The Huffington Post HIV/AIDS
Log In | Sign Up | July 11, 2009

If you have something to say...
Say it on the Huffington Post


The Blog

Spread Awareness - Stumble this Big News Page


Congress To Vote On Needle Exchange Ban, One Day After AIDS Activists' Protest


Comments
41
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Well done!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 AM on 07/11/2009
photo

Excellent. Congress doing its job to ensure that these types of programs are sustainable through legislation. Excellent.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 07/10/2009
photo

why is it the taxpayers responsibility to provide needles to drug addicts? If we are going to do this because of public safety issues then why not pay for vehicle maintanence such as brakes? That could affect public safety. Why not have govt cabs that take people home from bars?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 07/10/2009
photo

You are gross.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 07/10/2009

No, he makes a valid point, and offers a reasonable alternative.

Believe it or not, but many times RWM makes valid points. We may not agree with him entirely, but he makes an honest effort to explain his positions and offer ideas. Our country is well served by that.
-----
RWM,
Good idea, I would certainly use it often!

These addicts all learned in school about smack and how dangerous it is. They still chose to start doing it. I don't want to pay for their stoopidity (intentional).

Why don't we subsidize cigarettes? Instead, they just raise the taxes on smokers about 500% over the past 10 years. Same principle

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 07/10/2009

because needles are cheap and just because we can't prevent all unnecessary suffering doesn't mean we should do nothing.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 07/10/2009

And if the suffering is self-inflicted? We should start protecting people from themselves?

At what point do we stop?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 07/10/2009

I'd support all of those measures. Why not?

Why is it that you right wingers seem to have such disdain for the government helping people, or doing anything that is actually beneficial to anyone?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 07/10/2009

And where will the money to pay for this come from?

Seriously, I can think of many different ways my money can be spent NOT subsidising a junkie. These people all had health class, and all knew that smack will kill you. Their own decision, their own responsibility.

I chose to smoke cigarettes, does that mean that people will start subsidising my lighters? Or how about my future breathing treatments? Same principle

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 07/10/2009
photo

good...then you can subsidise their AIDS medications...which is what you will be doing. You can buy 9000 needles for what it would cost for ONE persons AIDS meds for one month. You do the math. Even preventing 1 AIDS transmission is beyond cost effective. Drug addiction is a disease and these people need treatment...not Holier than Thou attitudes

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 07/10/2009

You can't talk reason to these people. They don't want to hear it. The truth is they don't understand that a dollar now for a couple of new needles will save hundreds later for a pill.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 07/10/2009

Ideally, by the time you have lung cancer, this country will have join the civilized world and we will have universal healthcare, so yes our taxes will be helping you out. Your welcome!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 07/10/2009
photo

Impressive. I always wonder if protests and letters, emails and call to Congress actually worked.
It appears that maybe it does and we should continue to stay involved.

Then again... I don't imagine there is a big Lobby against this particular issue so the public's actual will and comman sense may have an impact.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 07/10/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect