute to Dr. Tiller, his family, and the women he served by speaking openly and honestly about our pro-choice values.

As we speak out, let's always remember to use the two powerful words that guided Dr. Tiller's work: Trust Women.

 

Follow Nancy Keenan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NARAL

 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:13 PM on 05/29/2010
LB 1103 addresses 20 week and beyond abortions because that is the point at which medical documentation concludes unborn children are capable of feeling pain. The law provides a medical emergency exception if the mother's life is in imminent peril or she stands to lose a major bodily function. While Nebraska's abortion reporting form has sections for reporting an unborn child's weight and length, those stats never show up in our annual abortion report because statute does not require LeRoy Carhart to list the weight and length of the babies he aborts. While it may look from our Nebraska report that very few 20 week and beyond abortions are done in Nebraska, Carhart by his own admission does abortions through 24 weeks. He has made conflicting statements about later gestational age abortions but was very vocal after George Tiller's death about training his own staff to do later term abortions. He vacillated between setting up a late term abortion business in Kansas and Nebraska, but it appears he is remaining in Bellevue, NE at this time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TempleCat
...only a whisker away from the wilds.
09:07 PM on 05/30/2010
What's interesting is that you, the Republican Executive Director of Nebraska's Anti-Choice movement, chooses to come to a memorial page for a doctor who was murdered and go on to engage in rhetoric against him and another doctor. And you never answered any of the questions about what your organization is doing to lessen the need for abortion. I can only assume that your organization does not provide birth control, education, early testing of defects, first trimester abortion options and emergency birth control, or any other preventative measure. This makes organizations like yours a part of the problem.

Nebraska's law is unconstitutional under both Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. For many of the ways this law fails, read this Omaha, NE news article at http://www.omaha.com/article/20100425/NEWS0802/704259989
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TempleCat
...only a whisker away from the wilds.
08:21 PM on 05/27/2010
The difference between a man intentionally causing a woman to lose her baby being "murder" and abortion being "murder" is that this was a wanted child. He removed the CHOICE from the situation. The woman's body does NOT belong to him. She did not make the choice herself and could have had hopes, dreams, a name picked out, etc.. in this case it is not just the termination of "potential life", but the murder of all her visions of the future with her child. There is a big difference.

Remember, pro-choice means I support your right to have a child just as much as I support your right not to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TempleCat
...only a whisker away from the wilds.
08:18 PM on 05/27/2010
You can't call these fanatics "pro-life". They intimidate, threaten, and murder others. It doesn't make sense. A better label would be "pro-control". They want to dictate what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. They want to force you to comply with their views, or else.

In reality, if they really wanted to stop abortions, they would push for better birth control, better education, and funding for those endeavors, At a time when we can test for pregnancy very early on (seven days past ovulation), we should be providing immediate termination of unintended and unwanted pregnancy. At this early stage we are talking a group of cells versus a fetus. As it is now we make women wait once they decide abortion is the right choice for them - sometimes into their 2nd trimester - before it is performed. Why? Because of the cost and all the red tape. This is, in essence, a self-fulfilling prophecy on the part of the anti-abortion crowd. Make women wait until the fetus has developed before abortion.

Some say that even that glob of cells is "potential life", but if you are to punish very early on abortions as "murder" then we must also charge those who miscarry with "involuntary manslaughter" and jail a girl the moment she has her first period for removing the potential for life from her womb. Doesn't make sense, does it?
09:32 PM on 05/27/2010
There is no criminal penalty in LB 1103 for the mother. The woman is the second victim in every abortion and you will never find the legitimate pro-life movement calling for criminal penalties against women who have abortions. The fetal pain ban in Nebraska addresses abortions at 20 weeks gestation and beyond because that is when medical documentation shows that unborn children are capable of feeling pain. Your reference to early abortions and the baby being a "group of cells" does not apply at 20 weeks and beyond as anyone who has a 2nd and 3rd trimester ultrasound photo of their unborn chld can attest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TempleCat
...only a whisker away from the wilds.
10:39 PM on 05/27/2010
"The woman is the second victim in every abortion" only when the "pro-life" crowd chooses to demoralize her over her own choices or removes her right to be in charge of her own body. The pro-choice movement empowers her to decide what is right for herself. If you don't want abortions performed after a certain stage then the best thing to do is make it easier to get one earlier on. Did they happen to measure the pain a woman feels when she is forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy, considers suicide, self-aborting measures, or is so frightened that she gives birth in a toilet and hides the evidence? How about one who will die if she carries the fetus to term? How about victims of rape and incest? Will the pro-life crowd victimize her yet again by denouncing her choice?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheDarklady
08:05 PM on 05/28/2010
I have a friend whose mother was pregnant with a much wanted boy when it was discovered that he had inherited a fatal condition from his father. After much mourning, the pregnancy was terminated.

