- BIG NEWS:
- Barack Obama
- |
- GOP
- |
- Sarah Palin
- |
- Bobby Jindal
- |
There is not a day that passes without a vast analysis of the relative merits of a Clinton or Obama presidency. One claims to have more experience. Another claims to be the voice of change. Both think they are qualified to answer the telephone at 3 A.M. (or any other time of day). With votes in short supply, each candidate is claiming to be the person best positioned to win the general election.
Is there any other factor that may favor one of these candidates? I believe so. Age. I am referring to the age of the voting pool, not the age of the candidates (who, by Constitutional mandate, at the very least are nearing middle age). Although it has dropped under the radar screen, the Senator from Illinois has garnered enormous support from young voters. If this pattern holds, and there is no reason to suppose it won't, demographics suggest that the elapse of time makes Senator Obama ever more formidable.
Why? As of 2006, the US Census Bureau estimated that there were 21.3 million people between the ages of 15 and 19. Using 2004 and 2005 data, this extrapolates to 22 million people in this age group now. Therefore, there are roughly 4.4 million 17 year olds. By the time of the general election, seven months hence, over 2.5 million new voters will be eligible to vote (my own daughter being one of them). If the primaries are any indication, Senator Obama will have a lot more support come election time.
Just one person's observation.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with