More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Natalia Brzezinski

GET UPDATES FROM Natalia Brzezinski
 

Work-Life Balance: Why Can't American Women Have It All?

Posted: 05/21/10 01:25 PM ET

It's graduation season, and at major universities everywhere, CEO's, news anchors, politicians and others are making commencement speeches and offering guidance to young people on how to achieve their dreams. "In your focus on career, do not sell short the fulfillment of starting a family," UN Ambassador Susan Rice wisely said at Spelman College, a historically all-female, African-American liberal arts school. As we encourage young female graduates to pursue the kind of balance that can lead to genuine fulfillment, we also need to empower them with the proper tools to attain both personal and professional aspirations.

We live in a country where there's a lot of talk about the value of dreams and family, yet we do not equip our young women with the necessary support to pursue both at the time in their life where they are most able to. Motherhood and self-determination are inalienable rights, yet most women today are often forced to sacrifice their 20s to one or the other, and limit their dynamism by doing so.

Manuela Schwesig, a leader of the opposition Social Democratic party in Germany, said in a January 17th, 2010 New York Times article: "I am a more fulfilled mother for working and a more motivated politician for having a child."

The cross-pollination of motherhood and career did not even occur to me as an ambitious but wildly naive college graduate. I remember imagining living the Bohemian lifestyle of a writer in New York City, establishing my reputation and literary voice all while wearing fabulous Laboutins and attending the Zac Posen show at Fashion Week. "Love, marriage and the baby carriage," would come at 30 after I had won a Pulitzer, of course.

But very quickly my Sex and the City-inspired fantasy was replaced with a hunger for something more fulfilling, and for me, something more complete. To my careerist chagrin, my biological clock had begun ticking 10 years before I intended it to. Luck delivered my now husband, and before I could blink, I was 24, married and pregnant. No Vanity Fair spreads or witty New York Times Style pieces, just me and my bump. I was simultaneously thrilled for new life and devastated over what I saw as the death of my dreams. I felt panicked and very disconnected from my generation. They are getting married and having children much later in life in some cases because, unlike most other countries in the developed world, our system does not give us the social benefits or network to do both.

My mother had me when she was 26 years old, working all day and getting her MBA at night. She got two weeks of maternity leave and missed out on my entire first year. It was so hard on her that she vowed not to have another baby until her career was settled. Ten years later it was too late for her biologically and no form of IVF could help. Although my parents later adopted, I know this broke her heart.

No woman should have to hear that she can't have babies after working her entire life to create a situation where she finally can. Other countries have taken steps to make work-life balance easier on women while ours continues to stall.

"In Europe, Nordic countries have the biggest share of women in the labor market and also, with France, high birthrates. All offer a continuum of support for parents with young children from subsidized care and paid parental leave to all-day schools with off-hour programs," said Willem Adema of the O.E.C.D., according to a New York Times, January 17, 2010 article.

In Germany, the popularity of afternoon school programs is rising and domestic businesses, such as Siemens, offer extensive on-site day-care programs, according to the article. America has enacted some legislation to help working mothers, but what about younger women just starting out in the workforce who do not have a professional home that gives them generous maternity leave or on-site childcare?

My mother relied on her parents, and my Bolivian friend was able to pursue a medical degree because in her country raising a child is a communal effort and everyone from aunts, to teachers, to neighbors help. President Obama has called for a sense of communal responsibility to educate and protect our children, and has expanded the Family Leave Act, but more targeted progress is necessary.

Cheaper day-care, child care tax credits for stay-at-home mothers and a more open approach to breast-pumping are suggestions. Being a breast-feeding mother in the workplace can be "crazy at times," as Ambassador Rice admitted, but it is the healthiest option. Some females on Wall Street are able to have access to tony lounges or have their nannies bring their infants to the office for a breastfeeding session during lunch. All women, not just the ones with six-figure paychecks, deserve the right to "express" themselves with dignity, sometimes 10-12 times a day.