A few months later, my friend's mother conceived again -- this time with... my friend.

It's kinda hard for me to look at her and tell her she doesn't deserve to be alive for the past 33 years and that her terminally and painfully ill brother should have been forced into the world for a few miserable and agonizing years, at best.
JEP57
To the right of Genghis Khan
11:15 PM on 05/27/2010
Your post has key words in it that betray what abortion has always been basically about. Words such as "pro-control" and "dictate what women can and cannot do..." show that it isn't so much about women's health issues or concern for poor innercity women who can't afford to be stuck raising another child. It's really grounded in radical feminism philosophy and used by its adherents as a surefire way of not being controlled by"some man". And I believe it was started and promoted by a woman that wanted to reduce the birthrate of a certain racial minority in this country. Both reasons are vile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TempleCat
...only a whisker away from the wilds.
11:55 PM on 05/27/2010
What is "vile" is your attempt to label the issue as "feminist" or "racial". You forget that this is about enforcing your beliefs on others, regardless of race. Nature dictates that it is women who must make these kinds of choices for themselves. Unless you're accusing nature of being feminist. If you are a man against abortion, don't have sex. If you are a woman, don't have one. The key word here is CHOICE. "Women's health issues or concern for poor innercity women who can't afford to be stuck raising another child" are only a couple of the issues involved in the need for pro-choice. The root of the pro-life movement is still control. What is also vile is telling the poor inner-city woman that she must have the child anyway, and then complaining about it afterward when she and the child are on welfare. That is another self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuated by the radical religious right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wiscoman
An irritated man in Wisconsin
06:40 PM on 05/27/2010
"Trust women."

Good advice.
02:05 AM on 05/27/2010
The wide-open health exception which included mental health is the reason why late term abortionists have been doing abortions through all nine months of gestation. The 7th Circuit upheld a Wisconsin case that had no mental health exception. LB 1103 creates another standard based on fetal pain documented at 20 weeks gestation which the Roe Court could not address in 1973 because it has only been documented through the advent of fetal surgery and 3 & 4-D ultrasound in recent years. The abortion industry was not prepared for the Nebraska law and our legislative record in the hearing on LB 1103 and on floor debate has left our opponents scrambling. They know we have a solid record while their star witness in the hearing had to later retract her statement as the gestation of her abortion was in error and was at 18 weeks, not the 22 weeks she stated in committee. The law goes into effect Oct. 15th, one of the few concessions Speaker Flood made to the other side, because they wanted extra time to prepare their legal case. Nebraska's latest volley in the abortion wars has put the pro-life movement on the offensive again. Ms. Keenan's article confirms that the abortion industry is in a world of hurt on this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TempleCat
...only a whisker away from the wilds.
02:15 AM on 05/28/2010
Quite the opposite. Places like Operation Rescue are dead end radical organizations full of misinformation. We will never abolish abortion in America because there is a real need for this option to continue. If you are against government telling you what you can do, remember passing laws like this are the first step in doing just that.

