Things to Do in Denver When You're Dems

Posted February 12, 2008 | 04:30 PM (EST)




A much despised war, a hated president, and a Democratic primary process characterized by wild ups and downs. I'm talking, of course, of the year 1968. The nomination race we on the left have been watching and participating in over the last many, many months has been terrifically compelling -- so much so that it's got this singular vibe about it. But let's face it, not much in American life is entirely unique. And particularly when we look ahead to the Democratic Convention to be held in Denver this summer, it's tempting to conclude that we've been in a place somewhat like this before.

The 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago saw hippies, yippies, college kids, high-schoolers, veterans, and middle Americans descend upon that city, motivated by two main impulses. The first is familiar: the rejection of a seemingly endless war (Vietnam, of course) and the revulsion with a Democratic Party apparent complicity in it -- embodied by candidate and Vice President Hubert Humphrey. The second: a global momentum towards democracy, transparency, and anti-authoritarianism; it was in that spirit that the protesters in Chicago get up legal workshops, health clinics, and freedom concerts.

In Denver today, activists are gathering under the banner of Recreate '68 to try to gin up that same spirit of activism to greet the Democratic National Convention that will take place in that city this August. The Recreate '68 team has been meeting with city and federal officials to secure permits and lay ground rules for convention-week events. I recently got on the phone with Glenn Spagnuolo, Recreate '68s' spokesperson and a member of its organizing committee. Glenn's predicting a turnout of about 50,000 people if Clinton is the nominee going into the convention, and about "half that" if Obama's already gotten the nod. Glenn jokes about Clinton: "She'll be our best organizer."

I laughed, because that's funny. And maybe Glenn's right. But that seems to me to be too simple and clean a read on where the Democratic Party finds itself today. And the reasons why point to the messiness inherent in an effort to completely recapture a year gone by.

We find ourselves in 2008 with two potential nominees. In one corner we have a sitting senator who spent eight years in the White House who looks more and more like a legitimate underdog everyday. She also happens to be a white woman, endorsed by such heroes of the civil right's movement -- a movement that didn't exactly embraced female leadership -- as Rep. John Lewis. And then in the other corner, we've got an upstart politician who has been embraced by no less an establishment figure as Ted Kennedy and no less an inside player as Tom Daschle. And on the Iraq war -- honestly, for all but the wonkiest of policy wonks finding daylight between their positions on ending it requires a magnifying glass and good eyesight.

If your thing is raging against the machine, in 2008 it can be difficult to know which direction to face.

Still, if the '68 Democratic National Convention in Chicago teaches any sort of lessons at all, its that what happens in Denver this summer stands a good chance of setting the Democratic Party's path in the years ahead. Humphrey's apparent coronation by the party establishment led to the scrapping of the superdelegate system. (Oh yeah, we've been on this merry-go-round before.) And the violence in the streets of Chicago during convention week left Humphrey a battered candidate leading a party that looked to be at war with itself -- smoothing McCain's, I mean Nixon's, path to the White House.

Barack Obama has a beautiful line that he's been using regularly on the stump, an apparent reference to the widespread appeal of this campaign: "We are the ones we have been waiting for." It's a sure applause getter. No matter who's the nominee, when Democrats and protesters convene in Denver's streets, hotels, and convention center this summer, the question will be: "Okay, we're here -- where to next?"

Comments for this post are now closed


 

Comments
8
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:

Iraq is no Vietnam. Vietnam had already cost America about 30,000 lives. Furthermore, in 1968 the US had just withstood the Tet Offensive. This series of attacks made it seem as if there was no Westmorelandian light at the end of the tunnel. In Iraq, we have yet to face an enemy offensive of equal magnitude. Finally, there's no draft in Iraq.

Comparing Iraq to Vietnam just feeds Boomers' bloated egos because it allows them to try and stop a second war.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 02/13/2008

So, there's a group of people who want to elect John McCain president in order to punish us evil Americans?

