At last, talks between the West and Iran over its nuclear program may be getting somewhere as negotiators sit down in Vienna. After the dramatic revelation of Iran's secret Qom enrichment plant at the G-20 summit in a joint appearance by President Obama, British Prime Minister Brown and French President Sarkozy, Iran has given a little. They are allowing IAEA inspectors into the plant on October 25 and seem willing to consider sending enriched uranium abroad to reprocess for medical use -- thus diverting it from any bomb development.
What impact, if any, might this fragile new relationship have on the so-called democratic "green movement" in Iran, led by former presidential candidate Mir Hussein Moussavi, that is still protesting the election results?
I put this question to Shirin Ebaid, the Nobel laureate for peace and human rights activist
from Iran. Here is what she said:
Its impact will depend on whether the nuclear energy issue is negotiated alone, or if democracy and human rights, too, are on the agenda of the talks. Because in the latter case, people in Iran will understand that the West is interested in their fate as much as it cares about its own security, which will strengthen the green movement.
But if in the negotiations, the West sacrifices democracy to gain on the nuclear issue front, naturally the impact is negative. It does not mean the movement will subside, but the people of Iran will be left alone in their struggle.
Marcus Buckingham: Words Of Wisdom From Strong Women
In the course of our research for Find Your Strongest Life, we interviewed many women who had created a fulfilling, satisfying life. Here are four of the most distinctive pieces of advice that were shared.
IRAN: Nuclear Negotiations - Council on Foreign Relations
How to interpret the Iran negotiations that took place in Geneva ...
U.S. sticking with tough stance on Iran negotiations - CNN.com
Iranian Opposition Reacts With Skepticism
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh
Note that the U.S. has been funding Jundullah, the outfit behind the bombing that recently rocked a security gathering in south-east Iran, killing 35 people and wounding another 28.
Its a win-win situation for the spooks. When the insurgents succeed, Iran suffers. When the insurgents are apprehended they can be characterised as victims of oppression in the Western press. Either way they serve the cause of destabilising Iran's Government.
http://iranian.com/main/blog/anonymous-observer/top-ten-similarities-between-republican-right-wing-and-iri
Obama is interfering in Iranian affairs at the expense of Iranians freedom and propsperity.
""In a sense, it all goes back to the Obama administration’s distorted policy of direct engagement with America’s adversaries, which relies heavily on a rather crude interpretation of the abstract principle of non-interference in international relations.
Taken to its logical conclusion, the above orientation has the dangerous tendency of undermining the very principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states by rewarding criminal state behavior so long as it suits the perceived interests of the United States or those of a particular administration. ""
http://iranian.com/main/2009/oct/obamas-deal-no-deal
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-gardels/dont-sacrifice-democracy_b_327091.html
In Iranian culture this sounds very important. In the light of such an achievement, for example, any random lay person will refuse to hear any criticism of the government. THE PLANT IS A HUGE POLITICAL INVESTMENT FOR THE REGIME.
Therefore, the WEST should do everything possible to HINDER the completion of a Nuclear Plant in Iran. It will simply, needlessly, prolong the democratic changes in the country.
Obama is interfering in Iranian affairs at the expense of Iranians freedom and propsperity.
""In a sense, it all goes back to the Obama administration’s distorted policy of direct engagement with America’s adversaries, which relies heavily on a rather crude interpretation of the abstract principle of non-interference in international relations.
Taken to its logical conclusion, the above orientation has the dangerous tendency of undermining the very principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states by rewarding criminal state behavior so long as it suits the perceived interests of the United States or those of a particular administration. ""
http://iranian.com/main/2009/oct/obamas-deal-no-deal
Iran will categorically reject any proposal that so much as implies that their democratic process is flawed or that their human rights record is tainted. We only strengthen the hard-liners by adding giving their anti-Western rhetoric fuel. They will scream and spit and shout about how the West is trying to control their country and probably manage to work something in about waging a war on Islam as well. The people of Iran _must_ effect social and democratic change itself. Remember: the Green movement might be anti-Ahmadinejad, but they're hardly pro-West. The last thing they want is to be seen as agents of West-sponsored regime change.
It feels good to stand up and preach that we should accept nothing less but the Right Thing. And obviously pushing Iran on human rights and democracy is the Right Thing to do, morally speaking. But realistically speaking our number one priority is ensuring that Iran agrees to submit to international monitoring of its nuclear program to protect our national security interests, curb nuclear proliferation, and prevent an arms race among the other nations of the middle east.
It is for Mr. Gardell to provide a shred of evidence for what he asserts/implies. I am not holding my breath.
It is fairly obvious folks. It doesn't matter how they try to snuff out any possibility of détente between US and Iran. Nuclear Holocaust, anti-semitism, illegitimate government, and/or human rights. If you see progress in resolution of one issue, expect a petulantce & frenzy in the other areas. Why? Because, if Iran were to have normalized relations with the US, who'd need the dictatorial / apartheid regimes of the middle east as friends?
Green is the color chosen by Iranian Civil Society to symbolize their unity and their hope for a better future.
"Bloody Sunday" was written to honor the 29 that were killed and the many who were wounded on January 30, 1972, when British troops opened fire on NONVIOLENT demonstrators in Derry, Ireland during a March for Civil Rights march.
In 1976, at the height of those "Troubles" Betty and Mairead Corrigan Maguire were awarded the 1976 Nobel Peace Prize for their leadership and vision.
Mairead insists: "that a peaceful and just society can be achieved only through nonviolent means and that the path to peace lies in each of our hearts...I am convinced that humanity is fast evolving to this higher consciousness. For those who say it cannot be done, let us remember that humanity learned to abolish slavery. Our task now is no less than the abolition of violence and war...Everything is changing and everything is possible."
http://www.wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1452&Itemid=225
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/10/07/iran/index.html
There have been three surveys of Iran which clearly indicate Iranians did infact re-elect Ahmadinejad by a landslide. Analysis of the post-election riots indicate the same. See the links below.
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/MediaAdvisory/2009/MA200919.html
http://www.terrorfreetomorrow.org/upimagestft/TFT%20Iran%20Survey%20Report%200609.pdf
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brmiddleeastnafricara/639.php?nid=&id=&pnt=639&lb=
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20090622_iranian_election_and_revolution_test
There is no evidence of Iran going for nuclear weapons:
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/MediaAdvisory/2009/MA200919.html
http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=7879
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200502/s1306353.htm
http://www.bibijon.org/iranimage/articles/Iran-election.htm#Foot%201
The US is hardly in the position to lecture Iran anyway, what with legalized torture, indefinite detention and mass surveillance going on here, not to mention the total lack of accountability for starting a war on entirely false pretenses.
I do not categorically agree with Francis Fukuyama, the American philosopher, but he said something relevant about liberal democracy in general:
"...What is initially universal is not the desire for liberal democracy but rather the desire to live in a modern - that is, technologically advanced and prosperous - society, which, if satisfied, tends to drive demands for political participation. Liberal democracy is one of the byproducts of this modernization process, something that becomes a universal aspiration only in the course of historical time..."
Remove the hostility and sanctions and Iranians figure out themselves how to deal with their regime! hands off!
See how there are santions against stem cell research, here:
http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/watch/player.html?pkg=rc78iran&seg=1&mod=0