Did you know that the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologist disagree with the fetal pain theory?
05:38 PM on 05/28/2010
ACOG's dismissal of fetal pain at 20 weeks is based on one study which is tainted by the fact that two of its authors have ties to the abortion industry; one an abortion clinic owner and the other a NARAL operative. The legislative record laid down on LB 1103 included nine peer-reviewed studies published in medical journals; testimony from two anesthesiologists, one maternal-fetal specialist, an OB-GYN and a constitutional law professor. The floor debate on LB 1103 was also bolstered the medical documentation. As I stated earlier, our opponents asked the introducer of LB 1103, Speaker Mike Flood, for three extra months tacked on to the enactment date specifically to allow the abortion industry time to prepare its legal challenge.
10:05 AM on 05/25/2010
A person can kill another person as long as he or she is in the womb, but cannot kill a person if he or she is outside the womb. That makes no sense at all.
01:10 PM on 05/26/2010
No, Rev TB, a person can kill another person OUTside of the womb but not terminate a 1-week old blastocyst is what makes no sense at all.
02:26 PM on 05/26/2010
The primary issue with Tiller wasn't over a "1-week old blastocyst". It was his performing late term abortions on babies that were 7, 8, even 9 months in the womb. Are you trying to be evasive or dismissive in talking about a "1-week old blastocyst"?

The moral argument in this article is that killing an adult person is wrong, but killing a unborn person is not wrong. That makes no sense at all.
01:11 PM on 05/26/2010
"but cannot kill a person if he or she is outside the womb"

there are 3500 inmates currently on death row
02:32 PM on 05/26/2010
Jada,

I think I understand the point you are making, but it's not actually to the point.

If killing 3,500 persons on death row is wrong, then... what?

I don't see how highlighting that point addresses my critique of the moral reasoning within the article.

If killing a person in a prison, in a church, etc. is wrong, how does that make killing a person in the womb permissible?

Your point illustrates my point - that form of moral reasoning (particularly the form expressed in the article) makes no sense at all.
04:03 AM on 05/25/2010
I have one question. It's kind of hard to word because I don't understand what wording pro-choice people would like me to use, so if the wording is wrong I apologize. If a man punches his pregnant girlfriend in the stomach repeatedly to make sure that the baby does not survive and he is successful, did he kill a baby?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wiscoman
An irritated man in Wisconsin
06:42 PM on 05/27/2010
I wasn't aware that was how abortions are performed.
04:35 AM on 05/28/2010
You never answered my question. I know I'm jumping to conclusions, but I think the reason you didn't answer it, is because you would have had to admit that there is a live baby in her womb. Which would make killing it, a.k.a. abortion, murder. You are correct though in stating abortions are not performed this way. Abortions are much more gruesome, I ask you to look up the options for abortion and post which procedure you would prefer over being beaten.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ziger123
All you need is unconditional love and acceptance
03:43 AM on 05/25/2010
A woman's right to choose trumps your views on my pregnancy - end of discussion. Why are we still arguing this? Take your politics out of my womb or support the children that come out of it - no? then bleep off
photo
Decorina
Hypocrisy means your karma ran over your dogma
08:38 AM on 05/25/2010
Excellent reply. Fanned.
10:37 AM on 05/25/2010
Couldn't agree more - and fanned!
JEP57
To the right of Genghis Khan
11:51 PM on 05/24/2010
If a woman is pregnant and her life is in jeopardy from the pregnancy, which I assume is a tiny minority of the time, wouldn't it be considered an emergency to be treated at a hospital L&D department instead of crossing state lines to seek out a "for profit" abortion clinic that does late term abortions. My guess is that most of the terminations taking place there weren't for life threatening circumstances but were because someone didn't want to have the baby after waiting too long to have it done "legally" in their own state at an earlier date.
09:39 AM on 05/25/2010
You are very wrong on this. First of all, every situation is different, and it is up to a woman and her doctor to determine what those situations are.

Secondly, many doctors nowadays, thanks to the controversy surrounding abortion, are not trained properly in how to perform an abortion, especially one as complex as those occurring later in pregnancy. Many hospitals, knowing the stigma that will be attached to them if word got out that they performed a 'late term abortion' as many anti-choice terrorists like to call them, won't perform the abortion. And then there are the hospitals that are religious based, so they would rather the woman die than to perform the abortion, as well.