You want to recreate 1968, then leave McCain alone and send your people to protest at every Clinton or Obama rally. That's what "they" did in '68.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 02/13/2008

"With Obama and Hillary, we have a contrast between adequacy and energy, and the Democratic Party has everything to gain by nominating Obama, and lots to lose if they decide on Hillary."

Are you saying Obama is adequate and Hillary is energetic? I think both candidates are excellent. I'm hoping they will be on the same ticket.

It isn't 1968 for other reasons too. 2008 isn't the post summer of love national mood swing that 1968 was. 1968 pot got you high, it didn't anesthetize you. LSD might've still been legal then. Gay marriage was unimaginable. It was the year of Funny Girl and Barbarella, Bullitt and Charly. Volvos started getting popular because they were safe, not because they got good gas mileage. There was no Clean Air Act. We hadn't walked on the moon. 45 rpm records fit perfectly inside a fruit cake tin left over from Xmas. Nixon hadn't happened yet, so the nation still trusted it's leaders. 1968 was "When hearts were true, red, white, and blue, and sky's were sunny..." (Lieber/Stoller)

I have thought about going to Denver and might. But I'd be surprised if there was violence in the streets. The mood of the country is much different from 1968.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 AM on 02/13/2008

Assessment completely accurate.

And I think that we do indeed need a draft, if our $343 million a day isn't to go to waste like so much oil leaking into the sand.

We will get '68.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 PM on 02/12/2008

Present day students do not have the draft to energize their opposition to war that we had during the Vietnam War. That they are lining up in support of Obama is a tribute to their passion for change and their recognition that Obama will lead the charge against discredited national and international policies.

We do not have a Hubert Humphrey in Hillary. Humphrey had more than one and a half Senate terms under his belt. He was, unlike Hillary, a tested legislative warrior and the establishment decided to line up behind him rather than honor the principled positions of McCarthy and the Kennedy supporters left without a candidate.

The key difference between then and now is that the passion and energy of Obama may be harnessed and employed against the culture of corruption Republicans generate with their absolutist, reactionary politics. With Obama and Hillary, we have a contrast between adequacy and energy, and the Democratic Party has everything to gain by nominating Obama, and lots to lose if they decide on Hillary.

The Republicans used to favor law and order, and they still do, but they've led the country into breaking the Geneva Convention and their own military code of justice by invoking fear and loathing of an enemy without borders. They have a determination to pack the Supreme Court with more extreme right wing ideologues should go together with their endless nightmare scenarios of terror and torture masquerading as law and order.

Have a living history diorama of the 68 convention in Denver, but then go out and work for Obama. Skip the Minnesota protests, even though they should be fairly obscene and bloody to poetically fit the party of obscene war profiteering and pandering to big money.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 02/12/2008

I'll be there with bells on.

Wouldn't miss it for the world.

THIS is Democracy in action!

ONWARD...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 02/12/2008

In 1968 people came to Chicago--and Chicagoans came down to the parks and streets--to protest an immoral, ill-advised war being waged by the politicians meeting in convention in the city of Chicago. The protestors never got within miles of the convention, but nonetheless their protest was extraordinarily effective in helping to change the direction of the Democratic party. Four years later a peace candidate was nominated by the Democrats and even 40 years later virtually every non-interventionist comes from the Democratic side.
In 2008, the politicians who started the Iraq war, who sold this war to the American people, who botched this war, have funnelled billions of war dollars to private contractors, those politicians are going to be conventioning in Minneapolis. Not Denver.
The good folks of Recreate '68 don't understand history and they don't understand the historical moment. Denver is a narcissistic sideshow, a diversion, an easy mark, preaching to the choir, pointless.
Bush is going to be in Minneapolis. Cheney is going to be in Minneapolis. Rumsfeld no doubt is going to be in Minneapolis. Wolfowitz is going to be in Minneapolis. Richard Armitage is going to be in Minneapolis. The warmakers will be in Minneapolis.
And you want to go to Denver?
Get serious.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 02/14/2008

It's more republicanism in action as there
is no direct say by the people, only layers
of proxy voting.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 02/13/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 

Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Nancy Scola›
 

 Site  Web ask.com