If you think this is hyperbole, you should meet my breast pump. We initially hid our torrid affair, but we were seeing each other so often that we began to do it in the car, on airplanes, and in front of stunned passersby, just to satisfy the need. Thankfully after 10 long months we ended it.

Some may not get the joke above or the need for breast-pumping legislation and this is just the problem. There are only 18 women in the Senate and only about 17 percent of Congress is female; out of that tiny pool, very few have young families. Women like Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who recently had another baby, are calling for progressive laws geared toward women. Gillibrand advocates tax-credits for part-time students, which would give young women much more flexibility.

As a young mother, I feel fortunate to have a supportive husband who helps give me flexibility at home so I can go after my goals. Every single woman deserves the opportunity to have it all. Our gender's pioneers gave us the right to finally be able to choose, but making the choice between family and career mutually exclusive defeats the purpose. If we really believe in family and country, not family or country, we need to start walking the walk.

 

Follow Natalia Brzezinski on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NatalBrz

It's graduation season, and at major universities everywhere, CEO's, news anchors, politicians and others are making commencement speeches and offering guidance to young people on how to achieve their...
It's graduation season, and at major universities everywhere, CEO's, news anchors, politicians and others are making commencement speeches and offering guidance to young people on how to achieve their...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:23 PM on 05/24/2010
You can have it all, but it would require a unique occupation choice and LOTS of money. If your wealthy in this country you can do anything you want. If your middle income your stuck in the struggle to anything with quality. If your poor you can forget it.

Here's what typically pops into most people's head (including mine) when you see articles like this one. Women working for a company then annuoncing after a year or two they are pregnant and leaving work for child rearing leave 1- 3 months but that typically turns into 4- 5 months. Followed by "....poor crazy me I have to stay home to care for my sick toddler..." 2 days a week.

Then THAT same do it all woman femnist somehow thinks she has earned the same level of rights for promotion and reward ? ERrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr thank you for playing. Doesn't work that way.

You step off the treadmill you DONT get to step back on in the same spot where you left off.
01:09 PM on 05/24/2010
Another problem is when women return to the workforce with a baby at home. No longer working overtime, weekends or traveling will make a huge impact in your salary.....especially when your job requires it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
avicenna
05:09 AM on 05/24/2010
As a woman in her early 30's who lives in a country that is a little more supportive to women who try to "have it all" (Canada) - I knew that I really needed to prioritize what I want and what would bring me contentment. I deeply value my near and dear, but a large chunk of my identity is wedded to my career trajectory as an academic scientist as well as my autonomy. I absolutely love exploring ideas and figuring out how things work - and it would be neither conducive to my potential offspring or myself to try to answer to the demands of a family. I don't think motherhood is a right - it is a choice (for most, but not all). With more than 6 billion people on this planet, the least I can do is keep doing what I do best - and it is much easier to crack those glass ceilings when you're not off for a good chunk of your most productive times on maternity leave. We have to be reasonable.
08:05 AM on 05/23/2010
To summarize why women can't have it all, it's because if women want it all, someone else has to pay. As the author states, lower childcare, childcare tax credits....what your really saying is, shouldn't everyone else pay for mothers to have it all? The answer, at least in America is "no". Europeans may be ahead in terms of state sponsored socialism, but it's pretty clear the effect on families and the financial situation there would prevent that from spreading any further. I suspect you will begin to see deep cuts in social spending so Europe can get off their financial house in order.
01:48 AM on 05/22/2010
Perhaps it's because nobody can have it all? Life is a compromise, and it is impossible to put one's energies both fully into career and family. Perhaps it's because nobody can have it all? One has the right to have children, but not the right of having children to be easy, nor do they have a right to a career (Just ask all the men unemployed in this recession.). The European programs (especially in France, where the origin was to try and reach population parity with Germany to be able to defeat them in a war) exist not out of some extra kindness towards women, but as a social engineering tool originally to make more young men to fight wars, but now to stop the population stagnation/decline. Given that we in the United States do not have this issue, I see no need for such encouragements.