In addition, many woman are forced to wait too long to terminate a pregnancy because they simply do not have access to abortion (which is a legal, medical procedure) in their area. There are some areas of the country that have no providers and it is necessary for women to travel across state lines to obtain services. And what medical service have you ever had that wasn't 'for profit'? In terms of the rest of the medical services provided in our country, abortion prices have remained relatively stagnant.

I would recommend that you do your homework regarding this topic before posting such ignorance next time.
01:13 PM on 05/26/2010
There is NO reason a woman would just "wait too long" for no reason. She obviously did not have access early enough or, it was a very wanted pregnancy and something went terribly wrong which brought her to the later abortion.
photo
ProudConservative
Fiscal conservative, social moderate
10:12 PM on 05/24/2010
You choose to call pro-life supporters anti-choice. How does it sound if I call pro-choice supporters anti-life?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibKitty
12:15 AM on 05/25/2010
I prefer to call so called pro-lifers, pro-birth. Most so called pro-life people could care less what happens to that life/child once it's born. I don't know of a single so called pro-life supporter that has adopted any child let alone a hard to place child. Until the so called pro-lifers put their money and hearts into helping these children, I will continue to call them pro-birth.

It's obvious you know nothing of the problems that can occur in a pregnancy. I hope you never have to decide weather it's your life or your unborn child. Do you leave your other child without a mother for a principle? How about if it's your wife, mother, sister, or daughter's life. Do you really want the government deciding whose life to save? Conservatives all want smaller government until it involves a woman's uterus, then they want to be in control. I'm a liberal who wants smaller government, I want the government out of my uterus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cal3b G
UShypocrisy
12:39 AM on 05/25/2010
That's because no one is "anti life". No one is telling people to have abortions. That's just stupid. You are pro-choice as in you support keeping abortion safe, rare, and legal or anti-choice as in you want a ban on all abortions no matter what the case. Pro-choice = keep it legal. Anti-choice = make it illegal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
momcat54
09:58 PM on 05/24/2010
It is heartbreaking that a good man dies and that an evil man felt justified in killing him..Theso called pro llife groups are far more cruel and heartless than those they condem for showing compassion and empathy for women facing the hardest decisons of their lives.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
09:03 PM on 05/24/2010
I will, for the moment, ignore the immorality of reducing women to incubators and the unconstitutionality of seizing their bodies if they become pregnant, and address the outcome for the children.
I should have been aborted. My mother's health was simply not up to a pregnancy. My parents emotional resources were not up to another baby. My birth began a spiral into hell that left ten lives shattered and still echoes in the lives of my generation's children. I do not feel guilt, exactly, because I had no say in this matter, but the disaster that followed my birth is a heavy burden to bear. The misery and abuse that followed are a ball and chain I must drag with me through life.
Those who are anti-choice say they love everyone and cherish every life. If that is how they treat their friends, I prefer my enemies.
Women must have the final say in their own bodies and destinies.
08:07 PM on 05/24/2010
The outrageous and dangerous antiabortion people are driven by pride and ignorance. Dr. Tiller was a hero who saved women from delivering babies which could not live a day after birth. He stood up to those who know nothing of the need for abortions or of the fact that perhaps one third of all pregnancies end in abortion naturally. The body terminates the pregnancy for good reason.

Meanwhile millions of children starve to death annually, and the abuse of children is on the rise. Perhaps if antiabortionists would step forward and volunteer to raise severely impaired children or even the normal ones who are brought into this world without hop of ever having a hope in hades of a decent home or education or love, their outrage would seem less sactimonious and more wholehearted. Abortion was legal until doctors appealed it because so many women died. Abortion became legal again as so many women were dying of back alley abortions. In the RC church abortion was legal until the sixth month. Thank you Dr. Tiller and those who have had the courage to be medically ethical and not controlled by Christian terrorists.
07:50 PM on 05/24/2010
I sit here, 7 months pregnant and wish to thank Dr. Tiller and his family for their ultimate sacrifice. My pregnancy is my choice and I respect the rights of all women to make the same choice (or a different one) for themselves.